Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/London Center for Policy Research - Knowledge

Source 📝

233:
There is virtually no RS coverage of this organization. We cannot construct an article on the subject if there are no RS to build an article from. The article appears to have been created by an individual employed by the organization.
202: 336:
I did a very brief search for sources and did not find more sources. I will support a standalone article if another editor finds a second source that provides substantial coverage about the London Center for Policy
271: 330:
titled "The Creepily Influential Trumpist Foreign-Policy Think Tank You've Never Heard Of" is a very substantial article about London Center for Policy Research. One more source would allow it to pass
196: 136: 131: 251: 163: 140: 123: 291: 110: 95: 321: 217: 127: 184: 398: 373: 348: 302: 283: 263: 243: 119: 71: 65: 178: 90: 83: 17: 174: 387:. Initially I was going to say redirect, but merge is more appropriate. Not enough coverage to warrant a standalone article. 224: 104: 100: 358: 239: 415: 317: 40: 190: 411: 369: 235: 36: 331: 279: 259: 210: 340: 61: 295: 79: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
410:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
344: 326: 384: 312: 275: 255: 53: 388: 57: 157: 406:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
361:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
272:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
153: 149: 145: 209: 367:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 318:Knowledge:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion 252:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions 332:Knowledge:Notability#General notability guideline 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 418:). No further edits should be made to this page. 290:Note: This discussion has been included in the 270:Note: This discussion has been included in the 250:Note: This discussion has been included in the 292:list of New York-related deletion discussions 223: 8: 111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 289: 269: 249: 7: 24: 120:London Center for Policy Research 72:London Center for Policy Research 96:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 399:03:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 374:05:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC) 66:04:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 349:10:48, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 303:19:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC) 284:19:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC) 264:19:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC) 244:19:26, 5 December 2020 (UTC) 86:(AfD)? Read these primers! 435: 408:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 84:Articles for deletion 316:, the founder, per 311:Merge/redirect to 376: 305: 286: 266: 101:Guide to deletion 91:How to contribute 426: 395: 392: 372: 366: 364: 362: 300: 236:Snooganssnoogans 228: 227: 213: 161: 143: 81: 34: 434: 433: 429: 428: 427: 425: 424: 423: 422: 416:deletion review 393: 390: 377: 368: 357: 355: 327:The Daily Beast 296: 170: 134: 118: 115: 78: 75: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 432: 430: 421: 420: 402: 401: 385:Herbert London 365: 354: 353: 352: 313:Herbert London 307: 306: 287: 267: 231: 230: 167: 114: 113: 108: 98: 93: 76: 74: 69: 54:Herbert London 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 431: 419: 417: 413: 409: 404: 403: 400: 397: 396: 386: 382: 379: 378: 375: 371: 370:North America 363: 360: 351: 350: 346: 342: 338: 333: 329: 328: 323: 319: 315: 314: 309: 308: 304: 301: 299: 293: 288: 285: 281: 277: 273: 268: 265: 261: 257: 253: 248: 247: 246: 245: 241: 237: 226: 222: 219: 216: 212: 208: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 176: 173: 172:Find sources: 168: 165: 159: 155: 151: 147: 142: 138: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 116: 112: 109: 106: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 88: 87: 85: 80: 73: 70: 68: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 407: 405: 389: 380: 356: 339: 335: 325: 322:This article 310: 298:CAPTAIN RAJU 297: 232: 220: 214: 206: 199: 193: 187: 181: 171: 77: 49: 47: 31: 28: 197:free images 412:talk page 337:Research. 276:Shellwood 256:Shellwood 37:talk page 414:or in a 359:Relisted 164:View log 105:glossary 58:Missvain 39:or in a 203:WP refs 191:scholar 137:protect 132:history 82:New to 341:Cunard 175:Google 141:delete 381:Merge 324:from 218:JSTOR 179:books 158:views 150:watch 146:links 50:merge 16:< 394:5969 391:Onel 345:talk 280:talk 260:talk 240:talk 211:FENS 185:news 154:logs 128:talk 124:edit 62:talk 383:to 225:TWL 162:– ( 52:to 347:) 320:. 294:. 282:) 274:. 262:) 254:. 242:) 205:) 156:| 152:| 148:| 144:| 139:| 135:| 130:| 126:| 64:) 56:. 343:( 334:. 278:( 258:( 238:( 229:) 221:· 215:· 207:· 200:· 194:· 188:· 182:· 177:( 169:( 166:) 160:) 122:( 107:) 103:( 60:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Herbert London
Missvain
talk
04:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
London Center for Policy Research

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
London Center for Policy Research
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.