113:
and wrote a book. They are stalking me and AFD every article i creat that is mildly relevant to the 9/11 Truth movement, and now, they have gone so far that they are AFD'ing article that are not even relevant to the 9/11 Truth movement, but solely since i created them. Further, the block threats are
310:
ABU GHRAIB: Author Lila Rajiva will talk about her book The
Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media, which examines how the torture of Iraqi prisoners was whitewashed by the media. Presented by the Marxist School of Sacramento. 7pm Th 12/15, free. Sierra 2 Center, 2791 24th St., (916)
600:
and the use of Google News. Its wiki page gives no indication as to its readership and Google News indexes many smaller publications as well. It indexes my college newspaper (its readership estimated conservatively at 1500) too. Should (an undergrad columnist) get an article too? He gets 5 google
77:
275:"Published authors, editors, and photographers who have written books with an audience of 5,000 or more or in periodicals with a circulation of 5,000 or more". It does seem Striver's gone overboard adding articles mostly relating to one broad topic, but I wonder if
312:
248:
How are journalists presumptively notable? Burden of proof is on notability, not the other way around. How exactly does one show non-notability? You can refute reasons for notability, but there aren't obvious criteria for
134:, and I'm not seeing it. What is the point Striver is trying to make by disrupting Knowledge (XXG)? It seems to me he is trying to get some information out there, but that's not disruption. He may be violating
445:
appears to be notable per capitalistroadster. While I sympathise with
Blnguyen's comment, this article does seem to be about someone who is sufficiently notable for a wikipedia article to exist.
523:
292:
268:
175:
minority" to believe in any alternate theories. To boost the significance of these people, he has resported to creating articles for them. Then created articles which he could cite (e.g.
76:. The user himself has several majority delete afd's and has attacked other contributing wikipedians. An Admin is already looking to block the user from editting wikipedia. (see
183:
to boost notability of the former. Notability in this case is highly circular. On the individual's pages he's claiming that they're notable because they are the most famous
163:
The best analogy I can give is that
Striver is wikibombing to boost the notability of individuals doubting the official 9-11 timeline. He started by slapping a POV tag on
506:
Appears to be somewhat notable, and while I agree the author's (of the article) postings have not generally been good, they shouldn't be blanket deleted.
167:, demanding that the official timeline be called "9/11 Bin Laden Conspiracy Theory", i.e. putting it on equal footing with the rest of the ideas at the
368:
My point of view on Google hits - Might not be the best way to judge. There might be other Lila Rajiva's that the search engine might be throwing up.
355:
352:
17:
114:
bogus, they have nothing that big on me, they just hate my edits. Also, how in the world does this article has anyting to do with
92:: Is this an AfD nomination? 'cos your nom explores the article author significantly more than it explores the article. —
677:
36:
421:, unlike most of the 9-11 related cruft produced by the original author, this individual does appear to be notable.
164:
201:
188:
176:
676:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
410:
180:
168:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
358:
239:
97:
459:
402:
387:
324:
Reaching for straws, aren't you? It's a calendar! Does "Parents without
Partners" deserve a page too? --
659:
645:
633:
621:
605:
588:
565:
549:
534:
510:
498:
486:
470:
449:
437:
425:
413:
390:
372:
361:
337:
328:
318:
299:
283:
253:
243:
220:
195:
154:
122:
101:
84:
52:
597:
562:
407:
399:
383:
543:
479:
468:
434:
235:
93:
49:
276:
205:
139:
135:
131:
115:
73:
602:
495:
325:
296:
250:
192:
78:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/The
Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media
630:
618:
81:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
656:
272:
583:
527:
507:
280:
212:
146:
494:
Only media citing the author or the book are bookseller reviews (not media) and blogs. --
558:
531:
422:
464:
629:
Notable journalist regardless of article author and subjects the journalist covers.
614:
334:
315:
119:
110:
69:
433:-- no case made for deletion other than dislike of the originator or subject. --
642:
546:
483:
369:
58:
578:
234:, journalists are presumptively notable, and no evidence shown otherwise. —
279:
isn't more relevant to the proposed deletions than it was to the creations?
446:
200:
I think you make good points here. Striver is kind of trying to make a
191:
he claims that these views are notable because these people hold it. --
557:
as above - she is clearly notable enough as a journalist/commentator.
333:
I started here, but i put the rest i found on the AFD for the book. --
291:
Keep if author can cite print media regarding the author; Merge to
670:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
204:, and clearly pushing a POV. All I'm saying is that it's not a
138:, or wrong, deluded, POV, who knows, but not in violation of
524:
The
Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media
293:
The
Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media
269:
The
Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media
208:
violation; I'm not defending it or voting to keep it.
171:
page. To do this he cites a policy that requiring a "
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
613:. Notable, regardless of who created the article.
680:). No further edits should be made to this page.
185:among those that hold these alternative views.
357:so she is notable in the far left community.
