687:, it’s more of an interesting scoreline than anything else. The problem is that we have let these other 9–0 pages pass, but when do we stop the trend. The first 9–0 was notable with Manchester United and Ipswich for being the first in the Premier League era, and an argument can be made for Leicester’s away victory against Southampton seeing as it was the biggest away win. However, I don’t think any of the 9–0’s since should have their own pages. Also, on a separate note, I think it is too soon to judge what impact this result has going forward so if it is decided to be kept, I think draftify should be an option put forward.
741:- It is the joint biggest win in the history of the most famous soccer league in the world. It may not have set the record, but it is a record nonetheless. To be honest, I think we need to stop demanding that matches be record-setters and actually deal with matches on their own merits based on coverage. I know it's crystal-balling to assume that the coverage will come for this game, but the magnitude of the result makes that almost guaranteed. –
980:- it's a tough call because this was a noteworthy game, especially given the sacking of the Bournemouth manager as an outcome. That said, it is one game in the course of a season, and one game in the lifetime of both clubs. There's a place for extreme outcomes, and it's on each club's page. There's a place for extreme outcomes in a season, and it's the page about the season.
255:. Not remotely notable. It's not a record score, nothing spectacular about the match in other respects, and to be honest once a match is clearly a rout, 9-0 is not much more surprising than 5-0. A closely fought 4-3 is much more interesting and momentous than this. We should probably consider deleting other prior 9-0 matches on the same grounds. —
808:. While I agree with The Kip – the other 9-0 results had their own articles and a 9-0 win in the Premier League is rare – I also understand Ad Orientem's point, as this match may have little importance once the season is over. If this event is really not significant enough to have its own article, I would suggest to redirect it to the
787:
Looking at the three articles in question, 1 easily sails through the GNG, having retrospectives about it produced decades later. The other two have issues. I haven't looked at their sourcing in depth enough to be definitive about it (and I don't want to even try to embark on the before required to
497:
In the
Premier League, a 9-0 is a rarity. 4 out of 11,500+ matches have ended with that scoreline. Given the demands of the league and its level of competitiveness in comparison to other top divisions around the world, these are more notable than say PSG of France winning 9-0 against a newly promoted
1209:
That San Marino game was much more likely to happen because you had a team of part-time players playing against some of the best in the world. In contrast, both
Liverpool and Bournemouth are fully professional teams with internationals in their lineup plus this being a Premier League game makes it a
455:
Sorry but whereas you could possibly argue
Scottish league is less competitive because its dominated by 2 teams or that they are from a smaller nation, that is certainly not true for Germany or France. Besides even the Scottish second tier is fully professional. The Premier League is not superior to
422:
To further consider my point, this is
Liverpool's record win and Bournemouth's record defeat in Premier League football, as well as being a match where two Liverpool players reached milestones. (Van Dijk 200th PL appearance, Henderson 400th appearance). Finally, this was the first Liverpool match in
661:
I'd argue a match that sets a particular record is more notable than one that matches it. The first 9-0 stood unmatched for 24 years and the
Southampton-Leicester result could make a case for staying as the record away win. With each subsequent match of that scoreline, the justification for its own
1550:
Looking at the other articles on 9-0 wins in the premier league, the one from the 90s can show its notability because it has in depth, reliable sources from decades afterward. I do not find credible the keep position that the 4th time such an event happened (and 2nd or 3rd time this year) will be
512:
Please explain how PSG, current champions, beating a newly promoted team is less notable than
Liverpool, a vice-champion, beating Bournemouth, a newly promoted team. Also Man City own 4 of the last 5 championships, and its the same 4-5 clubs routinely in the top 4-5 spots in the league pretty much
640:
I am a
Liverpool fan, but I have also nominated previous Liverpool matches that have been created if I don't believe they are notable. 4–0 against Barca and the 1984 semi-final against Dinamo Bucharest are cases in point. It's notable because it's the record win in the Premier League, along with
1527:
the
Liverpool/Bournemouth match is equal in notability to the two more recent matches involving Southampton. The Man Utd/Ipswich match has a reasonable claim to long-lasting notability, as for over 25 years it was a unique feat in the Premier League, and so that article should likely be kept.
