536:
believe he would even dispute being called a "Grandmaster", simply because that kind of talk didn't suit him, from the firsthand accounts I've heard). I'd also like to clarify that I am not accusing you personally of bias, but rather was noting quite a few edits by numerous people that seemed to lean towards personal bias rather than a genuine interest in improving
Knowledge. I myself do my best to refrain from editing when I could be considered to have a personal tie toward any of the subject matter, which is one reason I've refrained from cleaning up this article myself.
568:
Sheung not having enough news coverage are his students because it should not be up to the
Grandmaster to seek out his own publicity. What you can do is on every birthday of Leung Sheung is to create a celebratory event in his name and invite national media outlets like China Morning Post, if you do that every year I guarantee in three years maybe even two there will be enough to establish notability for wikipedia. If you invite a celebrity or a well known state political figure this will surely attract free publicity. Good luck.
374:. The most significant thing he appears to have accomplished for spreading Wing Chun was to have used his position in the restaurant worker's union to sponsor Ip Man's earliest classes. It seems that his position as Ip Man's first student should lead to more significant coverage, but I couldn't find it in independent sources. It seems like there should be more, so if someone finds some please ping me.
562:
is one of those fakes but since he has been published in national news sources in
Australia his article stands. In order to establish notability which is another word for famous, the subject needs to have enough credible third party sources, national and international news coverage is the main way to
467:
I wouldn't expect a blog post to be a verifiable source, however the page does preserve images from a genuine article from 1977. "Secrets of Kung-Fu vol. 1 no. 10, pp. 24-27 (Oct 1977)" I also do realize my own implicit bias, as previously stated, and as such, do not expect my own claims to be taken
535:
Oh, I'm aware there's a lot of fakery in the Wing Chun world, sadly. However, Leung Sheung is well known to have been the first disciple of Yip Man, and was encouraged to teach by him. The big issue is that Leung Sheung never really sought publicity; he was an immensely humble and quiet man (and I
405:
in Wing Chun
Illustrated. I also would like to submit that, while admitting my own bias, the recent rash of deletions and edits on Yip Man Wing Chun related pages may also be biased in nature, and would request this be further looked at before processing additional deletions. I'm still very new to
567:
is far less legitimate than Leung Sheung but he has attracted the most international media coverage than even Ip Chun himself, at one stage he was more famous than Ip Man because he claimed to have taught Bruce Lee to fight and the world's media believed him. The ones that are to blame for Leung
448:
I don't think a blog post by "Wooden Dummy" on the "My Way of Wing Chun" website will "meet the criteria for secondary verification of status". A brief bio page on another website that anyone can post to also does meet the standard of an independent and reliable source. I don't know about the
516:
the recent deletions and editing to Ip Man students was not bias they where made because of lack of reliable sources, every person that has had their photo taken with Ip Man has claimed to be a
Grandmaster of wing chun hence it is a case of
396:
I must admit, my own biases can't be removed from this discussion as a member of the Leung Sheung lineage, but the above article should meet the criteria for secondary verification of status. Additional sources include the
201:
269:
249:
162:
289:
195:
393:
109:
94:
449:
reliability or independence of "Wing Chun
Illustrated", but an article in it by someone in Leung Sheung's lineage is not sufficient to show that
328:
If you don’t know what’s your point? I know those books and anyone who has studied wing chun knows those books are not about Leung Sheung
406:
editing
Knowledge, so my apologies if I've rambled on too long while attempting to provide sources and a refutation for this deletion.
563:
verify notability. Martial arts magazines alone do not establish notability but they can serve to complete the content of an article.
541:
473:
411:
135:
130:
139:
89:
82:
17:
216:
573:
526:
500:
439:
425:
333:
237:
122:
183:
103:
99:
402:
606:
40:
495:
Just to clarity are you saying ewingchun.com which anyone can write on is a an independent and reliable source?
569:
522:
496:
435:
421:
329:
233:
177:
358:
316:
518:
371:
173:
602:
577:
545:
530:
504:
477:
462:
443:
429:
415:
383:
362:
337:
320:
301:
281:
261:
241:
64:
36:
126:
370:
It seems to be widely agreed upon that he was Ip Man's first student, but that seems to be a case of
223:
297:
277:
257:
209:
398:
118:
70:
458:
379:
354:
312:
468:
as "proof" in any way. Just trying to provide what sources I can that are available in
English.
