319:, when it says "The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient to establish notability. Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization. " and also says "Such coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements, and makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization. ". In fact the references indicates the brand satisfy
498:
This vote may be redundant given the speedy (I don't know which takes precedent), but here goes FWIW. I don't see anything suggesting notability. If the company were a bona fide luxury brand with such a long history etc. as claimed, it would surely have been covered more extensively and/or by more
239:
I have created this article somedays back. It was suddenly speedy deleted for promotional today and I recreated the article while trying to rectify the issue mentioned as the reason for deletion. But still some editor think it should be deleted. I am nominating my own article for deletion to let
208:
468:
Exactly. Two Forbes
Frances articles. Forbes is deprecated, its non-RS. The other eight refs are junk. A shop, an announcement, a profile page and so on, all fail Corpdepth or Orgind.
169:
257:
499:'serious' media (ATM the closest we get to that is probably Luxe.net, which may or may not be RS); the fact that it hasn't, suggests that it isn't. As it stands, fails
202:
363:
417:
324:
545:
To my untrained eye, having a CDS and AfD running parallel seems odd, but what do I know... Mind you, on this occasion a bot may have been partly to blame. --
116:
101:
416:
Can you please elaborate how you say "no significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" when we have
142:
137:
146:
96:
89:
17:
421:
328:
429:
336:
223:
129:
190:
110:
106:
573:
40:
284:
184:
550:
508:
459:
394:
180:
569:
554:
536:
512:
478:
463:
441:
398:
374:
348:
297:
268:
249:
71:
36:
133:
389:
no significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
230:
320:
316:
280:
216:
67:
125:
77:
546:
504:
455:
437:
390:
344:
245:
367:
261:
85:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
568:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
529:
471:
290:
386:
196:
523:
500:
60:
54:
433:
340:
241:
451:
163:
425:
332:
450:
A photograph, a Forbes puff piece article and a YouTube video do not make
564:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
522:
Hi Folks!! The article has been deleted by CSD'd per G11 by
240:
others decide if it should be there as an article or not.
159:
155:
151:
215:
526:, so this Afd is moot. Somebody needs to close it.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
576:). No further edits should be made to this page.
362:Note: This discussion has been included in the
287:. Native advertising. No effective references.
258:list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions
256:Note: This discussion has been included in the
364:list of Business-related deletion discussions
229:
8:
117:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
361:
255:
7:
24:
339:etc. Don't you think the same?--
315:Can you please say how it fails
102:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
555:12:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
537:11:04, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
513:06:57, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
479:00:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
464:22:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
442:21:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
399:21:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
375:20:52, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
349:21:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
298:20:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
269:20:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
250:20:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
72:09:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
92:(AfD)? Read these primers!
593:
566:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
90:Articles for deletion
55:(non-admin closure)
432:and many others?--
377:
285:WP:NOTADVERTISING
271:
107:Guide to deletion
97:How to contribute
70:
57:
584:
534:
532:
476:
474:
452:reliable sources
372:
295:
293:
266:
234:
233:
219:
167:
149:
87:
63:
59:
53:
34:
592:
591:
587:
586:
585:
583:
582:
581:
580:
574:deletion review
530:
528:
472:
470:
368:
323:as for example
291:
289:
262:
176:
140:
124:
121:
84:
81:
61:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
590:
588:
579:
578:
560:
559:
558:
557:
540:
539:
524:user:Jimfbleak
516:
515:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
466:
445:
444:
402:
401:
379:
378:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
301:
300:
273:
272:
237:
236:
173:
120:
119:
114:
104:
99:
82:
80:
75:
50:deleted as G11
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
589:
577:
575:
571:
567:
562:
561:
556:
552:
548:
547:DoubleGrazing
544:
543:
542:
541:
538:
535:
533:
525:
521:
518:
517:
514:
510:
506:
505:DoubleGrazing
502:
497:
494:
493:
480:
477:
475:
467:
465:
461:
457:
456:Theroadislong
453:
449:
448:
447:
446:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
400:
396:
392:
391:Theroadislong
388:
384:
381:
380:
376:
373:
371:
365:
360:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
299:
296:
294:
286:
282:
278:
275:
274:
270:
267:
265:
259:
254:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
171:
165:
161:
157:
153:
148:
144:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:
118:
115:
112:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
94:
93:
91:
86:
79:
76:
74:
73:
69:
65:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
565:
563:
527:
519:
495:
469:
413:
382:
370:CAPTAIN RAJU
369:
321:WP:CORPDEPTH
317:WP:CORPDEPTH
312:
288:
281:WP:CORPDEPTH
276:
264:CAPTAIN RAJU
263:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
126:Jahan Geneve
83:
78:Jahan Geneve
49:
47:
31:
28:
531:scope_creep
473:scope_creep
292:scope_creep
203:free images
570:talk page
37:talk page
572:or in a
434:Chiro725
387:WP:NCORP
341:Chiro725
242:Chiro725
170:View log
111:glossary
39:or in a
520:Comment
501:WP:CORP
414:Comment
313:Comment
209:WP refs
197:scholar
143:protect
138:history
88:New to
496:Delete
385:Fails
383:Delete
279:Fails
277:Delete
181:Google
147:delete
503:. --
224:JSTOR
185:books
164:views
156:watch
152:links
64:KNOWZ
16:<
551:talk
509:talk
460:talk
438:talk
430:this
426:this
422:this
418:this
395:talk
345:talk
337:this
333:this
329:this
325:this
283:and
246:talk
217:FENS
191:news
160:logs
134:talk
130:edit
68:TALK
62:HELL
231:TWL
168:– (
553:)
511:)
462:)
454:.
440:)
428:,
424:,
420:,
397:)
366:.
347:)
335:,
331:,
327:,
260:.
248:)
211:)
162:|
158:|
154:|
150:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
58:—
52:.
549:(
507:(
458:(
436:(
393:(
343:(
244:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
166:)
128:(
113:)
109:(
66:▎
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.