322:
relatively little text, but a large list of sources, and the creator was not known for copyvios. Or is the problem reliability? Yes, 3 of the 15 refs are to what appear like unreliable websites. If you have reasons to believe that the article content they support is dubious, you can challenge it or remove it outright. But that still leaves 12 other sources. Three of them are
English books: there is full bibliographic information provided (except for the ISBN of two of them), and they all look reliable. The rest are in Chinese. There's nothing whatsoever wrong with that:
326:. Yes, the bibliographic information is more telegraphic, showing the title, year and pages, but no publisher. However, these are all county almanacs or district gazetteers, so I presume they should be familiar to the people who edit China-related articles. Also, there's no requirement for an article to only give the English names of entities; providing the Chinese names of places is actually helpful when these places don't (yet) have articles on Knowledge. Regardless, cleanup – even if we agreed it was necessary –
321:
What exactly are the problems with the article? If you've checked the sources and found out there has been an instance of a copyright violation (rather than merely supposing there could have been one) then the offending text can be removed. However, I'd be surprised if there were any: the article has
395:
a great net positive contributor to the coverage of languages and peoples of
Mainland SE Asia & China (in spite of our occasional disagreements about the use of primary sources and blogs of subject-matter experts); the fact that he got blocked for some silly reason (*not* for sockpuppetry!) is
344:
I don't see any problems with it that can't be fixed with some attention. The lists of place names with
Chinese could be cleaned up and made clearer. Some of the sources have problems but it's got enough good published sources that it's easily notable. I can't check those sources myself, but being
203:
242:.But he has been blocked for using sock puppets, so the page has not been updated for three years. I think if this page is not deleted, someone needs to clean up the non-english and reference. I also noticed
346:
258:. This means that the content may have been copied from the original source. And because some don't have ISBN, website, publication information, it is difficult to confirm the reliability.
281:
164:
197:
301:
238:.I guess he should be PRC, so he used many forums as references,like tieba.baidu.com bbs.tianya.cn.The edit history shows that the main editing account is
111:
96:
350:
137:
132:
327:
141:
247:
239:
235:
124:
91:
84:
52:. Consensus is that the topic is notable and that the issues with the article can be solved with editing rather than deletion.
17:
218:
185:
105:
101:
422:
40:
179:
405:
375:
354:
334:
313:
293:
274:
175:
66:
401:
262:
Simplify the reason for deletion, the page has some problems, and the main editor account has disappeared.
418:
371:
270:
62:
36:
225:
388:
309:
289:
211:
128:
265:
It takes a lot of time and energy to eliminate those problems, which seems to be unworthy for us.
397:
331:
80:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
417:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
367:
266:
243:
191:
58:
392:
323:
305:
285:
120:
72:
54:
158:
413:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
366:
and tag for clean-up - that's what clean-up tags are for!
154:
150:
146:
345:
unable to check sources is never a reason to delete.--
210:
282:list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
425:). No further edits should be made to this page.
300:Note: This discussion has been included in the
280:Note: This discussion has been included in the
224:
8:
112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
302:list of China-related deletion discussions
299:
279:
252:by the Yi (Zhijin County Almanac 1997:159)
250:.These pages all use some APA format,like
347:2A00:23C8:4583:9F01:3D2F:78A6:C92C:5027
7:
324:sources don't have to be in English
330:. The topic is clearly notable. –
24:
328:is no reason to delete an article
246:the main editing account is also
248:Special:Contributions/Stevey7788
240:Special:Contributions/Stevey7788
236:Special:Contributions/Stevey7788
97:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
406:18:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
376:16:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
355:16:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
335:15:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
314:15:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
294:15:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
275:15:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
67:13:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
87:(AfD)? Read these primers!
442:
415:Please do not modify it.
234:This page is created by
32:Please do not modify it.
256:Zhang & Li (1982)
85:Articles for deletion
391:. FWIW, I consider
55:(non-admin closure)
396:irrelevant here. –
316:
296:
102:Guide to deletion
92:How to contribute
57:
433:
244:Longjia language
229:
228:
214:
162:
144:
82:
53:
34:
441:
440:
436:
435:
434:
432:
431:
430:
429:
423:deletion review
393:User:Stevey7788
171:
135:
119:
116:
79:
76:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
439:
437:
428:
427:
409:
408:
381:
380:
379:
378:
358:
357:
338:
337:
332:Uanfala (talk)
318:
317:
297:
277:
263:
232:
231:
168:
121:Longjia people
115:
114:
109:
99:
94:
77:
75:
73:Longjia people
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
438:
426:
424:
420:
416:
411:
410:
407:
403:
399:
394:
390:
389:WP:NOTCLEANUP
386:
383:
382:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
361:
360:
359:
356:
352:
348:
343:
340:
339:
336:
333:
329:
325:
320:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
298:
295:
291:
287:
283:
278:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
260:
259:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
88:
86:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
414:
412:
398:Austronesier
384:
363:
341:
255:
251:
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
78:
49:
47:
31:
28:
368:Iskandar323
267:Rastinition
198:free images
59:Qwaiiplayer
419:talk page
306:Shellwood
286:Shellwood
37:talk page
421:or in a
165:View log
106:glossary
39:or in a
204:WP refs
192:scholar
138:protect
133:history
83:New to
176:Google
142:delete
219:JSTOR
180:books
159:views
151:watch
147:links
16:<
402:talk
387:per
385:Keep
372:talk
364:Keep
351:talk
342:keep
310:talk
290:talk
271:talk
212:FENS
186:news
155:logs
129:talk
125:edit
63:talk
50:keep
254:or
226:TWL
163:– (
404:)
374:)
353:)
312:)
304:.
292:)
284:.
273:)
206:)
157:|
153:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
65:)
400:(
370:(
349:(
308:(
288:(
269:(
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
161:)
123:(
108:)
104:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.