476:
516:. Responses to an event don't become notable because the event was. Indiscriminate information: a collection of (predictable) response which are run-of-the-mill for such events, where the only rationale for inclusion is verifiability--in other words, everything that made it to a newspaper or website is suitable for inclusion.
496:
Having seen that there are a few of these "international reactions" pages up for nomination, I think it's worth putting forward that this one is by far the least notable: the attack was an entirely domestic
Norwegian incident with no international consequence, so the international reaction to it must
406:
that describes some of the issues with these "International reactions" articles and lists some of the previous outcomes of debates around them. It is not intended as a guideline, but more a reflection of how editors have dealt with such articles before. That said, editors may be interested in
100:
95:
339:
Then there should be a discussion in a centralized place (I'm sure there is an appropriate noticeboard) that covers the general "concept and content", not individual AfDs for every article of this type, which takes time and effort to address individually.
90:
475:– This is and will never be more than a list of about a hundred very similarly worded expressions of condolence and/or outrage. The whole article can be summarised into a single paragraph on the parent article. Mirroring the argument I've just made
202:
325:, the notability is questioned by an editor as is the concept and content of these articles. It is right to seek community consensus rather than over-riding it and butchering articles in an underhand manner without consensus.
128:
123:
132:
115:
196:
162:
155:
714:
693:
669:
649:
629:
609:
589:
569:
551:
525:
506:
488:
467:
442:
425:
390:
373:
349:
334:
314:
289:
268:
246:
73:
450:
There is nothing wrong per se with this article. It's well-sourced and the global reactions to such terrible events alone are often widely noted by the press. It boils down to
577:
617:
280:
states that "editors are encouraged to include current and up-to-date information within its coverage, and to develop stand-alone articles on significant current events"
597:
560:
657:
637:
217:
184:
361:- passes GNG easily. International reactions to major international events, especially by heads of state, are historically notable and encyclopedic content.
497:
surely be of only passing importance. At least the 2012 US presidental election or the MH17 shooting were events with some international repercussions.
178:
454:: although it might in hindsight seem almost silly to meticulously document all contemporary reactions, they are still clearly notable, and since
174:
119:
399:
224:
111:
79:
17:
190:
420:
733:
40:
585:
386:
412:
581:
330:
285:
403:
729:
36:
451:
567:
264:
242:
277:
234:
382:
210:
689:
408:
322:
298:
665:
645:
625:
605:
502:
484:
438:
326:
281:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
728:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
55:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
710:
521:
463:
702:
681:
534:
256:
564:
362:
260:
238:
101:
Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2011 Norway attacks (3rd nomination)
96:
Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2011 Norway attacks (2nd nomination)
537:, major attacks comes with reactions which is totally appropriate for its own article.
61:
685:
345:
310:
661:
641:
621:
601:
538:
498:
480:
434:
233:
Most of these quotes are redundant and warrant no place in an article. Delete per
149:
706:
517:
459:
407:
extending the essay or working it into a guideline - perhaps a supplement to
455:
381:
What has changed since the last nomination? Notability isn't temporary. -
341:
306:
91:
Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2011 Norway attacks
433:
I agree notability isn't temporary for
Knowledge (XXG)'s purposes.
722:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
302:
145:
141:
137:
209:
223:
112:International reactions to the 2011 Norway attacks
80:International reactions to the 2011 Norway attacks
276:Highly notable responses to a major world event.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
736:). No further edits should be made to this page.
578:list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions
618:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
656:Note: This debate has been included in the
636:Note: This debate has been included in the
616:Note: This debate has been included in the
596:Note: This debate has been included in the
576:Note: This debate has been included in the
559:Note: This debate has been included in the
598:list of Events-related deletion discussions
561:list of Norway-related deletion discussions
705:. Why nominate clearly notable articles?--
658:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
655:
638:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
635:
615:
595:
575:
558:
479:, this is a long, boring Wikiquote page.
