222:. I don't know which came first, the Myspace bio or the Knowledge (XXG) entry. The creator of the article has claimed that they have plaigarised him, but we only have his word for that. The Myspace site also has a French translation of the article, though this does not appear to be present in the French Knowledge (XXG) article. I am not sure what to make of this or how to proceed.
213:
I would be prepared to keep the article if all of the unsourced statements are removed, which is what I had edited the article down to - a statement that these individuals exist, that they are French and that they released a small number of records (I believe it is about five across the thirty odd
182:
The fact that a subject has an article in another language is not in and of itself sufficient to establish notability; however, it is usually an indication that a subject has received international attention and is probably encyclopedic. We have an entire project dedicated to writing articles that
123:
as it is unsourced, and is quite possibly unsourceable. I have tried to improve the article, but in the absence of sources I do not see how we can keep it. Obviously fanzines and
Internet forums do not count in this instance. Equally, there is no point voting to keep this article if nothing is, or
159:
Interestingly the articles on the French and Dutch sites consist of what I had whittled down this article to before you reverted my changes... the only bits which can be sourced, i.e. an introductory paragraph followed by a list of bands. Regardless, appearance of
Knowledge (XXG) pages does not
142:
This has articles in French and Dutch, and the bands dealt with have released material on four apparently noteworthy labels. The subject has inherent notability; that said, the article is in dire need of a good cleanup, and has been for some time. The fanny parts and wild speculation should be
314:
as my beef with this article is broadly one of verifiability not notability, but since you mention it... which bit of the guideline do you think qualifies LLN for inclusion (I agree with your stance on notability in general but I'm unconvinced the guideline backs you up on this one).
214:
bands said to be involved) on notable named labels. Everything else is unsourced and/or unsourceable and hence cannot be considered encyclopedic. This is in fact what the French and Dutch pages appear to have. I am still in search of
439:. There is nothing wrong with stubs. If the subject is notable, then better a stub than nothing. If the only way to improve the page is to strip it down to a stub, then so be it, but that should be the approach: not deletion.
476:'Being a big deal' is POV and needs sourcing. To claim that the LLN was as big as the Norwegian 'Black Mafia' but more so' is ridiculous, as numbers of reliable sources and record releases will demonstrate.
184:
112:
191:
notes that bands who release enough material on notable labels may generally be considered notable themselves; it's a good benchmark for a group's popularity.
278:
OK, I'll attempt a rewrite, but I am going to remove the unsourced rumoured material. Anyone else out there reading this who wants to help, feel free ;-).
119:
I firmly believe that Les
Legions Noires existed and that a small number of bands released records. However, the vast majority of this article constitutes
422:
article for this subject, or you think the article as currently stands is valid? If I remove everything unsourced, we end up with a nearly blank page.
85:
80:
89:
351:
reviews and a brief historical mention from the black metal retrospective looking at regional scenes. I'll try and add some of it with citation.
72:
218:
but they do not appear to exist. There is a further problem incidentally... the text is near identical to the text on this
Myspace site:
17:
460:
per it being a big deal. The LLN is just as big as the so called "black metal mafia" but more so. It was a whole movement.
219:
500:
485:
469:
448:
431:
411:
390:
360:
324:
287:
257:
231:
200:
173:
152:
133:
54:
36:
76:
499:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
481:
427:
378:
356:
320:
283:
227:
169:
129:
68:
60:
444:
164:
do, but not if the labels are 'noteworthy' for releasing LLN records. That would be circular logic.
407:
461:
477:
423:
352:
316:
279:
253:
223:
196:
165:
148:
125:
311:
188:
465:
386:
120:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
215:
440:
347:
I vastly prefer the current revision, though it still needs some work. I've found a few
403:
220:
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=282534767
249:
192:
144:
382:
106:
248:
The text of this article predates the creation of that myspace page.
493:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
102:
98:
94:
160:
establish notability. Releases on noteworthy labels
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
503:). No further edits should be made to this page.
418:You think that it is valid that there should be
8:
310:Actually, I was wasn't going to mention
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
183:have entries in other languages (
1:
486:23:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
470:23:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
449:16:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
432:00:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
412:22:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
391:15:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
361:22:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
325:01:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
288:00:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
258:17:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
232:16:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
201:14:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
174:14:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
153:06:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
134:01:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
55:08:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
124:can be done to improve it.
520:
496:Please do not modify it.
377:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
381:. It is listed now.
46:No consensus - Keep
69:Les Légions Noires
61:Les Légions Noires
52:
121:original research
50:
511:
498:
216:reliable sources
187:). Beyond that,
143:circular-filed.
110:
92:
34:
519:
518:
514:
513:
512:
510:
509:
508:
507:
501:deletion review
494:
402:valid article.
83:
67:
64:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
517:
515:
506:
505:
489:
488:
473:
472:
454:
453:
452:
451:
415:
414:
396:
395:
394:
393:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
206:
205:
204:
203:
177:
176:
156:
155:
117:
116:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
516:
504:
502:
497:
491:
490:
487:
483:
479:
478:Blackmetalbaz
475:
474:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
455:
450:
446:
442:
438:
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
424:Blackmetalbaz
421:
417:
416:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
397:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
375:
374:
373:
362:
358:
354:
353:Blackmetalbaz
350:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
326:
322:
318:
317:Blackmetalbaz
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
289:
285:
281:
280:Blackmetalbaz
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
259:
255:
251:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
233:
229:
225:
224:Blackmetalbaz
221:
217:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
181:
180:
179:
178:
175:
171:
167:
166:Blackmetalbaz
163:
158:
157:
154:
150:
146:
141:
138:
137:
136:
135:
131:
127:
126:Blackmetalbaz
122:
114:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
495:
492:
457:
436:
419:
399:
348:
161:
139:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
441:Bondegezou
379:incomplete
349:Terrorizer
404:Catchpole
312:WP:MUSIC
250:Chubbles
193:Chubbles
189:WP:MUSIC
145:Chubbles
113:View log
462:Hackser
437:Comment
383:DumbBOT
86:protect
81:history
90:delete
162:might
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
482:talk
466:talk
458:Keep
445:talk
428:talk
408:talk
400:Keep
387:talk
357:talk
321:talk
284:talk
254:talk
228:talk
197:talk
185:here
170:talk
149:talk
140:Keep
130:talk
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
48:. --
111:– (
484:)
468:)
447:)
430:)
420:an
410:)
389:)
359:)
323:)
286:)
256:)
230:)
199:)
172:)
151:)
132:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
51:VS
480:(
464:(
443:(
426:(
406:(
385:(
355:(
319:(
282:(
252:(
226:(
195:(
168:(
147:(
128:(
115:)
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.