Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Internet brigades (2nd nomination)

2125:. It is quite reasonable to assume that, considering the above historial trends. Not only that, but there is multiple intelligence functions used by state and non-state actors. The four functions of intelligence being: collection, analysis, counter-intelligence and covert action (with propaganda and disinfo being subsets of covert action programs)(Sources: Sherman, M. 'Intelligence Power in Peace and War' and Godson, R. 'Dirty Tricks and Trump Cards'). For an intelligence community to gather, and act on, complete information they have to be utilizing all four functions. The fact that the Russians still have a widespread intelligence collection effort directed towards the west (sourced above in my first entry) is enough for me to make the analytical leap that other intelligence functions like counter-intelligence and covert action are still in wide spread use. 2093:

seduction of the intellectuals') and that framework existed up into the late 80's and into the early 90's (source: 'Soviet Active Measures in the "Post-Cold War" Era 1988-1991' A Report Prepared at the Request of the United States House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations by the United States Information Agency June 1992). Bureaucracies like that don't change over night. There is a strong possibility that the infrastructure is still there especially considering the Russians found such operations very successful (source: Anastasi, P. Chapter 11 'Soviet Disinformation in Greece: A quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Ethnos' in 'The New Image Makers'). Essentially, Vlad, you are denying factual history, you are denying the nature of bureaucracies, and you are denying the fact that a nation state would just 'drop' a useful method of intelligence.

1114:

such "internet brigades"? You Google spamming is of no use here in Knowledge (XXG). May I translate sources on the first page of your Google search for the word "веб-бригада"? The first - link to Russian Knowledge (XXG), where is no source is shown to the term "web brigades" (and different term is used from "internet brigade" also, the term used by Russian Knowledge (XXG) is "web-brigades" and also there are no any sources on where it was taken), second link is to Occult Library (nice place if you are satanist), third link is to forum on crime rate (nothing related to our subject), fourth link is to the forums of Uzbekistan immigrants, fifth link is to the forum of GZT.ru, sixth link is to the forum of Ukrainian president, seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth links are to German Russian forum. Why you couldn't cite reliable source? By the way,

1976:

the Behavior and Tactics sections is way too generic, and that the few sources that actually carry some weight support not the alleged operations of "Internet brigades" of Russian origin (the description of which make for the bulk of the article), but rather something that happened in the Western world or in China. I say either delete the article or split it into two, separating international stuff from stuff specific to Russia (and then probably kill the bits specific to Russia since none of them are supported by a credible source), or, well, try cleaning up the article one more time (not likely to help, given that this would be attempt #3 already).

842:

not do any original research of my own. And I am not suppose to judge research of others. I only have to make sure that the sources are reliable, and their content is properly described in this artice. If you can provide any reliable sources which say: this particular reserach and claims made by Polyanskaya, Svirsky, journalists from Guardian and reports by New Times and grani.ru are wrong - such sources can be cited in the article. I found only one such source: claims by Usupovsky (with regard to only publication by Polyanskaya), and it is included.

2147:

been unravelled) should be beyond the capability of a bunch of wikipedia and Internet users. We are only ever going to see bits and pieces, and even then, the network is going to be like onion layers with security and deception spread between layers. That's the nature of intelligence. The fact that the person who created this article has done an excellent job at synthesizing the sources, to create a more illuminating picture of a phenomenon we know little about, is actually an outstanding achievement in open source intelligence gathering.

380:

thing in China. Guradian uses the term "army of secret comentators". Later after the article was nominated for deletion, Biophys has added a link to Polyanskaya article "Commissars of the internet". And again we see that throughout the whole text a term "brigade" is used meaning "team". Only once the term "web-brigade" is used. Looking onto other sources - we see that there is no such term which was used by Biophys. Conclusion, the term and the name for the article is an original research by Biophys which is not found in its sources.

2229:, are we going to have a vote about it? And if the majority of votes are from Turkish contributers that are against it, are we going to take it down? The same applies for an article critical of Islam, or anything else. This vote seems to be along those lines as well, with Russian contributers against it (I'm Russia though, just don't read well). I'm not even sure why the last one was taken down... it should have been marked as a conspiracy theory, not taken down. 1621:- I don't agree with the people who call it well-sourced. It isn't, it's still full of speculation and such. And the counter-reactions here are no indication of its merit. But! It does also contain some true, sourced information, and yes, it is definitely in the middle of a dispute. So, it's a start. Let's have at it and see where it winds up, maybe consider a merge at that point, and keep the disputed tags on in the meantime. Do not delete sourced information. -- 718:. The problem I have with this article is that a lot of things I see in here are "alleged" or "supposedly." I can't see how an article like this can stand on its' own with all of that text being used. However, it would be worth noting this in an article about Internet censorship in the Russian Federation, or on censorship in general, since while some nations are also mentioned, this is heavily about Russia. Notable subject, but just presented in the wrong format. 1992:. Original research etc., assuming it applies here at all (I can't say either way) is not a reason to delete an article: it's a reason to clean up an article. Deletion should really only concern itself with whether a topic is itself encyclopaedic and noteworthy, or whether, if it is, the article is so bad that it can't possibly be salvaged and that it's better to start over from scratch. I don't see why either of these criteria would apply here, though. -- 70: 2225:. I'll have my Russian friend read the article to make sure that it's correct. Keep the factual dispute tag until we can make sure that this is a real phenomenon. As an aside, I'm not sure why there is even a vote about this article. If it's a conspiracy theory then feel free to make the article such, but deleting it completely is blatant censorship. If, for example, there's an article up that criticizes 239:

contextualized to avoid unintentional endorsement. What is more, just because a quote is accurate and verifiably attributed to a particular source does not mean that the quote must necessarily be included in an article, but neither must it necessarily be excluded from an article. The sourced contribution must simply aid in the verifiable and neutral presentation of the subject".

2074:"Knowledge (XXG) "has steadily grown in popularity, credibility, and influence to the point that it is now used and referenced in U.S. Government intelligence products," explained Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, a group that monitors government information policy, in a recent blog post". 2209:. There's a lot of flaming going on around this article, but it looks like the article has shaped up as a result of the criticism and attention. What started as a nutjob conspiracy article is now barely worth reading. This could shape up to be a good article with some more work. I agree that it may need remaing or be merged with another section. 804:, and it was described as such. I agree that originally submitted stub was not good. So, I worked a lot to improve the article. Now it is significantly bigger, well-referenced, less POV, etc. This is exactly what WP rules ask us to do: create interesting articles supported by multiple reliable sources. Of course, it can be improved further. 1361:. You disputed the title of the article. Can you suggest anything better? Of course, the article could be called "state-sponsored on-line information warfare teams" (or "Russian information warfare teams" if to exclude materials about China). But the current title seems to be more concise and clear... 2315:

Biophys is also an author of deleted article on blog "La Russophobe". Biophys also republishes a lot of material from blog "La Russophobe". The English translation of an article given as a source to the current AfD article is taken from this blog. It also differs from the original article on Russian,

