683:: I keep seeing statements to the effect that this passes GNG but not NCORP, purportedly because the standards of NCORP are "more stringent". But looking at NCORP, it appears only that those standards are more stringent in that they demand independent, secondary sources. Someone mentioned its inclusion in a textbook, which sounds like an independent secondary source. Journal articles are independent but may be primary, although some could be secondary (ie reciew articles). NCORP gives an example of substantial coverage that would meet the requirements: "A scholarly article, a book passage, or ongoing media coverage focusing on a product or organization". Does this not describe several sources already mentioned? I do not know enough about this subject to feel comfortable voting either way, but I am concerned about clarity with regards to standard guidelines.
704:) is available in order to determine notability. So, for example, when editors say things like "that's an independent source", they usually mean that there is no corporate connection between the topic company and the publisher and that there's no personal connection between the journalist and the topic company. With NCORP, there is also a focus on "Independent Content" which tends to not get a thorough examination when looking at articles through GNG glasses. There is also an emphasis that a topic company must have an article that provides in-depth information on the actual topic company itself (
708:) and not an in-depth review of their product with a one-line description of the topic company. So when you're examining references here, ask yourself whether the reference discusses the company at an in-depth and detailed level and whether the journalist provides their own opinion or presents or one from a third party and isn't simply repeating or commenting on an announcement from the topic company.
772:: Doesn't seem to have multiple examples of significant coverage from reliable and independent sources. Thus it fails GNG, which is the only thing that matters. Anyone interested in keeping this article has had more than enough time to find and add such sources. Delete. Anyone who wants to keep it can hold a draft somewhere and if it ever gains significant coverage then recreate.
642:
Just to add, the product has been discussed, reviewed, described, etc, in many books and magazines but the topic is about the company and the references therefore must meet the criteria for establishing notability of the company. Nobody has yet managed to produce a single reference that discusses the
542:
The problem I see is that the *company* does not meet our notability guidelines for companies/organizations (which is NCORP) but the *product* of the same name probably does. I suggest the article is either draftified so that the topic becomes the product, or the article is
468:
471:
347:
193:
631:, not GNG. Much stricter. See my comment above - perhaps the topic should be the product and not the company. If you're offering to edit the article, please consider the option to Draftify. Thank you.
352:
736:
Relisting one more time. The discussion since the last relist is trivially related to the article. Please !vote carefully and make sure the more appropriate policies are being applied.
562:
I would like to take up this topic and made some changes in the article. IP2Location has played an important part in the history of
Knowledge (XXG). Kindly review and give feedback.
154:
700:
I'll give you my take on the primary differences. NCORP guidelines are stricter in order to counter "echo chamber" articles and to ensure that "Independent
Content" (as per
283:
518:
Just to add, the first book has no information on the company other that saying it is a subsidiary of
Hexasoft located in Malaysia and a remote office in Florida - fails
302:
264:
245:
187:
86:
101:
430:
Would appreciate more policy/guideline-focused discussion about the article itself to determine consensus. The cited sources do not appear to meet
389:
The nominator has been blocked as a spam sockpuppeteer, however I am leaving this nomination open so that it can be evaluated on its merits.
345:
as it is being used in academic for
Computer Science and Security. I found mentions in technical literatures or books published such as
81:
74:
17:
601:: This topic has notability. It has been been cited in more than 700 research and scientific publication from Universities to pass
491:
127:
122:
754:
131:
95:
91:
208:
725:
660:
419:
175:
114:
819:
40:
750:
777:
587:
I don't see really any hope with the article at this stage. We need to review notability from the beginning.
522:. The second is from MSFN Magazine and describes the product with nothing said about the company, also fails
169:
610:
567:
362:
705:
523:
519:
373:
815:
165:
36:
802:
781:
762:
714:
692:
673:
649:
637:
624:
614:
606:
593:
571:
563:
553:
532:
513:
498:
453:
410:
393:
382:
333:
313:
294:
275:
256:
237:
56:
118:
758:
688:
589:
487:
464:
449:
358:
330:
773:
406:
215:
201:
701:
431:
342:
746:
110:
62:
628:
504:
435:
369:
798:
306:
287:
268:
249:
233:
70:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
814:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
605:
as "Reliable" and "Independent of the subject". I will review and try to edit the article.
602:
474:
225:
684:
479:
442:
401:
agree, the nominator is blocked. I landed here randomly and hope I can contribute. Thanks
326:
181:
402:
740:
709:
644:
632:
548:
527:
508:
377:
794:
670:
229:
53:
148:
467:. I also found a couple of books which have a section talking about the company:
390:
348:
Collaborative
Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing
810:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
728:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
663:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
422:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
353:
GPEN GIAC Certified
Penetration Tester All-in-One Exam Guide
144:
140:
136:
200:
739:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~
441:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
669:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
214:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
822:). No further edits should be made to this page.
473:. That said, the article is good enough to pass
301:Note: This discussion has been included in the
282:Note: This discussion has been included in the
263:Note: This discussion has been included in the
244:Note: This discussion has been included in the
284:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
303:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
265:list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions
246:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
376:as the applicable guidelines for companies.
102:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
300:
281:
262:
243:
547:d if nobody is interested in fixing.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
324:, only a passing mention in Wired –
503:OK, but is it good enough to pass
24:
434:for establishing notability (see
87:Introduction to deletion process
1:
454:03:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
411:14:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
394:11:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
365:6:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
334:18:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
314:18:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
295:18:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
276:18:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
257:18:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
238:18:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
77:(AfD)? Read these primers!