930:
It is synonymous with a tragedy which took place in
Liverpool in the corresponding week, in which the football club continues to support the investigation of Olivia Pratt-Korbel's death. While the 9-0 is rare and alone should be the reason the article remains, it is a time signature from the
937:
Other characteristics of the notability from a footballing perspective include: Milestone appearances for two of
Liverpool's players, Milestone goal tally for one of Liverpool's players, Bournemouth's biggest ever top flight defeat, Harvey Elliott's first PL goal, Liverpool's biggest ever
1622:
NFL American football game which happened to be the 1940 NFL Championship game and was notable only for that reason). I believe the three other 9-0 games should be redirected as well (with Manchester United-Ipswich as a possible exception), but that is not the scope of this discussion.
942:
945:. This was the 4th out of 11,686 matches. 0.03% of PL matches have ended 9-0, which is less than the definition of a rarity, therefore this result should be classed as notable in its own right, without the extenuating factors and events surrounding the fixture.
1679:
applies here. Their existence is not evidence either for or against deleting this article. I think the sources they use do not show that this game will get the long term coverage that the game from the 90's got, but I am open to somebody proving me wrong.
591:
The match is notable as it equalled the record win in the Premier League. As the three other matches were this happened have an entry, this one should too. It's either that or they all go up for deletion in my view as they're all as notable as each other.
1486:— Everytime one of these happen people get needlessly mad at the article but it's clearly notable. Just because a few people don't feel like it should be notable doesn't make it non-notable. There's just no need for this rigmarole every two years or so.
1528:
However, the fact that there have been 9-0 scorelines in the Premier League three times in under two years indicates that such occurences, while still unusual, are becoming more widespread and are less notable. Whether that level of notability meets
205:
1507:
to anybody who doesn't watch soccer (or even Liverpool). And this being a "record for Liverpool" is a woefully unconvincing reason to keep this. "Only the fourth time" will bring a chuckle to the faces of the uninvolved, if this is kept.
1118:. It might be notable in the future but not now. The regurgitation of Sky's propaganda ("much less competitive than the Premier League") is sickening as are the attempts to make this game notable by using a nine year old girl's death.
481:. I would like to add that in your words: "it is only the fourth occasion" How arbitrary is this? Where's the cut-off point? Fifth, sixth, fourteenth? If a team wins by the same scoreline next week, does that match deserve a page?
1226:
Nice whataboutism. What makes this unique versus the Scottish result is the level of competition; the Premier League is is almost universally considered one of a handful of top-flight football leagues, to the point where
1210:
lot more unexpected, despite Liverpool being much better on paper. Same applies with the Dundee United v Celtic match, especially when you consider it was the away team that won 9-0, which is much rarer in elite football
897:
They may get deleted if someone nominates them on the notability basis, so this is not convincing argument. For example, think of a match that ends 10-0, then these are nothing special anymore, even in statistical terms.
1569:
I would say the fact that Bournemouth's manager was sacked three days after the match partly as a result to comments he made in broadcast interviews is something especially noteworthy in regards to it's aftermath
1584:
Also the same happened with Dundee United's manager after they lost 9-0 to Celtic, albeit that decision was made due to poor on-pitch performances and results instead of any apparent disagreements with the board
1532:
or not is not clear to me, but if this article is deleted, then the Man Utd/Southampton and Leicester/Southampton ones should be as well. There may be an argument to add those two to this deletion discussion.
346:
The results you have mentioned are in leagues, which are much less competitive than the Premier League, hence why this is only the fourth time it has occurred in the Premier League since its inception in 1992.
1297:
Uh...no. Two of those (Mexico and Canada) do not get posted because they're national leagues that do not receive international attention. The ELF is too new; there is not enough precedent, if any. —
199:
1610:. 9-goal wins happen from time-to-time even in top-flight leagues, so the game is not unique for having that margin of victory. If we look at record margins-of-victory across other sports (see
564:
applies here and the match is simply an interesting but unnotable occasion of a high score. The page is now being padded out in an attempt to make it appear more noteworthy than it is. Also,
135:
130:
968:
139:
396:. This result is notable, a it is only the fourth occasion that this has happened in the 30 year history of the Premier League, and all previous occasions also have their own articles.
122:
788:
bring them to a deletion discussion), but both are mostly sourced to articles from within days of when they happened, which implies they will have problems passing a notability test.
733:
1195:
obsession with the notion that all 9–0s have to be individually catalogued. If someone later does a 10–0, will we delete them all because they're no longer joint record holders? —
883:
This match equalled the record win in the Premier League. As the three other 9-0 matches have an entry, this one should too. If this is deleted then the others need to goa also.