554:
537:
511:
469:
407:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
601:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
189:
564:
293:
273:
253:
55:
490:
454:
450:
375:
350:
156:
349:
does not appear to have attracted the requisite secondary coverage required for
392:
A news article discussing Leung Sheung is preserved in image format here:
559:
434:
And Wing chun illustrated will write about anyone who teaches wing chun.
597:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
420:
ewingchun is not a reliable source anyone can write on it.
232:
A passing mention in 2 books does not establish notability
152:
148:
144:
208:
453:
is met (and also may not be considered independent).
270:list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions
250:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
609:). No further edits should be made to this page.
288:Note: This discussion has been included in the
268:Note: This discussion has been included in the
248:Note: This discussion has been included in the
290:list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions
222:
8:
521:If the sources are there the content stays.
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
311:it is not sure it are "passing mentions".
287:
267:
247:
403:Leung Sheung: Too Important to Overlook
7:
394:A Scandal of the Yung-Ch'un School
24:
95:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
578:08:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
546:06:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
531:06:08, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
505:05:32, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
478:06:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
463:12:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
444:08:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
430:07:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
416:04:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
384:00:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
363:12:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
338:11:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
321:22:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
302:21:05, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
282:21:05, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
262:21:05, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
242:20:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
65:11:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
626:
599:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
399:Wing Chun Sifu Database
83:Articles for deletion
570:Australianblackbelt
523:Australianblackbelt
497:Australianblackbelt
436:Australianblackbelt
422:Australianblackbelt
330:Australianblackbelt
234:Australianblackbelt
304:
284:
264:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
617:
558:
515:
494:
227:
226:
212:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
625:
624:
620:
619:
618:
616:
615:
614:
613:
607:deletion review
552:
519:WP:NOTINHERITED
509:
488:
372:WP:NOTINHERITED
169:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
623:
621:
612:
611:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
565:William Cheung
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
387:
386:
365:
343:
342:
341:
340:
306:
305:
285:
265:
230:
229:
166:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
622:
610:
608:
604:
600:
595:
594:
579:
575:
571:
566:
561:
556:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
543:
539:
534:
533:
532:
528:
524:
520:
513:
508:
507:
506:
502:
498:
492:
487:
479:
475:
471:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
433:
432:
431:
427:
423:
419:
418:
417:
413:
409:
404:
400:
395:
391:
390:
389:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:
364:
360:
356:
355:Jamesniederle
352:
348:
345:
344:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
318:
314:
313:SportsOlympic
310:
303:
299:
295:
291:
286:
283:
279:
275:
271:
266:
263:
259:
255:
251:
246:
245:
244:
243:
239:
235:
225:
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
175:
172:
171:Find sources:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
598:
596:
367:
346:
308:
307:
231:
219:
213:
205:
198:
192:
186:
180:
170:
119:Leung Sheung
76:
71:Leung Sheung
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
196:free images
58:Sandstein
603:talk page
294:Shellwood
274:Shellwood
254:Shellwood
37:talk page
605:or in a
560:Jim Fung
491:Papaursa
455:Papaursa
376:Papaursa
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
202:WP refs
190:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
451:WP:GNG
368:Delete
351:WP:GNG
347:Delete
174:Google
140:delete
50:delete
217:JSTOR
178:books
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
574:talk
555:彩虹牧師
542:talk
527:talk
512:彩虹牧師
501:talk
474:talk
459:talk
440:talk
426:talk
412:talk
401:and
380:talk
359:talk
334:talk
317:talk
309:Note
298:talk
278:talk
258:talk
238:talk
210:FENS
184:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
538:樂牧師
470:樂牧師
408:樂牧師
224:TWL
161:– (
576:)
544:)
529:)
503:)
476:)
461:)
442:)
428:)
414:)
382:)
361:)
353:.
336:)
319:)
300:)
292:.
280:)
272:.
260:)
252:.
240:)
204:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
572:(
557::
553:@
540:(
525:(
514::
510:@
499:(
493::
489:@
472:(
457:(
438:(
424:(
410:(
378:(
357:(
332:(
315:(
296:(
276:(
256:(
236:(
228:)
220:·
214:·
206:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
176:(
168:(
165:)
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.