246:. GNG states "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." Rivalry is not establish via current citations which lightly cover game (series) results which is only six games to date. There is some routine coverage in some search results showing slight, but not significant (or national), coverage.
266:
manner. Additionally, the number of games is less of indication of the existence of the rivalry and more an indication of conference realignment and perhaps a comment on the rising relevancy of
Louisville's athletics. Also, to say that it does not have enough citations is confusing to me, for it has 6 sentences total and four citations.
265:
I think it is difficult to accurately judge the relevance of a rivalry by the means you have described. If you feel that it is not as meaningful as others, I think that would be worth adding to the article, but I certainly feel as though it exists and therefore is deserving of note in an encyclopedic
458:
is the author's opinion piece which references the conference's (ACC) positioning re football scheduling. "the conference has been shoving
Virginia in our faces, telling us they’re our most heated rivals now." and "We may be stuck in this forced rivalry with Virginia, but that doesn’t mean the ACC
392:
requires "significant coverage in reliable sources" where " 'significant coverage' addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source
566:
the only sources I can find that even call this a "rivalry" are fan blogs, one by an editor named "Steak n Eggs" or something like that. Pretty sure we can chalk those up to the "non-reliable-source" column, and we're left with scores. Nowhere near the standards that we typically look for in
463:
is a 2015 aggregation by SB Nation's
Virginia site of fan comments from "a Kentucky Wildcats community". "The Conference dubbed Louisville-Virginia as permanent cross-division rivals, but a rivalry is not made overnight. Instead, we reached out to SB Nation's A Sea of Blue, a Kentucky Wildcats
208:
295:
202:
134:
129:
138:
121:
161:
335:
315:
492:
Even what little coverage exists doesn't appear to be taking the "rivalry" seriously. "Rivalries" which only receive coverage for being bad imitations of rivalries fail
168:
424:
93:
108:
223:
190:
434:
414:
580:
558:
533:
509:
476:
446:
402:
375:
347:
327:
307:
285:
259:
63:
184:
467:
Again, currently there are zero RS citations of an actual football rivalry, much less any "significant coverage" as required by GNG.
88:
81:
17:
180:
281:
125:
230:
102:
98:
117:
69:
58:
518:
597:
40:
196:
500:, they fail GNG as well. And this doesn't have nearly the coverage of that thing, whatever you want to call it.
454:
is a 2014 general/basketball article, when the football teams had played only twice, most recently in 1989.
343:
323:
303:
568:
269:
576:
593:
529:
505:
36:
493:
239:
544:
247:
442:
419:
371:
277:
216:
472:
398:
339:
319:
299:
255:
572:
77:
56:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
592:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
501:
389:
243:
393:
material." Hence this AFD, as the article topic is entirely unsupported at the moment.
385:
553:
497:
438:
367:
273:
363:
359:
468:
394:
251:
53:
155:
425:
Five In-Conference
Rivalries I Care More About Than Virginia, And So Should You
548:
429:
409:
358:
The subject is a perhaps not very widely known but it is quite established,
242:
says "Sports rivalries are not inherently notable" and defers to
588:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
521:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
567:
establishing a rivalry article here on
Knowledge (XXG).
464:
community, to ask them why we should hate the
Cardinals."
151:
147:
143:
296:
list of
American football-related deletion discussions
215:
527:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
435:
A Kentucky Fan: I hate
Louisville and So Should You
229:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
600:). No further edits should be made to this page.
334:Note: This discussion has been included in the
314:Note: This discussion has been included in the
294:Note: This discussion has been included in the
543:per the analysis presented by the nom. This is
336:list of Virginia-related deletion discussions
316:list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions
8:
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
333:
313:
293:
267:
384:Currently, the article contains zero
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
496:, and except in rare cases like the
415:Ye Olde Virginia-Louisville Rivalrye
118:Louisville-Virginia football rivalry
70:Louisville-Virginia football rivalry
24:
388:citations for the rivalry claim.
94:Introduction to deletion process
1:
459:can make me care about it"
360:in terms of Knowledge (XXG)
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
617:
581:18:11, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
559:15:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
534:11:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
510:17:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
477:17:48, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
447:08:28, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
403:19:59, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
376:18:07, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
348:06:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
328:06:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
308:06:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
286:17:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
260:14:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
590:Please do not modify it.
64:12:43, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
82:Articles for deletion
420:Cardinal Connection
569:try another wiki?
557:
536:
350:
330:
310:
288:
272:comment added by
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
608:
551:
532:
526:
524:
522:
407:I see some: the
234:
233:
219:
171:
159:
141:
79:
34:
616:
615:
611:
610:
609:
607:
606:
605:
604:
598:deletion review
537:
528:
517:
515:
176:
167:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
61:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
614:
612:
603:
602:
584:
583:
561:
525:
514:
513:
512:
498:Civil Conflict
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
465:
417:", 2014); the
379:
378:
352:
351:
331:
311:
290:
289:
237:
236:
173:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
59:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
613:
601:
599:
595:
591:
586:
585:
582:
578:
574:
573:Paul McDonald
570:
565:
562:
560:
555:
550:
546:
542:
539:
538:
535:
531:
530:North America
523:
520:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
488:
487:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
457:
453:
450:
449:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:
426:
422:
421:
416:
412:
411:
406:
405:
404:
400:
396:
391:
387:
383:
382:
381:
380:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
353:
349:
345:
341:
340:Coolabahapple
337:
332:
329:
325:
321:
320:Coolabahapple
317:
312:
309:
305:
301:
300:Coolabahapple
297:
292:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
264:
263:
262:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
170:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
589:
587:
563:
540:
516:
489:
460:
455:
451:
428:
418:
408:
355:
268:— Preceding
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
164:
75:
49:
47:
31:
28:
502:Smartyllama
494:WP:NRIVALRY
437:", 2015). -
240:WP:NRIVALRY
203:free images
545:WP:TOOSOON
427:", 2016);
248:WP:TOOSOON
594:talk page
554:reactions
439:The Gnome
430:Vox Media
410:SB Nation
368:The Gnome
274:Nolanwebb
37:talk page
596:or in a
519:Relisted
469:UW Dawgs
395:UW Dawgs
282:contribs
270:unsigned
252:UW Dawgs
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
364:notable
209:WP refs
197:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
54:Yunshui
564:Delete
541:Delete
490:Delete
390:WP:GNG
244:WP:GNG
181:Google
139:delete
50:delete
386:WP:RS
362:, as
224:JSTOR
185:books
169:Stats
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
577:talk
549:shoy
506:talk
473:talk
443:talk
399:talk
372:talk
356:Keep
344:talk
324:talk
304:talk
278:talk
256:talk
217:FENS
191:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
366:. -
231:TWL
160:– (
579:)
571:--
547:.
508:)
475:)
461:3.
456:2.
452:1.
445:)
433:("
423:("
413:("
401:)
374:)
346:)
338:.
326:)
318:.
306:)
298:.
284:)
280:•
258:)
250:.
211:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
52:.
575:(
556:)
552:(
504:(
471:(
441:(
397:(
370:(
342:(
322:(
302:(
276:(
254:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
165:·
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
60:水
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.