2146:

Again that wasn't the point. The above paragraphs extrapolate on the historical issue. Secondly, there is a reason why there is limited information on this phenomenon. Penetrating a states secrets (and that's what we are talking about here, a secret network for online disinformation that has possibly

1688:

It's very good you have appeared here! I already wanted to leave. You can take parabellum in the room 237, campus building N5. The code is A43HF4. And one more thing. The mayor appointed you the rank of junior sergeant. Now, really hurry. Your sector for tonight is the Far East and Syberia. Then, put

1118:

for "польша страна идиотов" (English - poland, a land of idiots) shows 285,000 results. Should we create such an article in Knowledge (XXG) by your line of logic and your own standarts? You won't believe, but search shows even some articles from Rzeczpospolita newspaper and even Gazeta Wyborcza!!! Ja

614:

Wrong!!! Reference 2 uses term "brigades", only once it says "web brigade". So you have confirmed that you've done original research, because you cited no sources for your "internet brigades". Thank you so much. Moreover reference 2 is published on blog, so it is violation of Knowledge (XXG) policies

379:

First of all, nothing has changed really in the article. The only thing that changed is defenition. And again it is original research. Where and who named those hoax russian teams "internet brigades"? Biophys linked originally to the Guradian article about China, but there is no any labelling of that

2061:

I have looked into your sources and found nothing in support of existence of Internet brigades. These sources even don't use this term "internet brigades". Moreover you just jam two different things "intelligence collection" and "disinformation through the internet". As for "intelligence collection"

1930:

An article seems to be nothing more than a hearsay, with an effort to legitimize it by citing "sources". The list of sources contains Reuters and Washinton Post, which is misleading, since both of them support a tiny "Miscellaneous" section of the article, not the bulk of the article which describes

841:

anything here. There are many complicated phenomena and controversial subjects described in WP. How to deal with them? Do not invent or research anything yourself. Simply follow reliable sources whatever they say. It is exactly what I did. Your are talking about "absense of any research". Yes, I did

434:

Roman Sadykhov. Conmsidering that this party uses fascist symbols, calls its regional commanders gauliaghters, like fascist were calling their leaders. The source of Polish allegations is not Tygodnik Powsechny, but anonymous Polish Experts on Russian Affairs. All this could be easily ascertained by

387:

Third, the article in Russian Knowledge (XXG) directly shows in its infobox that "Internet teams" are conspiracy theory and the whole thing is based on claims of few people, namely - Polyanskaya, Krivov and Lomko - authors of the article "Commissars of the Internet. The FSB at the Computer". Nowhere

2164:

It is also telling that you are more caught up in the validity of the term 'Internet Brigades'. The word is never the thing. Perhaps someone will come up with a better term to describe what is happening. It's arguing over semantics and a waste of time. But perhaps wasting our time is your MO? Which

1840:

but clarify language that it is a belief held by a number of people, and possibly a conspiracy theory, and that the existence of said brigades is controversial. However, I think it meets the criteria under fringe theories, and furthermore from reading the discussion I have come to suspect that many

1113:

You was so quick to state that the article is referenced, but you don't give us links? How many articles in Knowledge (XXG) are referenced to Google? Why you are unable to show us one normal link to reliable source which uses the term "internet brigades" and states that Russian Security Service has

417:

Eighth, Tygodnik Powszechny actually writes that "We don’t know it for certain (tracing a source of the attack failed). Only questions and assumptions remain and we are unable to verify them". Then it writes "According to Polish specialists in Russian affairs", the names of these are not disclosed,

1975:

I do not know who else you might be referring to, but if you are talking about me, then I confirm that I have registered upon seeing the article to cast my vote against it without being anonymous. With that taken out of the way, I do not think you can deny what I said, that is, that the content of

297:

I would like to stop this unstoppable continuing harassment by user Biophys. It seems that his only business in Knowledge (XXG) is discussion of other Wikipedians, rather than discussion of the articles. I pretty much understand his desire to republish blog La Russophobe and all other anti-russian

2016:

speculative and basing on original research rather then encyclopedic article. The main definition of article already have problems, so how his article can be equaled to encyclopedic article, then the basic foundation of it lacks support? Important claims of this article relays only on one online

566:

the allegations are supported by the sources. I do not remember the prev. article, but I see that this is not devoted to any one country. I have been canvassed to oppose this article, as I believe have a number of others. I have never been in contact with biophys. Entirely on my own account, I

395:

Fifth, the defenition of internet teams is totally original research. Nowhere you coud find that "intenet teams" are waging state-sponcored information warfare. Indeed, the word "warfare" is totally POV, except original research. Nowhere in sources you find that this is a warfare, and is against

1857:

I've seen several sources of media referencing this type of behavior in several formats, not to mention having witnessed it myself (yes, yes, original research). I look forward to working on this page a bit once I find more information in the American media about it, because this clearly is not

391:

Fourth, like the other article it is totally dedicated to Russia. Even adding some original research comparisons with China didn't help - the article is totally about Russia. For example. original research is all that Biophys published in the Section "Recent developments" nothing is said in the

2092:

The Russians have had a very successful propaganda and disinformation campaign in action for over 70 years. This historial trend of using propaganda and disinformation has been in use since by Russian before the second world war (source: koch, s. 'double lives: stalin, willi munzenberg and the

1953:

have verifiable sources available. Notability is established and sourced. The article needs cleanup, but it's far from a lost cause. This article has much higher quality than a great deal on wikipedia. So with regards to policy, it's a keeper. With regards to my own opinion on the matter,

1348:

from mainspace but move to the author's userspace rather than delete in order to give him a chance to use his work by adding to the existing articles or starting, finally, a proper article (proper both by name and by scope) on his pet project. This article, however, is as unencyclopedic as the

238:

Biophys just don't understand that WP:REDFLAG applies to all articles and not just biographies. Moreover, his conspiracy also violates WP:FRINGE. Here is relevant citation from Knowledge (XXG) policy Biophys violates: "Quotes that are controversial or potentially misleading need to be properly

1920:, but I should point out that similar teams can be found in Chinese (網特, which means government agent on network), and it should not be Russian-only issue. Once information is available, I hope this page can be generalized to contain both Russian and Chinese context, not just Russian context. 1635:

Do you, Biophys, want to say us, that people in FSB, instead of performing their direct duties, are having fun in internet blogs and forums?! It's disgraceful and very revolting! I think, we should write an open collective letter or something to the President and director of FSB. We are fair

1370:

I can't offer you a title until the article has a clear scope. Is is about the conspiracy theory? Is it about the Putin regime's underground effort to affect the world through an internet? Is it about the broader than Russia phenomenon? Current addition of China looks totally artificial and

1297:

per Haemo. The sources could be more diverse, but on the whole this is a decent enough start for an article on this supposed phenomenon. Articles relating to intel ops will often have to rely on sources that are of a somewhat speculative nature; maybe the text should make that clearer.

