411:
collections listed appear to fail verification. A commercial art gallery that has some works by an artist in stock is not a collection. The NGA would be significant, but fails verification. I cannot confirm that they bought any work by Pwerle. Notability here hinges on whether qualified professionals (not us) find the work somehow important ot significant. I am very sympathetic to CT55555's argument that recognition by the NGA ought to suffice. I'd like to see better sources. Are there no reviews? That would really help.
424:
houses a collection, but seems maybe her art was not in it permanently. This is obviously frustrating the way we live in a world where
Aboriginal women in Australia have been documented to be excluded from media, and we're applying the exact same standard to her as everyone else. This is a bigger conversation than this AfD, but I think Knowledge (XXG) also does encourage common sense and there is literally an agreed philosophy that we can
870:. Funny how people clutch at straws to try keep worthy pursuits like art and academia went there is no hint of passing GNG and rabidly attack less highbrow activities like sport even when there is a clear verified passing of a SNG. No that dictionary is not the "country's standard national biographical dictionary", no pass of ANYBIO #2. 32 words is not a GNG pass. ARTIST 4d is not passed by being sold in shops.
423:
Now is "Angelina Pwerle" and "Jeannie Pwerle" both of Utopia the same person? I see she goes by at least four names and Jeanie does sound like a contraction of
Angelina, so I'm saying yes. i.e. I think the claim is verifiable. But also is it a commercial gallery? I think it is, but seems like it also
428:
if they have negative consequences. What is a worse consequence that upholding systemic bias, systems of oppression. Should we ignore that because it's a bigger, longer term problem? I hope not. I plea to anyone reading this to vote, as
Knowledge (XXG) encourages, using common sense, the spirit of
662:
NARTIST 4(d) states that these need to be "notable galleries or museums". Mbantua
Gallery is a commerical gallery that sells her work. As for the Holmes à Court Collection (which in itself is at best marginally notable), all we have is a claim on a CV page from japingkaaboriginalart.com, another
348:
I think we need to consider scale here. If a local gallery said "here's the 250" best artists from our town, I'd accept the counter argument more easily. When the national gallery of a nation with 25 million people says "there are the 250" I think we need to accept that all 250 are probably
410:
My preference would be to keep the article, but the it has some serious issues. I didn't see any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Galleries who sell Pwerle's work have written about it, but that does not establish notability because it is not independent coverage. The
340:
When the national gallery of a country puts on an exhibition that is explicitly telling us that women have been underrepresented and this is an attempt to showcase the ones we should know, they are really doing exactly what I think the people who wrote
741:
notable permanent museum collections, the article is in error (I'll correct that after this post). The
Mbantua Gallery is not a museum it is a commercial sales gallery, and the item supposedly in their collection has been sold by the gallery. See:
299:
So in summary, the national gallery of a country is specifically telling us there are the 250 artists we should know about, it's quite directly telling us there are the notable artists, and she's one of them. I think she passes
748:. So it appears that these galleries show her work, but that fact does not contribute to notability. The National Gallery of Australia collection can be verified, but one collection is not enough to put her over the bar of
487:
is confirmation that the
National Gallery of Australia bought one of Pwerle's works (an untitled woodcut) in 1990. I'll try and confirm this at the library tomorrow, but I believe she has a biographical entry in the book
806:
five-year travelling exhibition (confirmed on the back of the poster) which seems pretty significant (it was a major exhibition featured during the
International Council of Museums (ICOM) conference in Melbourne).
202:
516:
states: "The person's work (or works) has: ... (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." Several means three or more, and this being a print does not help.
352:
I also don't think that just because they created pages for the artists in the series it should diminish my point. What the gallery did or did not do for others, I think, are arguments to avoid in AfD.
292:
artists in the exhibition So I think this could be argued either way, but also it was a country's national galleries most expensive exhibition ever (see above). Pwerle is mentioned and got her own page
326:
If there are over 250 artists in the show, then one painting by Pwerle cannot be deemed "a substantial part". And every artist gets their own page at the exhibtion website, so that means nothing.
345:
intended. All 250 are notable, as I see it. I don't see any sources for your statement that this is "one painting" so if you have more sources about her work, please share them.
159:
537:
196:
557:
383:. We have articles on approximately 75 % of the participants. It would be interesting to look at it a bit more closely and see if there is bias in our coverage.
91:
282:
106:
745:. The Holmes a Court Gallery is also a commercial sales gallery, not a museum, the citation in the article goes to a "Add to Cart, How to Buy" page.
