592:
like "hiring, promotion, or departure of personnel" notable (except in extremely rare cases) and 100% it's not because every company hires and fires people. Those are already things we don't include and in No way does not having articles on companies full of tables of everyone the company has hired and fired turn
Knowledge into the
240:
This was nominated for deletion back in 2014 due to lacking any refences, which it still doesn't have (in-depth or otherwise) and was keep "because SCHOOLOUTCOMES." SCHOOLOUTCOMES is not a valid keep reason now though. Since it has been over turned per the RfC about it (I think this is a good example
691:
Er, yes, of course I know what "something" means in this context. I'm afraid I don't understand the rest of your comment. You simply said that the topic of an article has to be unique. I disagreed. If you think that your position can be justified then justify it. Otherwise just stop posting, or (and
591:
Why do you think the whole "trivial" thing exists then or things like "changes in share or bond prices" or "product or a product line launch, sale, change, or discontinuance" not counting toward notability even though they sometimes get national or regional news coverage? Rarely if ever is something
558:
I think that's who it is. I semi-agree with that for like a
University maybe. I don't think it works if your talking about like a high-school football teams scores being in the local or even regional newspaper. At least where I'm from all high school sports gets that kind of coverage. For something
249:. Since it lacks the multiple in-depth reliable sources for it to be notable. I couldn't find any when I looked either (and no I won't list exactly where I looked, what specific keyboard buttons I pressed to do the search, or anything else along those lines). --
515:
in any way like your claiming they do? BTW, just an FYI the guidelines are pretty clear that multiple references from the same outlet only count as one source because they have to be journalistically (and otherwise) independent from each other.
677:"Something" as in the subject/content of the articles. Which would should be obvious since that's literally what we are evaluating. Seriously, we aren't deciding if a company is notable in a vacuum here or based on some sort of osmosis. --
712:
if you know I've never admitted to making a mistake before. BTW, your the one that responded to my comment to SportsFlyer. So, I think the solution to this back and forth would have been for you to not start it in the first place.
482:
isn't great but reported sports results is one marker of notability so including it. There are many more results, especially directory listings, discussions with school alumni, and a video with alleged bullying from the school.
415:
209:
76:
662:
You very clearly said "for something to be notable it has to be unique". They were your words, not mine. It's impossible to hold a civilised discussion about anything when you blatantly deny the obvious evidence.
826:
The sources provided are little more than mentions. The Mail & Guardian seems to be the best coverage and it actually provides very little coverage of the school. That means the subject currently fails
511:
Where do the guidelines say anywhere that reporting of sports results is a marker of notability? Also, how do the first and second sources, which are just pictures with a caption, meet
409:
203:
559:
to be notable it has to be unique and not applicable to every other thing in it's "category." Like were not going to have an article about a school just because it has walls. --
303:
277:
170:
477:
337:
320:
806:. I've trawled but regrettably don't see sufficient decent sources to support a meaningful article. The only mention that jumps out from a significant source is
117:
102:
143:
138:
147:
130:
863:
840:
818:
794:
722:
701:
686:
672:
657:
639:
605:
586:
568:
553:
525:
502:
453:
366:
346:
329:
312:
293:
258:
60:
548:
497:
357:
we need some actual 3rd-party sources to justify an article on a secondary school, not just internal sourcing to an organization itself.
430:
224:
807:
397:
191:
534:. You're right the first two sources are brief, but I think there's plenty on which a neutral standalone article can be written.