162:
240:. Also, no content apart from basic statistics. There probably are notable matches that merit separate articles, but those should be reserved for championship finals and such.
52:. More editors supported keeping than deleting/redirecting, but the arguments themselves do not amount to a consensus. Perhaps the passing of time will make the issue clearer.
934:
Going forwards, if these results were to occur more frequently (10+ times), then perhaps at that point a new article named "9-0 wins in the Premier League" could be created.
1191:
while we're at it. This is utterly absurd and depressing. The match is self-evidently less relevant to anything than so many other matches, the above "keeps" are just an
369:
849:
569:
397:
373:
1798:
Other 9-0 premier league wins have articles, and the article is well written and sourced. There is clearly enough information in the article to make it worth keeping.
852:
626:
I am in no way a Liverpool fan like NapHit, however as a footballing fan I believe it carries significant importance and as a result should remain. His point stands.
401:
464:. By any standards Celtic have a huge fanbase and Dundee Utd. have a much bigger European pedigree than Bournemouth (who have none actually). It's all subjective.
1615:
1607:
859:
828:
237:
1231:
only regularly posts the league champions of them, the Bundesliga, and La Liga. It’s a special occurrence versus that of a lower league such as the SPL or MLS.
855:
405:
94:
126:
109:
959:
But we have no articles for games ending 6-4, 9-1, 7-3 or 5-5 and these have all just happened once. Rarity does not necessarily make something notable.
220:
187:
365:
1313:“National league that does not receive international attention” likewise describes most soccer/football leagues outside of the Big 4 (one of whom,
118:
70:
1807:
1765:
1751:
1734:
1713:
1689:
1671:
1654:
1638:
1594:
1579:
1564:
1542:
1519:
1495:
1478:
1469:
which would seem the sensible thing to do. Clearly it's a notable match and worthy of mention, but not notable enough for a standaline article.
1457:
1426:
1408:
1366:
1342:
1326:
1308:
1292:
1266:
1240:
1219:
1204:
1182:
1161:
1144:
1127:
1102:
1081:
1062:
1043:
1027:
993:
954:
925:
904:
892:
871:
840:
821:
797:
782:
773:. Every other 9-0 Premier League result has its own article, so long as this one is well-written I don’t remotely see how it should be deleted.
765:
748:
715:
696:
671:
650:
635:
621:
601:
583:
538:
522:
507:
492:
473:
450:
432:
417:
385:
356:
339:
321:
264:
246:
64:
1331:
Attention in the media has absolutely nothing to do with the "level of competition", and I cannot imagine how you came to that conclusion. —
181:
612:
Is it worth pointing out that you are a self-confessed LFC fan? Usually such things seem more notable if you support the club in question.
285:
1586:
1571:
1211:
1009:
177:
1788:
423:
wake of the tragic murder of 9 year-old Olivia Pratt-Korbel; where Liverpool paid tribute to the girl who was a resident of the city.
1722:
1466:
89:
82:
17:
1453:
1035:
1001:
946:
917:
627:
530:
499:
703:
227:
1357:, which rank the different associations within UEFA, had Scotland at 11th, behind countries such as Serbia, Greece, and Austria.
1280:
297:
1614:
for examples), almost none of them have individual articles for these specific games (the only games that have articles are a
1396:
460:, besides you miss the point that high scores in top leagues is nothing new or rare. We are not a Liverpool FC fan-page, per
103:
99:
1667:
1317:
of Italy, isn’t posted anyways), which would as a result exclude the Scottish Premiership. Thanks for proving my point.
1170:
641:
three other matches which each have pages. If those ones have pages then it only stands to reason this one should have.
193:
1824:
40:
1414:
1272:
166:
1077:
809:
1619:
888:
1551:
able to generate press 2 weeks in the future, much less 2 years. Everything about the reporting on this game is
916:
Not only is this a rare occasion in the Premier League (the fourth occasion out of 11,686 Premier League matches
309:
1491:
1662:
Both of Southampton's 9-0 defeats have articles. Why shouldn't this? If this is deleted, those should be too.
683:
For me, I can see the argument from both sides. However, I think this should be deleted because, as stated by
1590:
1575:
1215:
1188:
1663:
662:
page decreases. If and when we get the first 10-0 Premier League result, all four pages will be redundant.
