71:
323:. By citing an essay and personal opinion on the interest of the material, the nom has not made much of a case for deletion. However, looks to me that the subject would have very broad interest among those researching American culture, political history and etymologies. A number of the terms do seem to be referenced, but better referencing would be welcome. --
472:, albeit neither matches the main list in the article in question), and "who knows where this stuff came from ?" ones like this. The fate of both articles should be to be reduced to verifiable, and thus shorter, lists. However, we're now at AFD for the Limbaugh list, so the time for eventualism is past.
507:
This can be fixed for most entries in this article. For example, a lexis-nexis search on " 'feminazi' AND 'limbaugh' " yielded 120 results in "major papers" and five in "magazines and journals." I am sure that among those is an article that could be cited where relevant information about "feminazi"
467:
You nominate it and I'll give you my opinion at the AFD. There's at least a degree of difference between "I picked up a book and copied out what it says" lists, which are verifiable and sourceable by adding the book(s) the material was extracted from as reference(s) (i.e. there are two lists of High
578:
Yeah, I saw that. Also wanted to chime in and mention the
Wikiquote option that we used on Levin, which helped win over those opposed to outright deletion of the list. If implemented on Limbaugh's page, the Rush jargon would survive intact at Wikiquote and you culd easily provide a link to it in
496:
I am new to wikipedia, but if what I hear is really true--that, for example, lists and descriptions of each and every
Simpsons episode reside here--then I don't see how Limbaugh jargon qualifies for deletion. "Unverified through anything other than listening to the show" (quoting CrazyRussian
409:-complete fancruft and at best it's a list of neologism which have no place here anyway. Now if there was a reliable source somewhere that had an article explicitedly about rush Limbaugh's jargon then you would have grounds to keep it. As it stands, it's WP:or cruft.
500:
As for a positive argument for "keep," I endorse what the "absolutely keep" entry said above: "Limbaugh jargon is used to parody and satirize the object of the jargon. It is a distinguishing feature of his program and therefore required for a encyclopedic
548:
page came up with, for dealing with a similar list of Levin jargon that was overwhelming the article, was to move the full list to
Wikiquote and keep a representative sample of 5 items behnd on the master Levin page. Would that not work here as
437:
as above unless fixed up to reference the sources which JJay refers to for each and every item; Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary of quotations and neologisms, verifiability is not optional and there are no eventualists round here.
48:
to delete at this time. The comments from anons/new users shouldn't be ignored because they actually make meaningful arguments. And several established contributers also want to keep... so there's clearly no consensus to delete.
191:
320:. Qualifies for inclusion as a glossary of terms used by Rush Limbaugh. Limbaugh's use of lanuage and rhetoric is widely discussed and analyzed - books and articles are written on the topic
511:
For any entry that cannot be found in published articles, it would suffice to reference a date when the term was heard on
Limbaugh's show, since audio archives of the show are available.
78:
689:. Like Limbaugh or not, the terminology used in his show has permiated society. Even if you don't agree with him, knowing what in fact is being inferred is a worthwhile excercise.
603:
I just don't see how the list of
Limbaugh jargon is any worse. Maybe the title of the Limbaugh article should be changed to "List of neologisms used on The Rush Limbaugh Show"?
612:
Yes, there are many items in that list that should be pared. However, the list itself should stay. There are several notable entries with their own articles on it, such as
384:, Limbaugh jargon is used to parody and satirize the object of the jargon. It is a distinguishing feature of his program and therefore required for a encyclopedic entry.
458:
might have to be immediately deleted since there are not references for "each and every item". There are plenty of eventualists here. It's a very valid approach. --
681:
669:
649:
635:
607:
587:
573:
553:
479:
462:
445:
429:
413:
376:
339:
327:
308:
289:
273:
253:
226:
213:
53:
521:
387:
350:
497:
above) ? Check. "of limited interest to a circumscribed minority"? Check. Simpsons episodes and
Limbaugh jargon must plead guilty to both charges.
