Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Irish neutrality during World War II - Knowledge

Source 📝

634:. (I actually enjoyed writing that phrase for the first time and enjoyed even more the lyrical language of the essay.) Since the main editor of the article is a fine and competent editor and seems to be well aware of any deficiencies, perhaps unusually he could be given a period of 7 days grace to improve the article in the ways suggested by deletionists if the consensus is for deletion? 324:
Where is the POV pushing? Until this AfD, the article went through 20 edits by 11 editors, none of which had been reverted. That the tone is not NPOV, I accept - the lede especially, as noted on the talk page, needs serious re-doing - but how is POV being pushed, if nobody is reverting anybody else's
808:
While this may need some work, Ireland's neutrality was the cornerstone of foreign policy during 1939-1945 when it was necessary to maintain a neutral stance so that none of the belligerents might any justification to invade the country or be annoyed about anything that Ireland did during this time.
356:
Article is horribly POV and inaccurate in many of its assertions, but these have never been reasons to delete and shouldn't be here. Irregardless of how it came to be made or ended up looking like this, Irish neutrality in World War II is unquestionably an encyclopaedic topic (and is different in
547:
here. The biggest war of the century (if not all history to that point), I'd say any country as close as Ireland was to it, should have some coverage. Given the length of the content at Irish neutrality, I suggest trimming it down and giving it extensive coverage on its own page. If this page
764:
In order to become an acceptable article, the essay deserves editorial attention in proportion to its subject's monumental importance to post-independence Irish history, but why shoo that attention away with a deletion? Efforts should be made, though, to harmonize the article with the one on
511:
I do not think the POV issues are unfixable, whatever its origin this is not a school essay at the present time, but about half-way to a good WP article. I wish some of the college essays transferred into WP were half as good, or had anywhere near the amount of work added to this one.
125:
that the article was "massively POV, written in the first person and an advocacy piece originally created by a student from his/her own thesis. I fixed as much as I could but it remains subject to revert warring." No edit warring has ever taken place on the article.
137:
stated, "I've had that article bookmarked for a while and have considered nominating it for deletion. The primary article author says on the talk page that it originated as a college essay, and it doesn't even come close to meeting the requirements of
192:. No question about the NPOV of content has ever been raised. Where questions of NPOV have been raised it has only been in regard to tone, not fact. This is easily fixed and in fact was happening through the natural WP editing process. Merging with 120:
Article was described as " massively subjective and non-encyclopaedic" by a user identified as the sock-puppet of an editor permanently banned for POV attacks on Irish editors. Without any further discussion on the talk page, the user posted to
674:: OK - I've withdrawn my delete and improved the article. It wasn't as bad as I feared when one removes the presumption that there was something to apologise for or question the "rightness" of Irish neutrality. Actually it was a good read. ( 218:. I didn't know that college essays were fair game, actually, and for that reason alone I'm not going with delete. The article definitely has some POV issues which could be cleaned up, but I'll leave that to the experts. 795:
Not sure whether there are similar articles for other countries, but it seems like a notable topic. It's an important part of the history of the ROI, and it seems to have good sources for an NPOV rewrite.
739:, while keeping enough detail, would overwhelm those two articles. It needs work (and I'm surprised David Gray doesn't get a mention), but nothing that can't be addressed by editing what's there. 403:
On reading further, I realise that the strong POV comes from the sources (which are all British). It is essential that they be balanced: if that is not possible then it has to be deleted. --
86: 81: 90: 73: 157:
At this point I noticed the discussion on AN/I. (No warning of this discussion was placed on the article itself.) I questioned the wisdom of the decision and pointed to
122: 113: 307:
I know it may be an unorthodox option, but if we just simply rewrite this, the current format will essentially be preserved and avenues of further POV
77: 357:
many respects to the concept of "Irish neutrality", some of which should be merged here). Article should certainly be extensively rewritten though.--
294: 170: 162: 147: 69: 61: 394:, which is a comprehensive and NPOV article that covers the WWII period in detail. This article is a fork and a very POV one at that. -- 560:
Very notable and encyclopedic topic deserving article. If it needs cleanup and checking for POV that is not justification for deletion.
836: 816: 800: 787: 756: 723: 707: 695: 678: 662: 643: 619: 603: 591: 564: 552: 535: 518: 503: 477: 457: 441: 423: 407: 398: 375: 361: 344: 331: 319: 297: 266: 237: 225: 210: 189: 179: 158: 55: 751: 197: 17: 169:. I replied that the relevant section in that article already contains the same information but in a more summarative manner. 578:. Ideally the article could also include references to the issues of Irish servicemen serving in the allied forces and 161:
which explicitly allows for undergraduate college essays so long as they are marked as requiring a clean-up in tone.
573: 851: 36: 576: 850:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
311:
are still left wide open. Best to just restart from scratch to create an unbiased, policy-compliant article. —
285:. This is admittedly not written as an encyclopedia article and there's little good information in it not at 587: 474: 549: 747: 134: 454: 450: 326: 205: 174: 133:
remarked that his/her edits were none the less valid, pointing specifically to an edit in the lede.