438:
1776:
1354:
1039:
1005:
950:
921:
858:. However, if this gets merged anyway, I would still stand by my proposal that it would be merged with the
631:
534:
503:
1803:
1784:
1651:
1631:
1516:
1474:
1339:
1305:
1073:
1024:
1820:
1449:
1157:
1096:
1058:
884:
761:
692:
568:
makes a valid point that the other 9-0 pages probably deserve to be deleted too. I argue that the first
36:
1799:
1780:
327:
964:
729:
1760:
989:
711:
1552:
1372:
1192:
561:
442:
424:
409:
348:
273:
1681:
1556:
1487:
789:
579:
488:
446:
428:
413:
381:
352:
213:
1700:
1504:
1115:
461:
1685:
1560:
1538:
1123:
867:
836:
817:
793:
667:
1726:
1676:
1395:
None of them have an article; why? That's just one season picked at random. In fact none of the
1647:
1626:
1510:
1470:
1422:
1404:
1362:
1333:
1322:
1299:
1288:
1262:
1236:
1200:
1178:
1021:
778:
724:
no evidence that there is enduring notability beyond routine coverage of a high scoring game.
617:
518:
469:
335:
317:
260:
78:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1819:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1254:
1228:
529:
In response to when the cut-off is, I would say when the record is broken (10-0 win in prem)
457:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1747:
1706:
1611:
1445:
1153:
1090:
1054:
757:
745:
688:
646:
597:
1529:
1399:
have match articles. And you cannot argue supremacy of Premier League over La Liga surely?
1111:
1730:
1503:: A single soccer match is unlikely to have long-lasting notability, and this is entirely
1140:
985:
960:
725:
707:
289:
1276:
1271:
Call it bias all you want, but it’s the same reason we don’t post the champions of the
684:
573:
482:
377:
293:
1534:
1119:
863:
832:
813:
663:
281:
1418:
1400:
1358:
1318:
1284:
1258:
1232:
1196:
1174:
774:
613:
565:
557:
514:
465:
331:
313:
301:
256:
156:
1743:
742:
642:
593:
277:
1725:. These scores have become commonplace and do not deserve an entire article.--
1136:
941:
An event is considered "rare" or "unusual" if its probability is 0.05 or less.
756:
per WP:ROUTINE and WP:ENDURING. Long-term significance is highly improbable. -
305:
931:
footballing world of when something directly affected the city and the club.
900:
827:
Update: In case the consensus would be "delete", it should be redirected to
242:
1618:
American college football which is an extreme and famous storyline, and a
1699:
Its not and absurd to say otherwise in the grand scheme of things. Fails
1384:
Highest scoring Deportivo La Coruña 2–8 Real Madrid (20 September 2014)
1314:
236:
Not notable in the big picture. This match would be perfectly fine at
1608:
List of highest-scoring Premier League matches#Biggest winning margin
829:
List of highest-scoring Premier League matches#Biggest winning margin
1444:
We already made articles for the other 9–0 Premier League matches.
408:
respectively. Makes no sense to not include this result as well.
1815:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1169:
So if this gets kept there will be no objections to creating a
513:
since 1997. How is that more competitive than other nations?
1152:
per all above. Rare and notable as the other 9–0 results.
1378:
Biggest home win Real Madrid 9–1 Granada (5 April 2015)
152:
148:
144:
212:
848:
until the record is surpassed. The same goes for the
437:
Any subsequent conversation should take place on the
1381:
Biggest away win Córdoba 0–8 Barcelona (2 May 2015)
706:'s list of association football-related deletions.
226:
1283:. It’s just simply a lower level of competition.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1827:). No further edits should be made to this page.
364:Note: This discussion has been included in the
1646:Seems like an important and significant match.
1417:article about the match that happened in 1966.
860:List of highest-scoring Premier League matches
572:is the only match that deserves its own page,
238:List of highest-scoring Premier League matches
1773:As per Phikia17:11, 4 September 2022 (UTC)~
8:
398:Manchester United F.C. 9–0 Ipswich Town F.C.
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
702:Note: This discussion has been included in
402:Manchester United F.C. 9–0 Southampton F.C.
363:
1034:Content issue has since been addressed.
406:Southampton F.C. 0–9 Leicester City F.C.
