230:
more unsettling claim was that Gloria
Steinem, social activist icon, formed a nonprofit with this person. It was a fundraiser project not a nonprofit and not Steinem’s project. Steinem is not connected by any admission or credible journalism. A blog post mistakenly identifies her as a cofounded and is not a credible source. Almost every citation I requested was a reverted edit as was a notability claim I put forth. There was even a claim this photographer was in the White House permanent collection. That would be easy information to find if the truth. The Women’s Museum mentioned has no mention of the photographer besides it closed over a decade ago so a photograph could not be in any collection. The galleries listed doesn’t mention this photographer either in searches. The year born was incorrect. There is no L.E.A.F. Foundation.
321:: since none of the above actually constitutes a proper rationale for deletion (which would address the issue of whether sourcing available was sufficient to demonstrate that the subject of the article meets Knowledge notability requirements, rather than consisting of ill-informed evidence-free assertions regarding Knowledge article content, and likewise evidence-free attacks on the integrity of more or less everyone except the initiator of the discussion), this AfD should probably be speedily closed as malformed.
408:, were Love is quoted as "I count my years as a student at Richmond among the best of my life. They were the catalyst for my successful career as a world-renowned artist." (Really, can anyone be so immodest?) is pure PR. Any source that says: "Please contact Robin Anderson at outreach@laylaloveart.com for further info." should have been dismissed as neither independent nor reliable.
229:
I found this biography to be advertising a
Shopify page firstly. As I researched the claims within I found no proof Bjork and Pink posed for this photographer as claimed. I soon found that the picture of Pink was a snapshot of her talking to another person in profile so it was a gross exaggeration. A
572:
almost every claim made in the article fell apart under closer scrutiny. Sources repeat what the subject has been telling them, but the claims in the sources are so extraordinary that cannot be used in the article without much better evidence in multiple independent reliable sources. The remaining
363:
2: the nominator appears to be a single purpose account who has been repeatedly warned that their single-minded focus on gutting this page and launching personal attacks against its original creator violates core policies. There is nothing to be gained from a prolongued notability discussion under
505:- I think this AfD should be withdrawn. The nom contains no policy rationale; it contains unverifiable statements about a living person. While there is no rule that says a new user can't PROD or AfD an article, perhaps it's better to wait until one has a deeper understanding of how WP works.
198:
404:, No, our decision should not "rest on art and writings". It should be informed by the quantity and quality of coverage in independent, reliable sources. That has been sorely lacking. A source like
338:: While I agree the article needs better referencing, I believe that Layla Love has a career and publications written about her and her career that confirm notability as an artist and author.
281:
422:
What I meant was reliable source coverage of her art and writings. I agree the
Richmond ref is perplexing, as it is from the school (?!?), yet has that link to website.
247:
159:
387:: Much of the opposition to the article voiced by the nominator is about the philanthropy content. Any decision on notability should rest on Love's art and writings.
192:
298:
264:
106:
91:
52:. If there is inaccurate or unsupported content, it should be corrected or removed, but there appear to be adequate sources to support notability.
531:
535:
523:
486:: Sennagod has again deleted referenced content and refs, stating the ref (DUGGAL Visual Solutions) is a blog, which it is not.
543:
86:
79:
17:
132:
127:
136:
213:
180:
119:
100:
96:
539:
359:
1: no rationale for deletion has been provided that has any connection to policy. Arguably there is a case too for
633:
40:
612:
405:
560:
527:
174:
326:
629:
595:
491:
474:
427:
392:
343:
36:
170:
616:
599:
582:
564:
547:
514:
495:
478:
461:
431:
417:
396:
379:
347:
330:
310:
290:
273:
256:
239:
61:
510:
373:
306:
608:
578:
413:
231:
206:
440:
Putting aside various oddities in the nomination, I don't see good evidence that she meets either
220:
556:
235:
322:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
628:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
591:
487:
470:
445:
441:
423:
401:
388:
360:
356:
339:
57:
506:
457:
365:
302:
123:
186:
574:
409:
285:
268:
251:
590:: The Gorezi ref has several photos of Love with Steinem (and text), so not fiction.
153:
573:
claims are based on those same sources that we already know to be untrustworthy.