276:
823:
Thanks for the ping. I remain keep for the reasons I made in my first comment (i.e. the national gallery saying she is one of their top 250).
279:
132:
127:
86:
79:
17:
136:
119:
853:
criterion #3. That combined with the fact she is in the
National Gallery collection, I think the article should be retained.
217:
100:
96:
184:
272:
890:
802:, but the bio is pretty short (about 32 words). The entry does mention that Pwerle was one of 46 featured artists in the
288:
And so was her work a substantial part of the exhibition? This is the weakest link in my logic chain, there are between
927:
40:
425:
163:
178:
875:
721:
687:
908:
879:
862:
832:
816:
784:
725:
708:
691:
672:
646:
590:
569:
549:
526:
501:
470:
448:
392:
362:
335:
312:
250:
174:
61:
123:
923:
36:
746:
224:
858:
780:
624:
586:
466:
749:
612:
238:
115:
67:
388:
210:
850:
773:
513:
342:
301:
260:
871:
761:
717:
683:
630:
439:
My comment was framed with a mistaken starting assumption, as corrected below, now striking out.
419:
Motivated by your comment, I looked into her exhibiting in the places she mentioned. I got here
828:
704:
668:
642:
522:
444:
434:
358:
331:
308:
246:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
922:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
615:
4(d), even if it is the national gallery. Furthermore, there is no current basis for passing
484:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
904:
812:
565:
545:
497:
420:
190:
57:
616:
234:
854:
776:
753:
620:
582:
462:
458:
579:
on the basis her work is in three collections including the
National Gallery of Australia
52:. The keep !votes based on WP:ARTIST part 4 and WP:ANYBIO have been adequately refuted.
384:
294:
268:
Criterion calls for artists work being "a substantial part of a significant exhibition"
285:
I could go on, there is a ton of coverage if you search "Know My Name" in google news.
803:
824:
757:
700:
664:
638:
518:
454:
440:
430:
354:
327:
304:
242:
461:
is a different artist. She was born in 1946 in Utopia. We have an article on her.
153:
900:
808:
765:
561:
541:
493:
53:
743:
663:
commercial gallery that sells her work. Sorry, but this is a clear 4d fail.
289:
429:
the rules and the spirit of "we are here to build an encyclopedia"
918:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
893:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
764:
about the collections. I'm holding off on !voting to see if
421:
http://holmesacourtgallery.com.au/article/angelina-pwerle
634:
608:
604:
376:
149:
145:
141:
209:
275:
significant? I think yes. My sources to back that up
295:
https://knowmyname.nga.gov.au/artists/jeanie-pwerle/
899:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
223:
619:as the references are nearly all gallery sources.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
930:). No further edits should be made to this page.
556:Note: This discussion has been included in the
536:Note: This discussion has been included in the
538:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
8:
847:Aboriginal Artists Dictionary of Biographies
800:Aboriginal Artists Dictionary of Biographies
770:Aboriginal Artists Dictionary of Biographies
714:Aboriginal Artists Dictionary of Biographies
558:list of Artists-related deletion discussions
492:by Margo Birnberg and Janusz Kreczmanski. --
490:Aboriginal Artists Dictionary of Biographies
271:So was the "Know my Name" exhibition by the
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
611:. One collection is not enough to satisfty
737:- Two of the "collections" are definitely
555:
535:
699:See my comment for the Keep vote above.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
735:Comment regarding the "collections"
379:at how we represent the artists in
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
259:On the basis of criterion 4 of
845:- based on the short entry in
1:
273:National Gallery of Australia
768:was able to find her in the
633:I wonder if you noted that,
437:) 12:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
947:
909:13:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
880:22:09, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
863:13:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
833:15:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
817:03:39, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
798:She does have an entry in
785:19:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
726:19:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
709:20:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
692:18:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
673:19:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
647:15:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
591:16:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
570:11:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
550:11:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
527:19:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
502:13:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
471:13:48, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
449:14:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
393:19:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
363:11:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
336:10:29, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
313:10:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
251:09:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
62:13:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
920:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
772:, if so she would pass
637:, just voted to keep?
