158:
piece turns out to be a one-paragraph review of one exhibition, only mentioning LOT itself in the final line as the name of the venue. I haven't checked the other references, but even if they do contain information demonstrating LOT's notability, the article fails to communicate that.
222:. I find it rather telling that of the 8 people listed as involved in it, we only have an article on one, and that's a microstub. The fact that it lasted for all of 2 years doesn't speak much for notability either.
121:
146:. The article doesn't make LOT's notability clear to me either. Saying that it "stretched the long-established template of the non-profit making artist-run space" is just a
251:
Little or no information on the topic, hard to understand, I just don't think that this should be suited as a
Knowledge article.
88:
83:
92:
17:
147:
75:
313:
36:
133:
312:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
273:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
291:
287:
295:
278:
257:
252:
241:
203:
168:
137:
129:
57:
53:
79:
269:
71:
63:
190:
164:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
223:
196:
184:
219:
160:
109:
178:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
215:
154:
was new about it? I'm not impressed by the
References list either. The
306:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116:
105:
101:
97:
183:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
316:). No further edits should be made to this page.
267:Absolutely no notability is actually claimed. -
128:I don't see what is notable about this topic.
8:
286:notable exhibits don't mean its notable.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
296:17:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
279:16:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
258:16:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
242:16:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
204:16:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
169:21:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
138:19:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
58:02:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
333:
309:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
206:
200:
148:peacock statement
44:The result was
324:
311:
277:
254:Redmarkviolinist
239:
236:
233:
230:
201:
198:
193:
187:
182:
180:
130:Moosato Cowabata
119:
113:
95:
34:
332:
331:
327:
326:
325:
323:
322:
321:
320:
314:deletion review
307:
276:
270:CobaltBlueTony™
268:
237:
234:
231:
228:
197:
191:
185:
176:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
330:
328:
319:
318:
301:
299:
298:
288:Travellingcari
281:
272:
265:Speedy delete.
261:
260:
245:
244:
224:Andrew Lenahan
208:
207:
181:
173:
172:
171:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
329:
317:
315:
310:
304:
303:
302:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
280:
275:
271:
266:
263:
262:
259:
256:
255:
250:
247:
246:
243:
240:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
209:
205:
202:
194:
188:
179:
175:
174:
170:
166:
162:
157:
153:
149:
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
308:
305:
300:
283:
264:
253:
248:
227:
211:
177:
155:
151:
143:
127:
72:LOT, Bristol
64:LOT, Bristol
45:
43:
31:
28:
50:Bongwarrior
199:Disclaimer
156:Guardian
122:View log
161:EALacey
89:protect
84:history
284:Delete
249:Delete
212:Delete
186:Keeper
144:Delete
117:delete
93:delete
46:delete
220:WP:RS
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
292:talk
274:talk
218:and
216:WP:N
214:per
165:talk
152:what
134:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
48:. --
235:bli
195:|
189:|
294:)
238:nd
232:ar
229:St
226:-
192:76
167:)
150:–
136:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
290:(
163:(
132:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.