383:

Second, Biophys again publishes Sections "Behaviour" and "Tactics" - they haven't changed even and are ridiculously worded. According to them, every man in the internet who supports Putin - is a member of KGB "internet team". It is stupid... They abuse directly other users in Knowledge

2473:(see his arguments). There are no any reasons for this article even to be considered for AfD. It should be clear from this discussion for an outside viewer that some users here simply do not like each other. Whatever their problems are, they have nothing to do with this article. 604:

English translation of reference 2 (first publication on this subject) say: "web-brigades". "Internet brigades" is a better wording in my opinion. But this can be easily corrected and not a reason for deletion. Russian version also calls them "web-brigades" or "forum brigades".

1902:, but if it overlaps with any similar articles on Internet censorship merge it . Sources need to be improved. Even if such brigades are a conspiracy theory it is worth documenting the theory (and labelling it as such). Maybe it could be extended to a general examination of 1645:

Let's act immediately, friends! While the bastartds are relaxing at the working place, Homeland is defenseless! Vlad Fedorov! I have already composed the draft of the letter, I need your help to make it legally correct! Biophys! The land of your ancestors is defenseless!

1607:. Article is well sourced and relates to an interesting subject. From some reactions I can read on this page, I would rather think that this article is closer to the truth than some here claim. I am even considering to translate in into French within the next weeks. -- 1371:

WP:POINTy. Where is the current title from? Once this all becomes clear, I could offer you a title. I can see many possible scopes coming out of this topic and currently the article does not have any clarity on what its scope is. Therefore, I don't see it in mainspace. --

539:

And Biophys has written that he claimed "to protect authorities" which is both false translation and falsification!!!! Later he inserts english word "only" to right translation which changes things again to false translation - "not only to protect" as opposite to "not to

1841:

of the objections to the article have to do with the content and not bona fide research or POV concerns, and may be political in nature. As long as the article presents itself as documentation of a social phenomenon, I think we should err on the side of retaining it. --

2082:

But there is no information in your sources confirming the existence of Russian Internet brigades. So please don't post links leading readers to nowhere. It is not quite polite to force us to spend a lot of time searching through this rubbish in order to end up with

1244:

as recreation of deleted material and attack page. I have changed my vote: it seems that people cannot see the humor in this, and are taking this seriously. Seriously speaking, this is nothing but speculation and lies, not supported by the claimed sources. See here:

1389:. May I ask AfD nominator (Vlad Fedorov) do not edit this article during the deletion discussion?! Everyone else is welcome. Vlad transforms this article to a garbage in order to "prove" that article is bad and facilitate its deletion. This is not fair. 1486:. We have to believe to the representative of political party currently banned for inciting ethnic hatred, exploiting nazist methods in its work and wearing fascist symbolics. You also misstaributed allegations as facts. You presented interview with 567:

judge it honest reporting, appropriate for WP. I can understand the POV that would wish to pretend that the methods of the KGB have not continued to the present. The very attempt to suppress this article might perhaps be taken to indicated otherwise.

2445:. And this has nothing to do with mine nationality - or yours for that matter. I bet you wouldn't like to be judged by your nationality rather than by your words and beliefs. If so, please be so kind as to extend the same rule to others. 1786:

It had already come to wide-scale propagandist campaign against Russia. But you do not notice it, because you have no solid knowledge about Russia. If WP writes Russians are eating christian babies for breakfast you'll trust even that.

1009:. The article makes for a good read and provides a fair collection of references by usual Wiki standards. Even though the subject might be perceived as controversial by some, the article, as is stands now falls far beyond the scope of 2432:

Sorry, my bad. I knew I already voted on this article, but thought my previous vote was in the previous voting. BTW, in addition to AGF, you might want to read the notification on top of this very page. Particularly the remark that

2041:

and Schultz 'Dezinformatsia: The strategy of Soviet Disinformation'. The times have changed. The Internet is the new media and they have evolved with the technology. The Russians still have a considerable intelligence collection

729:

I'd support that if not for the fact that in addition to censorship this article also describes information manipulation (adding false info, etc.) - which goes outside the definition of censorship. Last time I suggested the name

293:

talk page "KGB trolls in Knowledge (XXG)?", it is clear that Biophys publicly slanders and defames me and Alex Bakharev. As you could see from my IP address (which is not proxy like in Biophys case), I can't be man working for

2544: 2528: 1948:

when it comes to contentious articles, the things that are contended should be removed, cleaned up, sourced, and attributed. The article on the whole discusses a matter which has definitely received major media attention and

1192: 450: 275:, which is based on single unreliable source - immigration advertisement newspaper with circulation less than 5 000. And on the talk page to this article Biophys has created section entitled "KGB trolls in Knowledge (XXG)?" 652:

Original Russian article is an immigrant advertising newpaper with low circulation. English translation is from blog and falsifies Russian text. Moreover, you, Biophys has added to the original research a lot of texts not

1434:

It is remarkable that author of this article Biophys - reverts corrections of his falsifications, misattributions, original research to push his article through AfD. We could add these methods to the methods of Internet

1311:

Hey man! What you speak about? The aim of those Troll Squads is intimidation and disinformation. How this relates to the intelligence? And why USA support of terrorism is constantly being censured in English Knowledge

2017:

source rather then established academic sources, making it as one author speculation. Quite many sources are used for secondary points only rather then main topic. Article name – another problem of this article, btw

2165:

brings me to the topic of you Vlad, I'm curious about you (and some of the others on here). I'm curious about your relentless pursuit and near obsession with this article. In finishing, what is your motivation here?

1821:

May I note respectfully that The Washington Post, The Guardian and Reuters sources are related to a tiny section on China? No such sources are about Russia. The world has nothing about internet brigades in Russia.

1766:

1965:

Agreed there. Not to mention I find it funny when a portion of the people suggesting deletion have been created in the last three months or less, with one created not very long at all before this AFD came about.

418:

so it may be just Polish KGB disinformation and an act of Poland aggresion against Russia. Moreover, the first voting at AfD was rigged by Biophys and his Polish friends canvassing outside the Knowledge (XXG).

1173:. Anything presented as a fact is speculation and original research. The belief in these brigades is a notable phenomenon. I see these brigades at work all over Knowledge (XXG). In fact I myself belong to the 2580:

Well, these very detailed answers and suggestions on such a long list of articles violations of Knowledge (XXG) policies is very ridiculous. It seems that people coming just to make the visibility of support.

2301:. This article does not criticize Russia at all! It describes a phenomenon that may be related to activities of secret services and PR department of the current Putin's administration. They are not Russia. 1713:

poorly sourced with unreliable sources, recreation of deleted material, POV fork of a twice deleted article, original research, neologism, conspiracy theory and about a million other reasons for deletion.

883:. The article still has bad title and requires massive cleanup: I have to agree that it dangerously close to original research by mixing/matching different phenomena into one text: Russia + China + 535:

Its real translation is: "It is important to find such a turn of topic, not to protect the authorities - this is understood, we need to attract youth who could work creatively in the internet".

