Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/JioMeet - Knowledge

Source 📝

506:
why do you mention it has received praise? That is irrelevant. It doesn't matter if it is great or not, why do you think that would matter? The only thing that matters is the coverage and if there a sufficient amount. Why do you mention that it was praised by a movement initiated by Modi? That is
523:
The link isn't dead. I forgot to put a space between the link and 2. It's very much a live one. Why is it relevant? By that line of reasoning, 80% of Knowledge articles would be up for deletion because a bulk of the coverage rests on it being given 'significant' coverage. Indirect appeal to
246:
Not notable. After it was moved to draft space by another user, the author blanked the draft and recreated the article, so while I normally would move this to draft space to allow it to develop further, not sure that would be productive here.
498:, are you just pasting reference links from the article? Your second link is dead. Anyway, I went through the sources and I don't think there is any convincing coverage that is not just from the announcement or something. 215: 334: 328: 408: 596: 576: 331: 168: 556: 287:
do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Fails
264: 209: 456: 411: 357: 115: 414: 100: 460: 407:
Product is notable. Passes GNG and gains slightly more notability with praise from NITI Aayog's CEO, plus the Aatmanirbhar movement initiated by Modi.
325: 322: 338:
Notability is not temporary. Similarly, a burst of coverage (often around product announcements) does not automatically make a product notable.
175: 646:
Not really non notable. But given that it doesn't have sufficient sources specifically mentioning it, it should be redirected to
538:
Also, I most *certainly did not* paste links from the article. I'm not as unaware of policies as you seem to be insinuating. --
95: 88: 17: 388: 230: 141: 136: 109: 105: 197: 618: 145: 718: 40: 128: 66: 464: 455:
That's up to the closing admin (or non-admin) to take into consideration. In the meantime, here is more:
191: 714: 697: 543: 529: 472: 422: 36: 652: 604: 584: 564: 444: 187: 272: 252: 223: 62: 701: 680: 656: 636: 608: 588: 568: 547: 533: 516: 476: 448: 426: 399: 368: 348: 305: 276: 256: 70: 632: 512: 237: 673: 84: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
713:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
693: 539: 525: 501: 493: 468: 418: 384: 650:
as it's coverage won't endure for long on independent unless it becomes extremely popular.
600: 580: 560: 439: 363: 343: 318: 288: 268: 248: 58: 669: 664:
The best sources offered up are just articles saying it's been released. But we need
628: 508: 380: 203: 524:
authority? That's very silly. Also, no need to ping me twice in the same message. --
132: 162: 393: 292: 340:. All coverage is around the same date i.e date of the app's announcement. - 461:
another one on Zoom and JioMeet, this time detailing the latter's downloads
124: 76: 56:. No consensus to Keep, and a rough consensus to Redirect as an ATD. 437:
I think you have not sufficiently countered the point I made. -
336:- these could qualify as reliable and significant), but because 709:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
689: 647: 314: 53: 621:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
321:, not because there is no reliable and significant coverage ( 668:
coverage of a topic to actually write an article. Fails
158: 154: 150: 222: 627:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 721:). No further edits should be made to this page. 595:Note: This discussion has been included in the 575:Note: This discussion has been included in the 555:Note: This discussion has been included in the 356:Note: This discussion has been included in the 263:Note: This discussion has been included in the 597:list of Technology-related deletion discussions 577:list of Computing-related deletion discussions 557:list of Products-related deletion discussions 265:list of Software-related deletion discussions 236: 8: 116:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 379:to Jio#Jio_apps, where it is mentioned per 688:and perhaps merge a bit of the content to 594: 574: 554: 358:list of India-related deletion discussions 355: 262: 457:Zoom considering legal action against Jio 507:such an indirect appeal to authority! -- 463:and an Op-Ed that looks at the comption 337: 7: 24: 101:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 91:(AfD)? Read these primers! 