392:
council, county commissioner, county judge, and county legilstor are all used. County Judges are almost all executives, but there are often multiple ones, in Utah County, Utah with roughly 300,000 people, maybe more, they have 3 county comissioners, so this is clearly an executive and legislative function, it is like how Bull Connor was one of the city comissioners in
Birmingham, Alabama, he was part of a three member executive authority. However in Macomb County, Michigan before we got a county executive we had I think an 18 member county commission, for reasons I understand even less we made it smaller when we got county executive. However the county commission in Macomb County had less than full executive power, since the sheriff (over police operations on the county level and the jail system), the prosecutor (Michigan has county prosecutors instead of state district attorneys, which means the counties are the local level of crime enforcement for prosecution, the Wayne County Prosecutor,
241:(his staff profiles on the self-published websites of the county council and the radio station) that are not support for notability at all, while the two that come from media just namecheck his existence within coverage of the county council election as a whole, and thus aren't evidence that he's somehow
409:
has a mayor/council set up, while
Sterling Heights and Eastpointe have a council/city manager set up, although in Sterling Heights the mayor is directly elected to that position, but he is just the chair of the city council with any extra function fully ceremonial. The fact the other 6 members of the
236:
of a county councillor and local radio host, not adequately referenced as passing our notability standards for politicians or broadcasters. As always, neither serving on a county council nor hosting a local radio program in a single media market are "automatic" notability freebies that guarantee the
391:
In some places the county commission has both legislative and executive power, so yes they are not the same. But this is
Massachusetts, where very little power at all is in the county, so having legislative and executive power at that level still amounts to next to nothing. In the US terms county
470:
taking into consideration that county office is not deemed presumptively notable, that even with that county government in New
England is quite weak compared to the rest of the US, and that county government in Massachusetts in particular is vestigial: in most of the state the counties have been
396:
is without question notable, some states divide prosecutorial districts in ways that ignore county lines, thus lessening county power), the clerk and the tresurerer, and I think even the assessor are all directly elected. I really thought the new charter should have made less of these postions
410:
council are elected at large, while the mayor is elected in a one person election and the mayorial term and the council terms are the same length means that at times mayors run unopposed, because it is easier to get elected if you run for the council.
253:
appear in those two articles. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a stronger notability claim and better sourcing for it than just technical verification that he exists as a person who has jobs.
364:
that a county government uses for its members makes absolutely zero difference to our notability criteria for politicians, because regardless of whether the county government is called a "council" or a "commission", it's still a
202:
471:
abolished as anything other than geographical references. Plymouth County's one of about three exceptions, and even there the county commissioners don't do much more than oversee the county lockup. Whoop-de-doo.
433:. Our consensus has long been that county politicians are not presumed to be notable, and a Google news search brings up nothing except election results. Plymouth isn't even a particularly large county. Fails
401:, which has a county mayor, also has a county council, so if you compare that to neighboring Utah county you see they are using the words with their historic meanings, in Macomb County the county seat,
311:
196:
271:
397:
directly elected and if anything increased the number of comissioners. I think Wayne, Oakland and Macomb counties should rename their comissioners councilors. In Utah,
163:
237:
right to an article in and of themselves, but the article is not referenced well enough to make him notable for those things -- two of the four footnotes here are
291:
110:
95:
136:
131:
140:
123:
346:
217:
184:
90:
83:
17:
59:
527:
no where in the US are county commissioners default notable, in
Massachusetts they are pretty much default not notable.
104:
100:
178:
553:
532:
415:
40:
536:
519:
498:
481:
458:
419:
386:
350:
323:
303:
283:
263:
65:
238:
174:
127:
402:
224:
549:
438:
119:
71:
36:
528:
507:
472:
434:
411:
342:
338:
334:
331:
For starters, Valanzola is a county commissioner, not a county councilor. This is not the same job.
515:
210:
190:
494:
382:
319:
299:
279:
259:
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
548:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
506:
County councillors or commissioners (i.e., local government) do not inherit notability from
454:
442:
406:
398:
511:
446:
233:
53:
490:
378:
315:
295:
275:
255:
157:
450:
393:
377:
get an automatic presumption of notability just for holding it.
544:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
466:
Fails all the relevant notability criteria, and that's even
153:
149:
145:
209:
312:list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions
249:county councillors and/or candidates whose names
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
556:). No further edits should be made to this page.
310:Note: This discussion has been included in the
290:Note: This discussion has been included in the
272:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
270:Note: This discussion has been included in the
223:
8:
111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
309:
292:list of Radio-related deletion discussions
289:
269:
7:
24:
96:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
86:(AfD)? Read these primers!
573:
405:, is run by a commission,
537:12:12, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
520:11:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
499:23:33, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
482:22:42, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
459:15:48, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
420:12:24, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
387:16:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
351:15:36, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
324:13:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
304:13:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
284:13:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
264:13:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
66:23:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
546:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
403:Mount Clemens, Michigan
373:office where people do
245:notable than all the
84:Articles for deletion
369:, which is still a
120:Jared L. Valanzola
72:Jared L. Valanzola
529:John Pack Lambert
412:John Pack Lambert
367:county government
337:comment added by
326:
306:
286:
101:Guide to deletion
91:How to contribute
64:
564:
478:
407:Warren, Michigan
399:Salt Lake County
353:
228:
227:
213:
161:
143:
81:
56:
34:
572:
571:
567:
566:
565:
563:
562:
561:
560:
554:deletion review
474:
332:
239:primary sources
170:
134:
118:
115:
78:
75:
62:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
570:
568:
559:
558:
540:
539:
522:
501:
484:
461:
439:WP:ENTERTAINER
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
355:
354:
328:
327:
307:
287:
231:
230:
167:
114:
113:
108:
98:
93:
76:
74:
69:
58:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
569:
557:
555:
551:
547:
542:
541:
538:
534:
530:
526:
523:
521:
517:
513:
509:
508:WP:POLITICIAN
505:
502:
500:
496:
492:
489:per pburka.--
488:
485:
483:
480:
479:
477:
469:
465:
462:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
435:WP:POLITICIAN
432:
429:
428:
421:
417:
413:
408:
404:
400:
395:
390:
389:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
359:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
308:
305:
301:
297:
293:
288:
285:
281:
277:
273:
268:
267:
266:
265:
261:
257:
252:
248:
244:
240:
235:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
165:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
88:
87:
85:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
61:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
545:
543:
524:
503:
486:
475:
473:
467:
463:
430:
374:
370:
366:
361:
333:— Preceding
250:
246:
242:
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
77:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
476:Ravenswing
197:free images
394:Kym Worthy
339:OverArmour
550:talk page
512:Whiteguru
443:WP:ANYBIO
37:talk page
552:or in a
360:The job
347:contribs
335:unsigned
164:View log
105:glossary
54:Eddie891
39:or in a
504:Delete:
491:Mpen320
464:Delete:
379:Bearcat
316:Bearcat
296:Bearcat
276:Bearcat
256:Bearcat
203:WP refs
191:scholar
137:protect
132:history
82:New to
525:Delete
487:Delete
468:before
451:pburka
447:WP:GNG
431:Delete
234:WP:BLP
175:Google
141:delete
50:delete
371:local
362:title
247:other
218:JSTOR
179:books
158:views
150:watch
146:links
16:<
533:talk
516:talk
495:talk
455:talk
445:and
416:talk
383:talk
343:talk
320:talk
300:talk
280:talk
260:talk
251:also
243:more
211:FENS
185:news
154:logs
128:talk
124:edit
60:Work
375:not
225:TWL
162:– (
535:)
518:)
510:--
497:)
457:)
449:.
441:,
437:,
418:)
385:)
349:)
345:•
322:)
314:.
302:)
294:.
282:)
274:.
262:)
205:)
156:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
52:.
531:(
514:(
493:(
453:(
414:(
381:(
341:(
318:(
298:(
278:(
258:(
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
160:)
122:(
107:)
103:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.