2419:? Look, you seem to be quite well contented with the same use of boldface by Biophys. SHOUTING is quite something different. You are too imaginative. And by the way, I also advise you to visit 1115: 1058:) and article in Russian Knowledge (XXG). Of course, there is a question of best translation. I want to ask native speakers: is "Web-brigades" a better translation than "Internet brigades"? 943:, and the creating editor seems to have some kind of argument to be made using the pages. However, none of that really matters, since there's no coherent reason presented to remove it. -- 1087:

And please don't spam this page with repeated questions under each and every positive vote, because it won't make your voice sound louder and personally I don't particularly enjoy it. --

939:- once again, this article is still about as good as it was before. I'm still not convinced this is at all a notable phenomenon, since the key sources are very slim, and it smells like 1218:

Dear Petri Krohn, I respectfully disagree. First, only one source claims this to be a "conspiracy theory". So, this is small minority opinion. Second, there is no single mentioning of

1668: 1931:

Internet brigades in Russia. Other sources are extremely unreliable. The "meaty" parts of the article, that is, the Behavior and Tactics sections are so generic as to be useless. --

1107:

How many of these links are related to our subject and how many of them are not forums, blogs, wikis and other unreliable sources which use is prohibited by Knowledge (XXG) policies?

1041:

Could you cite where the term "internet brigades" is taken from? Please give me the reference. And additionaly could you cite me source on Russian where the loan word is used?

430:

Tenth, Biophys hides real sources of allegations. The source of the information about creation teams of Livejournal fighters is not The New Times newspaper, but allegations of

1071:

Web search is not as difficult as it sounds, Vlad fedorov. I suggest you do it yourself next time, but here are but a few search results for everybody else to take a note of:

671:. Well referenced, notable phenomena, former POV problems eliminated. For an article about what is in essence an ongoing intelligence operations by a major power, good job.-- 198: 1799:

for the reasons listed above, additionally the sources come from credible organizations including the Guardian. At the very least the popular media is reporting on it. --

1085: 1398:

The answer is no. Because you falsify information from the sources. You add a lot of original research. And by the way, it is not your userpage in your namespace. This

524:"It is important not only to protect authorities - that is needed for sure, but attract young people who can work creatively in the internet.<ref name="Surkov"/: --> 502:) Deletions of proper identification of the real sources of information for allegations by Tygodnik Powszechny -- anonymous "Polish specialists on Russian affairs". 734:(or similar) - this would probably be better than merge. But now that the article talks about Chine and other countries... I am not sure about the best new name.-- 853:

internet hooligans. Journalists — liberal democratic journalists — encountered them and wrote article about internet brigades. Fun? Not really. Fair? Not at all.

626:

Original Russian article is a reliable source. Providing English translation is not neccessary, although desiarable. So everything is consistent with WP policies.

2495:

And is this your reply for all the reasons for deletion put at the top of the page? This is ridiculous. You haven't responded for hell number of questions about

1412:

It is remarkable that AfD nominator can not wait until the end of the AfD discussion, but immediately edits the article to make it worse and prove his point.

2391:

This appears to be accidental. I've notified Halibutt and I'm sure he'll be here to remove his second vote shortly. In the meantime, I advise you to review

2004:

with preferably a rename. Well-sourced, the issue is too similar to already well-known techniques of astroturfing to be dismissed as a conspiracy theory.

1451:

was involved. The text about him was in the in the cited source: О работе в «Живом журнале»: «Я считаю, что это очень важный сектор работы», said Surkov.

1870:

This is a very well-sourced article. Even if the "internet brigades" do not exist, it has been referenced enough by outside media to warrant notation.

1636:

taxpayers, and we have the right to know, that FSB doesn't have fun at internet forums in the working time, but really works to safeguard the Homeland!

966: 851:

Not truth? Thank you. I do not have to reject nonsense. There are no names in sourced articles, no direct evidences. All is easy. Economic growth =: -->

775:

per CSD G4: Recreation of a deleted page. There is really nothing to discuss, this article is a blatant hoax and OR about a non-existing phenomenon. --

102: 635:

The problem is that the whole article doesn't correspond to the Russian text of the original russian article. You have done a lot of original research.

761:

implies that there is some truth to this. No proof has ever been presented; and even if the claims were true, they are unprovable and irrefutable. --

1883: 1622: 332:

CPTGbr given final warning for accusations against Alex Bakharev. Biophys given a warning about civility. Internet troll squads nominated at AFD.

298:

sources in the Knowledge (XXG), but this has nothing to do with personal attacks and with discussion of reliability of these anti-russian sources.

1246: 532:: "Важно найти такой поворот темы, не защищать власти — это само собой, надо привлекать ребят, которые умеют творчески работать в интернете". 1332:

just above me). The subject is real and deserves coverage in an encyclopedia, although it required rigourous cleanup and perhaps a merge with

1222:

in this article. This organization officially does not exist any more. But anyone is free to make any boxes and put them to his/her user page.

731: 171: 166: 254:

User Biophys already earlier made a personal attack against me (Vlad fedorov) due to his unstoppable edit warring see the whole matter here

694:

Czesc Piotrus. Could you cite where the term "internet brigades" is taken from? Please give me the reference. How your vote corresponds to

289:, that I and administrator Alex Bakharev are working for the Russian government. Considering that user Biophys entitled his section on the 175: 91:

to establish a consensus amongst Knowledge (XXG) editors on whether a page or group of pages is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have

427:

Ninth, Biophys had made an original research when he added that Internet brigades use "active measures" methods. No any links are given.

115: 2602: 2584: 2571: 2551: 2535: 2519: 2490: 2477: 2457: 2427: 2404: 2386: 2360: 2324: 2305: 2287: 2271: 2248: 2233: 2213: 2198: 2169: 2087: 2050: 2025: 2008: 1996: 1980: 1970: 1958: 1939: 1893: 1874: 1862: 1845: 1826: 1803: 1791: 1771: 1750: 1734: 1697: 1683: 1671:. In short, NKVD, KGB and FSB never worked to "safeguard the Homeland", but to control the entire Russian population, and importantly 1654: 1640: 1625: 1611: 1593: 1581: 1553: 1534: 1514: 1492: 1455: 1440: 1418: 1406: 1375: 1365: 1353: 1340: 1316: 1302: 1285: 1261: 1226: 1201: 1181: 1151: 1131: 1100: 1062: 1045: 1032: 997: 982: 947: 925: 916: 903: 891: 875: 857: 846: 824: 808: 787: 765: 748: 724: 702: 685: 657: 639: 630: 619: 609: 599: 586: 573: 558: 545: 512: 475: 456: 439: 422: 372: 366:

Not only these accusations are false, but they have nothing to do with this article. Let's discuss content of this article, not people

352: 327: 302: 233: 158: 59: 1010: 17: 2395:. By the way, your liberal use of boldface (on this page and elsewhere) makes it look like you're always yelling, so go easy on it. 1127:. I think you have a lot of work to do here in Knowledge (XXG). Perhaps you could "google" your opponents. I wish you good luck. 396:"blogs" or "political bloggers" - I have already pointed many times that nowhere in Russian sources you could find a word "Blog". 1109:

Perhaps instead of making personal attacks on me and voicing your personal dislikeness of me, you should read these sources and

2316:

because author of the blog added to the translations his comments. Biophys also publishes materials from blog La Russophobe to

2244:

The author of this article - Biophys - refuses to name it conspiracy theory. Please see his definition of "internet brigades".

