392:. The coverage of his career moves looks superficially impressive, but on inspection the sources (while reliable, independent, and about the subject) do not provide enough depth of coverage of the subject for an article. Typically there is one sentence saying something vacuous like "Fushman is the kind of person we're looking for" surrounded by a couple paragraphs of filler about the places he's moving from and to. That's not enough. —
413:
are plenty to prove notability. The content may be boring and have little relevance to someone not actively following
Silicon Valley IPOs, but business press is typically boring anyways, and not a reason to overlook content. More specifically, sensationalism and GNG have no relation, as far as I can
209:
309:
269:
289:
203:
162:
109:
94:
455:
169:
367:
coverage of business staff changes. They don't seem to speak to the notability of the subject, but the companies that hired him. -
135:
130:
139:
89:
82:
17:
409:
from stub creator. Concerning David
Eppstein's analysis, which I agree with mostly, I would argue that what he describes as
224:
122:
191:
419:
103:
99:
432:
331:
478:
40:
450:
397:
185:
415:
181:
474:
461:
423:
401:
376:
372:
349:
321:
301:
281:
261:
64:
36:
345:
231:
445:
442:
393:
257:
249:
217:
240:
I do not currently see any notability, either specifically as a businessperson, or according to
364:
317:
297:
277:
126:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
473:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
368:
341:
197:
389:
360:
253:
245:
55:
385:
241:
313:
293:
273:
118:
70:
156:
411:"a couple paragraphs of filler about the places he's moving from and to"
469:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
435:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
334:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
310:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
270:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
363:
on the academic stuff and the sources have the flavor of
152:
148:
144:
216:
441:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
340:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
290:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
481:). No further edits should be made to this page.
308:Note: This discussion has been included in the
288:Note: This discussion has been included in the
268:Note: This discussion has been included in the
230:
8:
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
307:
287:
267:
7:
24:
95:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
384:. The appropriate standard is
1:
414:make sense of the guideline.
252:) 15:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
498:
424:15:42, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
402:07:58, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
377:17:52, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
350:18:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
322:15:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
302:15:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
282:15:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
262:15:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
65:10:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
462:04:03, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
471:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
83:Articles for deletion
464:
416:MidwestSalamander
352:
324:
304:
284:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
489:
458:
453:
448:
440:
438:
436:
359:per nom. Fails
339:
337:
335:
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
497:
496:
492:
491:
490:
488:
487:
486:
485:
479:deletion review
465:
456:
451:
446:
431:
429:
353:
330:
328:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
495:
493:
484:
483:
439:
428:
427:
426:
404:
394:David Eppstein
379:
338:
327:
326:
325:
305:
285:
238:
237:
174:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
494:
482:
480:
476:
472:
467:
466:
463:
459:
454:
449:
444:
437:
434:
425:
421:
417:
412:
408:
405:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
380:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
355:
354:
351:
347:
343:
336:
333:
323:
319:
315:
311:
306:
303:
299:
295:
291:
286:
283:
279:
275:
271:
266:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
470:
468:
430:
410:
406:
381:
356:
329:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
119:Ilya Fushman
76:
71:Ilya Fushman
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
382:Weak delete
369:GretLomborg
204:free images
365:WP:ROUTINE
342:Randykitty
58:Sandstein
475:talk page
254:Ymblanter
246:Ymblanter
37:talk page
477:or in a
433:Relisted
332:Relisted
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
443:King of
407:Comment
390:WP:PROF
361:WP:PROF
314:Icewhiz
294:Icewhiz
274:Icewhiz
210:WP refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
388:, not
386:WP:GNG
357:Delete
242:WP:GNG
182:Google
140:delete
50:delete
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
420:talk
398:talk
373:talk
346:talk
318:talk
298:talk
278:talk
258:talk
250:talk
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
232:TWL
161:– (
460:♠
422:)
400:)
375:)
348:)
320:)
312:.
300:)
292:.
280:)
272:.
260:)
244:--
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
457:♣
452:♦
447:♥
418:(
396:(
371:(
344:(
316:(
296:(
276:(
256:(
248:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.