704: 293:
is actually biased the other way if anything, and is a further reason this article is unnecessary.
219: 491: 469:- The article in its current form is an abject POV disaster, and the topic is covered in depth at 780: 640: 583: 52: 833: 741: 496: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
825: 809:
A must have article in its own right and far too long to be included in the general article
732: 656: 631: 544: 528: 487: 470: 466: 391: 286: 282: 234: 193: 166: 151: 716: 579: 453:. It needs work, as others have said above, but its problems do not justify deletion. --- 204:. The subject is note-worthy enough to merit treatment as an article in its own right. -- 548:
isn't up to snuff it can be improved. As a subject though, I have no objection to it.
813: 692: 358: 139: 824:
This article is too long to merge into any other article. Reduce the WWII section in
146:
said, "It either needs stubbing down or outright deletion and starting from scratch."
829: 810: 770: 766: 736: 675: 636: 612: 600: 561: 532: 420: 416: 404: 395: 290: 263: 257: 201: 130: 797: 616: 129:
A discussion ensued as to whether or not the complaining user was the sock puppet.
107: 188:
That the article started life as a college essay is irrelevant, this is actually
652: 651:— The topic is notable and the neutrality of this article appears achievable. — 436: 372: 338: 313: 143: 572:
An area of history which is currently receiving increased attention; see, eg.:
435:- well referenced article on an encyclopedic topic. Does need work, though. 703:
obviously what countries in and near the war zone during WW2 is notable.
514: 371:-- a valid encyclopedic entry. Needs work, some good reference material. 233:, serious POV issues but thats a case to fix it rather than delete it!-- 691:
regardless of history of article it passes notability threshold,
844:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
173:
then suggested that the only alternative was to put it for AfD.
769:, up to preparations for a merge at some point in the future. 196:
would be difficult and unbeneficial. Likewise, merging with
150:
then removed the article content and redirect the page to
256:- it's an orgy of POV. If it stays I'll have to gut it. 103: 99: 95: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 492: 498: 854:). No further edits should be made to this page. 740: 717: 832:article link from that article to this one. -- 731:Important topic in its own right. Merging with 531:]. Some info can be moved to the new entry. 599:It needs a re-write but it needs to be here. 8: 336:Struck that out. Thanks for correcting me. — 281:- this could almost be called a POV fork of 260:is surely the same article under a different 611:, albeit guarding against overlap with 289:. In response to the previous poster, 171:User:The way, the truth, and the light 163:User:The way, the truth, and the light 148:User:The way, the truth, and the light 7: 165:suggested to merge the article into 70:Irish neutrality during World War II 62:Irish neutrality during World War II 527:redundant with the WWII section of 715:Pretty notable topic, why purge!! 198:History of the Republic of Ireland 24: 295:The way, the truth, and the light 782: 771: 718: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 287:Irish neutrality#World War II 46: 543:and move extra content from 390:(or change to a redirect to 871: 159:Contributing to Knowledge 847:Please do not modify it. 837:08:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC) 817:21:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC) 801:13:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC) 788:08:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC) 757:02:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC) 724:23:11, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 708:23:09, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 696:20:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 679:20:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 663:18:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 644:15:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 620:13:11, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 604:10:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 592:07:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 565:07:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 553:04:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 536:02:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 519:00:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 504:00:41, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 478:23:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 458:23:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 442:23:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 424:10:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 408:10:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 399:23:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 376:22:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 362:22:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 345:23:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 332:23:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 320:22:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 298:22:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 267:22:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 238:22:26, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 226:22:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 211:22:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 180:21:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 56:01:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 828:to a summary and put a 135:User:Crotalus_horridus 582:parades in Dublin.