421:
have been OK? So she and her WEBcomics are (naturally) only known for their WEB presence, and that's evidently not sufficient. This is as opposed to
Knowledge (XXG)'s 'presence'? At any rate, I VOTE (despite those who want all the 'power' for themselves, and who do not want to listen to the mere audience who READS the article) to have Jenn's article deleted because SHE wants it that way, NOT because there isn't demand and merit. Knowledge (XXG) may appear useful and objective on the surface, but ultimately, it is just another web community with the underlying motivation being a power trip for a few select people. So much for Knowledge (XXG)'s credibility. Unfortunately for those people, whether you delete or keep the article... Jenn 'wins'. That's pretty remarkable, considering all she was trying to do was get her info out there for those who are interested in her and her work. ...My edit of the main entry was admittedly accidental, but I can't say that it bothers me much at this point. xoxo
436:
all to ephemeral in nature, with future historians struggling to find information -- this is perhaps nowhere more pronounced than with bands, especially ones in countries that don't have an equivalent of the
Billboard 100 (so you're in country X, therefore you're non-notable by definition and must be deleted? The feedback I've gotten from some seems to be an unapologetic and resounding 'yes'). Can we please stop trying to destroy Knowledge (XXG)? --
159:
560:
delete - I am disapointed that this disscussion even came up. I go out to Jenn's pages more often than I come here. Jenn asked to be deleted. I think she is more than noteworthy enough to be listed, but you may not be noteworthy enough to do the listing. The first entry argues that her web comics
435:
Reluctantly, at the request of the subject, but this is the only one I'm going to play along with. I really hate the deletionist mindset of too many on
Knowledge (XXG). This isn't a paper encyclopedia. It is uniquely situated to be a repository of a wide expanse of cultural phenomena that may prove
508:
If Ms. Dolari isn't a public figure, as some would seem to suggest, then she has a right to privacy which includes protection against publicity of her private life. If she is a public figure, then aren't some of you just a bunch of pompous asses for trying to delete a entry just because you aren't
420:
How can something written BY THE PERSON, HERSELF have 'no reliable sources and no verifiability'? I've known Jenn, in person, for ten years, and I can verify it all... and by the way, who 'verifies' me or my writing? If I'd've written this same article instead of her writing it herself, it *might*
625:
Whoever's taking charge of this portion of the wiki seems to have it in for the person who was working on the Texas roads list. Such personal vendettas are unbecoming. A request on the individual's part to withdraw articles about her seems prudent; it keeps the article from becoming a place for
530:
said. I'm sorry Jenn's feeling are hurt at the VfD, but it seems to be a bit of an over-reaction. (Can someone pull their permissions to any information from
Britannica, actually? That's an interesting question...) Jenn's editing of her own page aside, she's notable and I'd say to keep her. I
592:"Lets just delete this article so that someone not affiliated with the author can write a new stub in a few days and make the objectors happy. Honestly, I think the idea here is to add information and correct incorrect information, not delete it. Hey its me first discussion :)"
341:
Why the heck am I pushing so hard for deletion? Simple. If people are going to keep putting this stuff for deletion, I'm gonna make sure it gets done, and I'm going to make sure I kill it myself. Y'all started it, and I'm gonna get it finished.
513:
familiar with its subject. Ms. Dolari is well known in the web comic community and has made many convention appearances. If, however, she doesn't want to be associated with
Knowledge (XXG) anymore, then you should respect her wishes.
142:"Please don't VfD this article just because the person it's about may contribute to it, it was initially created by a fan in the first place (hence a demonstration of notability). Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 10:58, 2005 September 2 (UTC)"
473:
wanted their pages deleted should they be? That would leave a gap from references in other pages that linked there. The page is linked to by at least 8 other content pages. Rather than being deleted, the page should perhaps be
166:
613:
wouldn't be allowed to delete his article just because he didn't like its content or
Knowledge (XXG). On the other hand, I have to respect Jenn's wishes however wrong her reasons.