978: 887:. Nevertheless the organized intereference into internet opinion flow is an observable and non-surprizing fact or opinion. `' 217:, Misattribution, False translation, Undue weight and Weasel words, POV fork from previously deleted article, attack page 2034: 1402:

by you of the text from the source you cite demonstrates your Anti-Russian bias and falsification of sources. Good luck.

1166: 2617: 96: 36: 1526:. And, yes, some of the reactions on this page remind me of the line "The lady doth protest too much, methinks" from 1561:: That is not a valid reason for deletion. Knowledge (XXG) is not a political tool, nor is it a soapbox. See WP:NOT 469:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Internet_brigades#Biophys_keeps_his_falsifications_and_original_research_in_the_article

403: 2279:

this feaces and the like that Biophys wrote for his propaganda crusade. Using wikipedia as a political platform to

1162: 1147:. The entire concept is original research. The attempts to remove the POV have made it even worse than before. --- 499:) Falsification of "group of investigative journalists" which are journalist, historian and programmer in reality. 1689:

the parabellum backwards. Damnit! I'll find somebody who will substitute you. Guys! who want to patrol area from

2616:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a

2112:"Moreover you just jam two different things "intelligence collection" and "disinformation through the internet" 1936: 431: 255: 35:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a

2508: 2226: 1120: 2435:

this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Knowledge (XXG) editors

1746:

The Washington Post, The Guardian and Reuters are unreliable sources, my my, what is this world coming to? --

2063: 529: 1247:

Talk:Persecution of political bloggers#English translation of Russian article about "Internet troll squads"

290: 272: 1675:(!) (two $ billions were spent only for funding foreign anti-war movements). They work and always worked 402:

Seventh, this article is a POV fork of the deleted article Internet Troll Squads which was twice deleted:

162: 1977: 1932: 1328:, because I am getting the impression this is more a content dispute than anything else (e.g. the remark 2545:

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Internet_brigades_(2nd_nomination)#Reply_to_AfD_nominator_arguments

2529:

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Internet_brigades_(2nd_nomination)#Reply_to_AfD_nominator_arguments

1903: 451:

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Internet_brigades_(2nd_nomination)#Reply_to_AfD_nominator_arguments

2483: 2470: 2230: 1730: 1577: 407: 348: 323: 282: 2046:

and it is quite reasonable that they have a propaganda and disinformation framework in action as well.

1250: 2210: 1890: 1858:

localized phenomena - it's happening in many places. Besides -- I'm always up for a good conspiracy.

1720: 1567: 1091: 1023: 783: 399:

Sixth, false translation and original research in that "internet brigades" are working against blogs.

338: 313: 54: 2496: 1124: 206: 2400: 2381:

repeatedly inserts here his votes, supposedly to advance his POV. I think this should be addressed.

2267: 2222: 2123:"it is quite reasonable that they have a propaganda and disinformation framework in action as well" 1337: 1333: 1198: 974: 758: 715: 256:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive78#If_this_a_personal_attack

83:

If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that

2532: 2500: 2474: 2337: 2302: 2043: 1680: 1452: 1415: 1390: 1362: 1282: 1278: 1223: 1059: 872: 843: 805: 627: 606: 453: 411: 369: 218: 214: 210: 92: 2454: 2378: 2357: 2195: 2144:"I have looked into your sources and found nothing in support of existence of Internet brigades." 1788: 1694: 1651: 1637: 921:

Should be renamed. Bad title as I already mentioned above. Any suggestions for a better one ? --

854: 821: 820:. It's pure conspiracy theory, and the article treats it as reality. {removed my prev. comment} 884: 467:

You actually haven't replied to anything posted here. I just added more questions for you here

2581: 2548: 2516: 2487: 2424: 2383: 2321: 2245: 2084: 1823: 1768: 1489: 1437: 1403: 1313: 1254: 1128: 1042: 994: 993:

Could you cite where the term "internet brigades" is taken from? Please give me the reference.

913: 912:

Could you cite where the term "internet brigades" is taken from? Please give me the reference.

741: 699: 678: 654: 636: 616: 596: 583: 582:

Could you cite where the term "internet brigades" is taken from? Please give me the reference.

555: 542: 509: 472: 436: 419: 299: 230: 154: 146: 29:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

471:. I have added more falsifications and original research cases for which you are in response. 2284: 1993: 1747: 1483: 1477: 1448: 1258: 1178: 762: 2420: 2416: 2392: 2345: 1650:, and you'll protect its borders! Hurry! Every minute may become the last for the country! 226: 222: 2568: 2512: 2317: 1800: 1715: 1590: 1562: 1550: 1488:] Roman Sadykhov as facts. No one has ever established the existence of internet brigades. 1088: 1020: 776: 508:) Original research on "active measures" - not sourced to any source despite my requests. 333: 308: 49: 2504: 2341: 2033:

There is a vast amount of scholarly literature on Russian propaganda and disinformation (

1330:

And why USA support of terrorism is constantly being censured in English Knowledge (XXG)?

1013:

injunction. It is equally important in my view to keep the title as it is because it’s a

940: 871:(I am creator of this article). I will answer to AfD nominator's claims at the talk page. 2597: 2396: 2263: 1842: 1531: 1511: 1299: 970: 719: 1119:

personalnie uwielbiam czytac Wyborcza! Search for "USA a land of idiots" - 1,110,000

69: 2451: 2375: 2354: 2192: 2005: 1955: 1669:

Talk:Federal_Security_Service_of_the_Russian_Federation#What_is_the_purpose_of_FSB.3F

1608: 888: 2018: 1510:. Interesting subject, referenced. Some cleanup needed, but that's no big deal. -- 1111:

present us reliable link which names these legendary KGB fellas "internet brigades"?

1907: 1871: 1647: 1148: 737: 674: 2221:, although I think it should be renamed and perhaps have parts of it discussed in 2037:) that shows the Russians have an infrastructure for setting up such attacks (see 192: 2482:

So you Biophys agree to mark this article as conspiracy theory if you agree with

1954:

there's something ammusing about deleting an article about internet censorship.