97:
90:
17:
391:
185:
377:, and more importantly when it comes to searching, it is actually called "Hoërskool Jeugland", not "Jeugland Hoërskool":
596:. Nor does not listing every single, or any, products a company has released. It's ridiculous to claim it otherwise. --
111:
107:
387:
181:
134:
573:
It is certainly not true that for something to be notable it has to be unique. Such a rule would turn us into the
880:
362:
40:
849:
437:
231:
859:
540:
489:
836:
814:
709:
697:
668:
635:
582:
471:
449:
876:
803:
788:
644:
I'd love to know how you translated "changes in share or bond prices" to me saying "a company has to be
36:
530:
Someone - maybe
Bearian? - has set out their own standards that schools must pass in order to get past
126:
66:
403:
358:
285:
269:
197:
468:
423:
217:
853:
718:
682:
653:
601:
564:
535:
521:
484:
273:
254:
832:
810:
765:
693:
664:
631:
615:
578:
445:
86:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
875:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
783:
769:
281:
761:
341:
324:
307:
246:
480:
828:
757:
714:
678:
649:
627:
623:
619:
597:
560:
531:
517:
512:
464:
250:
242:
776:
773:
57:
53:
164:
476:
is just a listing of schools in the area but it's notable enough to note, and
371:
I note that the location of this school was wrongly moved a few kilometres in
474:
610:
Please think before you write. Nothing there says that a company has to be
871:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
77:
Articles for deletion/Jeugland Hoërskool (2nd nomination)
241:
of why). So, this should be deleted due to failing both
373:
160:
156:
152:
422:
216:
692:
this would be a first) admit that you were mistaken.
809:, debatable whether it counts as in-depth coverage.
708:
All I have to say is that you really must be commit
278:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 October 23
304:list of South Africa-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
883:). No further edits should be made to this page.
336:Note: This discussion has been included in the
319:Note: This discussion has been included in the
302:Note: This discussion has been included in the
779:addressing the subject directly and in depth.
338:list of Education-related deletion discussions
436:
230:
8:
321:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
118:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
335:
318:
301:
74:
7:
73:
24:
614:, let alone a school, which, per
103:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
577:rather than an encyclopedia.
276:). I have transcluded it to
864:19:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
841:11:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
819:20:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
795:17:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
723:19:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
702:19:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
687:18:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
673:18:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
658:17:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
640:17:50, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
606:17:38, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
587:17:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
569:17:10, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
554:14:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
526:12:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
503:12:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
454:10:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
367:15:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
347:08:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
330:08:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
313:08:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
294:08:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
259:07:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
61:08:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
479:is brief but not bad. Also
268:This AfD was not correctly
93:(AfD)? Read these primers!
900:
768:. Sources in article and
873:Please do not modify it.
756:: Article does not meet
594:Guinness Book of Records
575:Guinness Book of Records
32:Please do not modify it.
622:, only has to pass the
72:AfDs for this article:
91:Articles for deletion
