461:
opinion in this case it is not applicable, and
Knowledge (XXG) does not run by precedent. However I will also note that the NOTNEWS aspect has been considered in both previous nominations on this article and rejected, and NOTNEWS was a key reason for the other similar AfD's working out how they did. It will be interesting to see what happens, this could result in a blanket deletion of articles if consensus allows this to go.
85:
356:
already sufficiently summarizes what this quote farm tries to convey hence a merge is entirely unnecessary and damaging. Note, I am not here to question the notability of the attacks, that is well-asserted and a given, but rather this page which gathered quotes simply to keep them away from the main
756:
By that I meant long after editor interest in the Norway attacks has declined. Given the millions of editors we have, let alone readers, AfD attracts such a tiny amount of user participation. OSE has been used throughout the discussion (and others) to suggest that because other reactions articles
680:
Nothing has really changed since the last two AfDs. This is just an attempt to delete this article under the cover of darkness. This is a legitimate split based on the size of the parent article. This was especially notable given the rarity of an attack of this nature in Norway. Reliable sources,
460:
In short even though this has been snow kept and keep with massive majority consensus with alot of good comments, twice - this is irrelevant and no one has previous considered your brilliant reasoning which has worked on at least two AfD's recently. I am not knocking your rationale, but in my
511:
the growing collection of international reactions to keep it from occupying a very sizeable portion of the main article. Reliable information about the actual attack was rather scarce at the time. The main page has since had ample time to develop as an article, and this page's deletion as an
212:
207:
761:
is filled with similar long-standing articles and I question if a one-by-one nomination is appropriate. Norway has a very low level of violent crime and this was an exceptional event (prior to the recent increase in terrorism in Europe) which prompted significant and notable reactions.
919:. Besides, you are only selectively quoting my rationale to support a statement that is still puzzling and not in sink with our procedures. And you are still ignoring the six other editors that advocate for deletion. AFD doesn't selectively ignore comments we do not personally like.
625:
893:
Your nomination states, "...this page...gathered quotes...to keep them away from the main article." That is a content concern, whether material should be here or there. Our policy is that any uninvolved editor can close this discussion and move it to the proper venue.
563:
Because expanding the problem will not make it any better. The main article's size is irrelevant; it is actually one of the best articles on a modern terror attack that I have seen. Kudos to the editors who dedicated themselves to making it more than a second-rate news
729:
arguments are unconvincing but I expected someone would try to invoke them for an AFD like this. 9/11 is on an entirely different scale than this attack, in its impact, response, and methods, while presidential elections are not even remotely similar to a terrorist
202:
348:. This is yet another memorial page where countries respond to an attack with condemnation and condolences, sometimes in the "strongest terms". However, there is nothing inherently notable about these quotes and to put them all together like this is
314:
794:
582:
What problem would be expanded though? When articles get too big they are usually split out, in this case the split off information would all be good referenced material. A nice summary can be placed on the main article for the reactions. -
481:
sympathy stmts of no lasting significance. These lists serve a function close to the event, allowing for future pare down of reactions as significance and lasting effect of established, without cluttering the main page. The future is
690:
824:
These international reaction articles are the epitome of non-notable, diplomatic/political routine; the only ones that matter in the long run are the odd ones, and those should be in the main article. The rest is clutter.
240:
235:
244:
776:
IMHO - such articles which contain mainly boilerplate sympathy reactions (which can be summarized as two lines in the main article as a show of support) - have a good chance of being deleted (as they tend to fail
227:
707:
9/11 is not the same scale - both in terms of the event itself and in terms of subsequent wars. Reactions to presidential elections might have a chance for deletion - though not all reactions there are always
308:
507:
is much better organized, providing a proper encyclopedic overview of the international response in a prose form. I was editing the main article around the hectic times when the attack occurred, and
274:
842:
Editors are not trying to delete the topic from the encyclopedia, and there is no claim to a partial IAR deletion of just this one article. So this is a content issue outside the scope of AfD and
375:- I am aware of the last two outcomes at AFD but my rationale is different and I believe editors have come a long way toward understanding why these pages do not meet notability standards or
790:
92:
267:
618:
materials – the reactions themselves, which are routine and do not stand out in any way. No encyclopedic relevance. Similar articles have been deleted in the recent past, such as:
946:
928:
903:
884:
855:
834:
806:
771:
739:
717:
702:
672:
646:
592:
573:
554:
521:
491:
469:
449:
429:
409:
388:
366:
68:
437:
397:
417:
329:
296:
462:
630:
290:
286:
867:
what are you talking about? There are six editors, not including myself, advocating for deletion. Even if they recommended, say a merge, that
686:
231:
336:
101:
223:
74:
131:
17:
875:
handled at AFD. Are you trying to somehow change how AFD has worked for years? Because I doubt you will be successful at this venue.
