258:
already covers him in the appropriate context, there's no compelling reason why he would need a standalone biographical article to delve more deeply into his childhood or his educational background or his career or his family relationships than the court case's article already does. To be clear, I do
247:
of a person who is notable for a specific event, but is already well-covered by that event's article without needing to delve deeper into his private personal life outside of the event. This is referenced entirely to factoids cherrypicked from coverage of the court case itself (along with a few stray
542:
the way over a notability standard in the absence of the court case, but it's still contributory — and Edie
Windsor also cites a lot more sources than this does, covering her in the context of a lot more than just the court case alone. That's the difference between her and this: her article is
617:
Obergefell is an important figure in the history of the
Supreme Court as well as an important LGBTQ+ activist. Obergefell's story is widely covered in high school history classrooms and students will frequently use his page for their research
213:
310:
166:
207:
290:
330:
252:
that aren't notability boosters), not to any evidence that his personal life has actually been a subject of coverage in its own right -- and since the existing
98:
113:
476:
498:
per
Bearian. There is plenty of precedent for people who became famous for 1E who use that fame to go on to become notable advocates and campaigners.
173:
427:
We don't keep articles just because somebody generically asserts, without showing any actual evidence, that there are more sources available.
269:-- but I'm not seeing a convincing reason why it needs to be a separate standalone biographical article that deep-dives into his private life
366:
139:
134:
431:
is not a magic word that instantly sends an AFD discussion to hell just because you say it — it only comes into play if you actually
93:
86:
17:
143:
555:
that he's notable for more than just the court case itself, not hard evidence equivalent to what
Windsor's article is showing.
393:
126:
228:
107:
103:
195:
52:. In the sense of "not delete". There is no consensus about whether to keep this as a separate article or to merge it into
357:; I think the "Recognition" section has some worthwhile material that can go there, but otherwise I agree with the nom. –
444:
644:
40:
249:
189:
623:
362:
405:- since the SCOTUS case, he's become notable as an activist. Plenty of sources are available about that; see
627:
607:
582:
564:
529:
507:
488:
465:
418:
397:
370:
342:
322:
302:
282:
185:
68:
640:
36:
235:
594:
353:
265:
254:
53:
619:
578:
503:
389:
358:
221:
130:
428:
406:
603:
484:
548:
381:
244:
560:
525:
414:
338:
318:
298:
278:
82:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
639:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
201:
534:
Edith
Windsor features evidence that she already had some degree of preexisting notability
574:
513:
499:
456:
385:
122:
74:
59:
599:
517:
480:
570:
556:
521:
472:
410:
334:
314:
294:
274:
160:
56:, but that can continue to be discussed on the article talk page.
635:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
551:, while Obergefell's isn't — all we've got is soft, unproven
447:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
311:
list of
Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
538:
her court case. It may not necessarily have gotten her
156:
152:
148:
220:
453:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
234:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
647:). No further edits should be made to this page.
329:Note: This discussion has been included in the
309:Note: This discussion has been included in the
289:Note: This discussion has been included in the
477:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject LGBT studies
8:
114:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
291:list of People-related deletion discussions
328:
308:
288:
331:list of Ohio-related deletion discussions
259:believe his name should be retained as a
273:of his role in the court case itself.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
479:on 15:08, 7 October 2019 (UTC). --
24:
475:placed a neutral notification at
99:Introduction to deletion process
543:actually showing and sourcing
1:
628:17:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
608:11:55, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
598:, the case looks notable. --
583:07:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
565:14:52, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
547:that she's more than just a
69:11:45, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
530:19:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
508:06:27, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
489:08:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
466:19:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
419:15:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
398:18:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
380:into the court case. Clear
378:Selective merge or redirect
371:19:07, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
343:17:11, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
323:17:11, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
303:17:11, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
283:17:11, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
89:(AfD)? Read these primers!
664:
637:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
520:for another example.