8:
577:is not a criterion for article deletion. --
596:I'm skeptical as to the readership of
351:reluctantly. Gets 71,000 Google hits
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
601:news hits and 30,000 ghits, too. --
109:Notable writer, made articles for
24:
118:? Another bad faith arguement.--
1:
606:15:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
589:15:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
566:14:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
550:13:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
535:01:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
511:21:38, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
499:15:30, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
487:15:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
471:15:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
450:14:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
438:12:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
426:10:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
414:09:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
391:06:52, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
373:13:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
362:04:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
338:05:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
329:04:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
319:04:52, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
300:04:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
284:03:17, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
254:21:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
244:02:43, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
221:13:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
202:Knowledge (XXG):Walled garden
196:04:39, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
155:02:40, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
123:02:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
102:02:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
85:01:28, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
44:The result of the debate was
641:notablity not established --
189:Talk: September 11th Attacks
179:). Then created items like
697:
354:and 8 Google News results
271:. Author seems to satisfy
165:September 11, 2001 attacks
660:16:33, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
646:00:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
634:15:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
622:06:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
273:WP:BIO#People still alive
181:Problem Reaction Solution
177:9-11: The Road to Tyranny
53:04:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
673:Please do not modify it.
169:9-11 Conspiracy Theories
68:, nn writer and part of
32:Please do not modify it.
295:& Delete if not --
130:. You keep mentioning
655:as per Schizombie.
530:comments above. --
359:Capitalistroadster
587:
249:non-notability.--
688:
675:
653:Keep & merge
581:
467:
462:
405:
388:Have your say!!!
382:as Strivercruft.
218:
215:
152:
149:
34:
696:
695:
691:
690:
689:
687:
686:
685:
684:
678:deletion review
671:
598:Dissident voice
460:
458:
403:
213:
210:
147:
144:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
694:
692:
683:
682:
665:
663:
662:
649:
648:
636:
624:
608:
591:
568:
552:
544:Simon Cursitor
537:
513:
501:
489:
480:Simon Cursitor
473:
452:
440:
435:Simon Cursitor
428:
416:
393:
376:
375:
365:
364:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
305:
303:
302:
286:
258:
257:
256:
228:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
158:
157:
125:
104:
87:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
693:
681:
679:
674:
668:
667:
666:
661:
658:
654:
651:
650:
647:
644:
640:
637:
635:
632:
628:
625:
623:
620:
616:
612:
609:
607:
604:
599:
595:
592:
590:
585:
580:
576:
572:
569:
567:
564:
560:
556:
553:
551:
548:
545:
541:
538:
536:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
514:
512:
509:
505:
502:
500:
497:
493:
490:
488:
485:
481:
477:
474:
472:
469:
466:
463:
456:
453:
451:
448:
444:
441:
439:
436:
432:
429:
427:
424:
420:
417:
415:
412:
409:
406:
401:
397:
394:
392:
389:
385:
381:
378:
377:
374:
371:
367:
366:
363:
360:
356:
353:
350:
347:
346:
339:
336:
332:
331:
330:
327:
323:
322:
321:
320:
317:
313:
308:
307:
306:
301:
298:
294:
290:
287:
285:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
259:
255:
252:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
236:Adrian~enwiki
233:
230:
229:
222:
219:
216:
207:
203:
199:
198:
197:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
161:
160:
159:
156:
153:
150:
141:
137:
133:
129:
126:
124:
121:
117:
112:
108:
105:
103:
99:
95:
94:Adrian~enwiki
91:
88:
86:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
50:Mailer Diablo
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
672:
669:
664:
652:
638:
631:Nigelthefish
626:
610:
593:
574:
570:
554:
539:
519:
515:
503:
491:
475:
454:
442:
430:
418:
395:
379:
348:
309:
304:
288:
264:
260:
231:
209:
184:
172:
143:
127:
111:CounterPunch
106:
89:
82:Jersey Devil
70:User:Striver
65:
45:
43:
31:
28:
657:JeffBurdges
573:. Notable.
457:per MLA. --
173:significant
59:Lila Rajiva
575:Ad hominem
528:Schizombie
508:Not my leg
311:799-1354.
281:Schizombie
559:Batmanand
532:Mmeinhart
423:Sandstein
398:, nn. --
384:Blnguyen
277:WP:POINT
206:WP:POINT
187:Then on
140:WP:POINT
132:WP:POINT
116:WP:POINT
74:WP:POINT
615:Bhumiya
594:Comment
542:as per
526:as per
478:as per
465:iva1979
335:Striver
316:Striver
289:Comment
136:WP:SOAP
128:Comment
120:Striver
90:Comment
643:rogerd
639:Delete
547:Sbohra
492:Delete
484:Vizjim
396:Delete
380:Delete
370:Sbohra
214:rodii
148:rodii
66:Delete
579:Krash
520:merge
411:e Ong
265:merge
261:Keep'
16:<
627:Keep
619:Talk
611:Keep
603:Mmx1
584:Talk
571:Keep
563:Talk
555:Keep
540:Keep
518:and
516:Keep
504:Keep
496:Mmx1
476:Keep
455:Keep
443:Keep
431:Keep
419:Keep
349:Keep
326:Mmx1
297:Mmx1
263:and
251:Mmx1
240:talk
232:Keep
193:Mmx1
107:Keep
98:talk
46:keep
522:in
447:MLA
400:Ter
267:in
72:'s
561:|
482:.
408:nc
386:|
314:--
242:)
217:·
211:·
151:·
145:·
142:.
100:)
80:)-
48:.
617:/
586:)
582:(
461:S
404:e
238:(
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.