31:
454:
possibilities. Sorry, but you are unable to see changes being made, as well as not able to propose any rationality. There will be no dialogue between us under such circustances, unless you will change your attitude to more reasonable. Currently we are going to get out of this AfD with featured article. Everybody, who have eyes and able to read, can judge by himself. –
329:(see page 49) but makes no mention of this particular alleged archetype. In fact, no example in the text comes anywhere close to this level of detail or specificity. Google turns up nothing on any of the alleged names except a few false positives, primarily re-quotes from a single piece of Lord-of-the-Rings fan-fiction.
438:
As already pointed out, none of the references cited in the article actually refer to the subject of the article at all. You use the references to prove that certain film making techniques are real, or that certain movie scenes exist, but no where do any of the references give any evidence that the
453:
Scratch the term. I've deleted it from the article. There is no single mention of "Just-in time lad" in the current edition of the article. I've allready stated that we do not discuss the terms. And you still do discuss the term instead of subject. You discuss the done thing, and I'm talking about
187:
500:. The article has been rewritten during the AFD to replace uses of the titled term ("just-in-time lad") with a new option ("last-minute hero"). I don't see much in the way of reliable sources to suppose
295:
to claim that these are stock archetypes. We would need to reference sources that talk about the stock character directly, which this article doesn't do, and as described above, don't seem to exist.
523:
181:
402:
148:
394:
40:
514:
constitutes a recognizable archetype in and of itself. And I'm just not seeing the sources to support that claim, regardless of what one might call it.
414:
Except that not only have you changed the search term, a cursory examination of the search results shows nothing related to the article content.
222:. In addition, actually searching for any reference to this supposed archetype gives no results, making it likely that this also falls under
121:
116:
125:
578:
108:
218:
The article was already declined as a Speedy Delete, but was suggested to be sent here. The article is seemingly in violation of
202:
17:
169:
519:
322:
541:
401:"? Well, well, well. I do not accusing anybody of misrepresenting the facts, but... the facts said it's not true (
163:
560:
65:
46:
559:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
545:
492:
458:
448:
433:
409:
386:
355:
338:
308:
282:
266:
245:
235:
90:
159:
488:
419:
537:
112:
515:
360:
Examination of the cited sources show no mention of "just-in-time lad" within their text. Additionally a
291:
and analysis. No matter what term is used as a title for the article, it's been produced as an original
484:
455:
430:
415:
406:
279:
242:
209:
426:
104:
96:
347:
241:
That's much better than "inappropriate pages". You're making real progress. Keep on the same way. –
444:
351:
304:
300:
262:
258:
231:
195:
334:
175:
85:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
325:. The one cited text currently on the article does discuss the general concept of character
510:
292:
440:
296:
274:
254:
227:
223:
572:
480:
369:
361:
533:
505:
476:
373:
330:
288:
287:
Ok, let me clarify. This is an originally created term, and therefore constitutes
219:
79:
142:
382:
377:
326:
439:
term "Just-in time lad" existed before you created it in this article.
553:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
25:
364:
finds no relevant sources other than the
Knowledge article.
376:
dealing with the article subject are produced to establish
138:
134:
130:
194:
253:, this is an original term, and we're not TV Tropes.
399:
no relevant sources other than the
Knowledge article
346:seriously lacking in sources. Possible hoax or OR.
68:). No further edits should be made to this page.
563:). No further edits should be made to this page.
208:
8:
508:asserting that the character who performs a
504:either. Fundamentally, this appears to be
45:For an explanation of the process, see
271:We're here not to discuss the terms (
7:
278:). Discuss the subject instead. –
24:
397:for only the google search are "
41:deletion review on 2011 April 27
29:
429:came to me while sleeping :) –
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
595:
546:11:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
524:17:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
493:19:23, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
459:19:32, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
449:16:54, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
434:08:58, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
410:14:58, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
403:check for accurate results
387:13:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
356:06:17, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
339:21:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
309:21:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
283:20:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
267:19:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
246:17:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
236:17:47, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
91:04:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
47:Knowledge:Deletion review
579:Pages at deletion review
556:Please do not modify it.
61:Please do not modify it.
405:). Best wishes. –
395:16 900 000 results
362:search engine test
506:original research
337:
323:original research
289:Original research
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
586:
558:
538:Reference Desker
516:Serpent's Choice
477:Origial research
456:George Serdechny
431:George Serdechny
407:George Serdechny
374:reliable sources
333:
280:George Serdechny
243:George Serdechny
213:
212:
198:
146:
128:
105:Just-in-time lad
97:Just-in-time lad
73:The result was
63:
33:
32:
26:
594:
593:
589:
588:
587:
585:
584:
583:
569:
568:
567:
561:deletion review
554:
511:deus ex machina
316:(edit conflict)
155:
119:
103:
100:
66:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
592:
590:
582:
581:
571:
570:
566:
565:
549:
548:
527:
526:
495:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
427:the references
390:
389:
358:
341:
321:as prohibited
313:
312:
311:
285:
273:for terms see
248:
216:
215:
152:
99:
94:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
591:
580:
577:
576:
574:
564:
562:
557:
551:
550:
547:
543:
539:
535:
532:
529:
528:
525:
521:
517:
513:
512:
507:
503:
499:
496:
494:
490:
486:
485:RichardOSmith
482:
478:
475:
472:
471:
460:
457:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
437:
436:
435:
432:
428:
424:
423:
421:
417:
416:RichardOSmith
413:
412:
411:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
391:
388:
385:
384:
379:
378:verifiability
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
284:
281:
277:
276:
270:
269:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
211:
207:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
161:
158:
157:Find sources:
153:
150:
144:
140:
136:
132:
127:
123:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
101:
98:
95:
93:
92:
88:
87:
82:
81:
76:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
555:
552:
530:
509:
501:
497:
473:
398:
381:
365:
343:
318:
315:
272:
250:
217:
205:
199:
191:
184:
178:
172:
166:
156:
84:
78:
74:
72:
60:
57:
36:
182:free images
425:Sure. And
327:archetypes
481:neologism
441:Rorshacma
393:Oh yeah?
348:HHaeyyn89
297:Night Gyr
293:synthesis
255:Night Gyr
228:Rorshacma
573:Category
149:View log
531:Delete:
372:unless
368:as per
331:Rossami
275:WP:MOVE
224:WP:HOAX
188:WP refs
176:scholar
122:protect
117:history
80:postdlf
498:Delete
479:and a
474:Delete
383:Allen3
370:WP:NOR
366:Delete
344:Delete
335:(talk)
319:Delete
251:Delete
160:Google
126:delete
75:DELETE
534:WP:OR
380:. --
220:WP:OR
203:JSTOR
164:books
143:views
135:watch
131:links
16:<
542:talk
520:talk
502:that
489:talk
445:talk
420:talk
352:talk
301:talk
259:talk
232:talk
196:FENS
170:news
139:logs
113:talk
109:edit
86:talk
210:TWL
147:– (
77:.
575::
544:)
536:--
522:)
491:)
483:.
447:)
422:)
354:)
307:)
305:Oy
265:)
263:Oy
234:)
226:.
190:)
141:|
137:|
133:|
129:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
89:)
43:.
540:(
518:(
487:(
443:(
418:(
350:(
303:/
299:(
261:/
257:(
230:(
214:)
206:·
200:·
192:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
162:(
154:(
151:)
145:)
107:(
83:(
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.