87:Articles for deletion
595:Obergefell v. Hodges
354:Obergefell v. Hodges
266:Obergefell v. Hodges
255:Obergefell v. Hodges
54:Obergefell v. Hodges
593:selective merge to
569:I was thinking of
491:
468:
464:
433:show the evidence
345:
325:
305:
104:Guide to deletion
94:How to contribute
67:
655:
471:
463:
461:
454:
452:
450:
448:
239:
238:
224:
176:
164:
146:
84:
66:
64:
57:
34:
663:
662:
658:
657:
656:
654:
653:
652:
651:
645:deletion review
469:
457:
455:
443:
441:
250:primary sources
181:
172:
137:
121:
118:
81:
78:
60:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
661:
659:
650:
649:
631:
630:
620:Serenewilliams
611:
610:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
567:
451:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
422:
421:
400:
374:
373:
359:John M Wolfson
346:
326:
306:
242:
241:
178:
123:Jim Obergefell
117:
116:
111:
101:
96:
79:
77:
75:Jim Obergefell
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
660:
648:
646:
642:
638:
633:
632:
629:
625:
621:
616:
613:
612:
609:
605:
601:
597:
596:
590:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
545:hard evidence
541:
537:
533:
532:
531:
527:
523:
519:
518:Edith Windsor
515:
511:
510:
509:
505:
501:
497:
494:
493:
492:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
467:
462:
460:
449:
446:
434:
430:
426:
425:
424:
423:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
401:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
376:
375:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
355:
350:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
327:
324:
320:
316:
312:
307:
304:
300:
296:
292:
287:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
262:
257:
256:
251:
246:
237:
233:
230:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
187:
184:
183:Find sources:
179:
175:
171:
168:
162:
158:
154:
150:
145:
141:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:
115:
112:
109:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
90:
88:
83:
76:
73:
71:
70:
65:
63:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
636:
634:
614:
592:
571:Walter Mikac
552:
544:
539:
535:
495:
470:
458:
442:
432:
402:
377:
352:
348:
270:
264:
260:
253:
243:
231:
225:
217:
210:
204:
198:
192:
182:
169:
80:
61:
49:
47:
31:
28:
573:, but yes.
516:. See also
512:Thank you,
208:free images
553:assertions
459:Sandstein
62:Sandstein
641:talk page
575:De Guerre
514:De Guerre
500:De Guerre
429:WP:NEXIST
407:WP:BEFORE
386:Roscelese
37:talk page
643:or in a
600:MarioGom
549:WP:BLP1E
481:MarioGom
445:Relisted
394:contribs
382:WP:BLP1E
367:contribs
261:redirect
245:WP:BLP1E
167:View log
108:glossary
39:or in a
557:Bearcat
522:Bearian
473:Bearian
435:. Also,
411:Bearian
335:Bearcat
315:Bearcat
295:Bearcat
275:Bearcat
271:outside
214:WP refs
202:scholar
140:protect
135:history
85:New to
591:Maybe
536:before
186:Google
144:delete
351:into
349:Merge
229:JSTOR
190:books
174:Stats
161:views
153:watch
149:links
16:<
624:talk
615:Keep
604:talk
579:talk
561:talk
526:talk
504:talk
496:Keep
485:talk
415:talk
403:Keep
390:talk
363:talk
339:talk
319:talk
299:talk
279:talk
222:FENS
196:news
157:logs
131:talk
127:edit
50:keep
540:all
384:. –
263:to
236:TWL
165:– (
626:)
606:)
581:)
563:)
528:)
506:)
487:)
417:)
409:.
396:)
392:⋅
369:)
365:•
341:)
333:.
321:)
313:.
301:)
293:.
281:)
216:)
159:|
155:|
151:|
147:|
142:|
138:|
133:|
129:|
622:(
602:(
577:(
559:(
524:(
502:(
483:(
413:(
388:(
361:(
337:(
317:(
297:(
277:(
240:)
232:·
226:·
218:·
211:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
188:(
180:(
177:)
170:·
163:)
125:(
110:)
106:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.