758:
725:"under the cover of darkness"; what does that even mean? Come on, you are smarter than that to make such a baseless remark. Your
668:
302:
117:
534:
973:
843:
40:
664:
916:
345:
924:
880:
735:
569:
384:
362:
90:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
942:
899:
851:
163:
52:. Consensus is that this is an inappropriate quote farm. The "wrong venue" opinion is not taken into account as
588:
550:
797:- and you are covering an actual issue (as opposed to a long list of condolences) - things might be different.
782:
147:
121:
767:
698:
106:
969:
920:
876:
731:
642:
565:
380:
358:
36:
938:
912:
895:
864:
847:
445:
425:
405:
778:
615:
626:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2016 Lahore suicide bombing (2nd nomination)
584:
546:
538:
504:
500:
477:. The more notable ones as well as the summary are in the main article. We do not need to document
353:
322:
503:
already. As the nom says, this article is just a random collection of quotes. The main article's
153:
84:
661:
611:
349:
937:
You have established a history with me of standing strong in defiance of the force of reason.
802:
763:
722:
713:
694:
487:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
968:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
530:
478:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
830:
638:
517:
726:
657:
607:
376:
53:
441:
421:
401:
213:
Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2011 Norway attacks (3rd nomination)
208:
Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2011 Norway attacks (2nd nomination)
59:
785:(beyond a two liner of "everyone sent condolences")). In situations where there are
798:
709:
483:
181:
169:
137:
261:
682:
116:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
826:
513:
795:
International reactions to the Saudi-led intervention in Yemen (2015–present)
56:
is clearly the proper venue in which to discuss the deletion of an article.
691:
International reactions to the United States presidential election, 2016
203:
Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2011 Norway attacks
512:
independent collection of rather unorganized quotes is well overdue. --
346:
Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information
962:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
79:
110:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
685:, covered international reactions to the attack. When will
757:
have been deleted, this one should as well. The category
100:
among
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
791:
International response to
Innocence of Muslims protests
508:
257:
253:
249:
321:
335:
224:International reactions to the 2011 Norway attacks
75:International reactions to the 2011 Norway attacks
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
976:). No further edits should be made to this page.
438:list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions
130:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
8:
436:Note: This debate has been included in the
416:Note: This debate has been included in the
396:Note: This debate has been included in the
631:Reactions to the Las Vegas concert shooting
398:list of Norway-related deletion discussions
435:
418:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
415:
395:
104:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
608:indiscriminate collection of information
499:, since it has been factually merged to
124:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
200:
687:Reactions to the September 11 attacks
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
535:Reactions to the 2011 Norway attacks
198:
24:
915:no it is part of my argument for
759:Category:International reactions
83:
533:. Why not just rename this to
1:
539:2011 Norway attacks#Reactions
120:on the part of others and to
947:17:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
929:16:03, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
904:12:10, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
885:03:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
856:01:47, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
835:19:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
807:07:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
772:07:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
740:06:43, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
718:05:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
703:05:47, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
673:02:04, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
647:00:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
593:13:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
574:23:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
555:22:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
522:20:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
492:20:22, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
470:20:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
450:20:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
430:20:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
410:20:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
389:19:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
367:19:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
69:10:36, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
993:
545:just about 200KB long. -
965:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
377:what Knowledge (XXG) is
162:; accounts blocked for
132:single-purpose accounts
102:policies and guidelines
665:Pharaoh of the Wizards
541:? The main article is
197:AfDs for this article:
501:2011 Norway attacks
354:2011 Norway attacks
114:by counting votes.
93:not a majority vote
873:has regularly been
844:WP:Deletion policy
610:and does not meet
917:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
789:reactions - e.g.
505:reactions section
452:
432:
412:
195:
194:
191:
118:assume good faith
67:
984:
967:
921:TheGracefulSlick
877:TheGracefulSlick
732:TheGracefulSlick
566:TheGracefulSlick
467:
381:TheGracefulSlick
359:TheGracefulSlick
340:
339:
325:
277:
265:
247:
189:
177:
161:
145:
126:
96:, but instead a
87:
80:
66:
64:
57:
34:
992:
991:
987:
986:
985:
983:
982:
981:
980:
974:deletion review
963:
939:Unscintillating
913:Unscintillating
896:Unscintillating
865:Unscintillating
848:Unscintillating
683:such as the BBC
527:Keep and expand
463:
373:Additional note
282:
273:
238:
222:
219:
217:
179:
167:
151:
135:
122:sign your posts
78:
60:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
990:
988:
979:
978:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
932:
931:
907:
906:
888:
887:
859:
858:
837:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
783:WP:PERSISTENCE
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
693:be nominated?