1387:Real Madrid 9–1 Granada (5 April 2015)
276:. To prove my point; on the same day
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
1390:Real Madrid 7–3 Getafe (23 May 2015)
1053:obviously notable football match. —
1355:UEFA’s 2021-22 league coefficients
1171:Dundee United F.C. 0–9 Celtic F.C.
119:Liverpool F.C. 9–0 AFC Bournemouth
71:Liverpool F.C. 9–0 AFC Bournemouth
24:
1415:Tasmania Berlin 0–9 MSV Duisburg
1281:Canadian Elite Basketball League
368:lists for the following topics:
95:Introduction to deletion process
1375:the following scores occurred:
1135:as per PeeJay and Jonny Nixon.
286:Match report from The Guardian
1:
1808:19:00, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
1766:06:10, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
1752:03:09, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
1735:13:58, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
1723:2022–23 Liverpool F.C. season
1714:11:18, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
1690:18:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
1672:14:47, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
1655:17:03, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
1639:15:50, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
1467:2022–23 Liverpool F.C. season
1371:To illustrate a point in the
1343:00:14, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
994:14:53, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
65:03:40, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
1595:23:15, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
1580:23:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
1565:21:39, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
1543:22:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
1520:14:25, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
1496:03:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
1479:21:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
1458:20:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
1427:22:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
1409:22:29, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
1367:15:47, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
1327:16:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
1309:22:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
1293:15:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
1273:European League of Football
1267:10:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
1241:02:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
1220:23:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
1205:17:17, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
1183:16:50, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
1162:16:12, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
1145:14:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
1128:13:48, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
1103:13:14, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
1082:11:50, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
1063:11:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
1044:10:39, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
1028:10:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
969:08:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
955:10:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
926:10:19, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
905:08:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
893:07:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
872:17:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
841:14:04, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
822:05:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
798:21:47, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
783:04:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
766:02:52, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
749:21:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
734:21:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
716:19:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
697:19:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
672:14:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
651:11:05, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
636:10:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
622:19:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
602:18:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
584:17:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
539:10:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
523:16:36, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
508:10:37, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
493:18:11, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
474:18:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
451:17:08, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
433:16:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
418:16:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
386:16:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
357:17:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
340:15:59, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
322:15:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
265:15:37, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
247:15:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1844:
1353:To further back my point,
308:6-1 away the day before (
1817:Please do not modify it.
1173:article then I take it?
498:team of their division.
32:Please do not modify it.
1189:San Marino 0–10 England
441:section of the article
1742:The match is notable.
810:2022–23 Premier League
167:edits since nomination
1010:few or no other edits
83:Articles for deletion
1759:As per scope_creep.
1012:outside this topic.
704:WikiProject Football
1413:Oh and there is no
1664:ArsenalGhanaPartey
1779:comment added by
1253:and there it is:
1013:
718:
388:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
1835:
1792:
1711:
1709:
1637:
1634:
1629:
1612:Blowout (sports)
1513:
1336:
1302:
1110:Currently fails
1099:
1093:
999:
885:Fernandosmission
701:
576:
485:
366:deletion sorting
330:may apply here.
231:
230:
216:
160:
142:
80:
62:
34:
1843:
1842:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1825:deletion review
1774:
1762:MrsSnoozyTurtle
1707:
1705:
1632:
1627:
1624:
1511:
1397:La Liga records
1373:2014–15 La Liga
1334:
1300:
1097:
1091:
1089:per all above.
1072:as per PeeJay.
574:
483:
456:argue it is is
298:L'Équipe report
290:Montpellier HSC
173:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1841:
1839:
1830:
1829:
1811:
1810:
1793:
1768:
1754:
1737:
1716:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1657:
1641:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1545:
1522:
1498:
1488:Watercheetah99
1481:
1460:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1411:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1388:
1385:
1382:
1379:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1277:Mexican League
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1164:
1147:
1130:
1105:
1084:
1074:Idiosincrático
1066:
1065:
1047:
1046:
1031:
1030:
997:
996:
983:
982:
981:
974:
973:
972:
971:
939:
935:
932:
910:
909:
908:
907:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
812:page instead.