839:
803:02:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
782:09:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
763:03:50, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
650:12:03, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
533:12:03, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
57:23:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
715:20:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
693:16:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
674:13:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
638:21:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
615:02:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
594:11:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
572:11:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
554:12:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
514:21:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
499:15:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
383:21:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
812:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
627:, you need to look at
75:Articles for deletion
224:Not notable. Fails
734:Relisting comment:
428:Relisting comment:
765:
676:
456:
316:
297:
278:
259:
92:Guide to deletion
82:How to contribute
830:
789:per HighKing or
743:
738:
731:
729:
668:
666:
664:
497:
495:
482:
445:
440:
425:
423:
311:
292:
273:
254:
219:
218:
204:
152:
134:
72:
34:
838:
837:
833:
832:
831:
829:
828:
827:
826:
820:deletion review
766:
741:
724:
722:
677:
659:
657:
590:Aman Kumar Goel
496:
485:
480:
478:
457:
443:
418:
416:
359:User:Alamak2020
307:
288:
269:
250:
161:
125:
109:
106:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
836:
834:
825:
824:
806:
805:
784:
774:Macktheknifeau
737:
732:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
667:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
640:
618:
617:
596:
577:
576:
575:
574:
557:
556:
537:
536:
535:
516:
484:
439:
426:
415:
414:
413:
396:
387:
386:
385:
336:
318:
317:
298:
279:
260:
222:
221:
158:
105:
104:
99:
89:
84:
67:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
835:
823:
821:
817:
813:
808:
807:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
785:
783:
779:
775:
771:
768:
767:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
735:
730:
727:
716:
713:
712:
707:
703:
699:
696:
695:
694:
690:
686:
682:
679:
678:
675:
672:
665:
662:
651:
648:
647:
641:
639:
636:
635:
630:
626:
622:
621:
620:
619:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
597:
595:
592:
591:
586:
582:
579:
578:
573:
569:
565:
561:
560:
559:
558:
555:
552:
551:
546:
541:
538:
534:
531:
530:
525:
521:
517:
515:
512:
511:
506:
502:
501:
500:
493:
489:
483:
476:
472:
469:
466:
462:
459:
458:
455:
451:
447:
437:
433:
429:
424:
421:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
395:
392:
388:
384:
381:
380:
375:
371:
367:
366:
364:
361:
360:
355:
354:
350:
349:
344:
340:
337:
335:
332:
329:
328:
323:
320:
319:
315:
312:
310:
304:
299:
296:
293:
291:
285:
280:
277:
274:
272:
266:
261:
258:
255:
253:
247:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
217:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
167:
164:
163:Find sources:
159:
156:
150:
146:
142:
138:
133:
129:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
103:
100:
97:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
78:
76:
71:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
811:
809:
790:
786:
769:
733:
723:
710:
706:WP:CORPDEPTH
697:
680:
658:
645:
633:
625:Mikecameroon
607:Mikecameroon
598:
588:
584:
580:
564:Mikecameroon
549:
544:
539:
528:
524:WP:CORPDEPTH
520:WP:CORPDEPTH
509:
460:
427:
417:
398:
378:
374:WP:CORPDEPTH
357:
351:
346:
338:
325:
321:
309:CAPTAIN RAJU
308:
290:CAPTAIN RAJU
289:
271:CAPTAIN RAJU
270:
252:CAPTAIN RAJU
251:
223:
211:
205:
197:
190:
184:
178:
172:
162:
68:
49:
47:
31:
28:
368:Please see
188:free images
111:IP2Location
63:IP2Location
685:Hyperion35
465:Alamak2020
816:talk page
702:WP:ORGIND
643:company.
432:WP:SIGCOV
403:SusanBlin
343:WP:SIGCOV
37:talk page
818:or in a
793:per nom.
787:Draftify
742:Aseleste
726:Relisted
711:HighKing
698:Response
681:Question
661:Relisted
646:HighKing
634:HighKing
629:WP:NCORP
585:Draftify
550:HighKing
540:Draftify
529:HighKing
510:HighKing
505:WP:NCORP
492:ICE CUBE
436:WP:NCORP
420:Relisted
379:HighKing
370:WP:NCORP
327:Thjarkur
155:View log
96:glossary
39:or in a
795:4meter4
671:Spartaz
481:ASTIG😎
230:DJFace1
194:WP refs
182:scholar
128:protect
123:history
73:New to
54:Spartaz
791:Delete
770:Delete
603:WP:GNG
581:Delete
545:Delete
475:WP:GNG
463:: Per
446:Earwig
363:(talk)
331:(talk)
322:Delete
226:WP:GNG
166:Google
132:delete
50:delete
488:ICE T
391:MER-C
356:. –
209:JSTOR
170:books
149:views
141:watch
137:links
16:<
799:talk
778:talk
689:talk
623:Hey
611:talk
599:Keep
583:and
568:talk
470:and
461:Keep
450:talk
407:talk
399:keep
372:and
341:Has
339:Keep
234:talk
202:FENS
176:news
145:logs
119:talk
115:edit
444:The
216:TWL
153:– (
801:)
780:)
761:)
757:,
753:|
749:,
691:)
613:)
570:)
526:.
507:?
490:•
477:.
452:)
438:).
409:)
305:.
286:.
267:.
248:.
236:)
228:.
196:)
147:|
143:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
121:|
117:|
52:.
797:(
776:(
759:l
755:c
751:e
747:t
745:(
687:(
609:(
566:(
494:)
486:(
448:(
405:(
232:(
220:)
212:·
206:·
198:·
191:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
168:(
160:(
157:)
151:)
113:(
98:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.