Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Jesuit Communications Foundation - Knowledge

Source 📝

547:
reference is about a "musical tribute" to be given by this organization and another. The article contains a standard description (found on the website and even in this article) and interview/quotation from Fr. Nono Alfonso, a senior exec with the topic organization. No Independent Content. Fails
203: 560:
reference also relies entirely on information provided by people connected with the topic organizations and is written by an individual from the topic organization, PRIMARY source, no Independent Content, also fails
375:
The second source does not even mention the organisation, two mentions of the same movie by the same department (headquarters and a local office), related sources and passing mentions. Sorry, I am not convinced.
608:
Not a single reference comes close to meeting the requirements for establishing notability as per NCORP nor would they even meet the less-strict interpretations of GNG. Topic fails NCORP.
197: 570: 331: 137: 132: 141: 278: 164: 567:
reference is a blog. Fails as a reliable source. Even leaving that aside, it was written by a person with the topic organization, therefore PRIMARY and also fails ORGIND.
124: 258: 427:
Unfortunately, this discussion is about "Jesuit Communications Foundation", not about "Jesuit Music Minstry". Something that is just a passing mention, by the way.
598: 343: 111: 592: 340: 96: 580: 334: 583:
reference is a mere mention-in-passing, fails CORPDEPTH. And that's leaving aside the fact that the Vatican News is hardly an independent publisher.
529:
and not vanilla GNG. The reliability of a source is only one small element of the requirements for sources to establish notability - the others are
539:
original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
218: 185: 128: 551: 322: 401:
mention Jesuit Music Minstry (as I indicated), which has its own section in the article. So, that would still count no matter what.
698: 675: 663:
Bold third relist to give the opportunity to rebut HighKing if desired, whose contributions I find (currently) the most persuasive.
643: 614: 517: 496: 473: 440: 422: 389: 370: 310: 290: 270: 250: 66: 179: 415: 363: 120: 72: 91: 84: 17: 589:
reference relies entirely on information provided by an executive, Rev Emmanuel Alfonso, no Independent Content, fails ORGIND
175: 586: 564: 337: 328: 601:] reference is also about the same movie with quotes from the head of the topic organization, fails CORPDEPTH and ORGIND 225: 557: 325: 105: 101: 652: 623: 537:. ORGIND requires "Independent Content" in order to count towards establishing notability, references must include 455: 544: 319: 715: 306: 40: 577:
produced by the topic organization. There is no information about the topic organization though, fails CORPDEPTH
191: 469: 62: 711: 36: 595:
reference is all about the movie, mention in passing of the topic company as producers, fails CORPDEPTH
508:
with sources presented above. JesCom is an independent institution registered under the Philippine SEC
434: 411: 383: 359: 302: 244: 530: 286: 266: 211: 465: 689:
until all the suggested citations are added to the article. Ping me if you can fix this issue.
694: 638: 574: 80: 58: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
710:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
671: 534: 492: 526: 429: 403: 394: 378: 351: 301:
we do not even have a seperate article of the Philippine Province of the Society of Jesus.
239: 282: 262: 54: 686: 609: 505: 484: 346: 235: 690: 633: 512: 318:: I found some reliable sources which talk about JesCom, JMM and their activities: 158: 541:. That last bit is important. Looking at the sources put forward by Astig above: 667: 488: 509: 685:. I have long been of the opinion that an article does not meet 554:
reference doesn't even mention the organization, fails CORPDEPTH
706:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
487:
with sources presented by Astig. They're reliable enough IMV.
655:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
626:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
458:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
571:
Dept of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of the Philippines
154: 150: 146: 210: 632:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
666:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 464:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 718:). No further edits should be made to this page. 345:. That said, the article is good enough to pass 279:list of Philippines-related deletion discussions 277:Note: This discussion has been included in the 257:Note: This discussion has been included in the 259:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 224: 8: 112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 573:reference is about the launch of the movie 276: 256: 593:Embassy of the Philippines, Madrid Spain 525:First off, the appropriate guideline is 7: 24: 121:Jesuit Communications Foundation 97:Introduction to deletion process 73:Jesuit Communications Foundation 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 565:Jesuit Conference of East Asia 1: 699:20:44, 19 August 2021 (UTC) 676:20:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC) 644:17:50, 10 August 2021 (UTC) 615:16:49, 10 August 2021 (UTC) 87:(AfD)? Read these primers! 67:08:23, 21 August 2021 (UTC) 735: 518:11:13, 7 August 2021 (UTC) 497:01:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC) 474:06:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC) 441:15:18, 8 August 2021 (UTC) 423:13:08, 8 August 2021 (UTC) 390:08:36, 7 August 2021 (UTC) 371:10:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC) 311:18:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC) 291:11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC) 271:11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC) 251:07:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC) 708:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 85:Articles for deletion 55:(non-admin closure) 661:Relisting comment: 678: 646: 642: 575:Ignacio de Loyola 476: 303:John Pack Lambert 293: 273: 102:Guide to deletion 92:How to contribute 57: 726: 665: 658: 656: 636: 631: 629: 627: 558:Another Inquirer 515: 463: 461: 459: 439: 432: 421: 419: 406: 388: 381: 369: 367: 354: 249: 242: 229: 228: 214: 162: 144: 82: 53: 34: 734: 733: 729: 728: 727: 725: 724: 723: 722: 716:deletion review 679: 651: 649: 647: 622: 620: 513: 477: 454: 452: 430: 428: 420: 409: 404: 402: 379: 377: 368: 357: 352: 350: 240: 238: 171: 135: 119: 116: 79: 76: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 732: 730: 721: 720: 702: 701: 664: 659: 648: 630: 619: 618: 617: 605: 604: 603: 602: 599:Adobo Magazine 596: 590: 584: 578: 568: 562: 555: 549: 520: 499: 462: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 408: 356: 313: 295: 294: 274: 232: 231: 168: 115: 114: 109: 99: 94: 77: 75: 70: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 731: 719: 717: 713: 709: 704: 703: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 681: 680: 677: 673: 669: 662: 657: 654: 645: 640: 635: 628: 625: 616: 613: 612: 607: 606: 600: 597: 594: 591: 588: 585: 582: 579: 576: 572: 569: 566: 563: 559: 556: 553: 550: 546: 543: 542: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 521: 519: 516: 510: 507: 503: 500: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 479: 478: 475: 471: 467: 466:Ambrosiawater 460: 457: 442: 438: 437: 433: 426: 425: 424: 417: 413: 407: 400: 396: 393: 392: 391: 387: 386: 382: 374: 373: 372: 365: 361: 355: 348: 344: 341: 338: 335: 332: 329: 326: 323: 320: 317: 314: 312: 308: 304: 300: 297: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 275: 272: 268: 264: 260: 255: 254: 253: 252: 248: 247: 243: 237: 227: 223: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 177: 174: 173:Find sources: 169: 166: 160: 156: 152: 148: 143: 139: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 117: 113: 110: 107: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 89: 88: 86: 81: 74: 71: 69: 68: 64: 60: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 707: 705: 682: 660: 650: 621: 610: 581:Vatican News 538: 531:WP:CORPDEPTH 522: 501: 480: 453: 435: 398: 384: 315: 298: 245: 233: 221: 215: 207: 200: 194: 188: 182: 172: 78: 59:AnsrieJames9 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 514:{ PMGOMEZ } 198:free images 431:The Banner 395:The Banner 380:The Banner 241:The Banner 712:talk page 535:WP:ORGIND 283:Shellwood 263:Shellwood 37:talk page 714:or in a 653:Relisted 624:Relisted 611:HighKing 552:GMA News 545:Inquirer 527:WP:NCORP 456:Relisted 416:ICE CUBE 364:ICE CUBE 165:View log 106:glossary 39:or in a 691:Bearian 548:ORGIND. 405:ASTIG😎 353:ASTIG😎 204:WP refs 192:scholar 138:protect 133:history 83:New to 687:WP:HEY 683:Delete 668:Daniel 561:ORGIND 523:Delete 506:WP:GNG 504:Meets 489:SBKSPP 485:WP:GNG 483:Meets 347:WP:GNG 299:Delete 236:WP:GNG 234:Fails 176:Google 142:delete 412:ICE T 397:, it 360:ICE T 219:JSTOR 180:books 159:views 151:watch 147:links 16:< 695:talk 672:talk 639:talk 587:CRUX 533:and 502:Keep 493:talk 481:Keep 470:talk 436:talk 385:talk 342:and 316:Keep 307:talk 287:talk 267:talk 246:talk 212:FENS 186:news 155:logs 129:talk 125:edit 63:talk 634:Joe 399:did 226:TWL 163:– ( 697:) 674:) 511:-- 495:) 472:) 414:• 362:• 349:. 339:, 336:, 333:, 330:, 327:, 324:, 321:, 309:) 289:) 281:. 269:) 261:. 206:) 157:| 153:| 149:| 145:| 140:| 136:| 131:| 127:| 65:) 52:. 693:( 670:( 641:) 637:( 491:( 468:( 418:) 410:( 366:) 358:( 305:( 285:( 265:( 230:) 222:· 216:· 208:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 183:· 178:( 170:( 167:) 161:) 123:( 108:) 104:( 61:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
AnsrieJames9
talk
08:23, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Jesuit Communications Foundation

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Jesuit Communications Foundation
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.