802:
801:
800:
768:
751:
736:
719:
699:
677:
676:
675:
674:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
605:
604:
586:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
527:
526:
525:
435:
390:
389:
361:
360:
359:
343:
342:
294:Stade Brestois
267:
234:
233:
170:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1840:
1828:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1813:
1812:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1772:
1769:
1767:
1764:
1763:
1758:
1755:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1738:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1717:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1702:
1698:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1678:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1642:
1640:
1636:
1635:
1630:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1602:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1587:86.25.138.179
1583:
1582:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1572:86.25.138.179
1568:
1567:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1549:
1546:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1531:
1526:
1523:
1521:
1518:
1515:
1514:
1506:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1482:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1461:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1440:
1439:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1389:
1386:
1383:
1380:
1377:
1376:
1374:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1344:
1341:
1338:
1337:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1307:
1304:
1303:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1212:86.25.138.179
1208:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1100:
1094:
1088:
1085:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1068:
1067:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1049:
1048:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1023:
1019:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1007:
1003:
995:
991:
987:
984:
979:
976:
975:
970:
966:
962:
958:
957:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
933:
929:
928:
927:
923:
919:
915:
912:
911:
906:
903:
902:
896:
895:
894:
890:
886:
882:
879:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
854:
851:
847:
844:
843:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
825:
824:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
786:
785:
784:
780:
776:
772:
769:
767:
763:
759:
755:
752:
750:
747:
744:
740:
737:
735:
731:
727:
723:
720:
717:
713:
709:
705:
700:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
679:
678:
673:
669:
665:
660:
652:
648:
644:
639:
638:
637:
633:
629:
625:
624:
623:
619:
615:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
603:
599:
595:
590:
587:
585:
581:
577:
571:
567:
563:
560:'s argument,
559:
555:
552:
551:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
511:
510:
509:
505:
501:
496:
495:
494:
490:
486:
480:
477:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
434:
430:
426:
421:
420:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:Do not delete
392:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
362:
358:
354:
350:
345:
344:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
311:
310:Kicker report
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
282:Dundee United
279:
275:
271:
268:
266:
262:
258:
254:
251:
250:
249:
248:
245:
244:
239:
229:
225:
222:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
179:
176:
175:Find sources:
171:
168:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
61:
60:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1816:
1814:
1800:Drinkdrinker
1795:
1781:JohnWalker31
1775:— Preceding
1770:
1761:
1756:
1739:
1718:
1704:
1696:
1659:
1648:Moondragon21
1643:
1625:
1603:
1547:
1524:
1512:VersaceSpace
1509:
1500:
1483:
1471:This is Paul
1462:
1441:
1335:VersaceSpace
1332:
1301:VersaceSpace
1298:
1166:
1149:
1132:
1107:
1086:
1069:
1050:
1020:per PeeJay.
1017:
998:
977:
913:
899:
880:
846:Keep for now
845:
805:
804:
770:
753:
738:
721:
680:
588:
553:
478:
393:
302:Union Berlin
269:
252:
241:
235:
223:
217:
209:
202:
196:
190:
184:
174:
76:
58:Arbitrarily0
57:
56:
55:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
1708:scope_creep
1446:KingSkyLord
1154:MSN12102001
1092:REDMAN 2019
1055:Jonny Nixon
1036:2.30.67.159
1008:) has made
1002:2.30.67.159
947:2.30.67.159
918:2.30.67.159
856:9-0 matches
758:Ad Orientem
689:Fats40boy11
628:2.30.67.159
531:2.30.67.159
500:2.30.67.159
328:WP:NOTSTATS
300:), whereas
200:free images
1553:WP:ROUTINE
1193:WP:ILIKEIT
986:Fooman6817
708:S.A. Julio
562:WP:ROUTINE
306:Schalke 04
296:7-0 away (
284:9-0 away (
274:WP:ROUTINE
1821:talk page
1701:WP:SIGCOV
1505:WP:TRIVIA
1116:WP:SIGCOV
961:Spike 'em
943:reference
862:article.
831:instead.
739:Weak keep
726:Spike 'em
685:MattSucci
575:MattSucci
556:. As per
484:MattSucci
462:WP:TRIVIA
443:Saltysers
425:Saltysers
410:Saltysers
378:Shellwood
349:Saltysers
37:talk page
1823:or in a
1789:contribs
1777:unsigned
1682:Rockphed
1677:WP:OTHER
1604:Redirect
1557:Rockphed
1535:RFBailey
1525:Comment:
1454:contribs
1120:Dougal18
938:victory.