2038: 1967: 1859: 1690: 286: 695: 592: 522:

Biophys has also falsified the following translation, he wrote in the article:

2262:, the article is interesting and provides many sources, more than most pages. 1921: 1911: 1372: 1350: 1170: 944: 754: 2166: 2047: 1015: 922: 900: 800:(Usupovsky) that claims this to be a "conspiracy theory" (not a hoax). So, 468: 2469:. As a creator of this article, I must partially agree with arguments of 2442: 2283:

Russia via conspiracy theories published by russophobes is deplorable. --

2114:. No I didn't jam them together. I guess you missed the part where I put 2022: 1886: 569: 530:

http://www.newtimes.ru/index.php?page=journal&issue=6&article=231

414:

you could find the original version of the article Internet troll squads.

796:

You are telling this is a hoax. Among all cited sources, there is only

2567:

Cleanup for reliable sources and verifiable text. Find a better term.

1677:

against civilian populations of their own country and other countries

1527: 505:) Falsifications of Usupov citation - intentioanly false translation. 388:

on this article the information about conspiracy theory is indicated.

2511:

and consider this ok? Please, give us sources for your insertion of

2121:(written in capital letters for your reading comprehension skills) 1679:. Hence, the disinformation and propaganda is their primary goal. 1482:] Roman Sadykhov, who claimed that he heard a "secret speech" of 1195:), as it was not dealing with the article, but with user conduct. 963:. Good article, nicely sourced, but potentially flamebait title. 2610:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

99:

are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

1019:

from an already established term coined in another language. --

281:, where he invites everyone to his talk page entitled "Vlad" - 2596:- The article is well referenced, but should be cleaned up. -- 1219: 488:

I would like to note that Biophys failed to give his sources:

1253:

is describing is nothing more than a Russian version of the

1277:

claim in this article is supported by sources that satisfy

2116:"still have a considerable intelligence collection effort" 1889:

at about this time. Expect many more votes as a result.

1667:

Since your question is about FSB, let's discuss it here:

392:

sources about the subject of the article - internet teams.

241:

http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:FRINGE#Sourcing_and_attribution

240: 2186:, possibly rename and keep up the good job sourcing it. 271:

However, Biophys has created an article which he titled

1548:

Let's help expose Putin's thuggery every chance we get.

1399: 1191:

I moved the discussion that was here to the talk page (

1174: 732:

Online information manipulation by Russian intelligence

278: 259: 188: 184: 180: 1914:, removing the emphasis on only one or two countries? 1546:. Nicely sourced; imperfect but able to be improved. 2415:

Another Pole covering other Pole by coming short of

2062:

