Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/John Barros (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

444:
test). But this article demonstrates neither of those things, so just having campaign coverage in the context of running for mayor isn't enough as it isn't any different from what every other person who ever ran for mayor of a city also has.
403:
be able to show some evidence of campaign coverage in the local media of the city where they're running for mayor, precisely because giving equal time to candidates in local elections is literally local media's
218: 366: 86: 290: 436:
than other people's candidacies, in such a way that even if he loses the election and never accomplishes another thing in his life, his candidacy itself would still pass the
270: 374: 369:), a ton of expected but not overly notable coverage from announcement of his mayoral bid and through all the candidate forums, and then a few more deep dives recently ( 179: 212: 370: 126: 81: 111: 362: 408:— so if the existence of campaign coverage were all it took to give candidates a GNG-based exemption from having to pass NPOL, then 152: 147: 106: 99: 17: 535: 508: 478: 454: 383: 349: 328: 302: 282: 262: 66: 156: 233: 200: 139: 62: 502: 120: 116: 420:
campaign coverage doesn't cut it — you need to demonstrate that either (a) he already had preexisting notability for
517: 489: 463: 391:, without prejudice against recreation if the basis for notability changes in the future. Literally by definition, 552: 40: 194: 58: 548: 190: 36: 441: 358: 250: 345: 298: 278: 258: 240: 226: 416:
get that exemption and NPOL itself would never actually apply to anybody at all anymore. So no,
450: 95: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
547:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
531: 336:, when is a politician too local or too routine for inclusion in Knowledge? Appears to pass 143: 496: 206: 437: 417: 341: 314: 294: 274: 254: 54: 429: 337: 318: 446: 173: 527: 474: 379: 135: 72: 492: 432:
test), or (b) he could credibly claim that his candidacy was markedly more
491:
isn't about a political campaign. I think there's just enough to keep.
543:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
520:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
466:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
488:
The coverage in the article isn't great, but coverage like
169: 165: 161: 361:, there's press coverage from before his mayoral bid ( 225: 526:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 472:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 313:- just the routine local politics coverage. Fails 291:list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions 87:Articles for deletion/John Barros (2nd nomination) 357:, passes GNG which is specifically called out in 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 555:). No further edits should be made to this page. 289:Note: This discussion has been included in the 271:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions 269:Note: This discussion has been included in the 253:. No sign of notability beyond local politics. 239: 8: 127:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 288: 268: 79: 440:for enduring significance anyway (the 7: 24: 82:Articles for deletion/John Barros 112:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 428:of political candidacies (the 1: 249:Local politician who fails 102:(AfD)? Read these primers! 572: 67:21:13, 6 August 2021 (UTC) 536:21:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC) 509:23:32, 29 July 2021 (UTC) 479:18:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC) 455:19:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC) 384:00:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC) 350:22:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC) 329:17:59, 16 July 2021 (UTC) 303:17:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC) 283:17:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC) 263:17:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC) 545:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 78:AfDs for this article: 100:Articles for deletion 395:candidate for mayor 442:Christine O'Donnell 55:(non-admin closure) 59:Extraordinary Writ 538: 481: 305: 285: 117:Guide to deletion 107:How to contribute 57: 563: 525: 523: 521: 505: 499: 471: 469: 467: 412:candidate would 325: 322: 244: 243: 229: 177: 159: 97: 53: 34: 571: 570: 566: 565: 564: 562: 561: 560: 559: 553:deletion review 539: 516: 514: 503: 497: 495:(power~enwiki, 482: 462: 460: 418:run of the mill 323: 320: 186: 150: 134: 131: 94: 91: 76: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 569: 567: 558: 557: 524: 513: 512: 511: 470: 459: 458: 457: 386: 352: 331: 307: 306: 286: 247: 246: 183: 130: 129: 124: 114: 109: 92: 90: 89: 84: 77: 75: 70: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 568: 556: 554: 550: 546: 541: 540: 537: 533: 529: 522: 519: 510: 506: 500: 494: 490: 487: 484: 483: 480: 477: 476: 468: 465: 456: 452: 448: 443: 439: 438:ten year test 435: 431: 430:Cynthia Nixon 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 402: 398: 394: 390: 387: 385: 382: 381: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 359:WP:POLITICIAN 356: 353: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 332: 330: 327: 326: 316: 312: 309: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 287: 284: 280: 276: 272: 267: 266: 265: 264: 260: 256: 252: 251:WP:POLITICIAN 242: 238: 235: 232: 228: 224: 220: 217: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 192: 189: 188:Find sources: 184: 181: 175: 171: 167: 163: 158: 154: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 132: 128: 125: 122: 118: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 104: 103: 101: 96: 88: 85: 83: 80: 74: 71: 69: 68: 64: 60: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 544: 542: 515: 485: 473: 461: 433: 425: 421: 413: 409: 405: 400: 396: 392: 388: 378: 354: 333: 319: 310: 248: 236: 230: 222: 215: 209: 203: 197: 187: 93: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 426:independent 213:free images 136:John Barros 73:John Barros 397:everywhere 549:talk page 486:Weak Keep 342:NemesisAT 295:John B123 275:John B123 255:John B123 37:talk page 551:or in a 518:Relisted 464:Relisted 424:reasons 180:View log 121:glossary 39:or in a 447:Bearcat 434:special 340:to me. 315:WP:NPOL 219:WP refs 207:scholar 153:protect 148:history 98:New to 528:Daniel 493:User:力 475:Bungle 414:always 401:always 389:Delete 380:EoRdE6 338:WP:GNG 311:Delete 191:Google 157:delete 422:other 410:every 399:will 393:every 234:JSTOR 195:books 174:views 166:watch 162:links 16:< 532:talk 451:talk 355:Keep 346:talk 334:Keep 324:5969 321:Onel 299:talk 279:talk 259:talk 227:FENS 201:news 170:logs 144:talk 140:edit 63:talk 406:job 377:). 241:TWL 178:– ( 534:) 507:) 501:, 453:) 373:, 365:, 348:) 317:. 301:) 293:. 281:) 273:. 261:) 221:) 172:| 168:| 164:| 160:| 155:| 151:| 146:| 142:| 65:) 52:. 530:( 504:ν 498:π 449:( 375:2 371:1 367:2 363:1 344:( 297:( 277:( 257:( 245:) 237:· 231:· 223:· 216:· 210:· 204:· 198:· 193:( 185:( 182:) 176:) 138:( 123:) 119:( 61:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
Extraordinary Writ
talk
21:13, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
John Barros
Articles for deletion/John Barros
Articles for deletion/John Barros (2nd nomination)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
John Barros
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.