565:(I count eight) contains extensive biographical information, including personal background unrelated to issues, about all major candidates, including also-rans, and in many cases even sketches in details about minor party fringe candidates. You are entitled to your opinion that an election article should exclude such details, but I, and an apparently large number of FA editors and reviewers, think that articles with these details are better. Besides the mere opinion from me and many editors that such background and context makes a better articles,
353:, since if this article is deleted then the election article will contain no information, and no bluelink, about the top runner up. Failing WP:POLITICIAN is not sufficient reason to delete an article. Simply scroll up a bit and read "People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below". Criteria like
218:
local coverage of the mayoral election itself with no evidence shown of any media coverage in any other context. As always, however, non-winning candidates for office do not get
Knowledge articles just for being candidates -- if you cannot demonstrate and
381:. Mallahan is notable for spending three times as much money as McGinn, winning all the major endorsements including the Governor, Seattle Times, and more, and only losing by a small margin. This unusual race was covered non-locally, for example,
429:
it — and people also quite regularly try to claim that GNG is passed on the basis of really trivial coverage like "local teenager tweets about Taylor Swift" or "nine-toed teen tries out for high school football team" in the local
517:
in italics as if I had made any such assertion, or as if I said that it was our job or that anything was mandatory. That's all an irrelevant straw man. We're not mandated to do anything, and no outcome is guaranteed. We don't
172:
537:
to the election article than to drop readers who click on his name on a blank page, and the election article is better if it gives readers some background and detail about the major candidates. The
417:
exist as "additional paths to keeping an article after they have failed GNG". People quite regularly try to create PR-inflated, or sometimes even outright hoax, articles about topics that are
395:
Politics
Magazine Nov.-Dec. 2009. We don't need to keep all the content from the Joe Mallahan bio, but keep enough to give a complete narrative of the 2009 election and results. --
125:
473:
mayor, not necessarily to maintain biographical details about non-winning also-rans. I'll grant that the election article certainly needs more content than it has about the
252:
465:
to maintain more than minimal "name and vote total" content about "top runners up" in elections — our job here is to publish appropriate information about the person who
166:
561:
warnings not to keep any uncited BLP content, and don't userfy articles that shouldn't be userfied, but otherwise, it's consistent with all of the above policies.
505:"A topic is presumed to merit an article if: 1. It meets either the general notability guideline below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline"
279:. Cannot establish the "political activism" claim outside of his sourced website. Everything else is associated with the failed run for mayor. --
569:
is one policy that points in the direction of fleshing out articles with quite a bit more than just
Mallahan's, name, employer and job title. --
132:
324:
549:
says, as an example, that information about a non-notable individual could be merged in to a related article about a notable topic.
98:
93:
538:
102:
17:
350:
51:
187:
85:
154:
562:
553:
says that merging a non-notable also ran into an election article is a common and often desirable AfD outcome. The
640:
574:
400:
40:
148:
320:
314:
coverage. I think this should be pruned back and mentioned in regional elections articles, if anywhere.--
144:
636:
621:
602:
578:
554:
550:
494:
404:
341:
288:
264:
244:
67:
36:
481:
as points of discussion and debate, but it doesn't need any more content than it has about
Mallahan's
613:
570:
500:
396:
297:
276:
194:
180:
566:
284:
598:
490:
332:
315:
260:
240:
215:
89:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
635:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
358:
354:
336:
558:
546:
374:
311:
210:
of a person notable only as a non-winning candidate for mayor of a city, which is sourced
160:
530:
362:
328:
58:
388:
378:
307:
302:
280:
207:
594:
534:
486:
256:
236:
220:
81:
73:
55:. It doesn't sound like those giving the earlier "delete" opinions would disagree.
119:
235:
the election, not just run in it, to attain notability because of the election.
522:
redirect and merge, but I think it's the best choice, and I have good reasons.
610:
since he received a fair amount of votes and may be notable in the future. ~
383:
629:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
425:, so an SNG cannot be passed without GNG-eligible sourcing to
300:. Although there is significant biographical detail in the
593:
as suggested and as usual practice. Nothing more to add.
434:, so coverage doesn't count toward GNG until it's in a
115:
111:
107:
179:
458:
with each other, not as distinct alternative paths.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
643:). No further edits should be made to this page.
253:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
563:Every single Featured Article about an election
543:"Alternatives to deletion should be considered"
193:
8:
251:Note: This debate has been included in the
509:I have no idea why you say "It is not our
250:
391:, November 7, 2009, or D'Aprile, Shane.
