431:#1 because it was reviewed by some notable sources. But you have not (at least in this discussion) provided any detail as to how exactly those sources confer notability. My assessment is that the sources in the article, including those from Acclaim and Howl & Echoes, are little more than introductions to the album's existence with some faint praise from a writer who probably listened to it once. I can find nothing beyond these in my own search. These brief media mentions might be enough for a "Weak Keep" vote for an album by a more notable artist. But since this rapper was already found to be non-notable in his own AfD, then so are his releases. Therefore my vote is
399:
Not quite, the cited policy also states, "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on
Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guidelines." As indicated above, notability in
469:
Album is self-published/self-released; the in-depth sources are more about the artist than the album and if they were not sufficient to establish notability for the artist they are not useful for the album either; the other sources seem to be local press, blogish or essentially trivial. There is no
226:
85:
344:). The artist may no longer be performing, his article may no longer exist, it may not be relevant to his current career but that does not mean that the work, itself, was not notable. This article should be kept.
279:
179:
80:
296:
220:
186:
261:
The reason for deletion is this ‘mixtape’ doesn’t exist anywhere on the internet. The artist is not notable (article has been deleted) and is no longer active.
111:
400:
this article is established per WP:ALBUM. The discussion at AfD:Lostkeyz was thin and unfortunately I missed it: that article should not have been deleted.
126:
364:
321:
498:
The lack of evidence that this entered any national charts is a huge problem. The fact that this article, if created today, would probably fall foul of
258:
152:
147:
156:
450:
386:
139:
511:
490:
455:
411:
391:
355:
305:
288:
271:
64:
106:
99:
17:
241:
208:
120:
116:
336:
and has the same name as the artist. I missed that AfD and would have argued against it. That same editor tried to have
528:
40:
435:
but I would not be opposed to re-creating the rapper's article when and if he becomes more notable as a musician. ---
202:
407:
351:
198:
143:
446:
382:
248:
482:
presumption of being non-notable. Being the work of a red-linked artist is the final nail in the coffin.
524:
401:
345:
301:
284:
135:
70:
36:
327:
507:
502:
is another concern. Knowledge (XXG) isn't meant to be a list of trivialities and non-notable things.
234:
471:
428:
317:
488:
437:
373:
475:
214:
95:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
523:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
470:
indication that it has charted. In total nothing convinces me that this work is notable per
341:
333:
503:
499:
368:
340:
article deleted in May and again a few days ago but used the failed 1st nomination (see
316:
The mixtape did exist, it was reviewed by at least three independent sources. It passes
262:
55:
483:
173:
320:#1. The artist's own article was deleted in April after being nominated (see
371:) unless there is evidence that anybody else notable was involved. ---
519:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
86:
Articles for deletion/Organic
Narratives (2nd nomination)
474:. In addition I think it appropriate to, by analogy to
169:
165:
161:
233:
280:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
247:
363:- Since the rapper has no article of his own (see
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
531:). No further edits should be made to this page.
295:Note: This discussion has been included in the
278:Note: This discussion has been included in the
297:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
8:
127:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
478:, consider a self-released work to have a
294:
277:
367:) , this album should be speedy deleted (
81:Articles for deletion/Organic Narratives
78:
427:- You have said that the album passes
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
77:
24:
112:Introduction to deletion process
332:who did not declare a possible
1:
512:14:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
491:01:04, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
456:18:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
412:00:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
392:14:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
356:21:38, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
306:06:53, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
289:06:53, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
272:15:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
102:(AfD)? Read these primers!
65:09:28, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
548:
521:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
259:ticket:2017070110003254
76:AfDs for this article:
100:Articles for deletion
136:Organic Narratives
71:Organic Narratives
441:
377:
308:
291:
117:Guide to deletion
107:How to contribute
63:
539:
486:
454:
439:
403:shaidar cuebiyar
390:
375:
347:shaidar cuebiyar
331:
304:
287:
267:
257:Request at OTRS
252:
251:
237:
189:
177:
159:
97:
62:
60:
53:
34:
547:
546:
542:
541:
540:
538:
537:
536:
535:
529:deletion review
484:
436:
372:
325:
300:
283:
265:
194:
185:
150:
134:
131:
94:
91:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
545:
543:
534:
533:
515:
514:
493:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
417:
416:
415:
414:
361:Policy Comment
358:
310:
309:
292:
255:
254:
191:
130:
129:
124:
114:
109:
92:
90:
89:
88:
83:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
544:
532:
530:
526:
522:
517:
516:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
494:
492:
489:
487:
481:
477:
473:
468:
465:
464:
457:
452:
448:
444:
443:
434:
430:
426:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
413:
409:
405:
404:
398:
395:
394:
393:
388:
384:
380:
379:
370:
366:
362:
359:
357:
353:
349:
348:
343:
339:
335:
329:
323:
319:
315:
312:
311:
307:
303:
302:North America
298:
293:
290:
286:
285:North America
281:
276:
275:
274:
273:
270:
269:
260:
250:
246:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
200:
197:
196:Find sources:
192:
188:
184:
181:
175:
171:
167:
163:
158:
154:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
132:
128:
125:
122:
118:
115:
113:
110:
108:
105:
104:
103:
101:
96:
87:
84:
82:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
520:
518:
495:
479:
466:
438:
432:
424:
402:
396:
374:
365:AfD:Lostkeyz
360:
346:
337:
328:Doronlosky97
322:AfD:Lostkeyz
313:
263:
256:
244:
238:
230:
223:
217:
211:
205:
195:
182:
93:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
221:free images
504:Exemplo347
440:DOOMSDAYER
376:DOOMSDAYER
58:Sandstein
525:talk page
472:WP:NALBUM
429:WP:NALBUM
318:WP:NALBUM
37:talk page
527:or in a
476:WP:NBOOK
451:Contribs
387:Contribs
342:contribs
180:View log
121:glossary
39:or in a
227:WP refs
215:scholar
153:protect
148:history
98:New to
496:Delete
480:strong
467:Delete
433:Delete
425:Delete
334:WP:COI
268:jones
199:Google
157:delete
50:delete
500:WP:A9
397:Reply
369:WP:A9
324:) by
242:JSTOR
203:books
187:Stats
174:views
166:watch
162:links
16:<
508:talk
447:Talk
408:talk
383:Talk
352:talk
338:this
314:Keep
235:FENS
209:news
170:logs
144:talk
140:edit
485:Jbh
442:520
378:520
264:Ron
249:TWL
178:– (
510:)
410:)
354:)
299:.
282:.
229:)
172:|
168:|
164:|
160:|
155:|
151:|
146:|
142:|
52:.
506:(
453:)
449:|
445:(
406:(
389:)
385:|
381:(
350:(
330::
326:@
266:h
253:)
245:·
239:·
231:·
224:·
218:·
212:·
206:·
201:(
193:(
190:)
183:·
176:)
138:(
123:)
119:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.