815:. In 2017 we has an edit war between a promo account and other SPAs who were trying to highlight some of Wohl's many exploits (and we had a handful - running foul of the NFA, using Instagram models to lure clients, financial training courses that included IIRC hookers, his business dealings at age 17, claims around Rachel G. Fox, real estate, politics, and a bunch of other stuff) - all this received coverage (all be it local and in financial sites for various schemes) - and at last AfD I argued SIGCOV - in any event even back then it was not a 1E. The Muller thing obviously adds a whole bunch of new coverage - and only adds to notability here. I will also note this is a high profile and "noisy" individual - we will probably see yet more coverage. I do think there are balance issues in the present article but deletion is not cleanup.
891:. Having said that, I disagree with Muboshgu and Cullen328. I thought he was non-notable as a person before, and his involvement with this scam (ALLEGED scam, whatever) doesn't add much. We don't need an article on him to solidify our understanding of current political events, and to the extent that this is a noteworthy thing (all the more noteworthy since NOTNEWS has gone by the wayside), it can be covered in any of the two million articles associated with Trump, Mueller, etc., with a redirect for those who seek him. Nor do I see that recent coverage has added much to our understanding of this person and his biography--let me note, for instance, that the
369:(responding to ping): The two previous articles on Wohl were rightfully deleted at AfD in June 2016 and April 2017 as promotional articles for a non-notable teenager. The current article is different, and as long as it does not turn into promotionalism and lies, and if the person is currently notable enough to pass GNG and NBIO without resorting to blatant PR and puff pieces as citations, then I don't have as much objection to it (particularly since there is nothing promotional about it, much less "
721:. Now, we have a new round of significant coverage of Wohl from the Daily Beast, the Atlantic, GQ, Vox, CNN, Slate, NBC and so on. I considered him borderline notable a year and a half ago, but he is definitely notable now. This article should be kept and the useful content from the previously deleted versions should be added back into the current article.
945:- There are more than enough reliable sources covering the subject to satisfy the GNG. If the article lacks balance or needs editing then edit it, that's what we do here. AfD is not for cleanup. EDIT: I also note there is apparently no puffery or promotion in this article, and it appears to me to simply state was the sources say.
898:"nails" him in one and a half sentences: "a 20-year-old conservative who’s most famous for sending speedy sycophantic replies to Trump’s tweets and making implausible, factually dubious claims. He also ran some shady hedge funds." We can do that too, and we should, because there simply isn't that much to tell him. So,
1129:
based on the fact that of course we are going to have an article on this person. He has entered history now. The whole affair is something some non-zero number of people will want to learn about even 100 years from now. OTOH I'd be OK with cutting it back to a stub for a while on BLP grounds. There's
678:
The nominator never participated in the previous AfDs (and presumably also never saw those articles), and this new article is in no way promotional at all. The nominator nonetheless falsely claimed this new article is "strongly promotional" and immediately pinged participants in the old AfDs, in an
394:
to a page called "Smear campaign against Robert
Mueller" or something, as this is the sole reason he is notable. Althoungh the existence of this article may give unwarranted attention to this teenage clown who definitely outsmarted himself, the incident and its resulting reports is significant
607:
as above this is a minor fringe figure who has not been convicted of the political allegations and the financial misdemeaners were very commonplace unfortunately. There is a saying that all publicity is good publicity and this character certainly does not warrant it for his
594:: "I must say that I liked Jacob Wohl a lot more when he was a comical fringe figure of the financial world than I do now that he’s a comical fringe figure of alt-right politics." A fringe figure is an appropriate description for a subject not meeting notability standards.
634:
467:
Agree. If this is the case, then yes. He will likely remain as a low-profile individual. Although it is very likely that he will do more stupid things that spark future AfD nominations, his past "achievements" are irrelevant, at best. We could add a section under
630:
247:
1024:
1046:
Note: it's easy to say "passes GNG", pointing at a half dozen or a dozen articles, but what we really need is significant discussion of the subject. What we have now is tidbits and involvement in a scandal.
105:
100:
962:- Multiple news outlets are reporting this guy's involvement with a scheme to frame Robert Mueller for sexual assault. He wasn't notable before, but the way this is going, he's notable now.
56:
keep. Consensus is that GNG is met; the nominator and others have been convinced by the substantial coverage demonstrated in the Keep !votes. Numerically it's something like 17-3 now.
1111:
Pretty much a slam dunk keep, given substantial coverage of the person by multiple reliable sources, that are not only covering the latest scandal, but delving into his background. --
1067:
Jacob Wohl, 20, far-right conspiracy theorist, gets a moment in spotlight with
Mueller plot: The Trump supporter, once billed as a teenage financial guru, has a history of schemes.