864:Vida0007
833:Vida0007
814:Vida0007
790:Rockphed
664:Apocnowt
370:Football
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
1419:Abcmaxx
1401:Abcmaxx
1359:The Kip
1319:The Kip
1315:Serie A
1285:The Kip
1259:Abcmaxx
1255:WP:BIAS
1233:The Kip
1229:WP:ITNR
1197:Amakuru
1175:Abcmaxx
1167:Comment
1025:Snowman
775:The Kip
614:Abcmaxx
570:9-0 win
566:Amakuru
558:Abcmaxx
515:Abcmaxx
479:Comment
466:Abcmaxx
458:WP:BIAS
374:England
332:Abcmaxx
314:Abcmaxx
257:Amakuru
206:WP refs
194:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
1757:Delete
1744:Phikia
1697:Delete
1633:Anchor
1548:Delete
1530:WP:GNG
1501:Delete
1112:WP:GNG
1108:Delete
978:Delete
754:Delete
722:Delete
681:Delete
643:NapHit
594:NapHit
554:Delete
404:, and
288:) and
278:Celtic
270:Delete
253:Delete
178:Google
140:delete
1727:Sakiv
1721:with
1719:Merge
1628:Frank
1616:222-0
1465:with
1463:Merge
1279:, or
1137:GWA88
1022:Giant
853:other
850:three
326:Also
304:beat
292:beat
280:beat
221:JSTOR
182:books
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
1804:talk
1796:Keep
1785:talk
1771:Keep
1748:talk
1740:Keep
1731:talk
1686:talk
1668:talk
1660:Keep
1652:talk
1644:Keep
1620:73-0
1591:talk
1576:talk
1561:talk
1539:talk
1492:talk
1484:Keep
1475:talk
1450:talk
1442:Keep
1423:talk
1405:talk
1363:talk
1323:talk
1289:talk
1263:talk
1237:talk
1216:talk
1201:talk
1187:And
1179:talk
1158:talk
1150:Keep
1141:talk
1133:Keep
1124:talk
1114:and
1098:talk
1087:Keep
1078:talk
1070:Keep
1059:talk
1051:Keep
1040:talk
1018:Keep
1006:talk
990:talk
965:talk
951:talk
922:talk
914:Keep
901:Tone
889:talk
881:Keep
868:talk
837:talk
818:talk
806:Wait
794:talk
779:talk
771:Keep
762:talk
730:talk
712:talk
693:talk
668:talk
647:talk
632:talk
618:talk
598:talk
589:Keep
580:talk
535:talk
519:talk
504:talk
489:talk
470:talk
447:talk
439:Talk
429:talk
414:talk
382:talk
372:and
353:talk
336:talk
318:talk
272:per
261:talk
243:Tone
214:FENS
188:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
1703:.
1606:to
746:Jay
743:Pee
312:).
228:TWL
161:– (
1806:)
1791:)
1787:•
1750:)
1733:)
1688:)
1670:)
1593:)
1578:)
1563:)
1555:.
1541:)
1533:--
1517:🌃
1494:)
1477:)
1456:)
1452:|
1425:)
1407:)
1365:)
1340:🌃
1325:)
1306:🌃
1291:)
1275:,
1265:)
1257:.
1239:)
1218:)
1203:)
1181:)
1160:)
1143:)
1126:)
1101:)
1080:)
1061:)
1042:)
1000:—
992:)
967:)
953:)
924:)
891:)
870:)
839:)
820:)
796:)
781:)
764:)
732:)
714:)
695:)
670:)
649:)
634:)
620:)
600:)
582:)
537:)
521:)
506:)
491:)
472:)
449:)
431:)
416:)
400:,
384:)
376:.
355:)
338:)
320:)
263:)
208:)
165:|
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
1802:(
1783:(
1746:(
1729:(
1684:(
1666:(
1650:(
1589:(
1574:(
1559:(
1537:(
1508:—
1490:(
1473:(
1448:(
1421:(
1403:(
1361:(
1321:(
1287:(
1261:(
1235:(
1214:(
1199:(
1177:(
1156:(
1139:(
1122:(
1095:(
1076:(
1057:(
1038:(
1004:(
988:(
963:(
949:(
920:(
887:(
866:(
835:(
816:(
792:(
777:(
760:(
728:(
710:(
691:(
666:(
645:(
630:(
616:(
596:(
578:(
533:(
517:(
502:(
487:(
468:(
445:(
427:(
412:(
380:(
351:(
334:(
316:(
259:(
232:)
224:·
218:·
210:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
185:·
180:(
172:(
169:)
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.