675:
656:per nom Fails
650:
649:
636:
635:
634:
628:
620:
619:
614:. Consists of
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
585:Knowledgekid87
577:
576:
558:
557:
547:Knowledgekid87
537:and merge out
524:
494:
472:
454:
453:
433:
413:
392:
391:
343:
342:
279:
218:
216:
215:
210:
205:
199:
196:
193:
192:
88:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
989:
977:
975:
971:
966:
960:
959:
948:
944:
940:
936:
935:
934:
933:
930:
926:
922:
918:
914:
911:
910:
909:
908:
905:
901:
897:
892:
891:
890:
889:
886:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
863:
862:
861:
860:
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
838:
836:
832:
828:
823:
820:
819:
808:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
780:
775:
774:
773:
769:
765:
760:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
741:
737:
733:
728:
724:
721:
720:
719:
715:
711:
706:
705:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
679:
676:
674:
670:
666:
663:
659:
655:
652:
651:
648:
644:
640:
637:
632:
629:
627:
624:
623:
622:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
602:
601:
594:
590:
586:
581:
580:
579:
578:
575:
571:
567:
562:
561:
560:
559:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
525:
523:
519:
515:
510:
506:
502:
498:
495:
493:
489:
485:
480:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
459:
456:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
434:
431:
427:
423:
419:
414:
411:
407:
403:
399:
394:
393:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
371:
370:
369:
368:
364:
360:
355:
351:
347:
338:
334:
331:
328:
324:
320:
316:
313:
310:
307:
304:
301:
298:
295:
292:
288:
285:
284:Find sources:
280:
276:
272:
269:
263:
259:
255:
251:
246:
242:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
214:
211:
209:
206:
204:
201:
187:
183:
175:
171:
165:
159:
155:
149:
143:
139:
133:
129:
125:
123:
119:
113:
109:
108:
103:
99:
95:
94:
89:
86:
82:
81:
76:
73:
71:
70:
65:
63:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
964:
961:
872:
868:
839:
821:
787:more complex
786:
764:AusLondonder
723:AusLondonder
695:AusLondonder
677:
653:
603:
542:
526:
496:
474:
464:
457:
372:
344:
332:
326:
318:
311:
305:
299:
293:
283:
270:
185:
173:
164:sockpuppetry
157:
146:; suspected
141:
127:
115:
111:
105:
97:
91:
61:
49:
47:
31:
28:
840:Wrong venue
639:K.e.coffman
309:free images
779:WP:LASTING
616:WP:PRIMARY
442:Tom Morris
422:Tom Morris
402:Tom Morris
98:discussion
62:Sandstein
970:talk page
730:incident.
633:and more.
509:split off
465:Dysklyver
357:article.
154:canvassed
148:canvassed
107:consensus
37:talk page
972:or in a
708:trivial.
662:WP:LISTN
612:WP:LISTN
350:WP:SYNTH
268:View log
186:username
180:{{subst:
174:username
168:{{subst:
158:username
152:{{subst:
142:username
136:{{subst:
39:or in a
799:Icewhiz
710:Icewhiz
531:WP:SIZE
484:Icewhiz
479:wp:fart
315:WP refs
303:scholar
241:protect
236:history
150:users:
827:Mangoe
822:delete
781:&
727:WP:OSE
658:WP:NOT
654:Delete
604:Delete
564:piece.
514:hydrox
497:Delete
475:Delete
458:Delete
352:. The
287:Google
245:delete
54:WP:AFD
50:delete
330:JSTOR
291:books
275:Stats
262:views
254:watch
250:links
128:Note:
16:<
943:talk
925:talk
900:talk
881:talk
871:and
852:talk
831:talk
803:talk
768:talk
736:talk
714:talk
699:talk
678:Keep
669:talk
660:and
643:talk
589:talk
570:talk
551:talk
543:over
529:per
518:talk
488:talk
482:now.
446:talk
426:talk
406:talk
385:talk
363:talk
323:FENS
297:news
258:logs
232:talk
228:edit
869:can
846:.
793:or
689:or
440:. —
420:. —
400:. —
337:TWL
266:– (
182:csp
178:or
170:csm
138:spa
112:not
945:)
927:)
902:)
883:)
854:)
833:)
805:)
770:)
738:)
716:)
701:)
671:)
645:)
606:–
591:)
572:)
553:)
520:)
490:)
448:)
428:)
408:)
387:)
365:)
317:)
260:|
256:|
252:|
248:|
243:|
239:|
234:|
230:|
188:}}
176:}}
166::
160:}}
144:}}
134::
941:(
923:(
898:(
879:(
850:(
829:(
801:(
766:(
734:(
712:(
697:(
667:(
641:(
587:(
568:(
549:(
516:(
486:(
444:(
424:(
404:(
383:(
379:.
361:(
341:)
333:·
327:·
319:·
312:·
306:·
300:·
294:·
289:(
281:(
278:)
271:·
264:)
226:(
190:.
184:|
172:|
156:|
140:|
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