200:
1002:
473:
980:
241:
1090:, I hate to say "that changes matters" but that changes matters. Can I pretend it's Brussels sprouts, which I pretend do not exist, and then it will all go away?
869:, this article has the potential to be of service to users trying to keep track of and understand events and persons associated with the Mueller investigation.
278:
Just like the last time, and the time before, no amount of adding negative information will justify a strongly promotional article about this 20-year-old guy.
207:
132:
95:
147:
1069:
That is a 27 paragraph long article that covers his whole "career" in detail. Certainly, that is the significant discussion that you are looking for.
661:. He is also currently under investigation by the FBI. This new article, unlike the previous iterations written by SPAs, is devoid of promotionalism.
395:
enough. Especially when he is under FBI investigation. All we need is to avoid PR edits per usual practice. I just can't wait to cement him into the
1148:
1200:
586:(responding to ping) This is quite a different article from its last two iterations. It is focused on the one current event and I agree that per
679:
apparent effort to get them to react to the false claim in his nomination rather than to actually read the new article or do due diligence.
758:– Only notable for his political stunt of the day, which will be forgotten within a week. Knowledge (XXG) should not give him a soapbox. —
503:
This is really too minor of an event for a section in those articles. Perhaps a single sentence. Good luck trying to add more than that.
1196:
72:
127:
120:
17:
739:
I agree with Cullen that the the useful content from the previously deleted versions should be added back into the current article.
539:
1130:
no super hurry here. And the hedge fund stuff is sub-notable. It is useful for answering the question "what is this entity" tho.
629:: Even prior to the Mueller thing, he had plenty of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
494:
408:
535:
BLP1E says we can have articles on people notable for only one event if the event is significant and their role is significant.
793:
643:
173:
168:
1222:
1204:
1183:
1159:
1139:
1120:
1099:
1082:
1056:
1038:
1016:
994:
971:
954:
935:
917:
878:
861:
840:
824:
807:
776:
762:
748:
734:
705:
688:
670:
621:
599:
591:
576:
551:
519:
498:
462:
440:
412:
382:
361:
294:
141:
137:
78:
649:
892:
536:
445:
If the article does not bear standing as is (which is still debatable), rather than being deleted, the material should be
177:
262:
1241:
229:
40:
160:
1155:
556:
The press coverage you linked seems to actually suggest that the event was debunked much before it even happened.
713:
I initially recommended deleting an earlier version of this article in April, 2017 but withdrew my !vote after
786:- Significant coverage here, plus purely fringe individuals don't usually appear as a subject on shows like
223:
1218:
772:
767:
No, his political stunts go way back and have been reported extensively on RS prior to this
Mueller hoax.
744:
684:
666:
458:
378:
373:" as the nominator claims), unless someone can convince me otherwise. I'll keep this AfD on my watchlist.
306:
66:
1195:. It will be interesting to follow his accomplishments as he moves into, say, the art world or medicine.
1237:
1151:
1135:
617:
36:
787:
219:
1167:(I nominated this). This has spawned a lot of coverage. Good prediction skills by early keep !voters.
490:
404:
342:
318:
718:
557:
1075:
950:
836:
803:
727:
255:
269:
1116:
967:
874:
857:
547:
1192:
638:
609:
587:
421:
926:
and his tyranny of "coverage in reliable sources", EVER. Having said that, dude's got a point.
1214:
1178:
820:
768:
740:
680:
662:
571:
514:
454:
435:
374:
356:
315:
289:
116:
62:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1236:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
58:
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1131:
1095:
1052:
1033:
1011:
989:
931:
913:
613:
336:
321:
849:
486:
400:
309:
164:
453:
or one of the articles on the
Special Counsel Investigation or the Russian interference.
701:
235:
1087:
1070:
946:
923:
888:
832:
799:
722:
469:
450:
396:
327:
324:
1112:
963:
884:
870:
853:
590:
deletion is warranted. As I was trying to find sources, I ran across this quote from
543:
542:
is suggesting that will be the case for this new, bizarre development in his life. –
1169:
816:
714:
595:
562:
505:
426:
347:
333:
330:
312:
280:
194:
370:
1091:
1062:
1048:
1028:
1006:
984:
927:
909:
339:
303:
300:
1066:
156:
84:
1191:
This fellow has now applied his talents in multiple fields so it's no longer
697:
759:
1147:
This guy's become notable. He's now the subject of tories like this one
560:
might not even apply, because this is a non-event, if we go that way.
798:. Even read excessively strictly, he meets the GNG policy anyways.
1232:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1025:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
190:
186:
182:
852:. Issues of balance can be addressed through editing.
254:
717:
expanded and improved the article considerably. See
641:
instance. He is a noted "pro-Trump internet troll" (
268:
696:, can't improve an article if it doesn't exist.