-- 463:Delete and Redirect 475:Ptah, the El Daoud 305:Delete and rewrite 785: 590: 388:Delete or rewrite 862: 849: 826:Irish neutrality 784: 781: 778: 755: 744: 733:Irish neutrality 721: 720: 586: 550:FrozenPurpleCube 545:Irish neutrality 529:Irish neutrality 500: 499:Vigeur de dessus 494: 488:Irish neutrality 471:Irish neutrality 467:Irish neutrality 439: 392:Irish neutrality 341: 329: 316: 283:Irish neutrality 222: 221:Ten Pound Hammer 208: 194:Irish Neutrality 190:encouraged by WP 177: 167:Irish neutrality 152:Irish neutrality 111: 93: 48: 34: 870: 869: 865: 864: 863: 861: 860: 859: 858: 852:deletion review 845: 742: 580:Remembrance Day 437: 339: 327: 314: 220: 206: 175: 84: 68: 65: 49:eep and rewrite 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 868: 866: 857: 856: 840: 839: 819: 803: 790: 759: 726: 710: 705:Carlossuarez46 698: 685: 684: 683: 682: 666: 665: 646: 622: 606: 594: 567: 555: 538: 522: 506: 486:or merge into 481: 460: 444: 429: 428: 427: 426: 410: 379: 378: 365: 364: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 301: 300: 271: 270: 241: 240: 228: 213: 118: 117: 64: 59: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 867: 855: 853: 848: 842: 841: 838: 835: 831: 830:Template:Main 827: 823: 820: 818: 815: 812: 811:The Emergency 807: 804: 802: 799: 794: 791: 789: 786: 779: 777: 776: 768: 767:The Emergency 763: 760: 758: 753: 749: 745: 738: 737:The Emergency 734: 730: 727: 725: 722: 714: 711: 709: 706: 702: 699: 697: 694: 690: 687: 686: 680: 677: 673: 670: 669: 668: 667: 664: 660: 659: 654: 650: 647: 645: 642: 639: 638: 633: 630: 626: 623: 621: 618: 614: 613:The Emergency 610: 607: 605: 602: 598: 595: 593: 589: 585: 584:Major Bonkers 581: 577: 574: 571: 568: 566: 563: 559: 556: 554: 551: 546: 542: 539: 537: 534: 530: 526: 523: 520: 517: 516: 510: 507: 505: 502: 501: 495: 489: 485: 482: 479: 476: 472: 468: 464: 461: 459: 456: 452: 448: 445: 443: 440: 434: 431: 430: 425: 422: 418: 417:The Emergency 414: 411: 409: 406: 402: 401: 400: 397: 393: 389: 386: 385: 381: 380: 377: 374: 370: 367: 366: 363: 360: 355: 352: 346: 343: 342: 335: 334: 333: 330: 323: 322: 321: 318: 317: 310: 306: 303: 302: 299: 296: 292: 291:The Emergency 288: 284: 280: 276: 273: 272: 268: 265: 261: 259: 258:The Emergency 255: 251: 250: 248: 247: 245: 244: 239: 236: 232: 229: 227: 223: 217: 214: 212: 209: 203: 202:The Emergency 199: 195: 191: 187: 184: 183: 182: 181: 178: 172: 168: 164: 160: 155: 153: 149: 145: 141: 136: 132: 131:User:Dynaflow 127: 124: 115: 109: 105: 101: 97: 92: 88: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 66: 63: 60: 58: 57: 54: 53:Mailer Diablo 50: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 846: 843: 821: 805: 792: 774: 773: 761: 743:FlowerpotmaN 728: 712: 700: 688: 671: 657: 648: 635: 628: 624: 608: 596: 569: 557: 540: 524: 513: 508: 497: 483: 462: 446: 432: 412: 387: 383: 382: 368: 353: 337: 312: 308: 304: 278: 274: 253: 252: 249: 246: 243: 242: 230: 215: 185: 156: 128: 119: 45: 43: 31: 28: 632:Vintagekits 235:Vintagekits 144:User:Kurykh 719:Gold♣heart 451:Sony-youth 328:sony-youth 207:sony-youth 176:sony-youth 814:ww2censor 693:SqueakBox 359:Jackyd101 325:edits? -- 216:Weak keep 775:Dynaflow 676:Sarah777 672:*Comment 637:W. Frank 601:Scolaire 562:Davewild 533:AlphaEta 421:Red King 405:Red King 396:Red King 309:-pushing 279:redirect 264:Sarah777 114:View log 834:Richard 798:Nyttend 617:McPhail 493:Barryob 140:WP:NPOV 123:WP:AN/I 87:protect 82:history 783:babble 588:(talk) 525:Delete 484:Delete 455:Cathal 438:Bastun 384:Delete 373:Djegan 340:Kurykh 315:Kurykh 275:Delete 262:name?( 254:Delete 91:delete 762:Keep. 627:, as 473:. --( 415:with 413:Merge 108:views 100:watch 96:links 16:< 822:Keep 806:Keep 793:Keep 729:Keep 713:Keep 701:Keep 689:Keep 658:talk 649:Keep 625:Keep 609:Keep 597:Keep 575:and 570:Keep 558:Keep 541:Keep 509:Keep 449:per 447:Keep 433:Keep 419:. -- 369:Keep 354:Keep 231:Keep 186:Keep 104:logs 78:talk 74:edit 51:. - 735:or 653:RJH 629:per 515:DGG 465:to 277:or 224:• 200:or 142:." 112:– ( 772:-- 750:· 661:) 615:. 490:-- 154:. 106:| 102:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 80:| 76:| 754:) 752:c 748:t 746:( 681:) 655:( 641:✉ 521:, 480:) 269:) 116:) 110:) 72:( 47:k

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Mailer Diablo
01:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Irish neutrality during World War II
Irish neutrality during World War II
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
WP:AN/I
User:Dynaflow
User:Crotalus_horridus
WP:NPOV
User:Kurykh
User:The way, the truth, and the light
Irish neutrality
Contributing to Knowledge
User:The way, the truth, and the light
Irish neutrality
User:The way, the truth, and the light
sony-youth
21:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
encouraged by WP

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.