545:, I haven't searched for sources online yet, so I am not voting just yet. However, I do disagree with the statement above that many of the already-cited sources have significant coverage. Coverage cited in the article consists of interviews in student publications and routine political candidacy press. The only citation that I see so far that clearly contributes toward GNG is
941:
Rarely do major publications like Vanity Fair and The
Washington Post write in-depth profiles on campaign staffers. It is because she was notable and significant in her own right that she received the coverage. Also the youngest Asian-American to ever run for federal office. Please do not erase that
769:
position, which is distinct from arguing that it doesn't meet GNG; if we were to follow secondary source's coverage of the subject when writing an article, we'd end up with an article almost entirely about said
Twitter drama, which I don't think makes sense as a standalone article that is ostensibly
601:
My bad on the NBC piece, I saw that it was election coverage for the subjects' failed congressional run and mentally wrote it off. I see now that it did have enough biographical information that it can be considered nontrivial. I'm still not thrilled that the available coverage is either 1)
568:
It's fair enough if you don't like the interview sources, though I would say some are reliable sources, but nevertheless the NBC source is certainly reliable together with the
Independent. Coverage in other reliable sources includes:
496:
Yes, there is a great deal of routine coverage. But there are also multiple reliable sources from 2015 to the present day, some of which have been provided in this discussion (notably
Independent and NBC), that do represent
1023:
1022:- Significant political figure who has been around for years and will continue to play a role in the 2020 presidential campaign. Vanity Fair recently wrote a profile on her, in addition to The Washington Post:
602:
borderline ROUTINE election coverage for a failed attempt to become the youngest US congressperson, 2) interviews or 3) glancing coverage that's much more about Bernie vs. Biden than it is about the subject.
203:
279:
683:
1061:
649:, having searched for sources online now, while there's a flurry of recent coverage, virtually all of it is about a Twitter skirmish related to the 2020 election. I'm leaning toward a
676:
Lots of sources including NBC and the
Independent. Other reliable sources not included include Fox News and The Philadelphia Inquirer. Has done a lot and works for Biden’s campaign.
546:
1024:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/the-congressional-kid-how-a-millennial-plans-to-make-it-to-the-capitol/2015/08/14/cec02162-3f62-11e5-9561-4b3dc93e3b9a_story.html
337:
259:
156:
703:
197:
701:
922:
her March 2020 "interview" "stir." And that stir was minimal, despite the best efforts of some partisans to puff it up into a scandal that could get some press.
570:
318:
299:
574:
1041:
957:
103:
88:
770:
a biography. IMO it makes much more sense to cover that incident in the context of existing articles about the 2020 election and related culture wars.
765:
I had already seen that source; it provides extremely detailed coverage of a
Twitter kerfluffle with unclear long-term consequences. I maintain my
578:
881:
failure. This isn't about her, it's about the stir her interview caused. And campaign staffers do interviews all the time, and it is so
687:
1065:
163:
993:
1037:
953:
906:, enough to write a good bio, starting with 1) substantial interest during her failed 2016 Congressional campaign including in
83:
76:
17:
798:
is the rationale of this nomination, so the deletion nomination fails if this is shown not to be the case. Nevertheless, your
748:
370:
cited in the article in which the subject has significant coverage and many more can be found (many google news sources).
989:
976:
129:
124:
218:
133:
97:
93:
185:
367:
1087:
116:
40:
1033:
949:
726:
Clearly notable and quite involved with the 2020 election and other political events in the foreseeable future.
581:. This is by no means exhaustive, just a few examples. Demonstrating long lasting coverage around the world.
972:
927:
756:
731:
179:
1083:
455:
Yet sources with significant coverage do exist and not just for recent events. They're not hard to find.
36:
705:
1057:
1029:
945:
852:
812:
710:
679:
628:
591:
522:
465:
414:
380:
175:
1069:
1045:
1014:
1010:
997:
980:
961:
931:
894:
857:
835:
817:
781:
760:
735:
718:
691:
668:
633:
613:
596:
559:
527:
491:
470:
442:
419:
385:
348:
329:
310:
291:
271:
251:
211:
58:
923:
890:
874:
752:
727:
487:
438:
287:
267:
247:
225:
882:
479:
341:
322:
303:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1082:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
799:
766:
650:
509:
498:
363:
878:
846:
806:
622:
585:
516:
475:
459:
430:
408:
374:
1006:
239:
191:
903:
899:
886:
828:
795:
774:
744:
661:
606:
552:
506:
502:
483:
434:
283:
263:
243:
235:
120:
433:, BEFORE was done. I was not impressed. Most of them are insignificant coverage. –
150:
654:
54:
910:
and 2) in
February 2020 her feud with Bernie Bros that was covered by the
112:
64:
482:
coverage are not hard to find. I don't see any significant coverage. –
653:
decision, perhaps integrating coverage about her into a section of
1078:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
823:
I was just replying here because I got pinged in that comment.
280:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
146:
142:
138:
366:
was not done prior to this nomination, there are many
210:
338:list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1090:). No further edits should be made to this page.
700:Notable political figure. Other sources include
336:Note: This discussion has been included in the
317:Note: This discussion has been included in the
298:Note: This discussion has been included in the
278:Note: This discussion has been included in the
260:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
258:Note: This discussion has been included in the
224:
8:
104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
1055:
1027:
988:several reliable sources for the subject.
943:
677:
335:
319:list of China-related deletion discussions
316:
300:list of Women-related deletion discussions
297:
277:
257:
234:Not a notable individual. Sourcing fails
971:coverage from several notable sources.
841:No worries, sorry to hijack your reply.
684:2600:1002:B017:11DB:60A9:FBEB:BBB1:C121
1062:2601:145:4380:8700:E07F:ADCB:C100:7B0F
885:that none of this is reaching GNG. –
7:
501:. I feel there is enough to satisfy
904:significant coverage in multiple RS
747:see also in-depth article in 2020
24:
1054:- Significant political figure
89:Introduction to deletion process
1005:- Notable political figure. -
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
579:another NBC article from 2015
512:leaning is not unreasonable.
478:, correction: sources with
79:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1107:
1070:05:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
1046:03:50, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
1015:22:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
998:20:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
981:17:41, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
962:04:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
932:05:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
895:19:03, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
858:20:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
836:20:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
818:20:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
782:17:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
761:17:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
528:20:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
492:19:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
59:12:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
736:22:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
719:21:19, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
692:18:34, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
669:17:22, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
634:17:37, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
614:17:34, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
597:17:24, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
560:16:39, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
471:21:26, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
443:21:22, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
420:17:37, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
386:16:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
349:15:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
330:15:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
311:15:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
292:15:40, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
272:15:40, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
252:15:40, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
1080:Please do not modify it.
575:South China Morning Post
32:Please do not modify it.
990:Iamreallygoodatcheckers
802:position is reasonable.
362:clearly notable, seems
657:or a similar article.
1034:Napoleonjosephine2020
950:Napoleonjosephine2020
77:Articles for deletion
618:Fair enough. Cheers
368:WP:Reliable sources
973:Royal Autumn Crest
1072:
1060:comment added by
1048:
1032:comment added by
1026:. 13 March 2020
964:
948:comment added by
856:
842:
824:
816:
694:
682:comment added by
632:
595:
526:
469:
418:
404:
384:
351:
332:
313:
294:
274:
94:Guide to deletion
84:How to contribute
1098:
843:
840:
822:
803:
713:
619:
582:
513:
456:
405:
394:
371:
346:
327:
308:
229:
228:
214:
166:
154:
136:
74:
34:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1088:deletion review
827:
773:
711:
660:
605:
551:
342:
323:
304:
171:
162:
127:
111:
108:
71:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1104:
1102:
1093:
1092:
1074:
1073:
1049:
1017:
1000:
983:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
825:
787:
786:
785:
784:
771:
743:passes WP:GNG
738:
721:
695:
671:
658:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
603:
563:
562:
549:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
448:
447:
446:
445:
425:
424:
423:
422:
389:
388:
353:
352:
333:
314:
295:
275:
232:
231:
168:
107:
106:
101:
91:
86:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1103:
1091:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1053:
1050:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1025:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1001:
999:
995:
991:
987:
984:
982:
978:
974:
970:
967:
966:
965:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
933:
929:
925:
924:HouseOfChange
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
898:
897:
896:
892:
888:
884:
880:
876:
875:HouseOfChange
873:
872:
871:
870:
859:
854:
850:
849:
848:
839:
838:
837:
834:
833:
832:
821:
820:
819:
814:
810:
809:
808:
801:
797:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
783:
780:
779:
778:
768:
764:
763:
762:
758:
754:
753:HouseOfChange
750:
746:
742:
739:
737:
733:
729:
728:Pennsylvania2
725:
722:
720:
716:
715:
714:
706:
704:
702:
699:
696:
693:
689:
685:
681:
675:
672:
670:
667:
666:
665:
656:
652:
648:
645:
644:
635:
630:
626:
625:
624:
617:
616:
615:
612:
611:
610:
600:
599:
598:
593:
589:
588:
587:
580:
576:
572:
567:
566:
565:
564:
561:
558:
557:
556:
547:
544:
541:
540:
529:
524:
520:
519:
518:
511:
508:
504:
500:
495:
494:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
474:
473:
472:
467:
463:
462:
461:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
444:
440:
436:
432:
429:
428:
427:
426:
421:
416:
412:
411:
410:
402:
398:
395:changed from
393:
392:
391:
390:
387:
382:
378:
377:
376:
369:
365:
361:
358:
355:
354:
350:
347:
345:
339:
334:
331:
328:
326:
320:
315:
312:
309:
307:
301:
296:
293:
289:
285:
281:
276:
273:
269:
265:
261:
256:
255:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
238:. Also fails
237:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
165:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
78:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1079:
1077:
1056:— Preceding
1051:
1028:— Preceding
1019:
1002:
985:
968:
944:— Preceding
940:
919:
915:
911:
907:
845:
844:
830:
829:
805:
804:
776:
775:
740:
723:
709:
708:
697:
678:— Preceding
673:
663:
662:
646:
621:
620:
608:
607:
584:
583:
554:
553:
542:
515:
514:
458:
457:
407:
406:
400:
396:
373:
372:
359:
356:
344:CAPTAIN RAJU
343:
325:CAPTAIN RAJU
324:
306:CAPTAIN RAJU
305:
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
159:
70:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1052:Speedy Keep
1020:Speedy Keep
916:Vanity Fair
794:Failure of
749:Vanity Fair
674:Speedy keep
655:Bernie Bros
647:Weak delete
505:, although
397:speedy keep
198:free images
942:history.
883:WP:ROUTINE
847:Polyamorph
807:Polyamorph
623:Polyamorph
586:Polyamorph
517:Polyamorph
480:WP:ROUTINE
476:Polyamorph
460:Polyamorph
431:Polyamorph
409:Polyamorph
375:Polyamorph
1084:talk page
1007:MA Javadi
902:There is
800:WP:NOPAGE
767:WP:NOPAGE
651:WP:NOPAGE
510:WP:NOPAGE
499:WP:SIGCOV
364:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
1086:or in a
1058:unsigned
1042:contribs
1030:unsigned
958:contribs
946:unsigned
912:Inquirer
900:Muboshgu
887:Muboshgu
879:WP:BLP1E
877:, clear
831:Rosguill
826:signed,
777:Rosguill
772:signed,
745:Rosguill
680:unsigned
664:Rosguill
659:signed,
609:Rosguill
604:signed,
571:Inquirer
555:Rosguill
550:signed,
507:Rosguill
484:Muboshgu
435:Muboshgu
284:Muboshgu
264:Muboshgu
244:Muboshgu
157:View log
113:Lindy Li
98:glossary
65:Lindy Li
39:or in a
543:Comment
240:WP:NPOL
204:WP refs
192:scholar
130:protect
125:history
75:New to
920:before
796:WP:GNG
503:WP:GNG
357:Speedy
236:WP:GNG
176:Google
134:delete
219:JSTOR
180:books
164:Stats
151:views
143:watch
139:links
16:<
1066:talk
1038:talk
1011:talk
1003:Keep
994:talk
986:Keep
977:talk
969:Keep
954:talk
928:talk
914:and
908:WaPo
891:talk
853:talk
813:talk
757:talk
741:Keep
732:talk
724:Keep
712:EDDY
698:Keep
688:talk
629:talk
592:talk
523:talk
488:talk
466:talk
439:talk
415:talk
401:keep
381:talk
360:Keep
288:talk
282:. –
268:talk
262:. –
248:talk
242:. –
212:FENS
186:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
55:Tone
50:keep
399:to
226:TWL
155:– (
1068:)
1044:)
1040:•
1013:)
996:)
979:)
960:)
956:•
930:)
918:,
893:)
759:)
751:.
734:)
717:~
690:)
577:,
573:,
548:.
490:)
441:)
340:.
321:.
302:.
290:)
270:)
250:)
206:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
52:.
1064:(
1036:(
1009:(
992:(
975:(
952:(
926:(
889:(
855:)
851:(
815:)
811:(
755:(
730:(
707:~
686:(
631:)
627:(
594:)
590:(
525:)
521:(
486:(
468:)
464:(
437:(
417:)
413:(
403:.
383:)
379:(
286:(
266:(
246:(
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
160:·
153:)
115:(
100:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.