Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Jan Moedwil - Knowledge

Source 📝

513:
brings up some points that again, while they don't establish notability, make me believe sources could well exist. So to err on the side of caution and not delete a potential good article, I'll happily switch to keep on the presumption they exist. (re: AleatoryPonderings aside comment: I always find
479:
when I agree with you that presumptions of notability still require evidence and do not result in a keep by default. But I think the coverage I've found, which is now in the article—aside from the Dutch source—demonstrates that the presumption should hold in this case.)
508:
found a source that appears to be non-trivial. In addition, while the the brief mentions I and others have found don't establish notability, they do give a reason to believe there may be other non-trival sources that address the topic directly and in-depth.
398: 52:. Per the discussion below, nomination gladly withdrawn. The points in the discussion, while not establishing notability, do give a reason to presume there may be non-trivial sources that address the topic directly and in-depth. 256:- For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" or "note"—that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded". 217: 170: 211: 339: 287: 313: 117: 102: 177: 143: 138: 97: 90: 17: 423: 147: 369: 232: 453:
The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work.
485: 431: 199: 130: 111: 107: 464: 550: 40: 193: 510: 481: 427: 546: 523: 351: 325: 299: 273: 189: 66: 36: 529: 489: 435: 410: 385: 357: 331: 305: 279: 72: 378: 239: 225: 448: 253: 86: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
545:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
372:
and in English publications during World War II. There are many sources in Dutch and French.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
518: 472: 468: 444: 419: 403: 346: 320: 294: 268: 257: 134: 61: 205: 505: 456: 373: 54: 422:
and would note that the corresponding articles in frwiki and nlwiki are unreferenced.
476: 249: 261: 164: 264:
that address the subject directly and in-depth that would establish notability.
126: 78: 426:
is the closest to sigcov I've been able to find, but I can't read Dutch.
393:
Extensive Gbook references are available. His radio program launched the
541:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
160: 156: 152: 224: 475:: you might think I'm being hypocritical by citing 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 553:). No further edits should be made to this page. 338:Note: This discussion has been included in the 312:Note: This discussion has been included in the 286:Note: This discussion has been included in the 238: 8: 340:list of Belgium-related deletion discussions 118:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 288:list of People-related deletion discussions 337: 314:list of Radio-related deletion discussions 311: 285: 397:in Belgium, that was started by the BBC. 514:your comments useful and thoughtful). 460: 452: 395:"V for Victory" campaign in July 1941 7: 451:criteria 3 and/or 4, especially 3: 24: 447:(mostly) aside, I think he meets 103:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 461:significant or well-known work 1: 463:. Or, as a recipient of the 471:criterion 1. (As an aside, 418:. I've had trouble finding 93:(AfD)? Read these primers! 570: 530:16:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 490:15:26, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 465:Order of Leopold (Belgium) 436:14:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 411:07:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 386:03:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 358:02:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 332:02:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 306:02:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 280:02:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 73:16:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 543:Please do not modify it. 368:He is discussed in this 32:Please do not modify it. 260:revealed no additional 455:I think broadcasts of 248:Article does not meet 370:English language book 91:Articles for deletion 55:(non-admin closure) 526: 522: 511:AleatoryPonderings 482:AleatoryPonderings 428:AleatoryPonderings 354: 350: 328: 324: 302: 298: 276: 272: 69: 65: 524: 516: 443:. Concerns about 360: 352: 344: 334: 326: 318: 308: 300: 292: 274: 266: 108:Guide to deletion 98:How to contribute 67: 59: 57: 561: 528: 408: 406: 383: 381:Let's discuss it 356: 330: 304: 278: 243: 242: 228: 180: 168: 150: 88: 71: 53: 34: 569: 568: 564: 563: 562: 560: 559: 558: 557: 551:deletion review 515: 404: 402: 379: 343: 317: 291: 265: 185: 176: 141: 125: 122: 85: 82: 58: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 567: 565: 556: 555: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 495: 494: 493: 492: 457:Radio Belgique 413: 388: 362: 361: 335: 309: 246: 245: 182: 121: 120: 115: 105: 100: 83: 81: 76: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 566: 554: 552: 548: 544: 539: 538: 531: 527: 520: 512: 507: 504: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 491: 487: 483: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 439: 438: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 414: 412: 409: 407: 399: 396: 392: 389: 387: 384: 382: 377: 376: 371: 367: 364: 363: 359: 355: 348: 341: 336: 333: 329: 322: 315: 310: 307: 303: 296: 289: 284: 283: 282: 281: 277: 270: 263: 259: 255: 251: 241: 237: 234: 231: 227: 223: 219: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 191: 188: 187:Find sources: 183: 179: 175: 172: 166: 162: 158: 154: 149: 145: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 123: 119: 116: 113: 109: 106: 104: 101: 99: 96: 95: 94: 92: 87: 80: 77: 75: 74: 70: 63: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 542: 540: 502: 440: 415: 401: 394: 390: 380: 374: 365: 247: 235: 229: 221: 214: 208: 202: 196: 186: 173: 84: 49: 47: 31: 28: 473:TimothyBlue 467:, he meets 459:count as a 405:scope_creep 212:free images 127:Jan Moedwil 79:Jan Moedwil 50:speedy keep 449:WP:NAUTHOR 254:WP:NPEOPLE 547:talk page 506:Cullen328 469:WP:ANYBIO 445:WP:SIGCOV 420:WP:SIGCOV 258:WP:BEFORE 37:talk page 549:or in a 171:View log 112:glossary 39:or in a 519:Timothy 477:WP:SNGs 416:Comment 347:Timothy 321:Timothy 295:Timothy 269:Timothy 218:WP refs 206:scholar 144:protect 139:history 89:New to 62:Timothy 375:Cullen 250:WP:GNG 190:Google 148:delete 262:WP:RS 233:JSTOR 194:books 178:Stats 165:views 157:watch 153:links 16:< 525:talk 503:Keep 486:talk 441:Keep 432:talk 424:This 391:Keep 366:Keep 353:talk 327:talk 301:talk 275:talk 226:FENS 200:news 161:logs 135:talk 131:edit 68:talk 521::: 517:// 349::: 345:// 323::: 319:// 297::: 293:// 271::: 267:// 252:or 240:TWL 169:– ( 64::: 60:// 488:) 434:) 400:. 342:. 316:. 290:. 220:) 163:| 159:| 155:| 151:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 484:( 430:( 244:) 236:· 230:· 222:· 215:· 209:· 203:· 197:· 192:( 184:( 181:) 174:· 167:) 129:( 114:) 110:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
Timothy
talk
16:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Jan Moedwil

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Jan Moedwil
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.