Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Justification of copyright infringement - Knowledge

Source 📝

184:-- it's not as all bad as that but needs work, and I'm not sure we need this given numerous other articles on the general topic. It is a reasonable list of some justifications that have been used, and it isn't problematically POV. -- 88: 83: 92: 75: 121: 192: 176: 159: 137: 57: 167:
per above. Original research. No opposition to a proper article being created if sourced and verifiable, as the topic is notable.
79: 17: 71: 63: 210: 36: 209:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
155: 133: 146:- Supposed sources do not discuss the supposed topic. This might work as a paper for class, but it is 52: 189: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
172: 151: 129: 128:
terrible justification, not sourced at all, view of one person. Not for an encyclopedia
49: 185: 147: 109: 168: 203:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
150:
here. (Unable to find this topic through various searches.) -
116: 105: 101: 97: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 213:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 72:Justification of copyright infringement 64:Justification of copyright infringement 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 193:20:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 177:20:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 160:19:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 138:19:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 58:03:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 230: 206:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 221: 208: 119: 113: 95: 55: 34: 229: 228: 224: 223: 222: 220: 219: 218: 217: 211:deletion review 204: 115: 86: 70: 67: 53: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 227: 225: 216: 215: 198: 196: 195: 179: 162: 126: 125: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 226: 214: 212: 207: 201: 200: 199: 194: 191: 187: 183: 180: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 142: 141: 140: 139: 135: 131: 123: 118: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 56: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 205: 202: 197: 181: 164: 143: 127: 45: 43: 31: 28: 182:Weak delete 152:Mdsummermsw 130:LightSpeed3 186:Dhartung 122:View log 89:protect 84:history 169:Stifle 165:Delete 144:Delete 117:delete 93:delete 46:delete 148:WP:OR 120:) – ( 110:views 102:watch 98:links 54:desat 16:< 190:Talk 173:talk 156:talk 134:talk 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 50:Core 188:| 175:) 158:) 136:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 48:. 171:( 154:( 132:( 124:) 114:( 112:) 74:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Core
desat
03:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Justification of copyright infringement
Justification of copyright infringement
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
LightSpeed3
talk
19:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
WP:OR
Mdsummermsw
talk
19:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Stifle
talk
20:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Dhartung
Talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.