384:Money Can't Buy You Love; Mayoral Races
7:
469:the election and thereby became the
442:an SNG. In other words it's not GNG
24:
231:of the candidacy, then he has to
227:notability for some other reason
499:Right there in the intro of the
421:to satisfy an SNG but actually
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
454:with each other. They work in
438:that specifically goes toward
351:Seattle mayoral election, 2009
52:Seattle mayoral election, 2009
1:
529:!vote is to argue that it is
622:16:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
603:00:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
579:21:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
495:19:45, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
485:background or his finances.
405:17:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
369:paths to keeping an article
342:14:37, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
289:02:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
265:23:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
245:23:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
68:12:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
310:because he has nothing but
660:
557:has a lot of unnecessary
632:Please do not modify it.
477:that were raised in the
32:Please do not modify it.
531:more of an improvement
306:, I think he fails
275:- Definitely fails
446:an SNG — it's GNG
461:And it's not our
373:they have failed
340:
267:
66:
651:
634:
616:
525:The point of my
318:
198:
197:
183:
135:
123:
105:
65:
63:
56:
34:
659:
658:
654:
653:
652:
650:
649:
648:
647:
641:deletion review
630:
614:
571:Dennis Bratland
503:policy it says
397:Dennis Bratland
221:reliably source
140:
131:
96:
80:
77:
59:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
657:
655:
646:
645:
625:
624:
605:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
555:WP:POLOUTCOMES
551:WP:POLOUTCOMES
539:AfD guidelines
515:responsibility
511:responsibility
507:. Enough said.
463:responsibility
459:
452:simultaneously
408:
407:
377:also known as
344:
291:
269:
268:
201:
200:
137:
76:
71:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
656:
644:
642:
638:
633:
627:
626:
623:
619:
618:
617:
609:
606:
604:
600:
596:
592:
589:
588:
581:
580:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
523:
521:
516:
512:
506:
502:
498:
497:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
411:
410:
409:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
389:The Economist
386:
385:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
343:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
317:
313:
309:
305:
304:
303:Seattle Times
299:
298:WP:POLITICIAN
295:
292:
290:
286:
282:
278:
277:WP:POLITICIAN
274:
271:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
249:
248:
247:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
217:
213:
209:
205:
196:
192:
189:
186:
182:
178:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
146:
143:
142:Find sources:
138:
134:
130:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
75:
72:
70:
69:
64:
62:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
631:
628:
612:
611:
607:
590:
542:
535:Joe Mallahan
533:to redirect
526:
524:
519:
514:
510:
508:
504:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:No, SNGs do
392:
382:
370:
366:
346:
316:TonyTheTiger
301:
293:
272:
232:
228:
224:
223:that he had
211:
203:
202:
190:
184:
176:
169:
163:
157:
151:
141:
128:
82:Joe Mallahan
74:Joe Mallahan
60:
49:
47:
31:
28:
567:WP:NOTSTATS
229:independent
225:preexisting
167:free images
501:Notability
440:satisfying
432:Pennysaver
393:Washington
367:additional
333:WP:CHICAGO
216:WP:ROUTINE
61:Sandstein
637:talk page
365:exist as
359:WP:ARTIST
355:WP:ANYBIO
337:WP:WAWARD
50:merge to
37:talk page
639:or in a
559:WP:BEANS
547:WP:ATD-M
483:personal
479:campaign
375:WP:BASIC
312:WP:LOCAL
281:CNMall41
212:entirely
126:View log
39:or in a
595:Bearian
520:have to
513:" with
487:Bearcat
450:an SNG
436:context
427:support
419:claimed
363:WP:NPOL
329:WP:FOUR
257:Bearcat
237:Bearcat
173:WP refs
161:scholar
99:protect
94:history
475:issues
471:actual
456:tandem
379:WP:GNG
308:WP:GNG
296:fails
294:Delete
273:Delete
208:WP:BLP
204:Delete
145:Google
103:delete
608:Merge
591:Merge
527:merge
423:don't
371:after
347:Merge
188:JSTOR
149:books
133:Stats
120:views
112:watch
108:links
16:<
615:EDDY
599:talk
575:talk
541:say
491:talk
401:talk
285:talk
261:talk
241:talk
181:FENS
155:news
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
467:won
448:and
415:not
361:or
357:or
349:to
233:win
214:to
195:TWL
124:– (
620:~
601:)
577:)
545:.
493:)
444:or
403:)
387:,
335:/
331:/
327:/
323:/
287:)
263:)
255:.
243:)
206:.
175:)
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
597:(
573:(
489:(
399:(
339:)
325:C
321:T
319:(
283:(
259:(
239:(
199:)
191:·
185:·
177:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
147:(
139:(
136:)
129:·
122:)
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.