335:. Provides a useful space to merge Limbaugh's new epithets as they are invented, and having them here is preferable to having articles on each. -
705:
362:
294:
Well, to be really precise GFDL doesn't protect facts or sources. So if someone took the time to re-investigate and type into the article
258:
This is an illegal vote. GFDL requires that history be preserved. If we're merging, we must redirect. If we're deleting we cannot merge. -
87:
399:
117:
533:
599:
OK guys, I did a little research and I see that there is an article on wikipedia titled "List of neologisms on The
Simpsons." It is
17:
198:
merged back in to the article on El Rushbo - a half dozen terms at most. But this article as currently constituted is ridiculous. -
59:
617:
103:
455:
321:
631:
569:
347:. This page was interesting. If anything it should be moved to the "Rush Limbaugh" page, but it's definately relevant.
269:
209:
190:. Unverified through anything other than listening to the show, of limited interest to a circumscribed minority. At the
723:
36:
76:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
299:
149:
722:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
701:
358:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
620:. Some entries are sourced. The ones that are not sourced and do not assert significance should be removed. -
476:
442:
395:
693:
133:
107:
697:
529:
354:
410:
92:
604:
391:
525:
627:
565:
372:, I'm sure one of the editors has a Rush Limbaugh fan website where this would be much more at home.
265:
205:
425:
that this is better than independent articles on each neologism. Is that really the alternative?
50:
473:
439:
139:
70:
677:. The Limbaugh Show in itself is notable enough for a glossary of terms used on the program. --
187:
285:
249:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
622:
560:
260:
200:
243:
298:
very simple information (as opposed to copy/pasting) then it would be GFDL compliant. -
239:
678:
584:
550:
426:
235:
223:
666:
167:
155:
123:
102:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
657:
There is a history of phrases coined by
Limbaugh that enter common use, such as
646:
422:
373:
336:
580:
545:
459:
324:
579:
the jargon section of the 'pedia article. I suggest voters here check out
613:
421:
per the Crazy
Russian. This is clearly cruft, although I agree with
716:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
65:
222:. fancruft and Knowledge (XXG) is not a collection of FAQs.
96:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
86:
among
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
305:
558:
This is precisely what I suggest in my nomination. -
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
726:). No further edits should be made to this page.
583:for an example of how this worked in practice.
116:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
8:
194:they glossed over this point. This could be
542:Delete on Knowledge (XXG)/Add to Wikiquote
90:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
110:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
454:Following your logic, articles like
504:As for the verifiability problem:
468:Kings of Ireland in Frank Byrne's
24:
69:
60:Jargon of The Rush Limbaugh Show
618:Cheese-eating surrender monkeys
544:A solution that editors on the
1:
456:List of High Kings of Ireland
106:on the part of others and to
682:01:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
670:18:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
650:01:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
636:13:05, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
608:05:18, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
588:13:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
574:04:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
554:03:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
493:for the following reasons.
480:12:56, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
463:12:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
446:10:21, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
430:09:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
414:23:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
377:18:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
340:14:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
328:12:13, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
309:05:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
290:04:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
280:reduce, merge, and redirect
274:04:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
254:04:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
227:04:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
214:02:54, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
54:02:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
743:
470:Irish Kings and High Kings
244:reliable secondary sources
234:only those instances into
232:Delete list page and merge
719:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
148:; accounts blocked for
118:single-purpose accounts
88:policies and guidelines
524:comment was added by
390:comment was added by
353:comment was added by
278:Oh? Fine, read it as
238:that can be strongly
100:by counting votes.
79:not a majority vote
710:
696:comment added by
634:
572:
537:
403:
366:
286:Kaustuv Chaudhuri
272:
250:Kaustuv Chaudhuri
212:
181:
180:
177:
104:assume good faith
734:
721:
709:
690:
626:
564:
519:
385:
348:
307:
302:
288:
264:
252:
204:
175:
163:
147:
131:
112:
82:, but instead a
73:
66:
34:
742:
741:
737:
736:
735:
733:
732:
731:
730:
724:deletion review
717:
698:137.190.180.203
691:
520:—The preceding
508:could be mined.
