191:
newspapers, newsletters, and radio shows around the world. I know I'm not suppose to say anything because I'm the person in mention, but how dare anyone of you JUDGE as to who is notable. It's the internet - not your private party. What arrogance! I'm a member of the
National Speakers Association as well, does that count or am I at your mercy - some group of guys who think they have more rights than others. Wow, I hope I never have to be called upon to JUDGE your success. I'll just pray for you instead.
290:
Just read the blog entitled 'Knowledge (XXG) Queens'. The writing may be a little more considered in tone, but the spirit is not so different. The subject's involvement in the article seems implicit, at least. The offense which they seem to have taken, even on the blog, is surprising for someone who
267:
and from that entry, it really does not remotely "sound" like the person using that username here on
Knowledge (XXG) is Jude Stringfellow. The blog is without question, written by the author of the book, and she does not use all caps, or type in the same manner as this username has done. Nor does she
280:
with the real person's blog, are sufficiently different that I personally do not believe that the username claiming to be the author, actually is. Aside from all of that, I believe that the article on the dog is notable enough, and perhaps the information regarding Jude
Stringfellow should simply be
190:
Date of birth: 11/22/1961 Oklhoma City, Oklahoma. HOW DARE YOU SAY that self published authors aren't notable! Some of us have sold many more books than the authors in regular houses. I've been featured on Oprah, Montel, in more than 100 magazines around the world, and on more than 100 tv shows,
263:
While I realize that it is impossible to truly verify usernames when they claim to be a specific person, I do believe it is worth noting that I have actually seen the Oprah show that this person was on (the dog is so cute!) and I went to the person's blog,
291:
is a writer and teacher--one would expect an understanding of an editorial process which strives, imperfectly, to uphold impartiality through the use of reliable sources and the discouragement of autobiography. This is proper for an encyclopedic venture.
312:
her and, as such, I've listed
Jstringfellow on an admin noticeboard with some useful links. The mean-spiritedness of both the persona and the person are vexing to me but, other than that, whether one = other is immaterial.
303:
I doubt we'll ever be able to say conclusively, nor is it really germane to the conversation here whether or not
Jstringfellow is indeed Jude Stringfellow. It's clear that Ms. Stringfellow is saying it's
114:
270:
We have enjoyed her stay on
Knowledge (XXG), but to be honest it doesn't make or break her abilities to be presented in public, or to be beneficial to anyone.
227:
and provide us with references to some of these 100 magazines around the world. Spitting vitriol won't help your position here. In any event, please review
128:
account, no evidence of notability and if this author is notable, why don't we know the date, year, and place of birth - red flags of non-notability.
149:
87:
82:
355:
91:
421:
be notable, it's not typical (after all, if you were notable, wouldn't you have signed a deal with a publisher?). That said, it requires
370:
326:
248:
206:
74:
17:
496:
276:
at the top of the blog entry. Again, fully realizing there's no way to verify it, the comparison of the writing styles of this
431:
154:
515:
36:
514:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
500:
477:
461:
445:
433:
409:
393:
377:
333:
295:
282:
255:
210:
182:
161:
132:
56:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
367:
323:
277:
245:
202:
144:
78:
194:
492:
198:
406:
129:
235:. I personally believe you're almost there, you just need to give verifiable secondary sources.
458:
358:
314:
236:
224:
429:
70:
62:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
486:
386:
228:
125:
442:
176:
422:
474:
53:
232:
454:
268:
really have any problem with the deletion of this article, as stated on that blog: "
426:
108:
470:
402:
171:
453:, not independently notable, and apparently itching to get onto BADSITES. --
223:
It would be immensely more helpful if you could find it in your heart to be
390:
292:
265:
308:
her and that there were multiple edits where JStringfellow said they
508:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
425:
to establish that notability, and this article has none. —
229:
Wikpedia's (not "the internet") guidelines for notability
405:, whose article I have just argued should be retained.
352:
104:
100:
96:
485:
or redirect, it's the dog that has the notability. --
272:" Further, she flat out states that this username is
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
52:in place of the article seems like a good idea. -
518:). No further edits should be made to this page.
233:Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines for verifiabilty
8:
351:Well, I did my level best. Based on this:
469:per nom, or, optionally, redirect to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
441:, nonnotable, no reliable sources.
124:self-published author written by a
24:
501:03:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
478:04:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
462:18:00, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
446:16:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
434:06:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
410:05:36, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
394:04:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
378:04:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
334:14:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
296:14:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
283:14:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
256:04:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
211:03:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
183:01:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
169:no assertion of notability. —
162:17:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
133:16:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
57:05:46, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
417:While self published people
357:, I'd even go speedy now.
281:merged into that article.
535:
48:per discussion below. A
511:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
401:- Notable only for her
389:. Vanity article.
374:
330:
252:
213:
197:comment added by
71:Jude Stringfellow
63:Jude Stringfellow
526:
513:
499:
489:
423:reliable sources
375:
372:
364:
331:
328:
320:
253:
250:
242:
192:
179:
174:
159:
157:
152:
147:
112:
94:
34:
534:
533:
529:
528:
527:
525:
524:
523:
522:
516:deletion review
509:
491:
487:
371:
360:
327:
316:
249:
238:
177:
172:
155:
150:
145:
143:
85:
69:
66:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
532:
530:
521:
520:
504:
503:
480:
464:
448:
436:
412:
396:
385:As per above,
380:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
231:of people and
215:
214:
185:
164:
130:Carlossuarez46
119:
118:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
531:
519:
517:
512:
506:
505:
502:
498:
494:
490:
484:
481:
479:
476:
472:
468:
465:
463:
460:
456:
452:
449:
447:
444:
440:
437:
435:
432:
430:
428:
424:
420:
416:
413:
411:
408:
404:
400:
397:
395:
392:
388:
384:
381:
379:
376:
368:
366:
365:
363:
362:Into The Fray
356:
353:
350:
347:
346:
335:
332:
324:
322:
321:
319:
318:Into The Fray
311:
307:
302:
299:
298:
297:
294:
289:
286:
285:
284:
279:
275:
271:
266:
262:
259:
258:
257:
254:
246:
244:
243:
241:
240:Into The Fray
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
199:Jstringfellow
196:
189:
186:
184:
181:
180:
175:
168:
165:
163:
160:
158:
153:
148:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
127:
123:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
510:
507:
482:
466:
450:
438:
418:
414:
398:
382:
361:
359:
348:
317:
315:
309:
305:
300:
287:
273:
269:
260:
239:
237:
220:
187:
170:
166:
142:
138:
121:
120:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
488:Groggy Dice
471:Faith (dog)
193:—Preceding
141:per above.
473:article.
443:NawlinWiki
407:SolidPlaid
475:RFerreira
403:dog Faith
354:and this
54:GTBacchus
455:Dhartung
278:username
207:contribs
195:unsigned
146:Zouavman
115:View log
50:REDIRECT
427:Timotab
301:Comment
288:Comment
274:not her
261:Comment
221:Comment
88:protect
83:history
483:Delete
467:Delete
451:Delete
439:Delete
415:Delete
399:Delete
387:WP:COI
383:Delete
349:Delete
167:Delete
156:Zouave
139:Delete
126:WP:COI
122:Delete
92:delete
46:DELETE
225:civil
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
459:Talk
310:were
203:talk
188:Keep
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
419:can
391:JNW
306:not
293:JNW
173:Wen
113:– (
495:|
457:|
209:)
205:•
178:li
151:Le
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
497:C
493:T
373:C
369:/
329:C
325:/
251:C
247:/
201:(
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.