400:Knowledge (XXG):Reactions to... articles
88:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
86:
24:
398:. I previously wrote an essay at
458:space is so cheap, why not? --
1:
715:23:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
694:17:16, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
670:18:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
650:18:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
630:18:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
610:18:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
590:17:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
570:16:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
552:20:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
526:01:59, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
507:04:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
489:22:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
468:16:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
443:04:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
426:00:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
391:23:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
374:22:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
350:22:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
335:21:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
315:21:51, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
290:21:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
269:21:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
247:21:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
74:00:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
753:
725:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
85:AfDs for this article:
494:Additional comment
672:
652:
632:
612:
592:
582:Shawn in Montreal
572:
301:Y nomination per
59:
56:non-admin closure
744:
727:
680:: Easily passes
548:
545:
542:
423:
419:
415:
370:
228:
227:
213:
165:
153:
135:
71:
66:
53:
34:
752:
751:
747:
746:
745:
743:
742:
741:
740:
734:deletion review
723:
546:
543:
540:
421:
417:
413:
363:
170:
161:
126:
110:
107:
105:
83:
67:
62:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
750:
748:
739:
738:
718:
717:
696:
674:
673:
653:
633:
613:
593:
573:
555:
554:
528:
511:
510:
509:
470:
445:
428:
393:
383:Knowledgekid87
376:
355:
354:
353:
352:
318:
317:
292:
271:
239:Obi-Wan Kenobi
231:
230:
167:
106:
104:
103:
98:
93:
87:
84:
82:
77:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
749:
737:
735:
731:
726:
720:
719:
716:
712:
708:
704:
701:*per passing
700:
697:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
676:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
654:
651:
647:
643:
639:
634:
631:
627:
623:
619:
614:
611:
607:
603:
599:
594:
591:
587:
583:
579:
574:
571:
568:
566:
562:
557:
556:
553:
550:
549:
536:
532:
529:
527:
523:
519:
515:
512:
508:
504:
500:
495:
492:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
471:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
446:
444:
440:
436:
432:
429:
427:
424:
416:
410:
405:
401:
397:
394:
392:
388:
384:
380:
377:
375:
371:
369:
368:
360:
357:
356:
351:
347:
343:
338:
337:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
319:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
236:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
164:
160:
157:
151:
147:
143:
139:
134:
130:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
108:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
81:
78:
76:
75:
72:
70:
65:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
724:
721:
698:
677:
539:
530:
513:
493:
472:
447:
430:
404:WP:REACTIONS
395:
378:
366:
365:
358:
327:AusLondonder
294:
282:AusLondonder
273:
252:
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
158:
68:
63:
49:
47:
31:
28:
531:Speedy Keep
452:WP:NOTPAPER
359:Speedy keep
261:epic genius
235:WP: NOTNEWS
197:free images
565:Sam Sailor
456:hard disks
278:WP:NOTNEWS
730:talk page
662:• Gene93k
642:• Gene93k
622:• Gene93k
602:• Gene93k
533:- Passes
323:WP:POINTy
255:. Passes
50:Snow Keep
37:talk page
732:or in a
686:Ddcm8991
409:WP:EVENT
367:Мандичка
299:WP:POINT
156:View log
39:or in a
499:Aspirex
481:Aspirex
435:PeRshGo
422:Windows
396:Comment
203:WP refs
191:scholar
129:protect
124:history
707:BabbaQ
703:WP:GNG
682:WP:GNG
535:WP:GNG
518:Drmies
514:Delete
473:Delete
460:hydrox
414:Fences
257:WP:GNG
175:Google
133:delete
418:&
218:JSTOR
179:books
163:Stats
150:views
142:watch
138:links
64:Davey
16:<
711:talk
699:Keep
690:talk
678:Keep
666:talk
646:talk
626:talk
606:talk
586:talk
522:talk
503:talk
485:talk
477:here
464:talk
448:Keep
439:talk
431:Keep
402:aka
387:talk
379:Keep
346:talk
331:talk
321:Not
311:talk
303:this
295:Keep
286:talk
274:Keep
265:talk
253:Keep
243:talk
211:FENS
185:news
146:logs
120:talk
116:edit
69:2010
684:.--
547:104
544:dog
372:😜
342:LjL
307:LjL
245:)
225:TWL
154:– (
52:.
713:)
692:)
668:)
660:.
648:)
640:.
628:)
620:.
608:)
600:.
588:)
580:.
563:.
524:)
505:)
487:)
466:)
441:)
411:.
389:)
348:)
333:)
313:)
305:.
297:-
288:)
267:)
259:.
237:.
205:)
148:|
144:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
122:|
118:|
709:(
688:(
664:(
644:(
624:(
604:(
584:(
541:A
520:(
501:(
483:(
462:(
437:(
385:(
364:—
344:(
329:(
309:(
284:(
263:(
241:(
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
159:·
152:)
114:(
60:–
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.