106:Articles for deletion/Jacob Wohl (3rd nomination)
101:Articles for deletion/Jacob Wohl (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1244:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1023:Note: This discussion has been included in the
1001:Note: This discussion has been included in the
979:Note: This discussion has been included in the
1065:, please consider the NBC news article called
1003:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
676:Misleading, apparently bad-faith nomination.
474:Special Counsel investigation (2017–present)
148:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
981:list of People-related deletion discussions
485:, from the current projection of this page
1022:
1000:
978:
345:Pinging previous discussion participants.
418:as this is the sole reason he is notable
93:
1213:Or particle physics. Sky's the limit.
417:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
91:
883:I could NEVER, EVER disagree with
24:
792:or receive in-depth coverage in
133:Introduction to deletion process
96:Articles for deletion/Jacob Wohl
922:I will NEVER, EVER give in to
647:) and "alt-right influencer" (
1:
1197:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris
1223:13:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
1205:13:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
1184:22:36, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1160:21:37, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1140:19:33, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1121:14:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1100:16:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1083:16:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1057:17:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
1039:16:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
1017:16:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
995:16:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
972:16:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
955:14:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
936:16:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
918:14:28, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
879:13:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
862:06:42, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
841:02:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
825:02:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
808:01:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
777:01:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
763:01:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
749:01:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
735:01:08, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
706:00:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
689:23:53, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
671:21:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
622:21:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
600:21:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
577:21:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
552:21:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
520:20:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
499:04:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
463:20:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
441:19:53, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
413:19:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
383:19:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
362:19:08, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
295:19:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
79:16:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
123:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1261:
592:a Bloomberg opinion piece
1234:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
653:). He is notable as a
90:AfDs for this article:
121:Articles for deletion
659:fraudulent financier
371:strongly promotional
848:as a clear pass of
655:conspiracy theorist
637:, so this is not a
59:(non-admin closure)
1125:I guess we should
789:Jimmy Kimmel Live!
1041:
1019:
997:
612:charades, thanks
138:Guide to deletion
128:How to contribute
61:
1252:
1181:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1152:Snooganssnoogans
1080:
1078:Let's discuss it
732:
730:Let's discuss it
574:
570:
568:
565:
517:
513:
511:
508:
438:
434:
432:
429:
399:. Comical gold.
372:
359:
355:
353:
350:
292:
288:
286:
283:
273:
272:
258:
210:
198:
180:
118:
75:
69:
57:
34:
1260:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1242:deletion review
1179:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1076:
1061:Reply to note:
1037:
1015:
993:
728:
572:
566:
563:
561:
515:
509:
506:
504:
436:
430:
427:
425:
357:
351:
348:
346:
290:
284:
281:
279:
215:
206:
171:
155:
152:
115:
112:
110:
88:
73:
67:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1258:
1256:
1247:
1246:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1208:
1207:
1186:
1162:
1142:
1123:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1043:
1042:
1031:
1020:
1009:
998:
987:
975:
974:
957:
940:
939:
938:
907:, if you like.
881:
864:
843:
827:
810:
781:
780:
779:
753:
752:
751:
708:
691:
673:
644:New York Times
624:
602:
581:
580:
579:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
470:Robert Mueller
451:Robert Mueller
420:so delete per
397:list of hoaxes
385:
364:
276:
275:
212:
151:
150:
145:
135:
130:
113:
111:
109:
108:
103:
98:
92:
89:
87:
82:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1257:
1245:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1230:
1229:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1176:
1166:
1163:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1146:
1143:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1128:
1124:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1107:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1074:
1073:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1026:
1021:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1004:
999:
996:
991:
986:
982:
977:
976:
973:
969:
965:
961:
958:
956:
952:
948:
944:
941:
937:
933:
929:
925:
921:
920:
919:
915:
911:
908:
906:
902:
897:
895:
890:
886:
882:
880:
876:
872:
868:
865:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
844:
842:
838:
834:
831:
828:
826:
822:
818:
814:
811:
809:
805:
801:
797:
796:
791:
790:
785:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
765:
764:
761:
757:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
737:
736:
733:
731:
726:
725:
720:
716:
712:
709:
707:
703:
699:
695:
692:
690:
686:
682:
677:
674:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
651:
646:
645:
640:
636:
632:
628:
625:
623:
619:
615:
611:
606:
603:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
582:
578:
575:
569:
559:
555:
554:
553:
549:
545:
541:
538:
534:
531:
521:
518:
512:
502:
501:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
481:
480:
475:
471:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
443:
442:
439:
433:
423:
419:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
393:
389:
386:
384:
380:
376:
368:
365:
363:
360:
354:
344:
341:
338:
335:
332:
329:
326:
323:
320:
317:
314:
311:
308:
305:
302:
299:
298:
297:
296:
293:
287:
271:
267:
264:
261:
257:
253:
249:
246:
243:
240:
237:
234:
231:
228:
225:
221:
218:
217:Find sources:
213:
209:
205:
202:
196:
192:
188:
184:
179:
175:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
153:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
134:
131:
129:
126:
125:
124:
122:
117:
107:
104:
102:
99:
97:
94:
86:
83:
81:
80:
76:
70:
64:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1233:
1231:
1215:Softlavender
1188:
1164:
1144:
1126:
1108:
1077:
1071:
959:
942:
904:
900:
899:
893:
866:
845:
829:
812:
794:
788:
783:
769:Softlavender
755:
741:Softlavender
729:
723:
710:
693:
681:Softlavender
675:
663:Softlavender
658:
654:
648:
642:
626:
604:
583:
532:
482:
478:
477:
455:Softlavender
446:
391:
387:
375:Softlavender
366:
277:
265:
259:
251:
244:
238:
232:
226:
216:
203:
114:
63:power~enwiki
49:
47:
31:
28:
1132:Herostratus
903:-- and/or
795:Vanity Fair
614:Atlantic306
242:free images
719:WP:HEYMANN
558:WP:NOTNEWS
487:Tsumikiria
401:Tsumikiria
157:Jacob Wohl
85:Jacob Wohl
1238:talk page
1088:Cullen328
947:EnPassant
924:Cullen328
889:Cullen328
833:soibangla
800:Isingness
657:and as a
476:instead.
37:talk page
1240:or in a
1193:WP:BLP1E
964:Lordbedo
905:redirect
885:Muboshgu
871:KConWiki
854:Bakazaka
639:WP:BLP1E
610:WP:BLP1E
588:WP:BLP1E
544:Muboshgu
540:coverage
422:WP:BLP1E
201:View log
142:glossary
39:or in a
896:article
817:Icewhiz
715:Icewhiz
367:Comment
248:WP refs
236:scholar
174:protect
169:history
119:New to
54:WP:SNOW
1174:umbolo
1092:Drmies
1072:Cullen
1063:Drmies
1049:Drmies
1029:clpo13
1007:clpo13
985:clpo13
928:Drmies
910:Drmies
901:delete
850:WP:GNG
756:Delete
724:Cullen
605:Delete
584:Delete
567:umbolo
510:umbolo
447:merged
431:umbolo
352:umbolo
285:umbolo
220:Google
178:delete
650:Wired
596:Geoff
537:Press
479:Merge
449:into
390:, or
263:JSTOR
224:books
208:Stats
195:views
187:watch
183:links
16:<
1219:talk
1201:talk
1189:Keep
1165:Keep
1156:talk
1145:Keep
1136:talk
1127:keep
1117:talk
1109:Keep
1096:talk
1053:talk
1034:talk
1012:talk
990:talk
968:talk
960:Keep
951:talk
943:Keep
932:talk
914:talk
875:talk
867:Keep
858:talk
846:Keep
837:talk
830:Keep
821:talk
813:Keep
804:talk
784:Keep
773:talk
745:talk
711:Keep
702:talk
694:Keep
685:talk
667:talk
635:News
627:Keep
618:talk
548:talk
533:Keep
483:Keep
459:talk
392:move
388:Keep
379:talk
256:FENS
230:news
191:logs
165:talk
161:edit
50:keep
1180:^^^
1113:Rob
894:Vox
887:or
760:JFG
698:X1\
631:Web
598:|
573:^^^
516:^^^
472:or
437:^^^
358:^^^
291:^^^
270:TWL
199:– (
1221:)
1203:)
1158:)
1150:.
1138:)
1119:)
1098:)
1055:)
1027:.
1005:.
983:.
970:)
953:)
934:)
916:)
877:)
860:)
839:)
823:)
806:)
775:)
747:)
704:)
687:)
669:)
633:,
620:)
550:)
497:)
461:)
424:?
411:)
381:)
250:)
193:|
189:|
185:|
181:|
176:|
172:|
167:|
163:|
77:)
71:,
52:.
1217:(
1199:(
1171:w
1154:(
1134:(
1115:(
1094:(
1051:(
1036:)
1032:(
1014:)
1010:(
992:)
988:(
966:(
949:(
930:(
912:(
873:(
856:(
835:(
819:(
802:(
771:(
743:(
700:(
683:(
665:(
616:(
564:w
546:(
507:w
495:C
493:/
491:T
489:(
457:(
428:w
409:C
407:/
405:T
403:(
377:(
349:w
343:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
313:
310:
307:
304:
301:
282:w
274:)
266:·
260:·
252:·
245:·
239:·
233:·
227:·
222:(
214:(
211:)
204:·
197:)
159:(
144:)
140:(
74:ν
68:π
65:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.