336:, as is often claimed; the notability of the artist is not based upon whether or not the label has an article, although this is sometimes used as a lazy shorthand. There are many labels without articles that fit these criteria. Much as we do with artists who are members of more than one clearly notable band but who are not themselves the subject of extensive news coverage, I think it is sensible to do the same with labels. Maybe not for one or two notable bands, but if a label has or had a roster of half a dozen or a dozen notable acts, this is evidence of cultural importance. The actual number and length of time to "pass muster" can be decided on case-by-case bases, but it's thoroughly destructive to go about deleting plainly important things based upon a Procrustean yardstick.
354:, but not all labels are notable enough for an encyclopedia article, and until we have some agreed criteria, we can only judge each label on its merits. It would be helpful if you could address the label in question in this and the other AFD's as I don't feel your comments will otherwise carry much weight with whoever closes the discussion. --
308:
is a silly straitjacket to be judging independent record labels by. Let's think about what makes record labels noteworthy (in the real world). Well, what they do is put out records; people know and care about them because of the music they put out into the world. The story, then, is the artists much
331:
to come up with a standard of worth for labels which have a clear cultural importance based upon the music they release. Which it actually does, buried in the artists' section - a label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of many notable musicians. This is not circular and does not
313:
do this in comparison with how much they write about musicians. They generally do this only for major labels (whose business is large enough to make the financial papers) and labels which become so venerable and storied as to be iconic
133:
304:. The nominator seems to be asking for a referendum on the notability of record labels, having nominated a dozen or so, nearly all of which I believe are worth keeping.
163:
125:
192:
132:
Non-notable record company who do not establish stand alone notability with significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources per the
92:
87:
96:
309:
more often than the label, and news agencies know this, which is why they very rarely write full articles about labels; in fact, they almost
79:
140:
to their label. Article was tagged, sources searched for, but noting of substance was found, so I'm putting it out to the community.
17:
284:
49:
472:
455:
435:
405:
363:
345:
296:
265:
248:
231:
210:
181:
152:
61:
487:
36:
486:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
276:
220:
I don't think anyone can properly judge so many unrelated articles in one AfD. Please relist as separate AfDs.
83:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
433:
333:
137:
244:
369:
75:
67:
451:
401:
341:
426:
315:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
385:
359:
292:
240:
350:
I agree that we need separate criteria for independent record labels rather than applying
328:
57:
468:
351:
305:
255:
227:
200:
171:
142:
447:
397:
337:
463:
In generaL, a record label such as this one should be significant enough to keep.
113:
381:
373:
355:
319:
288:
393:
53:
464:
419:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
377:
223:
396:
makes this one of the premier hardcore punk labels of the 1990s/2000s.
280:
389:
480:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
136:. While the bands themselves maybe notable, I feel this doesn't
322:, etc.) such that they begin to acquire book-length treatments.
253:
Done and done. Bloody silly idea once I looked back at it.
120:
109:
105:
101:
134:
notability guidelines for companies and organizations
424:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
368:Sure. The fact that Level Plane released albums by
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
490:). No further edits should be made to this page.
164:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
287:, which are not in-depth, but don't hurt.--
275:. Substantial feature from Stylus magazine
193:list of Music-related deletion discussions
187:
158:
239:, too much to consider at one AFD, imho.
191:: This debate has been included in the
162:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
327:What is really needed is for
507:
483:Please do not modify it.
473:23:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
456:00:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
436:00:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
62:01:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
406:14:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
364:14:31, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
346:11:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
297:07:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
266:03:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
249:02:14, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
232:01:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
211:01:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
182:01:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
153:01:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
138:automatically transfer
370:City of Caterpillar
76:Level Plane Records
68:Level Plane Records
44:The result was
438:
264:
237:relist separately
213:
209:
196:
184:
180:
167:
151:
50:non-admin closure
498:
485:
429:
423:
421:
386:The One AM Radio
262:
261:
254:
207:
206:
199:
197:
178:
177:
170:
168:
149:
148:
141:
123:
117:
99:
34:
506:
505:
501:
500:
499:
497:
496:
495:
494:
488:deletion review
481:
427:
417:
334:WP:NOTINHERITED
279:, plus there's
259:Esradekan Gibb
257:
256:
204:Esradekan Gibb
202:
201:
175:Esradekan Gibb
173:
172:
146:Esradekan Gibb
144:
143:
119:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
504:
502:
493:
492:
476:
475:
458:
440:
439:
422:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
324:
323:
299:
270:
269:
268:
234:
214:
185:
130:
129:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
503:
491:
489:
484:
478:
477:
474:
470:
466:
462:
459:
457:
453:
449:
446:: Per above.
445:
442:
441:
437:
434:
431:
430:
420:
416:
415:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
348:
347:
343:
339:
335:
330:
326:
325:
321:
317:
312:
307:
303:
300:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
271:
267:
263:
260:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
233:
229:
225:
221:
219:
215:
212:
208:
205:
194:
190:
186:
183:
179:
176:
165:
161:
157:
156:
155:
154:
150:
147:
139:
135:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
482:
479:
460:
443:
428:Juliancolton
425:
418:
310:
301:
272:
258:
236:
217:
216:
203:
188:
174:
159:
145:
131:
45:
43:
31:
28:
382:Melt-Banana
241:Umbralcorax
394:Racebannon
378:Hot Cross
316:Blue Note
448:Iowateen
398:Chubbles
338:Chubbles
332:violate
329:WP:MUSIC
126:View log
352:WP:CORP
306:WP:CORP
222:Thanks
218:Comment
93:protect
88:history
392:, and
390:Saetia
356:Michig
289:Michig
283:, and
121:delete
97:delete
311:never
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
54:Erik9
16:<
469:talk
465:AyaK
461:Keep
452:talk
444:Keep
402:talk
374:Envy
360:talk
342:talk
302:Keep
293:talk
285:this
281:this
277:here
273:Keep
245:talk
228:talk
224:Gigs
189:Note
160:Note
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
46:keep
320:Sun
48:. (
471:)
454:)
432:|
404:)
388:,
384:,
380:,
376:,
372:,
362:)
344:)
318:,
295:)
247:)
230:)
195:.
166:.
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:)
467:(
450:(
400:(
358:(
340:(
314:(
291:(
243:(
226:(
198:—
169:—
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.