386:—The preceding
382:Absolutely Keep
355:131.230.228.233
349:—The preceding
337:Smerdis of Tlön
304:
300:
283:
247:
165:
153:
137:
121:
108:sign your posts
64:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
740:
738:
729:
728:
712:
711:
684:
672:
663:drive-by media
652:
640:
639:
638:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
509:
502:
498:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
474:Angus McLellan
449:
448:
440:Angus McLellan
432:
416:
411:205.157.110.11
404:
379:
367:
342:
330:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
292:
229:
179:
178:
74:
63:
57:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
739:
727:
725:
720:
714:
713:
707:
703:
699:
695:
688:
685:
683:
680:
676:
673:
671:
668:
664:
660:
656:
653:
651:
648:
644:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
624:
619:
615:
611:
610:
609:
606:
605:152.3.246.168
602:
601:78 kilobytes.
598:
595:
589:
586:
582:
577:
576:
575:
571:
567:
563:
562:
557:
556:
555:
552:
547:
543:
540:
539:
538:
535:
531:
527:
523:
510:
506:
505:
503:
499:
495:
494:
492:
489:
488:
481:
478:
475:
471:
466:
465:
464:
461:
457:
453:
452:
451:
450:
447:
444:
441:
436:
433:
431:
428:
424:
420:
417:
415:
412:
408:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:162.90.97.254
389:
383:
380:
378:
375:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
346:
343:
341:
338:
334:
331:
329:
326:
322:
319:
316:
310:
306:
303:
297:
293:
291:
287:
281:
277:
276:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:
257:
256:
255:
251:
245:
241:
237:
236:Rush Limbaugh
233:
230:
228:
225:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
202:
197:
193:
189:
185:
173:
169:
161:
157:
151:
145:
141:
135:
129:
125:
119:
115:
111:
109:
105:
99:
95:
94:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
61:
58:
56:
55:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
718:
715:
692:— Preceding
686:
674:
662:
658:
654:
642:
623:CrazyRussian
621:
600:
596:
561:CrazyRussian
559:
541:
526:152.3.180.23
518:
490:
469:
434:
418:
406:
381:
369:
344:
332:
317:
295:
279:
261:CrazyRussian
259:
231:
219:
201:CrazyRussian
199:
195:
183:
182:
171:
159:
150:sockpuppetry
143:
132:; suspected
127:
113:
101:
97:
91:
83:
77:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
423:User:Ihcoyc
645:fancruft.
581:Mark Levin
546:Mark Levin
296:themselves
84:discussion
301:brenneman
192:first AfD
186:textbook
140:canvassed
134:canvassed
93:consensus
62:(2nd nom)
706:contribs
694:unsigned
679:Crevaner
659:feminazi
585:NYCTommy
551:NYCTommy
534:contribs
522:unsigned
427:Eusebeus
400:contribs
388:unsigned
363:contribs
351:unsigned
240:verified
224:Gazpacho
172:username
166:{{subst:
160:username
154:{{subst:
144:username
138:{{subst:
128:username
122:{{subst:
667:Bedford
501:entry."
136:users:
51:W.marsh
647:CaliEd
643:Delete
477:(Talk)
443:(Talk)
435:Delete
419:Delete
407:Delete
374:Recury
370:Delete
242:using
220:Delete
184:Delete
632:email
614:D'oh!
597:Keep.
570:email
549:well?
270:email
210:email
188:cruft
114:Note:
16:<
702:talk
687:Keep
675:Keep
661:and
655:Keep
628:talk
616:and
566:talk
530:talk
491:Keep
460:JJay
396:talk
359:talk
345:Keep
333:Keep
325:JJay
318:Keep
266:talk
206:talk
665:.--
536:) .
402:) .
365:) .
168:csp
164:or
156:csm
124:spa
98:not
708:)
704:•
532:•
398:•
361:•
284:—
282:.
248:—
246:.
174:}}
162:}}
152::
146:}}
130:}}
120::
700:(
630:/
568:/
528:(
394:(
357:(
268:/
208:/
196:s
176:.
170:|
158:|
142:|
126:|
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