117:
427:
To hell with your "this is not a ballot." Jenn has requested her own deletion, and she's got legions of fans who will follow her to the ends of the earth. "Not notable," my arse.
531:
understand her feelings to pretty much flip wikipedia the bird (and on a personal level, support it entirely). On an editor level, though, I think the page should stay. --
406:
Subject is not particularly notable, so it's probably a judgement call, and since the subject (and partial author) thinks it should be deleted, I'm voting delete. --
129:
568:, doesn't meet our notability or verifiablity standards. With no decent references, the article is all original research and personal point of view. --
358:
I vote this only because Jenn wants it that way, and because I agree with her belief that
Knowledge (XXG) has grown too pretentious for its own good.
382:
I vote for this because Jenn is a good person, and if she wants her information removed, than dang it she should ahve every right to make it happen.
609:. Anyway, I've been through that argument before. I personally think Jenn's reasons for wanting the articles about her work deleted are wrong -
175:
205:
607:
Webcomics articles on
Knowledge (XXG) are deleted too zealously and the entire Notability procedure needs to be completely overhauled
17:
325:
The less mention of me there is on a site I've grown to loathe, the happier I am. Y'all wanna AFD the comics, too? Be my guest.
90:
85:
634:
617:
584:
572:
554:
518:
500:
455:
440:
410:
398:
386:
374:
362:
346:
329:
317:
287:
148:
136:
59:
483:
94:
191:
546:
496:
If you're so upset that she wrote the article, delete it as she's asked you to. Seems like a win-win situation to me.-SLP
77:
649:
36:
626:
slander until the caretakers themselves are fully investigated. This crusade against Texas highway detailing must
164:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
237:
648:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
593:
407:
221:
195:
395:
180:
497:
359:
81:
561:
MIGHT fail? How could such an argument be taken seriously based on your own guidlines? GChapman.
482:
by another wiki user. For example, the current version doesn't list the subject's organising of the
383:
53:
515:
527:
487:
284:
227:
158:
73:
65:
447:
Actually, it seems rather silly to say 'delete' here when I just added content to the article.
540:
133:
124:
No reliable sources, no verifiability and therefore not notable, too. The text of the article
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
569:
343:
326:
296:
280:
276:
610:
300:
631:
581:
470:
452:
437:
50:
466:
371:
145:
533:
255:
243:
211:
111:
190:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
614:
394:
At Jenn Dolari's personal request to me, I am also voting to delete this.
486:
Webcomics
Project (and I have just added a link to this on that page. --
465:
Just because the subject of the page wants it deleted, should it be? If
642:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
153:
184:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
174:
among
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
279:. Also appears webcomics mentioned in article may fail
143:
125:
107:
103:
99:
370:If she doesn't want it here, I don't want it here.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
652:). No further edits should be made to this page.
299:unless we have multiple independent sources.
204:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
8:
178:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
630:even if this is the only way to do it. -
198:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
126:was written by Jenn Dolari herself
24:
490:25 January 2007 2:57 (GMT +10:00)
157:
275:, no indication subject passes
484:Transgender Day of Remembrance
1:
601:If I had my way I'd vote for
194:on the part of others and to
635:19:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
618:18:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
585:17:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
573:04:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
555:19:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
519:17:01, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
501:16:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
456:22:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
441:14:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
411:08:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
399:04:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
387:04:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
375:03:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
363:02:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
347:08:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
330:01:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
318:19:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
288:14:26, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
149:03:51, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
137:14:20, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
60:04:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
669:
48:. No arguments to keep. --
645:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
236:; accounts blocked for
206:single-purpose accounts
176:policies and guidelines
188:by counting votes.
167:not a majority vote
130:Previous nomination
594:structured_spirits
434:
408:Strange but untrue
430:
269:
268:
265:
192:assume good faith
660:
647:
580:"Jenn sent me."
