Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/International Academy of Science - Knowledge

Source 📝

441:, would have to be one of the clearest and most concise claims of notability possible. A Thursday night poker game founded by this group would probably be notable. Cleanup to explain that the other organizations are NOT affiliated with this one, would go a long way to clearing up confusion for potential readers of this article and for this who have voted to delete based on an incorrect understanding of what this organization is. 367:: I'm deeply uneasy about this one. There seem to be a lot of these obscure institutions claiming large numbers of Nobel laureates as members, and all claiming to be terribly important and prestigious, but curiously they run out of PO boxes in places like Eichstaett or Huddersfield. Looks to me more like self-aggrandisement than anything else. Weak 269:. I think you are confusing two quite different things - an unaccredited school and an International Professional Society. That link is off the one on this article and it is presumably where the author of the article (not me) got the information about Pauling. Or are you all saying this web site is a fraud? -- 570:
is trying to point out that you either seem to be terribly confused or just plain vindictive that an organization with a similar name exists to an article you had earlier deleted. Stating in your excuse for nomination that it makes "no claims of notability" and "does not directly assert is goals or
593:
Virtually every delete vote seems to believe that this is an article for a school, the usual and customary target of your attacks. You have never clarified this to any of those who have blindly followed your nomination, and your confirmation that you had deleted a school with the same name never
621:
Arbustoo, you have stood idly by allowing others to be misled into voting to delete an article on the assumption that it's a school. When are you finally going to clean up this mess and clarify that this is an article for an organization and not a school? This whole AfD is starting to appear
598:
The individuals who switched their votes did so upon realizing that this AfD is not for a school. While I cannot assume in this case that you are operating in bad faith, the fact that you have never clarified the nature of this AfD leaves this nomination and your motives in question.
154:
This vote should be reconsidered, as it is clearly not related to a school, a subject that several individuals seem to confuse, including the nominator. If this vote is not recast based on the fact that it is an organization, it should be ignored by the closing administrator.
470:
I am almost certain we already deleted this once under another title. I seem to recall that the claims are all down to letters form the illustrious supporting the idea (but not actually doing or promising anything), and the balance turned out to be unverifiable.
563: 517: 566:, the fact that he still believes this article to be for a school is baffling. IT'S NOT A SCHOOL! It's an organization that was founded by several world-renowned scientists, including the odd Nobel Prize-winner or two, and 140:. No verifiable evidence that pauling had anything to do with it (according to the IAS's homepage it was founded by Roger Billings in 1985, so Pauling could not have founded it in 1980). Has a snazzy name, though. -- 319:. It's a notable NGO, with numerous Nobel laureates as members. It's a big deal. The problem here is the confusion between the NGO and the small unaccredited school in Missouri. 83: 78: 87: 388: 70: 125:
and improve. Look at the list of founding members. Anything founded by them and chaired until the end of his life by Linus Pauling is clearly notable. --
384:
This organization is not one of them. This is one of those organizations that Nobel laureates put on their resume. See, for example,
112:
No independent sources and no claims of notability. Vague description of what it is does not directly assert is goals or importance.
252: 650: 626: 616: 603: 588: 575: 557: 542: 524: 511: 490: 477: 460: 445: 405: 375: 359: 347: 335: 309: 297: 273: 257: 226: 209: 186: 159: 146: 129: 116: 52: 17: 571:
importance" is directly contradicted by the simplest reading of the text of the article. This nomination should be withdrawn.
74: 393:. The problem is, the Missouri organization has not actively discouraged people from confusing the two organizations. See 385: 66: 58: 486:
I recall something too, but I recall it being an article on the unaccredited school. However I can not find it. --
664: 36: 663:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
305:
If so, we should probably have an article about the legitimate IAS here with a one-line note about the school.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
608:
Can't admit you were wrong. Your recent comments to new users and myself are out of line. If you can't follow
538:
The IAS is certainly notable, and it looks like the school confusion has been cleaned up in the article. ~
580:
1) Where did I call this a school? 2) Your bad behavior and attacks of various people is a violation of
248: 138: 266: 243: 235: 238: 49: 222: 647: 141: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
609: 581: 430: 564:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/International Academy of Science (Independence, Missouri)
518:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/International Academy of Science (Independence, Missouri)
438: 426: 206: 197: 623: 613: 600: 585: 572: 554: 521: 473: 457: 442: 434: 418: 391: 372: 356: 344: 219: 156: 113: 567: 539: 495:
That's correct. There was an article about the Missouri organization, now deleted.
453: 422: 306: 291: 183: 173: 287: 104: 283: 496: 402: 320: 282:. It is mentioned above but not given. It is even more confusing. There is also 487: 398: 294: 270: 126: 279: 417:
A notable international organization. The fact that it was founded by
657:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
553:
Actually no major edits have been made since I opened this afd.
394: 562:
Considering that Arbusto/oo created the original AfD for
205:
after the confusion with the school has been cleaned up.
182:
per new info presuming that the claims can be sourced.
100: 96: 92: 596:
THIS IS NOT A SCHOOL, IT'S A SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATION.
