374:
and this suggests that keeping the page is the best course of action. Also, considering the page views that this has received recently, it is fair to say that her notability is not in question. I do, however, believe that the page can be further built upon, which is something that can be looked at.
241:
The sources are way too weak to pass GNG. It is essentially routine rehashes of press releases. For the moment she has achieved nothing notable enough to get in depth coverage on her own merits. A good deal of the sources are about her father and she gets a passing mention. The rest are articles
433:
She might have her legitimate article in encyclopedia in the future. As of now, it is too soon to include her here. Most of her notability is inherited by her dad and his business empire. Besides, she can't pass GNG on the basis of a grand wedding.
326:
This is one of those articles, similar to one I just nominated elsewhere, which at first glance looks well-sourced and legitimate. Digging deeper into the sources, though, shows they are simply incidental mentions and
206:
376:
363:
263:
159:
242:
announcing that her father appointed his children as board members of his company aged 23. The rest is a forbes list and reports of the Forbes list. Probably the work of
200:
359:
303:
283:
106:
472:
91:
468:
166:
380:
452:
132:
127:
86:
79:
17:
136:
221:
508:
188:
119:
100:
96:
574:
355:
605:
40:
182:
500:
331:
coverage including lightly paraphrased press releases from outlets of questionable quality. Another case of
543:: Isha Ambani is notable and a big personality in India and many parts of the world. If celebutantes like
499:
This article should be kept a little longer. Someone please add photo and little detail about the person.
456:
601:
556:
451:: Genuine query- isn't appearing on three Forbes' lists of richest X people an indicator of notability?
178:
36:
586:
560:
533:
512:
489:
460:
443:
425:
408:
384:
344:
315:
295:
275:
255:
61:
358:, as mentioned, and has also been covered across several verifiable independent publications such as
332:
311:
291:
271:
251:
57:
228:
214:
340:
582:
439:
328:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
600:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
570:
552:
238:
123:
421:
367:
307:
287:
267:
247:
53:
194:
544:
371:
336:
243:
354:
Hello. I believe the article deserves to be kept at present. She has been listed by
578:
548:
520:
476:
435:
395:
153:
115:
67:
417:
467:
You can't solely use Forbes to prove notability. Plus these inclusions:
596:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
149:
145:
141:
213:
264:
551:can have articles, she qualifies for it as well. (
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
608:). No further edits should be made to this page.
302:Note: This discussion has been included in the
282:Note: This discussion has been included in the
262:Note: This discussion has been included in the
227:
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
519:Any reasoning as to why it should be kept?
475:are in the context of her father's wealth.
304:list of India-related deletion discussions
301:
284:list of Women-related deletion discussions
281:
261:
416:Knowledge:Notability is not inherited. --
394:Subject has no standalone notability.
377:2402:3A80:6A6:E213:28AF:20F9:C820:2AC3
573:, how is she notable? And do go over
7:
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
587:01:43, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
561:01:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
534:19:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
513:17:46, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
490:15:02, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
461:11:24, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
444:20:15, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
426:06:04, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
409:22:50, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
385:12:23, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
345:06:14, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
316:06:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
296:06:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
276:06:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
256:06:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
62:14:48, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
625:
577:for your second argument.
366:, etc. She clearly passes
598:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
80:Articles for deletion
575:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
503:Shivkarandholiya12
318:
298:
278:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
616:
531:
527:
505:
487:
483:
406:
402:
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
624:
623:
619:
618:
617:
615:
614:
613:
612:
606:deletion review
525:
521:
501:
481:
477:
400:
396:
174:
165:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
622:
620:
611:
610:
592:
591:
590:
589:
565:
564:
545:Kim Kardashian
537:
536:
516:
515:
493:
492:
464:
463:
446:
428:
411:
388:
387:
364:Economic Times
348:
347:
320:
319:
308:Dom from Paris
299:
288:Dom from Paris
279:
268:Dom from Paris
248:Dom from Paris
235:
234:
171:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
621:
609:
607:
603:
599:
594:
593:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
569:
568:
567:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
539:
538:
535:
532:
530:
524:
518:
517:
514:
510:
506:
504:
498:
495:
494:
491:
488:
486:
480:
474:
470:
466:
465:
462:
458:
454:
450:
447:
445:
441:
437:
432:
429:
427:
423:
419:
415:
412:
410:
407:
405:
399:
393:
390:
389:
386:
382:
378:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
350:
349:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:WP:REFBOMBING
330:
325:
322:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
280:
277:
273:
269:
265:
260:
259:
258:
257:
253:
249:
245:
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
597:
595:
549:Paris Hilton
540:
528:
522:
502:
496:
484:
478:
448:
430:
413:
403:
397:
391:
351:
323:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
571:Highpeaks35
553:Highpeaks35
201:free images
116:Isha Ambani
68:Isha Ambani
453:2.51.17.28
329:WP:ROUTINE
54:Randykitty
602:talk page
246:editors.
239:WP:ANYBIO
37:talk page
604:or in a
368:WP:BASIC
360:USAToday
337:Wolfson5
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
579:Dial911
449:Comment
436:Dial911
207:WP refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
431:Delete
414:Delete
392:Delete
372:WP:GNG
356:Forbes
324:Delete
244:WP:UPE
237:Fails
179:Google
137:delete
50:delete
523:Cesde
479:Cesde
418:Saqib
398:Cesde
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
583:talk
557:talk
541:Keep
509:talk
497:Keep
457:talk
440:talk
422:talk
381:talk
370:and
352:Keep
341:talk
312:talk
292:talk
272:talk
252:talk
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
547:or
229:TWL
158:– (
585:)
559:)
511:)
471:,
459:)
442:)
424:)
383:)
362:,
343:)
335:.
314:)
306:.
294:)
286:.
274:)
266:.
254:)
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
581:(
563:)
555:(
529:a
526:v
507:(
485:a
482:v
473:2
469:1
455:(
438:(
420:(
404:a
401:v
379:(
339:(
310:(
290:(
270:(
250:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.