738: 702:07:38, 17 July 2020 (UTC) 681:00:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 657:05:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 637:00:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 548:01:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 477:01:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 71:11:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 711:Please do not modify it. 609:19:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 589:19:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 569:19:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 534:09:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 517:23:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC) 449:22:19, 8 July 2020 (UTC) 427:14:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC) 400:08:48, 8 July 2020 (UTC) 369:20:23, 1 July 2020 (UTC) 349:19:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC) 306:13:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC) 277:12:32, 1 July 2020 (UTC) 257:12:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 89:Articles for deletion 59:(non-admin closure) 317:. It doesn't pass 639: 611: 591: 571: 371: 279: 106:Guide to deletion 96:How to contribute 61: 729: 626: 624: 622: 505: 497: 396: 366: 346: 302: 299: 296: 241: 240: 226: 178: 166: 148: 86: 57: 34: 737: 736: 732: 731: 730: 728: 727: 726: 725: 719:deletion review 653:Aman Kumar Goel 640: 617: 615: 499: 491: 394: 362: 342: 300: 297: 294: 183: 174: 139: 123: 120: 83: 80: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 735: 733: 724: 723: 705: 704: 683: 659: 625: 614: 613: 612: 592: 572: 552: 551: 550: 520: 519: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 452: 451: 430: 429: 402: 373: 372: 352: 351: 308: 281: 280: 244: 243: 180: 119: 118: 113: 103: 98: 81: 79: 74: 63:Britishfinance 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 734: 722: 720: 716: 712: 707: 706: 703: 699: 695: 692:if need be. - 691: 687: 684: 682: 679: 678: 677: 671: 667: 663: 660: 658: 655: 654: 649: 645: 642: 641: 638: 634: 630: 623: 620: 610: 606: 602: 598: 593: 590: 586: 582: 578: 573: 570: 566: 562: 558: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 536: 535: 531: 527: 522: 521: 518: 514: 510: 503: 495: 489: 486: 485: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 453: 450: 446: 442: 441: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 428: 424: 420: 416: 413: 410: 406: 403: 401: 398: 397: 390: 386: 382: 378: 375: 374: 370: 367: 365: 359: 354: 353: 350: 347: 345: 339: 335: 332: 329: 326: 323: 320: 316: 312: 309: 307: 304: 303: 290: 286: 283: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 261: 260: 259: 258: 254: 250: 239: 235: 232: 229: 225: 221: 217: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 189: 186: 185:Find sources: 181: 177: 173: 170: 164: 160: 156: 152: 147: 143: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 121: 117: 114: 111: 107: 104: 102: 99: 97: 94: 93: 92: 90: 85: 78: 75: 73: 72: 68: 64: 60: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 710: 708: 685: 676:FenixFeather 675: 674: 665: 661: 651: 648:Jio#Jio_apps 643: 616: 487: 438: 404: 392: 376: 361: 341: 315:Jio#Jio_apps 310: 293: 284: 245: 233: 227: 219: 212: 206: 200: 194: 184: 171: 82: 54:Jio#Jio apps 49: 47: 31: 28: 694:Kj cheetham 666:significant 540:Rsrikanth05 526:Rsrikanth05 502:Rsrikanth05 494:Rsrikanth05 469:Rsrikanth05 419:Rsrikanth05 210:free images 601:Lightburst 581:Lightburst 561:Lightburst 715:talk page 269:DannyS712 249:DannyS712 37:talk page 717:or in a 686:Redirect 644:Redirect 629:Darkwind 619:Relisted 509:Ysangkok 377:Redirect 319:WP:NSOFT 311:Redirect 289:WP:NSOFT 169:View log 110:glossary 50:redirect 39:or in a 216:WP refs 204:scholar 142:protect 137:history 125:JioMeet 87:New to 77:JioMeet 670:WP:GNG 662:Delete 488:Delete 395:buidhe 381:WP:ATD 285:Delete 188:Google 146:delete 440:Harsh 364:Harsh 344:Harsh 313:: to 231:JSTOR 192:books 176:Stats 163:views 155:watch 151:links 16:< 698:talk 672:. – 633:talk 605:talk 585:talk 565:talk 544:talk 530:talk 513:talk 473:talk 467:. -- 465:here 445:talk 423:talk 417:. -- 405:Keep 360:. - 273:talk 253:talk 224:FENS 198:news 159:logs 133:talk 129:edit 67:talk 690:Jio 459:], 301:Son 238:TWL 167:– ( 52:to 700:) 635:) 607:) 599:. 587:) 579:. 567:) 559:. 546:) 532:) 515:) 490:, 475:) 447:) 425:) 391:) 387:· 333:, 330:, 327:, 324:, 298:My 291:. 275:) 267:. 255:) 218:) 161:| 157:| 153:| 149:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 69:) 696:( 631:( 603:( 583:( 563:( 542:( 528:( 511:( 504:: 500:@ 496:: 492:@ 471:( 443:( 421:( 415:3 412:2 409:1 389:c 385:t 383:( 295:D 271:( 251:( 242:) 234:· 228:· 220:· 213:· 207:· 201:· 195:· 190:( 182:( 179:) 172:· 165:) 127:( 112:) 108:( 65:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Jio#Jio apps
(non-admin closure)
Britishfinance
talk
11:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
JioMeet

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
JioMeet
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.