260:
on him that gave in-depth coverage. The only significant coverage I've found are from non-independent sources, and the article looks like much of the same. (The article also oversells some of the sources out there, such as saying he "generated controversy", citing
217:
381:
178:
341:
272:
mentions that a reporter (who previously was a co-worker to, and had a large falling out with, Bill O'Reilly) said that he used the term "The O'Reilly Factor" first. This
401:
361:
321:
211:
420:
273:
301:
280:. Although he might be a somewhat well-known marketer, especially since he's had media appearances, I don't see any sources that shows he passes Knowledge
262:
125:
110:
269:
151:
146:
277:
155:
78:
105:
98:
17:
138:
232:
199:
119:
115:
441:
471:
40:
193:
454:
431:
412:
393:
389:
373:
369:
353:
349:
333:
329:
313:
309:
293:
289:
189:
80:
467:
142:
36:
281:
239:
76:
61:
225:
134:
86:
53:
424:
405:
385:
365:
345:
325:
305:
285:
94:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
466:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
253:
205:
71:
57:
249:
451:
257:
172:
276:
mentions him in passing, that he was hired as a representative for the
268:
Two of the most reliable sources I've found are passing mentions:
462:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
444:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
382:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
56:, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired
168:
164:
160:
66:
224:
450:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
474:). No further edits should be made to this page.
419:Note: This discussion has been included in the
400:Note: This discussion has been included in the
380:Note: This discussion has been included in the
360:Note: This discussion has been included in the
342:list of Advertising-related deletion discussions
340:Note: This discussion has been included in the
320:Note: This discussion has been included in the
300:Note: This discussion has been included in the
402:list of Television-related deletion discussions
362:list of Psychology-related deletion discussions
322:list of News media-related deletion discussions
421:list of New York-related deletion discussions
238:
8:
126:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
302:list of People-related deletion discussions
418:
399:
379:
359:
339:
319:
299:
7:
24:
278:Shoup Voting Machine Corporation
111:Introduction to deletion process
67:request the article's undeletion
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
455:10:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
81:10:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
432:06:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
413:06:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
394:02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
374:02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
354:02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
334:02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
314:02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
294:02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
270:This Rolling Stones article
101:(AfD)? Read these primers!
491:
464:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
256:, I could not find any
248:Doesn't seem to pass
99:Articles for deletion
54:minimal participation
252:notability. With a
457:
434:
415:
396:
376:
356:
336:
316:
116:Guide to deletion
106:How to contribute
482:
449:
447:
445:
429:
410:
258:reliable sources
243:
242:
228:
176:
158:
96:
69:
34:
490:
489:
485:
484:
483:
481:
480:
479:
478:
472:deletion review
458:
440:
438:
425:
406:
185:
149:
133:
130:
93:
90:
65:
64:). Editors can
62:"soft deletion"
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
488:
486:
477:
476:
448:
437:
436:
435:
416:
397:
377:
357:
337:
317:
274:NYTimes source
263:this interview
246:
245:
182:
129:
128:
123:
113:
108:
91:
89:
84:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
487:
475:
473:
469:
465:
460:
459:
456:
453:
446:
443:
433:
430:
428:
422:
417:
414:
411:
409:
403:
398:
395:
391:
387:
383:
378:
375:
371:
367:
363:
358:
355:
351:
347:
343:
338:
335:
331:
327:
323:
318:
315:
311:
307:
303:
298:
297:
296:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
266:
264:
259:
255:
251:
241:
237:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
191:
188:
187:Find sources:
183:
180:
174:
170:
166:
162:
157:
153:
148:
144:
140:
136:
135:John Tantillo
132:
131:
127:
124:
121:
117:
114:
112:
109:
107:
104:
103:
102:
100:
95:
88:
87:John Tantillo
85:
83:
82:
79:
77:
75:
74:
68:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
463:
461:
439:
427:CAPTAIN RAJU
426:
408:CAPTAIN RAJU
407:
386:Whisperjanes
366:Whisperjanes
346:Whisperjanes
326:Whisperjanes
306:Whisperjanes
286:Whisperjanes
267:
247:
235:
229:
221:
214:
208:
202:
196:
186:
92:
72:
49:
47:
31:
28:
212:free images
52:. Based on
50:soft delete
282:notability
73:Ritchie333
468:talk page
265:on NPR.)
254:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
470:or in a
442:Relisted
179:View log
120:glossary
60:(a.k.a.
39:or in a
452:Spartaz
218:WP refs
206:scholar
152:protect
147:history
97:New to
250:WP:GNG
190:Google
156:delete
233:JSTOR
194:books
173:views
165:watch
161:links
16:<
390:talk
370:talk
350:talk
330:talk
310:talk
290:talk
284:. -
226:FENS
200:news
169:logs
143:talk
139:edit
58:PROD
240:TWL
177:– (
423:.
404:.
392:)
384:.
372:)
364:.
352:)
344:.
332:)
324:.
312:)
304:.
292:)
220:)
171:|
167:|
163:|
159:|
154:|
150:|
145:|
141:|
70:.
388:(
368:(
348:(
328:(
308:(
288:(
244:)
236:·
230:·
222:·
215:·
209:·
203:·
197:·
192:(
184:(
181:)
175:)
137:(
122:)
118:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.