619:. The news coverage is sparse and mostly redundant. The only potential claim to notability is being the oldest person who lived in a small country (I don't see NZ as a "substantial country", as someone said above, if it has a population smaller than cities I've lived in). I just don't see how the standard of "received significant coverage" as required by
347:, with no information other than she's lived a long time and had an extremely ordinary life. Other than updating her age, they're all a rehash of the same information easily recognized (at least on people with less than a 3-digit age) as thoroughly routine. It has nothing to do with liking or disliking the subject.
424:
coverage of her that fails to demonstrate notability and there is no notability guideline that "the fourth oldest x" is notable (The article incorrectly claims she is the oldest in the country, but the NZ Herald says she is the 4th oldest). The content of the article is pretty much just trivia on how
265:
AFD nomination on spurious grounds as coverage of a 110 year old is hardly routine and the article already contains significant coverage in reliable sources such as The New
Zealand Herald. Also these articles are not straightforward as a number of them have gone to deletion review where there has
425:
she relates to her family's death dates or false claims to a longevity milestone, with some fluff about where she has lived and her secret to longevity. There is almost nothing actually said about her in an article that is supposed to be about her, which demonstrates how the article fails
547:
as coverage is local and routine birthday articles. Even if these local articles made her "notable", there's nothing in this article that can't easily be summarised on a list as it won't expand beyond "Born, got married, had kids, grandkids, etc and got old".
280:
It's a couple of one-off articles. That's the definition of routine. And the DRVs in question had a huge and well-documented problem with massive off-wiki canvassing, so they're mostly useless for determining the actual consensus on these articles.
492:, but the fourth. There is also no policy or guideline that the oldest anything is notable or entitled to an article on Knowledge. The oldest person in the U.S. doesn't even have an article because that is never an automatic grant of notability.
209:
240:
Contested PROD, on spurious grounds. Non-notable supercentenarian. As established through many discussions simply being the oldest person in a country is not inherently notable, and the sources are simple
162:
371:
203:
390:
488:
New
Zealand is a small remote country and this individual is not even the oldest living person in New Zealand according to this very recent reliable source
109:
352:
286:
250:
94:
616:
430:
348:
282:
246:
510:
does she pass? Definitely not 3, definitely hasn't made any contributions to a specific field and "being old" doesn't grant awards/honors.
169:
462:
Being the oldest person in a substantial country like NZ is obviously not routine; it's a unique distinction and so the subject passes
135:
130:
139:
89:
82:
17:
122:
224:
489:
191:
313:
nomination based on an interpretation of past consensus unless you can point to a policy reason for deletion, perhaps in
103:
99:
566:
668:
471:
40:
305:
from at least 2013-2018 (link by
Newshunter12 below) so its not routine coverage and the subject easily passes
185:
646:
553:
515:
651:
632:
607:
587:
557:
519:
501:
497:
475:
454:
442:
438:
401:
382:
358:
326:
292:
275:
256:
181:
64:
664:
322:
310:
271:
36:
602:
485:
467:
450:– No independent notability established beyond her exceptional longevity. We have tables for this. —
231:
540:
302:
217:
641:
628:
549:
511:
126:
493:
434:
421:
394:
375:
242:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
663:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
598:
536:
507:
463:
426:
318:
267:
197:
417:
578:
55:
624:
620:
544:
413:
314:
306:
118:
70:
344:
156:
451:
343:
The sources in question are 4 news articles indicating she's celebrating
429:. Her age, life dates, and nationality are already recorded on the
659:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
569:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
601:. Insufficient encyclopedic content to justify an article.
152:
148:
144:
216:
575:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
671:). No further edits should be made to this page.
389:Note: This discussion has been included in the
372:list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions
370:Note: This discussion has been included in the
230:
8:
615:or redirect to list where she is mentioned,
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
391:list of Women-related deletion discussions
388:
369:
617:List of supercentenarians by continent
431:List of supercentenarians by continent
7:
266:been many opposing views, regards
24:
433:, where they are easier to view.
