378:, "the deletion processes are not a forum for revoking policy"). If the argument is that specific articles on the list need to be deleted or merged, then the right approach is to consider those articles and not the index. And even if we assumed that the currently in-vogue cull of fiction-related topics pares the list down somewhat, there's no realistic claim that this isn't a valid index.
440:
I still tend to feel that's a policy revision that would preferably need an RFC first. Don't get me wrong, I'm inclined to argue that we deprecate indexes and outlines in their entirety. But that's not up to me (and isn't in order at AFD). Right now, indexes are a permitted navigation structure, and
306:
which explains that we have a variety of ways of helping readers navigate our voluminous content and these are complementary rather than exclusive. Categories are quite inadequate, because they do not support citations and their tree structure does not work well with multiple independent keywords.
611:
as it stands, i don't recommend deleting it yet. It's just a navigational list. Some of the articles may not all be notable or are redirects. I recommend reviewing all the articles in the index before trying to delete the index itself. I'm in the firm belief that if the articles are well maintained
467:
I'd say it's less a denial of policy and more simply an editorial decision to retire functionally useless and hard to maintain pages. Categories are so much more useful in not requiring manual updates that I don't see much valid reason to keep them unless they are religiously maintained and have a
366:, potentially speedily so. I've never been a big fan of index articles; the project supports them as a sort of analog to the traditional table of contents. Personally, I think they tend to be incomplete, often poorly maintained, and rarely accessible to readers. But my opinion on them
421:
both - Seems like a pointless relic of the past. That a set of articles is allowed does not mean it actually needs to be utilized. There are only two fiction-related ones in the category, so it's not like this is a major trend.
203:
256:
251:
260:
243:
547:
But cull and then perhaps redirect. The vast majority of these entries appear to be articles on episodes, and those that are not are not actually "articles" but redirects to sections of other articles like
247:
441:
there's nothing prohibiting their use in fiction or fiction-related topics; if anything, that just means that index-space is not done (and I'd oppose a fiction restriction; things like
197:
633:
are kinda dumb, but policy says they're allowed. No good rationale has been given for why these specific nom'd index articles are less worthy of existence than any of the others at
344:
239:
156:
568:
be actual articles from what I can see). It's entirely possible that once all entries that are not actual articles are removed, the index will be completely redundant with
491:
How many of those links are just redirects? Anyone got a bot to show that? As long as enough of them are links to valid articles, this list/index article should remain.
129:
124:
133:
325:
116:
103:
163:
88:
289:, but I haven't seen such pages for TV shows in ages, and I believe them to be unnecessary because categories will do the job just fine. –
218:
185:
400:
120:
396:
83:
76:
17:
581:
179:
646:
621:
612:
and check notability, then indexes aren't normally needed for franchises like
Babylon 5. But that's just a personal opinion.
603:
586:
539:
514:
477:
458:
431:
411:
387:
355:
336:
316:
293:
58:
454:
383:
527:
175:
307:
Indexes are a traditional way of navigating reference works and so it is quite reasonable that we should support them.
112:
97:
93:
64:
634:
617:
569:
549:
523:
286:
225:
663:
312:
40:
450:
379:
535:
191:
659:
613:
522:
until such time as index-related policy changes, but with major trimming to avoid overlapping. Links to
36:
599:
557:
308:
374:
as part of our system of navigation tools. If you desire to change this, AFD isn't the right venue (
211:
578:
642:
630:
553:
531:
371:
348:
329:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
658:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
492:
595:
561:
407:
used as navigation tools anymore, so they have lost their right of existence (IMO). –
573:
473:
427:
408:
303:
290:
403:
seems to have been dead for at least the past 5 years, so these index pages clearly
638:
375:
277:
150:
564:
were the first two I clicked on that were actual articles, but neither of them
370:
as an issue of policy; index articles (and the similar outline articles) are
54:
469:
423:
552:. Several of the others that are articles should probably be merged per
654:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
468:
large enough page view count to substantiate their usefulness.
530:
are sufficient, not ones to every damn (fragging?) one.
273:
269:
265:
146:
142:
138:
210:
240:
Index of articles related to Buffy the
Vampire Slayer
345:
list of
Science fiction-related deletion discussions
234:I am also nominating the following related pages:
285:I guess index pages are allowed on WP because of
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
666:). No further edits should be made to this page.
