Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Liselle Terret - Knowledge

Source 📝

480: 475:. As a side note, citations are usually a poor indicator of academic notability in the humanities, and one has to look at other factors. In this case I feel that most of the subject's notability comes from her theatrical work, and thus she should be primarily evaluated on 214: 310: 492:
University Award for Student Diversity and Widening Participation. (I have added the relevant info, with refs to the article.) Overall, I think there is a reasonable case here for passing
376: 167: 572: 208: 483: 354: 288: 259:
Her highest citation count is 290, but that was for a work in which she contributed a chapter (Applied Theatre). Without that, her highest citation count is 9
332: 114: 99: 174: 140: 135: 479:
grounds. There are examples of in-depth detailed coverage of her personally and her theatrical work. E.g. pages 127-129 in this book
144: 127: 94: 87: 17: 514:
I find the first two examples provided here to be good examples of significant coverage and would now consider myself to lean
229: 196: 486: 108: 104: 488:. The latter interview is conducted because the program she lauched, The Performance Making Diploma, won the 2015 265:
has received 290 citations--it is not clear that the chapter specifically authored by Terret was cited. DePROD by
606: 456: 40: 190: 589: 554: 529: 505: 462: 420: 390: 368: 346: 324: 302: 280: 186: 69: 602: 568: 36: 236: 550: 453: 266: 406: 250: 222: 131: 585: 83: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
601:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
564: 202: 65: 546: 501: 53: 542: 123: 75: 522: 493: 476: 436: 410: 402: 383: 361: 339: 317: 295: 273: 254: 246: 57: 581: 489: 161: 431: 428:
Her "neo-burlesque" work appears to pass GNG as notable, at first glance. See:
61: 497: 496:, taking into account the other sources already in the article. 597:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
442:
Naked Exhibitionism: Gendered Performance and Public Exposure
311:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
157: 153: 149: 221: 563:Like Rosguill, I am persuaded by Nsk92's findings. 377:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
485:, an interview with her in this scholarly journal 437:https://royalcourttheatre.com/cast/doris-la-trine/ 580:- these new sources have established notability. 261:. However, in my own search, it appears that the 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 609:). No further edits should be made to this page. 375:Note: This discussion has been included in the 353:Note: This discussion has been included in the 331:Note: This discussion has been included in the 309:Note: This discussion has been included in the 287:Note: This discussion has been included in the 432:https://burdy.co/featured-act/doris-la-trine/ 235: 8: 355:list of Theatre-related deletion discussions 115:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 545:. Notability will have to found elsewhere. 444:Chapter "Cross Dressing and Grrrrly Shows". 289:list of People-related deletion discussions 374: 352: 333:list of Women-related deletion discussions 330: 308: 286: 56:, but has enough coverage in general for 258: 249:, no evidence that the subject meets 7: 24: 100:Introduction to deletion process 482:, p. 3 in this journal article 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 590:17:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC) 70:20:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC) 1: 573:17:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 555:22:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 530:21:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 506:20:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 463:19:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 421:19:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 391:18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 369:18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 347:18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 325:18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 303:18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 281:18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 253:. When nominating for PROD, 90:(AfD)? Read these primers! 626: 52:. Possibly not there via 599:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 541:. Certainly no pass of 88:Articles for deletion 466: 393: 371: 349: 327: 305: 105:Guide to deletion 95:How to contribute 617: 461: 417: 414: 240: 239: 225: 177: 165: 147: 85: 34: 625: 624: 620: 619: 618: 616: 615: 614: 613: 607:deletion review 521: 415: 412: 382: 360: 338: 316: 294: 272: 267:Rich Farmbrough 182: 173: 138: 122: 119: 82: 79: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 623: 621: 612: 611: 593: 592: 575: 558: 535: 534: 533: 532: 519: 509: 508: 469: 468: 467: 451:All the best: 448: 447: 446: 445: 439: 434: 423: 395: 394: 380: 372: 358: 350: 336: 328: 314: 306: 292: 270: 245:Does not meet 243: 242: 179: 124:Liselle Terret 118: 117: 112: 102: 97: 80: 78: 76:Liselle Terret 73: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 622: 610: 608: 604: 600: 595: 594: 591: 587: 583: 579: 576: 574: 570: 566: 562: 559: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 537: 536: 531: 528: 527: 526: 517: 513: 512: 511: 510: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 484: 481: 478: 474: 471: 470: 464: 459: 458: 455: 450: 449: 443: 440: 438: 435: 433: 430: 429: 427: 424: 422: 419: 418: 408: 404: 400: 397: 396: 392: 389: 388: 387: 378: 373: 370: 367: 366: 365: 356: 351: 348: 345: 344: 343: 334: 329: 326: 323: 322: 321: 312: 307: 304: 301: 300: 299: 290: 285: 284: 283: 282: 279: 278: 277: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 238: 234: 231: 228: 224: 220: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 188: 185: 184:Find sources: 180: 176: 172: 169: 163: 159: 155: 151: 146: 142: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 120: 116: 113: 110: 106: 103: 101: 98: 96: 93: 92: 91: 89: 84: 77: 74: 72: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 598: 596: 577: 560: 538: 524: 523: 515: 490:The Guardian 472: 452: 441: 425: 411: 407:WP:NACADEMIC 398: 385: 384: 363: 362: 341: 340: 319: 318: 297: 296: 275: 274: 262: 251:WP:NACADEMIC 244: 232: 226: 218: 211: 205: 199: 193: 183: 170: 81: 49: 47: 31: 28: 209:free images 565:XOR'easter 547:Xxanthippe 457:Farmbrough 603:talk page 37:talk page 605:or in a 525:Rosguill 520:signed, 401:- Fails 386:Rosguill 381:signed, 364:Rosguill 359:signed, 342:Rosguill 337:signed, 320:Rosguill 315:signed, 298:Rosguill 293:signed, 276:Rosguill 271:signed, 255:Onel5969 168:View log 109:glossary 54:WP:NPROF 39:or in a 582:Mujinga 543:WP:Prof 539:Comment 215:WP refs 203:scholar 141:protect 136:history 86:New to 494:WP:GNG 477:WP:GNG 403:WP:GNG 399:Delete 247:WP:GNG 187:Google 145:delete 62:RL0919 58:WP:GNG 498:Nsk92 257:said 230:JSTOR 191:books 175:Stats 162:views 154:watch 150:links 16:< 586:talk 578:Keep 569:talk 561:Keep 551:talk 516:keep 502:talk 473:Keep 454:Rich 426:Keep 416:5969 413:Onel 405:and 263:book 223:FENS 197:news 158:logs 132:talk 128:edit 66:talk 50:keep 237:TWL 166:– ( 588:) 571:) 553:) 518:. 504:) 409:. 379:. 357:. 335:. 313:. 291:. 269:. 217:) 160:| 156:| 152:| 148:| 143:| 139:| 134:| 130:| 68:) 60:. 584:( 567:( 557:. 549:( 500:( 465:. 460:, 241:) 233:· 227:· 219:· 212:· 206:· 200:· 194:· 189:( 181:( 178:) 171:· 164:) 126:( 111:) 107:( 64:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
WP:NPROF
WP:GNG
RL0919
talk
20:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Liselle Terret

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Liselle Terret
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.