349:The Blade of the Northern Lights
283:The Blade of the Northern Lights
247:The Blade of the Northern Lights
95:Introduction to deletion process
506:Which of the three criteria of
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
65:18:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
652:22:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
633:17:02, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
608:16:50, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
588:16:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
558:09:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
520:09:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
502:13:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
476:09:57, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
455:09:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
443:23:27, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
402:22:13, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
383:22:13, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
359:00:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
345:One More Day Above The Roses
327:15:55, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
293:16:48, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
276:15:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
257:15:14, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
597:As per nom and others. Per
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
688:
661:Please do not modify it.
535:to appropriate list per
32:Please do not modify it.
420:because there is only
309:. Therefore this is a
83:Articles for deletion
412:This article fails
303:sustained coverage
590:
586:
404:
385:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
679:
649:
605:
585:
583:
576:
574:
572:
570:
399:
380:
355:
289:
253:
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
687:
686:
682:
681:
680:
678:
677:
676:
675:
669:deletion review
645:
604:DerbyCountyinNZ
603:
595:Delete/Redirect
591:
579:
577:
565:
563:
395:
376:
353:
287:
251:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
685:
683:
674:
673:
655:
654:
635:
610:
573:
562:
561:
560:
525:
524:
523:
522:
504:
479:
478:
457:
445:
406:
405:
386:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
311:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
296:
295:
238:
237:
174:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
684:
672:
670:
666:
662:
657:
656:
653:
650:
648:
643:
642:SportingFlyer
639:
636:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
611:
609:
606:
600:
596:
593:
592:
589:
584:
582:
571:
568:
559:
555:
551:
550:CommanderLinx
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
527:
526:
521:
517:
513:
512:CommanderLinx
509:
505:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
482:
481:
480:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
458:
456:
453:
449:
446:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
407:
403:
400:
398:
392:
387:
384:
381:
379:
373:
368:
360:
356:
350:
346:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:
298:
297:
294:
290:
284:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
264:
261:
260:
259:
258:
254:
248:
244:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:Linda Wiggins
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
71:Linda Wiggins
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
660:
658:
644:
637:
612:
594:
580:
564:
541:WP:PERMASTUB
532:
528:
494:Newshunter12
459:
447:
435:Newshunter12
409:
397:CAPTAIN RAJU
396:
378:CAPTAIN RAJU
377:
262:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
76:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
319:Atlantic306
268:Atlantic306
204:free images
581:Sandstein
422:WP:ROUTINE
317:, regards
245:coverage.
58:Sandstein
665:talk page
640:per nom.
623:is met.
599:WP:NOPAGE
537:WP:NOPAGE
508:WP:ANYBIO
486:Andrew D.
468:Andrew D.
464:WP:ANYBIO
427:WP:NOPAGE
301:There is
37:talk page
667:or in a
625:TimBuck2
567:Relisted
543:. Fails
533:Redirect
418:WP:BIO1E
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
243:routine
210:WP refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
638:Delete
621:WP:BIO
613:Delete
545:WP:GNG
529:Delete
448:Delete
414:WP:GNG
410:Delete
354:話して下さい
315:WP:NOT
307:WP:GNG
288:話して下さい
252:話して下さい
182:Google
140:delete
50:delete
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
647:talk
629:talk
554:talk
539:and
516:talk
498:talk
472:talk
460:Keep
439:talk
416:and
323:talk
272:talk
263:Keep
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
531:or
452:JFG
232:TWL
161:– (
631:)
556:)
518:)
500:)
474:)
466:.
441:)
393:.
374:.
357:)
325:)
291:)
274:)
255:)
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
627:(
552:(
514:(
496:(
490:1
484:@
470:(
437:(
351:(
321:(
285:(
270:(
249:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.