791:
787:
626:, not necessarily
266:Automated comment:
127:Jeugland Hoërskool
67:Jeugland Hoërskool
850:WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES
789:
781:
618:which is part of
359:John Pack Lambert
349:
332:
315:
296:
292:
108:Guide to deletion
98:How to contribute
891:
856:
793:
551:
543:
500:
492:
441:
440:
426:
376:
344:
327:
310:
288:
287:Talk to my owner
283:
264:
235:
234:
220:
168:
150:
88:
34:
899:
898:
894:
893:
892:
890:
889:
888:
887:
881:deletion review
854:
780:
710:WP:WIKIHOUNDING
547:
539:
496:
488:
383:
372:
342:
325:
308:
291:
286:
177:
141:
125:
122:
85:
82:
70:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
897:
895:
886:
885:
867:
866:
843:
821:
797:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
506:
505:
457:
456:
443:
379:
378:
369:
351:
350:
333:
316:
298:
297:
284:
238:
237:
174:
121:
120:
115:
105:
100:
83:
81:
80:
79:
71:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
896:
884:
882:
878:
874:
869:
868:
865:
861:
857:
851:
847:
844:
842:
838:
834:
830:
825:
822:
820:
816:
812:
808:
805:
801:
798:
796:
792:
785:
778:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
752:
751:
724:
720:
716:
711:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
699:
695:
690:
689:
688:
684:
680:
676:
675:
674:
670:
666:
661:
660:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
642:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
608:
607:
603:
599:
595:
590:
589:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
571:
570:
566:
562:
557:
556:
555:
552:
550:
544:
542:
537:
536:SportingFlyer
533:
529:
528:
527:
523:
519:
514:
510:
509:
508:
507:
504:
501:
499:
493:
491:
486:
485:SportingFlyer
481:
478:
475:
472:
469:
466:
462:
459:
458:
455:
451:
447:
444:
439:
435:
432:
429:
425:
421:
417:
414:
411:
408:
405:
402:
399:
396:
393:
389:
386:
385:Find sources:
381:
380:
375:
370:
368:
364:
360:
356:
353:
352:
348:
345:
339:
334:
331:
328:
322:
317:
314:
311:
305:
300:
299:
295:
289:
282:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
172:
166:
162:
158:
154:
149:
145:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:
119:
116:
113:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
95:
94:
92:
87:
78:
75:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
872:
870:
845:
833:Pax:Vobiscum
823:
811:Humansdorpie
804:Kempton Park
799:
753:
694:Phil Bridger
665:Phil Bridger
645:
632:Phil Bridger
611:
593:
579:Phil Bridger
574:
546:
538:
495:
487:
460:
446:Phil Bridger
433:
427:
419:
412:
406:
400:
394:
384:
354:
272:to the log (
265:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
84:
56:. As an ATD
54:Kempton Park
49:
47:
31:
28:
467:. Coverage
410:free images
270:transcluded
204:free images
855:KartikeyaS
766:WP:NSCHOOL
616:WP:NSCHOOL
877:talk page
772:were not
770:WP:BEFORE
374:this edit
343:Spiderone
326:Spiderone
309:Spiderone
37:talk page
879:or in a
800:Redirect
715:Adamant1
679:Adamant1
650:Adamant1
598:Adamant1
561:Adamant1
518:Adamant1
251:Adamant1
171:View log
112:glossary
50:redirect
39:or in a
784:Timothy
762:WP:NORG
463:Passes
416:WP refs
404:scholar
290::Online
247:WP:NORG
210:WP refs
198:scholar
144:protect
139:history
89:New to
58:Spartaz
846:Delete
829:WP:GNG
824:Delete
758:WP:GNG
754:Delete
646:unique
628:WP:ORG
624:WP:GNG
620:WP:ORG
612:unique
532:WP:GNG
513:WP:GNG
465:WP:GNG
388:Google
355:Delete
274:step 3
243:WP:GNG
182:Google
148:delete
777:WP:RS
774:WP:IS
648:." --
461:Keep'
431:JSTOR
392:books
225:JSTOR
186:books
165:views
157:watch
153:links
16:<
860:talk
852:. --
848:per
837:talk
815:talk
790:talk
719:talk
698:talk
683:talk
669:talk
654:talk
636:talk
602:talk
583:talk
565:talk
522:talk
470:and
450:talk
424:FENS
398:news
363:talk
280:. —
255:talk
245:and
218:FENS
192:news
161:logs
135:talk
131:edit
802:to
786:::
782://
760:or
438:TWL
232:TWL
169:– (
52:to
862:)
839:)
831:.
817:)
764:/
721:)
713:--
700:)
685:)
671:)
656:)
638:)
630:.
604:)
585:)
567:)
524:)
516:--
473:.
452:)
418:)
365:)
340:.
323:.
306:.
257:)
212:)
163:|
159:|
155:|
151:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
858:(
835:(
813:(
717:(
696:(
681:(
667:(
652:(
634:(
600:(
581:(
563:(
549:C
545:·
541:T
520:(
498:C
494:·
490:T
448:(
442:)
434:·
428:·
420:·
413:·
407:·
401:·
395:·
390:(
382:(
361:(
253:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
167:)
129:(
114:)
110:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.