Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Oleg Maltsev (psychologist) - Knowledge

Source 📝

349:
are dozens of reputable sources, printed books that confirm the authority of CESNUR. But besides Cesnur magazine, the article included other sources that have been deleted. I understand that some sources were primary related to the subject of the article, so they could cause displeasure for a number
246:
is neither a reliable source nor independent of Maltsev. There are brief mentions of his degree on a government website, two reviews of a martial arts book that make brief mention of him, but that's it. (Additionally, the article was created by an editor with an apparent COI suggesting they are
441:
Your main point, as I understand it, is that CESNUR is not RS. This is your POV. I do not see problems with RS. I looked at the article in Ukrainian Knowledge, there are a significant number of sources there, which were not used in the English Knowledge. Apparently some of them are affiliated. It
534:
I did a super-quick cleanup to remove the promotional tone / COI issues, but Ring & SI are definitely RSes. In any case, cleanups shouldn't have any effect on this deletion discussion -- my understanding is that deletion discussions are NOT about the current version of the article at all,
323:
nomination was rightly closed by a non-admin as intentionally disruptive after its nom was blocked for sockpuppetry. Also looks like that discussion wasn't correctly listed, at least not at first. The "second nomination" was really just a contested close by a user unfamiliar with non-admin
426:
We shall have to disagree on CESNUR; my understanding of past archives is that longstanding wikipedia precedent (far predating me) has held CESNUR is not considered a RS. A well-sourced criticism of CESNUR is that its scholars lack sufficient independence from it subjects.
327:
When a COI is exposed, it makes sense to revisit these issues. I don't think this article would exist if CESNUR didn't send someone here to create it in service of promoting the subject, and I don't think there's enough to write an article without the CESNUR-published
473: 722: 346: 207: 401:
As for your remark that CESNUR is affiliated with Maltsev, it sounds absurd. The Maltsev's group was the subject of CESNUR research. With this logic, we can assume that a microbiologist is affiliated on
201: 423:! (that book already has its own article, we could always merge the biographical material into that article if the powers that be decide we don't have enough to do justice to a bio). 718: 378: 264: 553:
for no reason at all during the discussion of deleting the article. Such removing is not consensus. You say that you removed the promotional tone/COI issues, but you left the
606: 442:
will take some time to select the sources that can be used and are not affiliated with CESNUR. Moreover, I think we can find other sources if we will work with Google Search.
160: 133: 128: 281: 137: 626: 485: 120: 107: 167: 92: 477: 358: 419:
Most of the sources seem to be passing references (but still useful! thanks again!). The Sports Illustrated piece is a full review of Maltov's book
373: 222: 481: 189: 363: 331:
No prejudice against the subject whatsoever, I'd be quite happy to be corrected in the form of RSes with which to forge a good article.
368: 712: 391: 183: 124: 60: 87: 80: 17: 714: 396: 733: 701: 671: 638: 618: 589: 572: 544: 529: 500: 451: 436: 411: 383: 340: 310: 290: 273: 256: 179: 62: 320: 229: 116: 101: 97: 68: 680: 648: 550: 509: 750: 40: 420: 195: 711:. There are a number of independent reliable sources that sufficiently describe the subject of the article 520:. This is very similar to what was done with this article in the first and second nominations for deletion. 716: 746: 634: 614: 568: 525: 496: 447: 407: 306: 36: 720: 630: 610: 564: 521: 492: 443: 403: 302: 58: 489: 215: 517: 729: 585: 540: 432: 336: 252: 76: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
745:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
465: 345:
The fact that CESNUR is an authoritative source is easily any unbiased author can be check.
285: 268: 53: 692: 667: 577:
Actually Ring and SI are still being used in the article, they weren't removed at all.
350:
of participants. But also removed a large number of independent authoritative sources.
301:: The article has already been submitted twice for deletion by the same argumentation. 513: 239: 725: 581: 557: 536: 505: 428: 332: 248: 154: 247:
from CESNUR, here to engage in widespread promotion of that group's materials.)
535:
they're about the idea of Knowledge having an article about the given subject.
663: 469: 416:
Thanks for the sources, I've added some of them to the article already.
243: 353: 741:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
683:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
651:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
580:
COI tag is just up pending deletion discussion resolution.
150: 146: 142: 214: 689:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 662:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 388:
There are still sources of authoritative magazines:
265:
list of Social science-related deletion discussions