343:Note: This discussion has been included in the
324:Note: This discussion has been included in the
224:
8:
104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
342:
326:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
323:
594:This list/index article should remain.
629:per Squeamish Ossifrage. I too think
7:
24:
89:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
647:01:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
59:16:04, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
622:22:27, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
604:03:08, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
587:02:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
540:20:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
528:List of Babylon 5 characters
515:18:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
478:18:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
459:18:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
432:17:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
412:18:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
388:17:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
356:16:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
337:16:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
317:15:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
294:14:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
113:Index of Babylon 5 articles
79:(AfD)? Read these primers!
65:Index of Babylon 5 articles
683:
635:Category:Knowledge indexes
570:List of Babylon 5 episodes
550:Civilizations in Babylon 5
524:List of Babylon 5 episodes
287:Category:Knowledge indexes
401:WP:WikiProject Buffyverse
656:Please do not modify it.
399:is marked inactive, and
397:WP:WikiProject Babylon 5
32:Please do not modify it.
77:Articles for deletion
558:Centauri (Babylon 5)
372:explicitly permitted
451:Squeamish Ossifrage
449:support an index).
380:Squeamish Ossifrage
584:
358:
339:
94:Guide to deletion
84:How to contribute
674:
614:Blue Pumpkin Pie
577:
511:
508:
505:
502:
499:
496:
393:Counter-argument
353:
334:
281:
263:
229:
228:
214:
166:
154:
136:
74:
34:
682:
681:
677:
676:
675:
673:
672:
671:
670:
664:deletion review
509:
506:
503:
500:
497:
494:
349:
330:
254:
238:
171:
162:
127:
111:
108:
71:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
680:
678:
669:
668:
650:
649:
624:
606:
589:
562:Lyta Alexander
542:
517:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
462:
461:
435:
434:
416:
415:
414:
368:doesn't matter
360:
359:
340:
320:
319:
283:
282:
232:
231:
168:
107:
106:
101:
91:
86:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
679:
667:
665:
661:
657:
652:
651:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
625:
623:
619:
615:
610:
607:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:
588:
583:
580:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
546:
543:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
518:
516:
513:
512:
490:
487:
486:
479:
475:
471:
466:
465:
464:
463:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
439:
438:
437:
436:
433:
429:
425:
420:
417:
413:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
390:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
361:
357:
354:
352:
346:
341:
338:
335:
333:
327:
322:
321:
318:
314:
310:
305:
301:
298:
297:
296:
295:
292:
288:
279:
275:
271:
267:
262:
258:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
165:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
78:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
655:
653:
626:
608:
592:Keep for now
591:
565:
544:
532:Clarityfiend
519:
493:
488:
446:
443:The Simpsons
442:
418:
404:
392:
367:
363:
351:CAPTAIN RAJU
350:
332:CAPTAIN RAJU
331:
299:
284:
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
159:
70:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
198:free images
631:WP:Indexes
596:Lightburst
554:WP:ALLPLOT
445:certainly
660:talk page
609:Weak keep
574:Hijiri 88
545:Weak keep
309:Andrew D.
37:talk page
662:or in a
409:sgeureka
291:sgeureka
157:View log
98:glossary
39:or in a
639:Colin M
257:protect
252:history
204:WP refs
192:scholar
130:protect
125:history
75:New to
566:should
419:Delete
405:aren't
376:indeed
304:WP:CLN
261:delete
176:Google
134:delete
510:Focus
447:could
278:views
270:watch
266:links
219:JSTOR
180:books
164:Stats
151:views
143:watch
139:links
16:<
643:talk
627:Keep
618:talk
600:talk
560:and
536:talk
526:and
520:Keep
489:Keep
474:talk
455:talk
428:talk
384:talk
364:Keep
313:talk
302:per
300:Keep
274:logs
248:talk
244:edit
212:FENS
186:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
55:Tone
50:keep
470:TTN
424:TTN
226:TWL
155:– (
645:)
637:.
620:)
602:)
585:)
582:やや
572:.
538:)
476:)
457:)
430:)
395::
386:)
347:.
328:.
315:)
276:|
272:|
268:|
264:|
259:|
255:|
250:|
246:|
206:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
52:.
641:(
616:(
598:(
579:聖
576:(
556:(
534:(
507:m
504:a
501:e
498:r
495:D
472:(
453:(
426:(
382:(
311:(
280:)
242:(
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
160:·
153:)
115:(
100:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.