215:
Whisperer" (citation to the
Journal of Ghost Whisperer Studies? Don't think so...). In this case, it's clear that the author translated the Polish article and added some other information not contained therein. Like Cap, I don't read Polish either, so I'm not going to be grouczy about an article about Graczyk.
214:
per
Campnango. I don't get the part about original research-- did the author snap the photos? "Original research" is overused, and because it's not consistently applied, an argument that's no longer taken seriously. I'm not sure how else one writes an article about the latest episode of "Ghost
156:
The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries, museums or internationally significant
143:
The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or
251:
159:(a:) no (b:) had some individual exhibitions but there is no assertion for significance, notability and/or media coverage in the article (c:) no (d:) According to the article:
110:
194:
says this guy is notable, given the medals he has earned, the length of his career and the widespread galleries that display his work. Mark the article with
17:
125:
83:
78:
87:
231:
in the UK. A verify tag would be appropriate, but it's easily attributable and, because he's dead, the extra stringency of
70:
302:
36:
174:
198:
if you want, and there could be a bit less editorializing in the text, but this does not at all appear to fall under
301:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
282:
285:
261:
241:
219:
206:
178:
52:
74:
278:
281:]. Add links i.e. for "Warsaw uprising 1944" and the above reference regarding "Ad-Hoc" Gallery".
66:
58:
191:
131:
The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors:
236:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
232:
168:
199:
118:
163:, but no sources and no assertion for significance of these art collections were given.
271:
216:
203:
137:
The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique:
49:
104:
258:
228:
164:
161:
The artist`s works can be found in private and national art collections (...)
227:. He was a very well-known and well-regarded Polish artist, on the level of
190:
Okay, I don't read Polish, so you can research this better than me, but
295:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
151:
Polish and foreign media presented Jan
Graczyk`s sculptures
124:
Fails criteria of creative professionals notability (see
100:
96:
92:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
305:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
250:: This debate has been included in the
126:WP:BIO\Criteria for notability of people
252:list of Visual arts-related deletions
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
322:
274:- an art gallery listed by
286:15:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
270:- notable article as per
262:07:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
242:22:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
220:22:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
207:21:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
179:21:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
53:00:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
298:Please do not modify it.
149:, it has been mentioned
32:Please do not modify it.
279:Official page of Warsaw
153:but no source are given
119:No original research
235:does not apply. --
264:
255:
313:
300:
283:greg park avenue
256:
246:
239:
108:
90:
34:
321:
320:
316:
315:
314:
312:
311:
310:
309:
303:deletion review
296:
259:John Vandenberg
237:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
319:
317:
308:
307:
290:
276:
275:
272:Galeria Ad-Hoc
265:
244:
222:
209:
184:
183:
182:
181:
158:
154:
145:
141:
135:
122:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
318:
306:
304:
299:
293:
292:
291:
288:
287:
284:
280:
273:
269:
266:
263:
260:
253:
249:
245:
243:
240:
234:
230:
226:
223:
221:
218:
213:
210:
208:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
185:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
155:
152:
148:
142:
140:
136:
134:
130:
129:
127:
123:
120:
117:
116:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
297:
294:
289:
277:
267:
247:
224:
211:
195:
192:common sense
187:
171:
160:
150:
146:
138:
132:
45:
43:
31:
28:
229:Henry Moore
225:Strong Keep
67:Jan Graczyk
59:Jan Graczyk
157:libraries:
217:Mandsford
238:Charlene
204:Capmango
175:contribs
144:reviews:
111:View log
84:protect
79:history
50:Caknuck
233:WP:BLP
196:verify
88:delete
200:WP:NN
165:Visor
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
268:Keep
248:Note
212:Keep
188:Keep
169:talk
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:Keep
257:--
254:.
128:):
109:– (
202:.
177:)
147:no
139:no
133:no
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:—
172:·
167:(
121:.
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.