258:, making it impossible to move information to complete the merge as the information is already there. I also noticed that there's no history I could find regarding the article passing or being put up for the AFC to be reviewed, nor is there any article information on the talk page regarding the class or level of importance the article conveys. I hope we could come to a consensus on this topic and put these contradictions to rest.
513:
if not, this was my first time coming across an article without any information regarding the article class or level of importance on the talk page nor any log of a AFC review being done. Also I'm keen on the deletion of this page because the information regarding the individual is already covered extensively here
332:
I understand, but what I'm trying to convey is that the information presented on this article's page is already on the page that it was to be merged with. I made a mistake in not realizing it earlier but all the information had been lifted from the page that was to receive the merge information. Just
512:
I think you've misunderstood what I've said, I understand the first bit 100 percent, but I was always under the impression that in order to publish a page you need to pass the AFC, where reviewers would undertake the vetted process of identifying if the article meets general notability guidelines or
442:
it altogether, but this is turning into a bit of a procedural mess. In any case, LilyPichu has some minor media notice in her line of work and that is sufficient for a mention over at the
OfflineTV article. This separate article tries to flesh things out with unreliable video links and information
536:
is not mandatory: the process is "intended to assist editors who cannot (e.g. non-registered or non-autoconfirmed users) or should not (e.g. people with a conflict of interest), create new articles directly into mainspace." Usually, when we merge one page into another, we leave the old page as a
253:
and failed to warrant a standalone article, the article comprises of many YouTube links. I noticed a couple of odd things regarding this article, after the merge consensus was met and the discussion was closed, (apart from new additions) I discovered that most, if not all the information on this
521:
thus I feel it's pointless just conveying the same information again, aside from that her work isn't notable in terms of what she has accomplished, these accomplishments have also been met by others in that space, who don't warrant their own article. I feel whatever is in here
573:
Oh I see, thank you for explaining and addressing the confusion I had, I actually wasn't aware of these factors including the doubts I had regarding the AFC, I'm comfortable with this redirect, now that I'm aware and understand what it's all about. Thank you!
475:
Aside from the fact of supporting deletion, can someone explain how this page made it to the main space in the first place, I can't find any history of an AFC review, nor any information on the talk page, is there another way? by moving perhaps?.
333:
to summarize, there's no point having this page around and going ahead with the merge as the article that was to receive the merge information, already has all of it because the editor copied the information form that page itself.
214:
541:
to the new one. This does not require deleting the old page. The old one acts as a hint to search engines (including the built-in one) that searches for, e.g. "LilyPichu", should be directed to, e.g.
411:
391:
494:
Any confirmed user can create pages in main space: it's how most pages are created. Why do you oppose redirecting? It seems like a useful search term at the very least.
286:
167:
371:
208:
351:
311:. I deprodded this article because the nom appeared to be asking for a redirect. If you want to merge and redirect, just do it. No need to delete anything.
114:
99:
546:
458:
174:
609:
94:
87:
17:
140:
135:
229:
144:
196:
108:
104:
57:
127:
633:
526:
is more than enough, the rest are just passing mentions, at least until she does something more notable of course
65:
40:
454:
190:
629:
579:
481:
338:
263:
36:
443:
about her personal life, which is not only non-notable but also comes with a "who cares?" quality. ---
186:
605:
419:
399:
379:
359:
294:
278:
61:
616:
583:
558:
503:
485:
463:
423:
403:
383:
363:
342:
320:
302:
267:
69:
222:
538:
445:
282:
236:
83:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
628:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
575:
554:
499:
477:
334:
316:
259:
246:
597:
415:
395:
375:
355:
290:
202:
131:
533:
250:
161:
550:
495:
312:
592:
542:
523:
518:
514:
435:
255:
254:
subject was copied and pasted from the subject's subsection on another page
123:
75:
53:
245:
I proposed this article for merging earlier as it did not seem to pass
624:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
545:. The redirect page can also be included in categories, e.g.
549:. That's why I'm recommending that the page not be deleted.
438:
as suggested by the nominator. I would not be opposed to
412:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
157:
153:
149:
221:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
636:). No further edits should be made to this page.
410:Note: This discussion has been included in the
392:list of Video games-related deletion discussions
390:Note: This discussion has been included in the
370:Note: This discussion has been included in the
350:Note: This discussion has been included in the
287:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 11
56:. Consensus that this person is not notable. (
372:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
235:
8:
115:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
409:
389:
369:
352:list of Women-related deletion discussions
349:
7:
547:Category:Twitch (service) streamers
24:
100:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
285:). I have transcluded it to
277:This AfD was not correctly
90:(AfD)? Read these primers!
