Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Liverpool 4–0 Barcelona - Knowledge (XXG)

Source πŸ“

380:- My reasons from the last discussion still stand. I don't think anything has changed in that time. The match still fails notability guidelines. As spectacular comeback it was but there have been many of them in the past. Is this more notable than the 3–1 victory against Olympiakos? The comeback against Dortmund? St Etienne? The semi-final against Chelsea in 2005? The list goes on. This information can be included in the relevant section on 478:
page. Only "routine" coverage I can find for this so doesn't necessitate its own article, but clearly a historic comeback that warrants at least some prose in that article. Similarly for the other semi-final that year, just feels dry only detailing the match as you would for a match between Stoke
548:(their subsection of the Road to the final section). Nothing's changed since the last AfD. It was an impressive comeback, and there was a lot of big-club hype in the media, but that's not enough to justify a standalone article. cheers, 202: 566: 364: 453:
It is notable as the biggest Champions League comeback at such a late stage coupled with the fact that a under-strength Liverpool beat what was the strongest team Barcelona could have put out.
196: 163: 261: 441:. Coming from three goals down to win is impressive, but it's certainly doesn't impart notability - I've twice seen my club alone do that in 90 minutes, let alone 180. 537: 501: 475: 292: 326: 136: 131: 309: 140: 123: 95: 110: 217: 184: 497: 541: 479:
City and Ipswich Town. And surely the reason for having a separate article for the knockout phase is to be able to have such detail?
438: 381: 90: 83: 53: 17: 524: 343: 127: 584: 557: 528: 511: 488: 466: 445: 429: 414: 393: 372: 352: 335: 318: 301: 284: 253: 65: 545: 178: 174: 104: 100: 520: 601: 224: 119: 71: 40: 569:. Also, it's probably eligible for deletion under G5 (created by sockpuppet) and G4 (previously deleted at AfD). 190: 426: 597: 460: 410: 36: 581: 575: 442: 61: 265: 234: 278: 247: 210: 553: 484: 423: 79: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
596:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
508: 454: 406: 389: 402: 570: 57: 367: 347: 330: 313: 296: 549: 480: 157: 505: 385: 567:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Liverpool F.C. 4–0 FC Barcelona
401:: for me, this match is notable and the article definetely meets 592:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
544:
as suggested above. There's already some prose about it at
153: 149: 145: 209: 346:'s list of association football-related deletions. 223: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 604:). No further edits should be made to this page. 325:Note: This discussion has been included in the 308:Note: This discussion has been included in the 291:Note: This discussion has been included in the 260:Note: This discussion has been included in the 233:Not notable. Page could also be deleted per G5 262:list of Football-related deletion discussions 8: 538:2018–19 UEFA Champions League knockout phase 502:2018–19 UEFA Champions League knockout phase 476:2018–19 UEFA Champions League knockout phase 293:list of England-related deletion discussions 111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 342:Note: This discussion has been included in 327:list of Events-related deletion discussions 546:2019 UEFA Champions League Final#Liverpool 324: 310:list of Spain-related deletion discussions 307: 290: 259: 542:2018–19 UEFA Champions League#Semi-finals 439:2018–19 UEFA Champions League#Semi-finals 382:2018–19 UEFA Champions League#Semi-finals 54:2018–19 UEFA Champions League#Semi-finals 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 363:- previous discussion can be found 24: 384:rather than a separate article. 96:Introduction to deletion process 498:Liverpool F.C. 4–0 FC Barcelona 1: 519:per consensus at last AFD. -- 504:, so why not this one too? – 422:per consensus at last AFD. 86:(AfD)? Read these primers! 