Knowledge (XXG) itself is used as Intelligence Tool

101:You can participate and give your opinion. Please 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 2423:, especially when something "look like" for you. 1123:. Search for "russia a land of idiots" is 936,000 205:Recreation of deleted article, Original research, 2620:). No further edits should be made to this page. 2019:probably his is the main base of these brigades 258:. He was warned by administrator Alex Bakharev 247:Preceding events to the creation of the article 1693:to the Ural mountains for tonight? Sign here! 595:guideline of Knowledge (XXG)? Please explain. 219:Original version of previously deleted article 1169:. The existence of these claimed brigades is 8: 2515:term in the defenition of Internet brigades? 1349:deleted one and is even very close to it. -- 243:Vlad fedorov 16:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 105:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. 2543:. I doubt that you have details indeed. 1480:is involved according to allegations of 899:. Referenced. But possibly bad title. -- 528:Please see the original of Russian text 738:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 675:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2340:(as used in one of the sources). But 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 1623:Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 1476:I do not accuse, just state facts. 24: 2525:See my answer in all detail here 1273:. What claim was not supported? 262:and personal attack was removed. 68: 1882:--This page was linked to from 753:I would rather merge this with 698:guideline of Knowledge (XXG)? 1: 1163:Web brigade conspiracy theory 591:How your vote corresponds to 1167:category:conspiracy theories 802:this is small minority opion 95:to help us decide this, and 2541:See my objections there too 1446:Your accusations are false. 114:Comments made by suspected 85:this is not a majority vote 2637: 2603:22:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2585:17:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2572:17:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2552:16:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2536:15:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2520:15:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2491:16:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2478:15:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2458:14:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2428:13:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2405:12:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2387:10:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2361:09:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2325:07:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2306:15:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2288:10:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 2272:19:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2249:19:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2234:19:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2214:16:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2199:15:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2170:02:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2088:07:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2051:12:08, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2026:11:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2009:10:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1997:08:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1981:07:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1971:08:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1959:07:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1940:06:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1894:16:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1875:05:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1863:02:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1846:02:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1827:06:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1804:02:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1792:05:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1772:06:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1751:01:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1735:21:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1698:21:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1684:20:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1655:19:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1641:19:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1626:17:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1612:07:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1594:15:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1582:22:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1554:05:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1535:14:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1515:04:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1493:06:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1456:16:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1441:16:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1419:16:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1407:04:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1376:17:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1366:02:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1354:01:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1286:02:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 926:08:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 766:03:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 546:18:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 513:17:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 476:18:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 457:18:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 440:03:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 373:15:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 353:05:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 328:04:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 303:04:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 60:19:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2437:. I did not come here to 1924:13:50 11 April 2007 (HKT) 1673:the public opinion abroad 1648:We'll give you parabellum 1341:13:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1317:12:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1303:12:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1262:23:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1227:15:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1202:18:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1182:08:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1152:03:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1132:08:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1101:06:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1081: 1063:14:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1046:03:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1033:00:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 998:03:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 983:21:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 948:20:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 917:03:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 904:18:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 892:18:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 876:14:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 858:20:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 852:spread of internet =: --> 847:14:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 825:20:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 809:14:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 788:12:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 749:06:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 725:05:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 703:06:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 686:05:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 658:15:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 640:14:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 631:14:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 620:08:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 610:07:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 600:09:38, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 587:06:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 574:05:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 559:05:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 423:04:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 234:05:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 2613:Please do not modify it. 1336:should be considered. -- 1175:KGB Internet troll squad 835:verifiability, not truth 32:Please do not modify it. 2202:(see my comment below) 961:Internet disinformation 116:single purpose accounts 93:policies and guidelines 2344:is the way to go, not 2336:and perhaps rename to 1338:Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 1199:Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 283:User_talk:Biophys#Vlad 221:. Essentially SoapBox 2227:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1054:See my answer above ( 969:comment was added by 291:Internet troll squads 285:. At this page user 273:Internet troll squads 118:can be tagged using 2374:I noticed that user 1530:(III, ii, 239). — 615:to use blog entries. 554:per abovementioned. 2441:, but to propose a 2223:Internet Censorship 1910:for the purpose of 1334:Information warfare 759:Internet censorship 716:Internet censorship 307:Looking into this. 2201: 1074:Google Results: 59 1056:references 2 and 3 432:national-bolshevik 97:deletion decisions 2484:User:Codingmonkey 2471:User:Codingmonkey 2181: 1732: 1633:Abstract thought. 1579: 1255:eternal September 1098: 1082:Internet brigades 1030: 986: 723: 447:See my reply here 435:looking at links. 350: 325: 155:Internet brigades 147:Internet brigades 142: 141: 2628: 2615: 2600: 2449: 2352: 2190: 1731: 1728: 1727: 1724: 1718: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1571: 1565: 1484:Vladislav Surkov 1478:Vladislav Surkov 1449:Vladislav Surkov 1414:This is uncivil. 1251:Anna Polyanskaya 1097: 1096: 1092: 1083: 1029: 1028: 1024: 964: 781: 746: 744: 722: 683: 681: 349: 346: 345: 342: 336: 324: 321: 320: 317: 311: 196: 178: 72: 65: 64: 34: 2636: 2635: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2618:deletion review 2611: 2598: 2513:active measures 2447: 2350: 2318:Boris Stomakhin 2211:Paladinwannabe2 2188: 2142:You then state 1891:Paladinwannabe2 1725: 1722: 1721: 1716: 1572: 1569: 1568: 1563: 1165:and include in 1094: 1093: 1026: 1025: 965:—The preceding 777: 757:. Merging with 747: 742: 736: 696:Fringe Theories 684: 679: 673: 593:Fringe Theories 408:deletion review 343: 340: 339: 334: 318: 315: 314: 309: 169: 153: 150: 143: 103:sign your posts 87:, but rather a 81: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2634: 2632: 2623: 2622: 2606: 2605: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2575: 2574: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2509:WP:ATTRIBUTION 2493: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2439:advance my POV 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2364: 2363: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2291: 2290: 2274: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2237: 2236: 2216: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2054: 2053: 2028: 2011: 1999: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1978:Peter malenkov 1962: 1961: 1943: 1933:Peter malenkov 1925: 1915: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1865: 1849: 1848: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1794: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1738: 1737: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1629: 1628: 1615: 1614: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1518: 1517: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1385: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1343: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1306: 1305: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1281:in my opinion. 