Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Janet Borden Inc. - Knowledge

Source 📝

457: 338:
say she's an artist. It's a hard case to make that the person is notable but the business is not, when they are so closely connected. I don't see that Borden is notable for anything except as a gallerist. I'd support renaming and keeping this page as a redirect.
458:
https://books.google.com/books?id=xGCjXTVpv-0C&pg=PA85&dq=%22Janet+Borden+Inc.%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi0wavx94LuAhUQ1lkKHVK0DCoQ6AEwAnoECAEQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Janet%20Borden%20Inc.%22%20-wikipedia&f=false
198: 233:
fail. I did manage to find four sources, but two are interviews and one was a single line in the New York Times confirming the date they opened. There is basically no in-depth independent coverage available.
567:. Almost every gallery in the New York scene has a "stable" of several notable(?) artists that it represented from time to time, which then gets them a little, passing coverage, so 159: 192: 313: 273: 293: 106: 91: 560: 132: 127: 483:, please note that Borden is NOT an artist. As an aside, I thought it was interesting that we don't have an article on the #4 on that list: 136: 460:
combined with several google book hits, make me lean keep. The article could be improved, my google results suggest the things that meet
253:
as an artist. I have copied a line about the gallery to that new article. I think she's the notable topic (by our standard) and this one,
119: 213: 86: 79: 17: 180: 100: 96: 589: 515: 174: 646: 40: 629: 610: 580: 533: 504: 475: 440: 420: 391: 373: 348: 325: 305: 285: 266: 243: 61: 170: 123: 484: 568: 378:
OK it seems likely I have this wrong about her being an artist. But: the Smithsonian did have her in the
220: 642: 625: 36: 254: 115: 67: 495:. We seem to be better at wring biographic articles on photographers than on curators and gallerists. 555:- this was never notable, and is not notable. I consider myself something of a "culture vulture" in 500: 416: 344: 206: 428: 335: 250: 552: 529: 492: 488: 436: 387: 369: 321: 301: 281: 262: 239: 186: 576: 470: 404: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
641:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
621: 544: 57: 548: 230: 601: 496: 412: 359: 340: 620:
I have found several mentions, but they are passing. There's no significant coverage.
400: 525: 461: 432: 408: 396: 383: 365: 331: 317: 297: 277: 258: 235: 572: 480: 465: 379: 153: 53: 456:
it is hard to separate the artist and the company, but number 95 on this list
559:, and I've never heard of this gallery. And it appears for good reasons: 556: 364:
She's a photographer herself with two works in permanent collections?
637:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
592:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
518:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
405:
https://collections.eastman.org/objects/550523/janet-borden
403:
is by Mark Cohen, from a portfolion published by Borden.
149: 145: 141: 205: 524:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
598:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 401:
https://americanart.si.edu/artist/janet-borden-6597
431:for CSD. I don't see either as being notable now. 249:Note: I found sources establishing notability for 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 649:). No further edits should be made to this page. 314:list of Photography-related deletion discussions 312:Note: This discussion has been included in the 292:Note: This discussion has been included in the 274:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions 272:Note: This discussion has been included in the 294:list of New York-related deletion discussions 219: 8: 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 311: 291: 271: 399:, Yeah, it's not very clear. The work on 464:are not well documented in the article. 382:! Vexations, can you confirm the facts? 407:is portrait of Borden, by photographer 334:, are you sure? None of the sources at 229:Article is on a New York art gallery; 565:newspaper articles about this company 7: 380:list of artists in their collection 569:such a factor is not determinative 24: 92:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 441:22:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC) 421:21:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC) 392:18:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC) 374:17:57, 31 December 2020 (UTC) 349:13:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC) 326:23:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 306:18:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 286:18:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 267:23:35, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 244:18:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 630:12:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC) 611:22:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC) 581:12:57, 12 January 2021 (UTC) 257:, can be safely redirected. 62:03:57, 22 January 2021 (UTC) 534:08:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC) 505:22:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC) 476:18:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC) 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 666: 639:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 485:Maria Morris Hambourg 80:Articles for deletion 427:Agreed. I nominated 613: 609: 536: 474: 328: 308: 288: 255:Janet Borden Inc. 116:Janet Borden Inc. 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 68:Janet Borden Inc. 657: 608: 606: 599: 597: 595: 593: 523: 521: 519: 468: 363: 224: 223: 209: 157: 139: 77: 34: 665: 664: 660: 659: 658: 656: 655: 654: 653: 647:deletion review 614: 602: 600: 588: 586: 537: 514: 512: 357: 166: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 663: 661: 652: 651: 633: 632: 596: 585: 584: 583: 522: 511: 510: 509: 508: 507: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 424: 423: 376: 352: 351: 309: 289: 269: 227: 226: 163: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 662: 650: 648: 644: 640: 635: 634: 631: 627: 623: 619: 616: 615: 612: 607: 605: 594: 591: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 564: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 539: 538: 535: 531: 527: 520: 517: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 479: 478: 477: 472: 467: 463: 459: 455: 452: 451: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 425: 422: 418: 414: 410: 409:JoAnn Verburg 406: 402: 398: 395: 394: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 375: 371: 367: 361: 356: 355: 354: 353: 350: 346: 342: 337: 333: 330: 329: 327: 323: 319: 315: 310: 307: 303: 299: 295: 290: 287: 283: 279: 275: 270: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 247: 246: 245: 241: 237: 232: 222: 218: 215: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 172: 169: 168:Find sources: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 638: 636: 617: 603: 587: 563:exactly zero 562: 540: 513: 453: 429:Janet Borden 336:Janet Borden 251:Janet Borden 228: 216: 210: 202: 195: 189: 183: 177: 167: 73: 49: 47: 31: 28: 622:Less Unless 553:WP:CREATIVE 493:Rick Wester 491:or the#18, 489:Weston Naef 193:free images 604:Sandstein 561:there are 487:, the #7, 643:talk page 545:WP:SIGCOV 497:Vexations 454:Weak Keep 413:Vexations 360:Vexations 341:Vexations 37:talk page 645:or in a 590:Relisted 557:New York 549:WP:NCORP 526:Darkwind 516:Relisted 433:Possibly 397:Possibly 384:Possibly 366:Possibly 332:Possibly 318:Possibly 298:Possibly 278:Possibly 259:Possibly 236:Possibly 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 573:Bearian 481:Jeepday 466:Jeepday 199:WP refs 187:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 618:Delete 551:, and 541:Delete 462:WP:GNG 171:Google 137:delete 54:Daniel 50:delete 231:NCORP 214:JSTOR 175:books 154:views 146:watch 142:links 16:< 626:talk 577:talk 543:per 530:talk 501:talk 471:talk 437:talk 417:talk 388:talk 370:talk 345:talk 322:talk 302:talk 282:talk 263:talk 240:talk 207:FENS 181:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 316:. 296:. 276:. 221:TWL 158:– ( 628:) 579:) 571:. 547:, 532:) 503:) 439:) 419:) 411:. 390:) 372:) 347:) 324:) 304:) 284:) 265:) 242:) 201:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 52:. 624:( 575:( 528:( 499:( 473:) 469:( 435:( 415:( 386:( 368:( 362:: 358:@ 343:( 320:( 300:( 280:( 261:( 238:( 225:) 217:· 211:· 203:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 178:· 173:( 165:( 162:) 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Daniel
talk
03:57, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Janet Borden Inc.

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Janet Borden Inc.
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.