469:: After filing the AfD, Sennagod deleted referenced content and refs (reverted)
53:
453:
115:
67:
406:
https://www.richmond.ac.uk/art-loses-its-ego-when-its-paired-with-purpose/
607:
While the article needs cleanup, there are enough sources for notability.
555:
rationale for deletion is not based on policy. (came from ANI btw).
624:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
149:
145:
141:
205:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
636:). No further edits should be made to this page.
297:Note: This discussion has been included in the
282:list of Photography-related deletion discussions
280:Note: This discussion has been included in the
263:Note: This discussion has been included in the
246:Note: This discussion has been included in the
248:list of California-related deletion discussions
219:
8:
299:list of Artists-related deletion discussions
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
296:
279:
265:list of Women-related deletion discussions
262:
245:
7:
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
538:are some easy ones to find.
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
653:
617:11:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
600:03:35, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
583:12:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
565:12:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
548:16:45, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
515:15:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
496:02:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
479:09:51, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
462:22:44, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
432:12:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
418:11:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
397:01:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
380:22:47, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
348:15:33, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
331:15:29, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
311:13:26, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
291:10:08, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
274:10:07, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
257:10:07, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
240:04:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
62:21:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
626:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
364:these circumstances. -
522:Tons of good sources,
540:ScottishFinnishRadish
80:Articles for deletion
313:
293:
276:
259:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
644:
536:Psychology Today
370:
288:
271:
254:
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
652:
651:
647:
646:
645:
643:
642:
641:
640:
634:deletion review
524:The Daily Beast
366:
286:
269:
252:
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
650:
648:
639:
638:
620:
619:
609:Jackattack1597
602:
585:
567:
550:
517:
500:
499:
498:
464:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
382:
350:
333:
315:
314:
294:
277:
260:
227:
226:
163:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
649:
637:
635:
631:
627:
622:
621:
618:
614:
610:
606:
603:
601:
597:
593:
589:
586:
584:
580:
576:
571:
568:
566:
562:
558:
557:Lavalizard101
554:
551:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
532:NY Daily News
529:
525:
521:
518:
516:
512:
508:
504:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
482:
481:
480:
476:
472:
468:
465:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
433:
429:
425:
421:
420:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
400:
399:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
381:
377:
376:
371:
369:
362:
358:
354:
351:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
332:
328:
324:
320:
317:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
295:
292:
289:
283:
278:
275:
272:
266:
261:
258:
255:
249:
244:
243:
242:
241:
237:
233:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
625:
623:
604:
587:
569:
552:
519:
502:
483:
466:
449:
384:
374:
367:
352:
335:
323:AndyTheGrump
318:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
592:David notMD
488:David notMD
471:David notMD
424:David notMD
402:David notMD
389:David notMD
353:Speedy Keep
340:David notMD
193:free images
507:Netherzone
368:Astrophobe
303:Netherzone
116:Layla Love
68:Layla Love
630:talk page
575:Vexations
446:WP:ARTIST
442:WP:PERSON
410:Vexations
361:WP:SKCRIT
357:WP:SKCRIT
287:Spiderone
270:Spiderone
253:Spiderone
37:talk page
632:or in a
232:Sennagod
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
588:Comment
503:Comment
484:Comment
467:Comment
385:Comment
319:Comment
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
570:Delete
534:, and
450:Delete
171:Google
137:delete
54:RL0919
528:as if
454:Hoary
452:. --
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
613:talk
605:Keep
596:talk
579:talk
561:talk
553:Keep
544:talk
520:Keep
511:talk
492:talk
475:talk
458:talk
428:talk
414:talk
393:talk
375:talk
344:talk
336:Keep
327:talk
307:talk
236:talk
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
50:keep
444:or
355:by
221:TWL
158:– (
615:)
598:)
581:)
563:)
546:)
530:,
526:,
513:)
494:)
477:)
460:)
448:.
430:)
416:)
395:)
378:)
346:)
329:)
309:)
301:.
284:.
267:.
250:.
238:)
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
611:(
594:(
577:(
559:(
542:(
509:(
490:(
473:(
456:(
426:(
412:(
391:(
372:(
342:(
325:(
305:(
234:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.