659:This discussion has not yet received enough input. 607:list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 753:). No further edits should be made to this page. 625:Note: This discussion has been included in the 605:Note: This discussion has been included in the 280:Note: This discussion has been included in the 263:Note: This discussion has been included in the 228: 8: 282:list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions 108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 627:list of People-related deletion discussions 624: 604: 279: 262: 464:Found more additional reliable sources: 7: 512:? Among the remote sources is the 24: 93:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 672:05:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC) 639:19:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC) 619:19:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC) 590:02:29, 25 November 2019 (UTC) 573:13:25, 24 November 2019 (UTC) 545:00:03, 24 November 2019 (UTC) 530:19:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC) 501:23:16, 22 November 2019 (UTC) 452:10:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC) 437:08:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 412:02:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC) 341:03:16, 17 November 2019 (UTC) 311:02:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC) 291:09:08, 16 November 2019 (UTC) 274:09:08, 16 November 2019 (UTC) 257:08:55, 16 November 2019 (UTC) 734:03:29, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 702:12:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC) 63:16:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC) 117:Oleg Maltsev (psychologist) 83:(AfD)? Read these primers! 69:Oleg Maltsev (psychologist) 770: 743:Please do not modify it. 421:Non-compromised Pendulum 242:when one considers that 32:Please do not modify it. 384:National Geographic 2 379:National Geographic 1 81:Articles for deletion 508:Why did you delete 657:Relisting comment: 518:Sports Illustrated 474:tureligious.com.ua 704: 700: 674: 641: 621: 392:Sport Illustrated 364:Lavoce di NewYork 293: 276: 98:Guide to deletion 88:How to contribute 761: 699: 697: 690: 688: 686: 684: 661: 654: 652: 562: 556: 551:Reliable sources 510:Reliable sources 238:Appears to fail 233: 232: 218: 170: 158: 140: 78: 34: 769: 768: 764: 763: 762: 760: 759: 758: 757: 751:deletion review 705: 693: 691: 679: 677: 675: 647: 645: 560: 554: 175: 166: 131: 115: 112: 75: 72: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 767: 765: 756: 755: 737: 736: 687: 676: 660: 655: 644: 643: 642: 622: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 578: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 424: 417: 399: 394: 389: 386: 381: 376: 374:calabrianews24 371: 366: 361: 356: 351: 329: 325: 314: 313: 295: 294: 277: 236: 235: 172: 111: 110: 105: 95: 90: 73: 71: 66: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 766: 754: 752: 748: 744: 739: 738: 735: 731: 727: 723: 721: 719: 717: 715: 713: 710: 707: 706: 703: 698: 696: 685: 682: 673: 669: 665: 658: 653: 650: 640: 636: 632: 628: 623: 620: 616: 612: 608: 603: 602: 591: 587: 583: 579: 576: 575: 574: 570: 566: 559: 552: 548: 547: 546: 542: 538: 533: 532: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 514:Ring Magazine 511: 507: 504: 503: 502: 498: 494: 491: 490:Nächste Stufe 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 463: 453: 449: 445: 440: 439: 438: 434: 430: 425: 422: 418: 415: 414: 413: 409: 405: 400: 398: 395: 393: 390: 387: 385: 382: 380: 377: 375: 372: 370: 367: 365: 362: 360: 357: 355: 352: 348: 344: 343: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 317: 316: 315: 312: 308: 304: 300: 297: 296: 292: 289: 288: 283: 278: 275: 272: 271: 266: 261: 260: 259: 258: 254: 250: 245: 241: 231: 227: 224: 221: 217: 213: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 181: 178: 177:Find sources: 173: 169: 165: 162: 156: 152: 148: 144: 139: 135: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 113: 109: 106: 103: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 85: 84: 82: 77: 70: 67: 65: 64: 61: 59: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 742: 740: 708: 694: 678: 656: 646: 549:You removed 369:PalermoToday 298: 286: 269: 237: 225: 219: 211: 204: 198: 192: 186: 176: 163: 74: 54: 49: 47: 31: 28: 631:124Sanroque 611:124Sanroque 565:124Sanroque 522:124Sanroque 493:124Sanroque 444:124Sanroque 404:124Sanroque 303:124Sanroque 299:Speedy keep 202:free images 695:Sandstein 359:un-sci.com 354:tyzhden.ua 287:CASSIOPEIA 270:CASSIOPEIA 55:Ritchie333 747:talk page 563:template. 478:allboxing 402:bacteria. 328:articles. 37:talk page 749:or in a 681:Relisted 649:Relisted 486:telegraf 470:Interfax 466:Interfax 397:The Ring 324:closure. 161:View log 102:glossary 39:or in a 726:Yakudza 582:Feoffer 537:Feoffer 506:Feoffer 429:Feoffer 333:Feoffer 249:Feoffer 208:WP refs 196:scholar 134:protect 129:history 79:New to 244:CESNUR 240:WP:GNG 180:Google 138:delete 321:first 223:JSTOR 184:books 168:Stats 155:views 147:watch 143:links 16:< 730:talk 709:Keep 668:talk 664:ST47 635:talk 615:talk 586:talk 569:talk 541:talk 526:talk 516:and 497:talk 448:talk 433:talk 408:talk 347:Here 337:talk 319:The 307:talk 253:talk 216:FENS 190:news 151:logs 125:talk 121:edit 50:keep 558:COI 482:WBN 472:), 230:TWL 159:– ( 732:) 724:-- 670:) 637:) 629:. 617:) 609:. 588:) 571:) 561:}} 555:{{ 543:) 528:) 499:) 488:, 484:, 480:, 476:, 450:) 435:) 410:) 339:) 309:) 284:. 267:. 255:) 210:) 153:| 149:| 145:| 141:| 136:| 132:| 127:| 123:| 52:. 728:( 666:( 633:( 613:( 584:( 567:( 539:( 524:( 495:( 468:( 446:( 431:( 406:( 335:( 305:( 251:( 234:) 226:· 220:· 212:· 205:· 199:· 193:· 187:· 182:( 174:( 171:) 164:· 157:) 119:( 104:) 100:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Ritchie333


16:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Oleg Maltsev (psychologist)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Oleg Maltsev (psychologist)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.