553:
549:
543:
315:
309:
305:
263:
251:
235:
219:
200:
170:, but instead a
161:
154:
115:
97:
56:
34:
668:
667:
663:
662:
661:
659:
658:
657:
656:
650:deletion review
643:
611:Osama Bin Laden
547:
541:
532:
311:
307:
301:
253:
241:
225:
209:
196:sign your posts
88:
72:
69:
54:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
666:
664:
655:
654:
638:
637:
620:
596:
587:
575:
558:
557:
528:Laura Seabrook
521:
503:
491:
488:Laura Seabrook
471:Vladimir Putin
459:
458:
444:
443:
428:
422:
414:
413:
401:
396:24.238.161.111
389:
377:
365:
352:
351:
350:
349:
333:
332:
320:
290:
267:
266:
162:
152:
151:
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
665:
653:
651:
646:
640:
639:
636:
633:
629:
624:
621:
619:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
597:
595:
591:
588:
586:
583:
579:
576:
574:
571:
567:
564:
563:
562:
556:
552:
550:
544:
537:
536:
529:
525:
522:
520:
517:
512:
507:
504:
502:
499:
498:65.65.111.228
495:
492:
489:
485:
481:
477:
472:
468:
467:Harrison Ford
464:
461:
460:
457:
454:
450:
446:
445:
442:
439:
433:
429:
426:
423:
419:
416:
415:
412:
409:
405:
402:
400:
397:
393:
390:
388:
385:
381:
378:
376:
373:
369:
366:
364:
361:
357:
354:
353:
348:
345:
340:
337:
336:
335:
334:
331:
328:
324:
321:
319:
316:
314:
310:
304:
298:
294:
291:
289:
286:
285:Seraphimblade
282:
278:
274:
271:
270:
261:
257:
249:
245:
239:
233:
229:
223:
217:
213:
207:
203:
199:
197:
193:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
169:
168:
163:
160:
156:
155:
150:
147:
144:
141:
140:
139:
138:
135:
131:
127:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
644:
641:
627:
622:
606:
602:
598:
589:
577:
565:
559:
538:
534:
523:
510:
505:
493:
479:
475:
462:
448:
431:
424:
417:
403:
391:
379:
367:
355:
338:
322:
312:
306:
302:
292:
272:
259:
247:
238:sockpuppetry
231:
220:; suspected
215:
201:
189:
185:
179:
171:
165:
123:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
570:Dragonfiend
344:Jenn Dolari
327:Jenn Dolari
295:as failing
74:Jenn Dolari
66:Jenn Dolari
632:Doc Mackie
511:personally
172:discussion
582:Coolgamer
476:rewritten
453:Strangelv
438:Strangelv
384:Dred Lily
228:canvassed
222:canvassed
181:consensus
605:because
548:contribs
524:Re-write
463:Re-write
449:Re-write
372:Krisorey
260:username
254:{{subst:
248:username
242:{{subst:
232:username
226:{{subst:
216:username
210:{{subst:
146:Krisorey
118:View log
599:Abstain
535:Ipstenu
516:Wiscesq
480:updated
360:JBladen
339:Comment
224:users:
91:protect
86:history
623:Delete
590:Delete
578:Delete
566:Delete
506:Delete
494:Delete
432:Delete
425:Delete
418:Delete
404:Delete
392:Delete
380:Delete
368:Delete
356:Delete
323:Delete
297:WP:BIO
293:Delete
281:WP:WEB
277:WP:BIO
273:Delete
134:bogdan
95:delete
46:delete
615:Lee M
526:What
202:Note:
112:views
104:watch
100:links
55:desat
16:<
628:end,
603:Keep
542:talk
478:and
303:Buck
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
51:Core
469:or
451:--
313:ofg
308:ets
256:csp
252:or
244:csm
212:spa
186:not
116:- (
514:--
283:.
262:}}
250:}}
240::
234:}}
218:}}
208::
132:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
551:)
545:|
539:(
264:.
258:|
246:|
230:|
214:|
128:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