622:deliberately fraudulent and just a casual mistake. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 667:). No further edits should be made to this page. 343:per COGDEN, to delete this would be a mistake. 286:. Note the plural "Sciences". And then there is 8: 355:It needs cleaned up and sourced to be kept. 278:To clarify further. The school web site is 371:, though I could be persuaded otherwise. 397:, which has a big seal and a picture of 395:this site from the Missouri organization 401:, and says "Current Membership: 11". 7: 24: 284:International Academy of Sciences 234:, no assertion of notability. -- 67:International Academy of Science 59:International Academy of Science 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 651:21:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 627:21:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 617:20:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 604:10:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 589:07:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 576:07:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 558:07:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 543:01:42, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 525:07:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 512:06:19, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 491:00:50, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 478:00:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 406:06:19, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 160:10:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 53:23:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 461:22:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 446:05:32, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 376:14:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 360:01:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 348:23:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 336:09:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 310:07:09, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 298:22:37, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 274:07:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 258:06:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 227:06:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 210:05:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 200:06:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 187:01:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 176:05:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 147:01:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 130:00:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 117:23:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 646:I starting to see a trend. 612:then don't edit wikipedia. 684: 660:Please do not modify it. 288:World Academy of Science 196:per above, advertising. 32:Please do not modify it. 172:per Charlene and nom. 290:. We are discussing 137:Unaccredited school 508: 332: 265:. Take a look at 675: 662: 507: 504: 501: 500: 331: 328: 325: 324: 241: 225: 144: 108: 90: 34: 683: 682: 678: 677: 676: 674: 673: 672: 671: 665:deletion review 658: 516:For reference: 505: 502: 498: 452:Please provide 431:Andrei Sakharov 329: 326: 322: 256: 239: 218: 142: 81: 65: 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 681: 679: 670: 669: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 594:mentions that 546: 545: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 514: 481: 480: 464: 463: 449: 448: 439:Ilya Prigogine 427:Alexander Todd 411: 410: 409: 408: 379: 378: 362: 350: 338: 314: 313: 312: 300: 267:History of IAS 260: 246: 229: 212: 165: 164: 163: 162: 132: 110: 109: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 680: 668: 666: 661: 655: 654: 653: 652: 649: 628: 625: 620: 619: 618: 615: 611: 607: 606: 605: 602: 597: 592: 591: 590: 587: 583: 579: 578: 577: 574: 569: 565: 561: 560: 559: 556: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 544: 541: 537: 534: 533: 526: 523: 519: 515: 513: 510: 509: 494: 493: 492: 489: 485: 484: 483: 482: 479: 476: 475: 469: 466: 465: 462: 459: 455: 451: 450: 447: 444: 440: 436: 435:Konrad Lorenz 432: 428: 424: 420: 419:Linus Pauling 416: 413: 412: 407: 404: 400: 396: 392: 389: 386: 383: 382: 381: 380: 377: 374: 370: 366: 363: 361: 358: 354: 351: 349: 346: 342: 339: 337: 334: 333: 318: 315: 311: 308: 304: 301: 299: 296: 292: 289: 285: 281: 277: 276: 275: 272: 268: 264: 261: 259: 254: 250: 245: 242: 237: 233: 230: 228: 224: 221: 216: 213: 211: 208: 204: 201: 199: 195: 191: 190: 189: 188: 185: 181: 177: 175: 171: 161: 158: 153: 150: 149: 148: 145: 139: 136: 133: 131: 128: 124: 121: 120: 119: 118: 115: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 659: 656: 648:Helical Rift 645: 595: 535: 497: 472: 467: 423:John Kendrew 414: 368: 364: 352: 340: 321: 316: 302: 262: 231: 214: 202: 193: 192: 179: 178:Changing to 169: 167: 166: 151: 134: 122: 111: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 415:Strong Keep 399:Neils Bohr 207:Sandstein 198:Sandstein 624:Alansohn 610:WP:CIVIL 601:Alansohn 582:WP:CIVIL 573:Alansohn 443:Alansohn 373:WMMartin 345:Silensor 157:Alansohn 143:Charlene 614:Arbusto 586:Arbusto 568:BigrTex 555:Arbusto 540:BigrTex 522:Arbusto 458:Arbusto 365:Comment 357:Arbusto 353:Comment 307:JoshuaZ 303:Comment 263:Comment 244:nce Ong 184:JoshuaZ 174:JoshuaZ 152:Comment 114:Arbusto 84:protect 79:history 50:W.marsh 468:Delete 390:, and 369:delete 232:Delete 215:Delete 194:Delete 170:Delete 135:Delete 88:delete 488:Bduke 454:WP:RS 295:Bduke 271:Bduke 127:Bduke 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 584:. -- 536:Keep 437:and 341:Keep 317:Keep 293:. -- 280:here 223:khoi 220:Khoi 203:Keep 180:keep 123:Keep 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 474:Guy 236:Ter 520:. 506:EN 503:GD 499:CO 456:. 433:, 429:, 425:, 421:, 387:, 330:EN 327:GD 323:CO 251:| 217:. 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 403:O 255:) 253:C 249:T 247:( 240:e 168:* 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
W.marsh
23:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
International Academy of Science
International Academy of Science
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
Arbusto
23:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Bduke
00:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Charlene
01:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Alansohn
10:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
JoshuaZ
JoshuaZ
01:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Sandstein
Sandstein
05:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.