1265: 1264: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1185: 1184: 1154: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1072: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1036: 1035: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 988: 987: 950: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 907: 906: 894: 878: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 828: 827: 814: 813: 812: 811: 791: 790: 770: 769: 768: 751: 735: 720:User:Zscout370 708: 707: 706: 705: 689: 688: 672: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 602: 577: 576: 561: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 506: 503: 500: 492: 491: 490: 489: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 460: 459: 443: 442: 428: 425: 415: 400: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 376: 375: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 295: 276: 266: 265: 264: 263: 227:WP:NOT#SOAPBOX 203: 202: 149: 144: 140: 139: 138: 137: 136: 109: 107:Happy editing! 77: 75: 73: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2633: 2621: 2619: 2614: 2608: 2607: 2604: 2601: 2595: 2592: 2591: 2586: 2583: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2573: 2570: 2566: 2563: 2562: 2553: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2492: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2467:Final comment 2465: 2459: 2456: 2453: 2450: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2385: 2382: 2380: 2377: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2353: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2332: 2331: 2326: 2323: 2319: 2314: 2311: 2307: 2304: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2289: 2286: 2285:Kuban Cossack 2282: 2278: 2275: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2258: 2257: 2250: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2235: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2217: 2215: 2212: 2208: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2200: 2197: 2194: 2191: 2185: 2171: 2168: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2145: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2124: 2120: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2086: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2065: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2052: 2049: 2045: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2029: 2027: 2024: 2020: 2015: 2012: 2010: 2007: 2003: 2000: 1998: 1995: 1991: 1988: 1987: 1982: 1979: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1969: 1964: 1963: 1960: 1957: 1952: 1947: 1944: 1941: 1938: 1934: 1929: 1926: 1923: 1919: 1916: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1892: 1888: 1885: 1876: 1873: 1869: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1856: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1847: 1844: 1839: 1836: 1835: 1828: 1825: 1820: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1805: 1802: 1798: 1795: 1793: 1790: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1773: 1770: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1752: 1749: 1745: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1736: 1733: 1729: 1719: 1712: 1711:Strong delete 1709: 1708: 1699: 1696: 1692: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1639: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1627: 1624: 1620: 1617: 1616: 1613: 1610: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1595: 1592: 1589:: Happy now? 1588: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1580: 1576: 1566: 1560: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1545: 1544:Vehement keep 1542: 1541: 1536: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1516: 1513: 1509: 1506: 1505: 1494: 1491: 1487: 1485: 1481: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1457: 1454: 1450: 1447: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1420: 1417: 1413: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1377: 1374: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1352: 1347: 1344: 1342: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1324: 1323: 1318: 1315: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1296: 1293: 1292: 1287: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1263: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1243: 1242:Speedy delete 1240: 1239: 1228: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1194: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1183: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1159: 1155: 1153: 1150: 1146: 1143: 1142: 1133: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1117: 1116:Google search 1112: 1108: 1105:Yes, indeed. 1104: 1103: 1102: 1099: 1090: 1086: 1079: 1075: 1070: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1034: 1031: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1012: 1008: 1005: 1004: 999: 996: 992: 991: 990: 989: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 962: 958: 954: 951: 949: 946: 942: 938: 935: 934: 927: 924: 920: 919: 918: 915: 911: 910: 909: 908: 905: 902: 898: 895: 893: 890: 886: 882: 879: 877: 874: 870: 867: 866: 859: 856: 850: 849: 848: 845: 840: 836: 832: 831: 830: 829: 826: 823: 819: 816: 815: 810: 807: 803: 799: 795: 794: 793: 792: 789: 786: 785: 782: 780: 774: 773:Speedy delete 771: 767: 764: 760: 756: 752: 750: 745: 739: 733: 728: 727: 726: 721: 717: 713: 710: 709: 704: 701: 697: 693: 692: 691: 690: 687: 682: 676: 670: 667: 666: 659: 656: 651: 641: 638: 634: 633: 632: 629: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 618: 613: 612: 611: 608: 603: 601: 598: 594: 590: 589: 588: 585: 581: 580: 579: 578: 575: 572: 571: 565: 562: 560: 557: 553: 550: 549: 548: 547: 544: 541: 536: 533: 531: 526: 525: 514: 511: 507: 504: 501: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 487: 486: 485: 484: 477: 474: 470: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 458: 455: 452: 448: 445: 444: 441: 438: 433: 429: 426: 424: 421: 416: 413: 409: 405: 401: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 377: 374: 371: 367: 364: 363: 354: 351: 347: 337: 331: 330: 329: 326: 322: 312: 306: 305: 304: 301: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 277: 274: 270: 269: 268: 267: 261: 257: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 244: 242: 236: 235: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 200: 194: 190: 186: 182: 177: 173: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 151: 148: 145: 134: 133:UTC timestamp 130: 126: 122: 121: 120: 119: 117: 113: 108: 104: 100: 98: 94: 90: 86: 80: 76: 74: 71: 67: 66: 62: 61: 58: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 2612: 2609: 2593: 2582:Vlad fedorov 2564: 2549:Vlad fedorov 2540: 2524: 2517:Vlad fedorov 2488:Vlad fedorov 2466: 2446: 2438: 2434: 2425:Vlad fedorov 2384:Vlad fedorov 2373: 2349: 2338:web-brigades 2333: 2322:Vlad fedorov 2312: 2298: 2280: 2276: 2259: 2246:Vlad fedorov 2231:Codingmonkey 2218: 2206: 2187: 2183: 2180: 2143: 2122: 2118: 2115: 2111: 2085:Vlad fedorov 2073: 2030: 2013: 2001: 1989: 1950: 1945: 1927: 1917: 1908:astroturfing 1899: 1881: 1867: 1855:Strong Keep. 1854: 1837: 1824:Vlad fedorov 1818: 1796: 1769:Vlad fedorov 1763: 1743: 1710: 1676: 1672: 1632: 1618: 1604: 1586: 1558: 1547: 1543: 1523: 1507: 1490:Vlad fedorov 1445: 1438:Vlad fedorov 1433: 1411: 1404:Vlad fedorov 1386: 1384: 1358: 1345: 1329: 1325: 1314:Vlad fedorov 1294: 1274: 1270: 1241: 1197:Regards, --- 1190: 1157: 1156: 1144: 1129:Vlad fedorov 1110: 1106: 1077: 1073: 1055: 1043:Vlad fedorov 1014: 1006: 995:Vlad fedorov 960: 956: 952: 936: 914:Vlad fedorov 896: 880: 868: 838: 837:. No one is 834: 817: 801: 797: 784: 778: 772: 711: 700:Vlad fedorov 668: 655:Vlad fedorov 637:Vlad fedorov 617:Vlad fedorov 597:Vlad fedorov 584:Vlad fedorov 568: 563: 556:Vlad fedorov 551: 543:Vlad fedorov 538: 537: 534: 527: 523: 521: 510:Vlad fedorov 473:Vlad fedorov 446: 437:Vlad fedorov 420:Vlad fedorov 365: 300:Vlad fedorov 246: 245: 237: 231:Vlad fedorov 204: 132: 128: 124: 111: 110: 106: 88: 84: 82: 78: 55: 50: 45: 43: 31: 28: 2066:. Citation: 2002:Strong keep 1994:Schneelocke 1946:Strong keep 1904:sockpuppets 1797:Strong keep 1748:Saint-Paddy 1744:Strong keep 1691:Kaliningrad 1605:Strong Keep 1435:brigades!!! 1259:Petri Krohn 1179:Petri Krohn 1078:Веб-бригады 1007:Strong Keep 897:Strong Keep 833:Rules say: 763:Petri Krohn 223:WP:NOT#SOAP 2569:Mukadderat 2497:WP:REDFLAG 2110:You said: 1956:i kan reed 1922:User:csmth 1912:censorship 1801:BuddyJesus 1591:Biruitorul 1551:Biruitorul 1171:unprovable 1089:Poeticbent 1080:(English: 1021:Poeticbent 755:Leprechaun 207:WP:REDFLAG 89:discussion 79:ATTENTION! 51:Cbrown1023 2501:WP:FRINGE 2397:Appleseed 2264:Appleseed 2207:Weak Keep 1843:Kadin2048 1532:Turgidson 1512:Turgidson 1387:A request 1300:Sandstein 1295:Weak keep 1279:WP:SOURCE 1016:loan-word 971:Blast san 937:Weak Keep 885:CyberArmy 881:Weak keep 653:relevant. 215:WP:SOURCE 211:WP:FRINGE 2443:solution 2320:article. 2083:nothing. 2035:see here 2006:KiloByte 1887:slashdot 1609:Lebob-BE 1400:deletion 979:contribs 967:unsigned 540:protect" 199:View log 129:username 123:{{subst: 2533:Biophys 2475:Biophys 2313:Comment 2303:Biophys 2064:article 1928:Delete. 1872:ASBands 1681:Biophys 1587:Comment 1559:Comment 1524:Comment 1453:Biophys 1416:Biophys 1391:Biophys 1363:Biophys 1283:Biophys 1249:. What 1224:Biophys 1149:RockMFR 1125:results 1121:results 1060:Biophys 873:Biophys 844:Biophys 839:proving 806:Biophys 779:Grafikm 628:Biophys 607:Biophys 454:Biophys 370:Biophys 172:protect 167:history 2599:Bryson 2452:Halibu 2421:WP:AGF 2417:WP:NPA 2393:WP:AGF 2376:Halibu 2355:Halibu 2346:WP:AfD 2277:Delete 2193:Halibu 2044:effort 2039:Godson 2014:Delete 1968:Kuroji 1860:Kuroji 1726:Jester 1573:Jester 1528:Hamlet 1346:Remove 1312:(XXG)? 1145:Delete 957:rename 818:delete 552:Delete 384:(XXG). 344:Jester 319:Jester 287:CPTGbr 176:delete 2505:WP:OR 2342:WP:RM 2299:Reply 2281:smear 2119:"AND" 1918:Keep. 1868:Keep. 1789:ellol 1695:ellol 1652:ellol 1638:ellol 1373:Irpen 1359:Reply 1351:Irpen 1275:Every 1271:Reply 1257:. -- 1177:. -- 1095:talk 1027:talk 945:Haemo 941:WP:OR 889:mikka 855:ellol 822:ellol 743:talk 714:with 712:Merge 680:talk 193:views 185:watch 181:links 112:Note: 16:< 2594:Keep 2565:keep 2401:Talk 2334:Keep 2268:Talk 2260:Keep 2219:Keep 2184:Keep 2167:Evud 2048:Evud 2031:Keep 2023:M.K. 1990:Keep 1951:does 1937:talk 1906:and 1900:Keep 1838:Keep 1819:Note 1764:Note 1723:SWAT 1619:Keep 1570:SWAT 1508:Keep 1326:Keep 1193:here 1158:Move 1076:for 975:talk 955:and 953:Keep 923:Lysy 901:Lysy 869:Keep 669:Keep 564:Keep 412:Here 406:and 341:SWAT 316:SWAT 294:KGB. 279:diff 260:here 189:logs 163:talk 159:edit 56:talk 46:Keep 1220:KGB 1161:to 1011:AfD 959:to 798:one 570:DGG 404:AfD 197:– ( 125:spa 2547:. 2527:: 2507:, 2503:, 2499:, 2486:? 2455:tt 2448:// 2403:) 2379:tt 2358:tt 2351:// 2348:. 2270:) 2196:tt 2189:// 1884:/. 1084:) 981:) 977:• 449:: 410:. 229:. 225:, 213:, 209:, 191:| 187:| 183:| 179:| 174:| 170:| 165:| 161:| 135:}} 48:. 2531:. 2399:( 2266:( 2182:* 2021:. 1942:. 1935:( 1717:⇒ 1564:⇒ 985:. 973:( 740:| 677:| 368:. 335:⇒ 310:⇒ 201:) 195:) 157:( 131:| 127:|

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Internet brigades (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Index