Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Interweb (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

254:
Whether or not Wiktionary would include this content is irrelevant; Wiktionary is not the only dictionary in existence, nor, oddly enough, is it the most comprehensive dictionary in existence. All that matters is that the content is what would properly belong in
262:
Original Research is not really an issue here, nor is notability. Although the number of citations is very low, I think notability is well established, and there really is no text here that takes such a logical leap as to risk being original
223:
Well, here we are, 18 months later, and the article, if anything, has gotten worse, not better. I think this reinforces my point that the article is not likely to ever become more than it is now, and what it is now is a dictionary entry.
192: 87: 81: 405:
there's really nothing here that makes this an encyclopedia article. It's just an arbitrary list of places that a somewhat popular neologism has been used. It might as well be called
153: 93: 287: 98: 186: 247:
can include much more than a simple definition. Comprehensive dictionaries include extensive etymology and lists of notable uses. There is quite literally
406: 76: 376:. The IPC section alone should go, and that might help, as it does suitably describe the term, but to be blunt, this is better off living on 393: 17: 418: 397: 364: 345: 322: 297: 270: 59: 126: 121: 207: 313:
and it's basically a dictionary definition followed by a random list of stuff. Neither is appropriate for Knowledge.
130: 174: 373: 334:). As it stands this article is little more than an acknowledgement of a humorous word, and hardly encyclopaedic. 433: 113: 36: 432:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
360: 168: 389: 164: 318: 200: 414: 356: 214: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
381: 335: 314: 55: 180: 410: 331: 294: 267: 236: 117: 310: 251:
in this article that wouldn't be just as appropriate in a comprehensive dictionary.
330:
Both dictionary defs and lists of pop culture in this form are discouraged by WP (
147: 231:
Yes, the article as it stands now is "more than just a dicdef". But dictionary
227:
Now, before we get into the same old arguments, let me stipulate a few things:
377: 50: 109: 65: 355:
per nom. I don't see how this can be a suitably encyclopedic topic.
426:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
143: 139: 135: 407:
List of media works that have used the word "interweb"
199: 309:
Nominator argument appears basically sound. Lots of
88:Articles for deletion/Interweb (second nomination) 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 436:). No further edits should be made to this page. 82:Articles for deletion/Interweb (2nd nomination) 288:list of Language-related deletion discussions 213: 8: 282: 286:: This debate has been included in the 94:Articles for deletion/Interweb galactica 74: 235:are not what is cautioned against by 99:Articles for deletion/Interweb medley 7: 72: 24: 372:. Granted, I added the link to 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 77:Articles for deletion/Interweb 1: 60:01:35, 14 October 2009 (UTC) 419:04:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 398:20:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 365:19:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 346:17:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 323:15:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 298:14:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 271:13:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 453: 374:September That Never Ended 429:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 71:AfDs for this article: 243:are, and dictionary 44:The result was 300: 291: 444: 431: 385: 384:Dennis The Tiger 342: 339: 292: 218: 217: 203: 151: 133: 34: 452: 451: 447: 446: 445: 443: 442: 441: 440: 434:deletion review 427: 383: 380:if anything. -- 340: 337: 160: 124: 108: 105: 103: 90: 69: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 450: 448: 439: 438: 422: 421: 400: 367: 350: 349: 348: 301: 280: 279: 278: 265: 264: 260: 252: 239:. Dictionary 221: 220: 157: 104: 102: 101: 96: 91: 86: 84: 79: 73: 70: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 449: 437: 435: 430: 424: 423: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 401: 399: 395: 391: 387: 386: 379: 375: 371: 368: 366: 362: 358: 357:ReverendWayne 354: 351: 347: 344: 343: 333: 329: 326: 325: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 306: 302: 299: 296: 289: 285: 281: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 269: 261: 258: 253: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 229: 228: 225: 216: 212: 209: 206: 202: 198: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 173: 170: 166: 163: 162:Find sources: 158: 155: 149: 145: 141: 137: 132: 128: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 106: 100: 97: 95: 92: 89: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 428: 425: 402: 382: 369: 352: 336: 327: 304: 303: 283: 266: 256: 248: 244: 240: 232: 226: 222: 210: 204: 196: 189: 183: 177: 171: 161: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 259:dictionary. 233:definitions 187:free images 378:Wiktionary 315:Simonm223 263:research. 411:Drdisque 154:View log 110:Interweb 66:Interweb 249:nothing 245:entries 241:entries 193:WP refs 181:scholar 127:protect 122:history 403:Delete 370:Delete 353:Delete 341:103245 332:WP:IPC 328:Delete 307:Delete 295:Powers 268:Powers 237:WP:NAD 165:Google 131:delete 46:delete 394:stuff 311:WP:OR 208:JSTOR 169:books 148:views 140:watch 136:links 16:< 415:talk 392:and 390:Rawr 361:talk 319:talk 305:Weak 284:Note 201:FENS 175:news 144:logs 118:talk 114:edit 56:talk 51:Cirt 338:DB 215:TWL 152:– ( 417:) 409:.- 396:) 363:) 321:) 290:. 195:) 146:| 142:| 138:| 134:| 129:| 125:| 120:| 116:| 58:) 48:. 413:( 388:( 359:( 317:( 293:— 257:a 219:) 211:· 205:· 197:· 190:· 184:· 178:· 172:· 167:( 159:( 156:) 150:) 112:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Cirt
talk
01:35, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Interweb
Articles for deletion/Interweb
Articles for deletion/Interweb (2nd nomination)
Articles for deletion/Interweb (second nomination)
Articles for deletion/Interweb galactica
Articles for deletion/Interweb medley
Interweb
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.