621: 585:13:13, 22 March 2021 (UTC) 558:11:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC) 529:04:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC) 512:18:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC) 489:16:29, 20 March 2021 (UTC) 467:13:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC) 446:12:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC) 430:22:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 415:22:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 394:22:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 373:22:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 353:22:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 336:22:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 319:22:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 302:22:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 285:22:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 254:22:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 66:23:35, 26 March 2021 (UTC) 594:Please do not modify it. 565:as per the consensus at 496:– We already redirected 32:Please do not modify it. 536:to somewhere suitable: 521:Justanothersgwikieditor 120:Liverpool 4–0 Barcelona 72:Liverpool 4–0 Barcelona 84:Articles for deletion 344:WikiProject Football 443:Black Kite (talk) 355: 338: 321: 304: 287: 274: 243: 101:Guide to deletion 91:How to contribute 612: 463: 457: 370: 350: 341: 333: 316: 299: 270: 239: 228: 227: 213: 161: 143: 81: 34: 620: 619: 615: 614: 613: 611: 610: 609: 608: 602:deletion review 461: 455: 368: 348: 331: 314: 297: 275: 244: 170: 134: 118: 115: 78: 75: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 618: 616: 607: 606: 588: 587: 560: 531: 514: 491: 469: 448: 432: 417: 396: 375: 357: 356: 339: 322: 305: 288: 269: 238: 231: 230: 167: 114: 113: 108: 98: 93: 76: 74: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 617: 605: 603: 599: 595: 590: 589: 586: 583: 579: 578: 574: 573: 568: 564: 561: 559: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 532: 530: 526: 522: 518: 515: 513: 510: 507: 503: 499: 495: 492: 490: 486: 482: 477: 473: 470: 468: 464: 458: 452: 449: 447: 444: 440: 436: 433: 431: 428: 425: 421: 418: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 397: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 376: 374: 371: 366: 362: 359: 358: 354: 351: 345: 340: 337: 334: 328: 323: 320: 317: 311: 306: 303: 300: 294: 289: 286: 282: 281: 276: 273: 268: 263: 258: 257: 256: 255: 251: 250: 245: 242: 237: 226: 222: 219: 216: 212: 208: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 176: 173: 172:Find sources: 168: 165: 159: 155: 151: 147: 142: 138: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 116: 112: 109: 106: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 88: 87: 85: 80: 73: 70: 68: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 593: 591: 576: 571: 562: 533: 516: 493: 471: 450: 434: 419: 398: 377: 360: 279: 271: 266: 248: 240: 235: 232: 220: 214: 206: 199: 193: 187: 181: 171: 77: 49: 47: 31: 28: 456:REDMAN 2019 407:Paul Vaurie 197:free images 58:Fenix down 598:talk page 474:into the 369:Spiderone 349:Spiderone 332:Spiderone 315:Spiderone 298:Spiderone 37:talk page 600:or in a 563:Redirect 550:Struway2 534:Redirect 517:Redirect 494:Redirect 481:ItsKesha 435:Redirect 420:Redirect 164:View log 105:glossary 50:redirect 39:or in a 427:Snowman 361:Comment 203:WPΒ refs 191:scholar 137:protect 132:history 82:New to 572:Joseph 403:WP:GNG 386:NapHit 378:Delete 272:Salvus 241:Salvus 175:Google 141:delete 582:talk) 472:Merge 424:Giant 218:JSTOR 179:books 158:views 150:watch 146:links 16:< 577:2302 554:talk 525:talk 485:talk 462:talk 451:Keep 411:talk 399:Keep 390:talk 365:here 280:talk 249:talk 211:FENS 185:news 154:logs 128:talk 124:edit 62:talk 540:or 509:Jay 506:Pee 500:to 437:to 225:TWL 162:– ( 52:to 556:) 527:) 487:) 465:) 413:) 405:. 392:) 329:. 312:. 295:. 283:) 267:Dr 264:. 252:) 236:Dr 205:) 156:| 152:| 148:| 144:| 139:| 135:| 130:| 126:| 64:) 56:. 580:( 552:( 523:( 483:( 459:( 409:( 388:( 277:( 246:( 229:) 221:Β· 215:Β· 207:Β· 200:Β· 194:Β· 188:Β· 182:Β· 177:( 169:( 166:) 160:) 122:( 107:) 103:( 60:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
2018–19 UEFA Champions League#Semi-finals
Fenix down
talk
23:35, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Liverpool 4–0 Barcelona

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Liverpool 4–0 Barcelona
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