164:edits since nomination
603:based on comments by
263:. Explanation follows
80:Articles for deletion
752:. Courtesy pings to
599:Switching vote to
426:"ignore all rules"
911:
572:
552:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
938:
898:
896:
894:
228:
227:
213:
157:
139:
77:
34:
946:
945:
941:
940:
939:
937:
936:
935:
934:
928:deletion review
889:
887:
459:Angelina Pwerle
170:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
944:
942:
933:
932:
914:
913:
897:
883:
882:
865:
838:
837:
836:
835:
821:
820:
819:
788:
787:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
677:
676:
675:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
594:
593:
573:
553:
532:
531:
530:
529:
505:
504:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
413:
412:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
368:
367:
366:
365:
350:
346:
316:
315:
297:
286:
269:
265:
264:
231:
230:
167:
116:Jeannie Pwerle
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
68:Jeannie Pwerle
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
943:
931:
929:
925:
921:
916:
915:
912:
910:
906:
902:
895:
892:
885:
884:
881:
877:
873:
872:duffbeerforme
869:
866:
864:
860:
856:
852:
848:
844:
840:
839:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
805:
804:Meeting Place
801:
797:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
786:
782:
778:
775:
771:
767:
763:
762:Theredproject
759:
755:
751:
747:
744:
740:
736:
733:
727:
723:
719:
718:Theredproject
716:meets ANYBIO
715:
712:
711:
710:
706:
702:
698:
695:
694:
693:
689:
685:
684:Theredproject
682:NARTIST 4(d)
681:
678:
674:
670:
666:
661:
658:
657:
656:
655:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
629:
628:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
597:
596:
595:
592:
588:
584:
580:
578:
574:
571:
567:
563:
559:
554:
551:
547:
543:
539:
534:
533:
528:
524:
520:
515:
512:
509:
508:
507:
506:
503:
499:
495:
491:
486:
483:
480:
479:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
438:
436:
432:
427:
422:
417:
416:
415:
414:
409:
406:
405:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
364:
360:
356:
351:
347:
344:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
314:
310:
306:
303:
298:
296:
291:
287:
284:
281:
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
262:
258:
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
165:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
919:
917:
888:
886:
867:
849:, she meets
846:
842:
799:
795:
769:
738:
734:
713:
696:
679:
659:
600:
576:
575:
510:
489:
481:
418:
407:
381:Know my Name
380:
323:
256:
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
631:@Curiocurio
197:free images
855:Netherzone
777:Netherzone
754:Curiocurio
750:WP:NARTIST
635:Netherzone
621:Curiocurio
613:WP:NARTIST
609:Netherzone
583:Curiocurio
463:Netherzone
239:WP:NARTIST
924:talk page
851:WP:ANYBIO
774:WP:ANYBIO
514:WP:ARTIST
385:Vexations
343:WP:ARTIST
302:WP:ARTIST
261:WP:ARTIST
37:talk page
926:or in a
891:Relisted
349:notable.
290:over 250
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
825:CT55555
796:Comment
758:CT55555
701:Edwardx
697:Comment
665:Edwardx
660:Comment
639:CT55555
605:Edwardx
519:Edwardx
511:Comment
455:CT55555
441:CT55555
431:CT55555
408:Comment
375:I took
355:CT55555
328:Edwardx
324:Comment
305:CT55555
243:Edwardx
203:WP refs
191:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
901:DMySon
868:Delete
809:Canley
766:Canley
617:WP:GNG
601:Delete
562:Canley
542:Canley
494:Canley
377:a look
235:WP:GNG
233:Fails
175:Google
137:delete
54:Stifle
50:delete
841:Weak
257:Keep
218:JSTOR
179:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
905:talk
876:talk
859:talk
843:Keep
829:talk
813:talk
781:talk
722:talk
705:talk
688:talk
680:Keep
669:talk
643:talk
625:talk
607:and
587:talk
577:Keep
566:talk
546:talk
523:talk
498:talk
485:Here
482:Keep
467:talk
445:talk
435:talk
389:talk
359:talk
332:talk
309:talk
247:talk
237:and
211:FENS
185:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
739:not
225:TWL
158:– (
907:)
878:)
861:)
831:)
815:)
807:--
783:)
760:,
756:,
724:)
707:)
690:)
671:)
645:)
627:)
589:)
581:.
568:)
560:.
548:)
540:.
525:)
500:)
469:)
457:,
447:)
391:)
361:)
334:)
311:)
249:)
241:.
205:)
162:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
903:(
874:(
857:(
827:(
811:(
779:(
720:(
703:(
686:(
667:(
641:(
623:(
585:(
564:(
544:(
521:(
496:(
465:(
453:@
443:(
433:(
387:(
357:(
330:(
307:(
283:3
280:2
277:1
245:(
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.