653:
519:OfflineTV#SleightlyMusical
617:16:00, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
584:18:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
559:18:05, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
504:17:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
486:16:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
464:14:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
424:20:00, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
404:19:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
384:19:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
364:19:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
343:18:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
321:18:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
303:18:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
268:17:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
70:01:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
626:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
88:Articles for deletion
593:OfflineTV#LilyPichu
543:OfflineTV#LilyPichu
524:OfflineTV#LilyPichu
515:OfflineTV#LilyPichu
436:OfflineTV#LilyPichu
256:OfflineTV#LilyPichu
54:OfflineTV#LilyPichu
275:Automated comment:
595:: Per nominator.
449:
426:
406:
386:
366:
305:
301:
105:Guide to deletion
95:How to contribute
58:non-admin closure
644:
615:
613:
600:
462:
447:
297:
296:Talk to my owner
292:
273:
240:
239:
225:
177:
165:
147:
85:
34:
652:
651:
647:
646:
645:
643:
642:
641:
640:
634:deletion review
614:
603:
598:
596:
444:
300:
295:
182:
173:
138:
122:
119:
82:
79:
62:Devonian Wombat
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
650:
648:
639:
638:
620:
619:
602:
586:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
528:
527:
507:
506:
489:
488:
467:
466:
428:
427:
407:
387:
367:
347:
346:
345:
324:
323:
306:
293:
243:
242:
179:
118:
117:
112:
102:
97:
80:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
649:
637:
635:
631:
627:
622:
621:
618:
611:
607:
601:
594:
590:
587:
585:
581:
577:
572:
571:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
535:
532:
531:
530:
529:
525:
520:
516:
511:
510:
509:
508:
505:
501:
497:
493:
492:
491:
490:
487:
483:
479:
474:
471:
470:
469:
468:
465:
460:
456:
452:
451:
441:
437:
433:
430:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
408:
405:
401:
397:
393:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
368:
365:
361:
357:
353:
348:
344:
340:
336:
331:
328:
327:
326:
325:
322:
318:
314:
310:
307:
304:
298:
291:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:
270:
269:
265:
261:
257:
252:
248:
238:
234:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
188:
185:
184:Find sources:
180:
176:
172:
169:
163:
159:
155:
151:
146:
142:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
120:
116:
113:
110:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
92:
91:
89:
84:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
625:
623:
588:
472:
446:
439:
431:
329:
308:
281:to the log (
274:
244:
232:
226:
218:
211:
205:
199:
193:
183:
170:
81:
49:
47:
31:
28:
576:Delta fiver
539:WP:REDIRECT
478:Delta fiver
335:Delta fiver
279:transcluded
260:Delta fiver
249:or the BLP
209:free images
448:DOOMSDAYER
416:Lightburst
396:Lightburst
376:Lightburst
356:Lightburst
630:talk page
517:and here
247:WP:SIGCOV
124:LilyPichu
76:LilyPichu
37:talk page
632:or in a
610:ICE CUBE
589:Redirect
582:) (UTC)
484:) (UTC)
459:Contribs
440:deleting
432:Redirect
341:) (UTC)
266:) (UTC)
168:View log
109:glossary
50:Redirect
39:or in a
599:ASTIG😎
473:Comment
330:Comment
309:Comment
299::Online
215:WP refs
203:scholar
141:protect
136:history
86:New to
551:pburka
534:WP:AFC
496:pburka
313:pburka
283:step 3
251:WP:GNG
187:Google
145:delete
606:ICE T
230:JSTOR
191:books
175:Stats
162:views
154:watch
150:links
16:<
580:talk
555:talk
500:talk
482:talk
455:Talk
420:talk
400:talk
380:talk
360:talk
339:talk
317:talk
289:. —
264:talk
223:FENS
197:news
158:logs
132:talk
128:edit
66:talk
591:to
450:520
434:to
237:TWL
166:– (
52:to
608:•
557:)
502:)
422:)
414:.
402:)
394:.
382:)
374:.
362:)
354:.
319:)
217:)
160:|
156:|
152:|
148:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
68:)
60:)
612:)
604:(
578:(
553:(
498:(
480:(
461:)
457:|
453:(
418:(
398:(
378:(
358:(
337:(
315:(
262:(
241:)
233:·
227:·
219:·
212:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
189:(
181:(
178:)
171:·
164:)
126:(
111:)
107:(
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.