362:
316:
It certainly can. "Redirect" is a slightly different form of "Delete", whereby a redirect is left behind after deletion. It can also be transwikied; but not to
Wikidata or Wikiversity. (Wikidata's nature does not support this anyway.) However, if you mean merged instead of redirected, no, thanks to
366:
I wish there were more people like. The majority of people so far care-freely used "redirect" to mean "merge and redirect" and "notability" to mean "fame", "due weight" or lots of other thing. I certainly didn't say meant policy conflict; only
Software Wiki seems a more appropriate target and
389:, so we will not send the content there. As far as transwiki is concerned, Wikiversity is probably the only candidate. Redirection is not normally preceded by page deletion. The content would be preserved in the page history because NOTCHANGELOG isn't a grounds for
339:
I meant exactly what I said. If I had meant to use the word "merge", I would have done so. Wikiversity will accept almost anything that is outside the scope of the other projects. In what way would this conflict with
Wikiversity's content policies?
170:
321:. Forcing readers to read such a list is cruel anyway. (I still have occasional nightmares about those stupid tables we have to memorize in school, only to forget them after the exam.) Best regards,
164:
123:
393:. The reason for this is probably that we don't like to delete information that we might conceivably want to use later (WP:R and WP:PRESERVE). The mere existence of a list doesn't
262:
96:
91:
421:
100:
441:
83:
226:
130:
386:
185:
152:
87:
367:
Wikiversity like the least suitable target. (Refer to the nightmare part of my last message.) But please, suit yourself. Best regards,
17:
537:
504:
480:
453:
433:
406:
376:
349:
330:
307:
290:
254:
218:
65:
146:
79:
71:
521:
517:
279:
243:
142:
516:
This article is a clear example of a changelog and worse, is redundant with a lot of the information already presented in
298:
Why can't this be redirected to the list in the main article? Why can't this be transwikied to wikidata or wikiversity?
556:
192:
40:
469:
318:
202:
158:
372:
326:
284:
248:
214:
552:
533:
501:
36:
205:
because it entirely consists of a list of releases and dates, irrelevant of their significance and
178:
490:
390:
402:
368:
345:
322:
303:
274:
238:
210:
449:
429:
60:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
551:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
529:
472:
guidance. This more detailed coverage is problematic. Maybe some of the refs can be used in
206:
397:
anyone to read it and cruelty to readers isn't a grounds for deletion or anything else.
477:
473:
465:
398:
341:
299:
267:
231:
445:
425:
54:
117:
493:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
209:. A shorter policy-compliant list is already available in the main article.
524:, maybe some refs? In principle a redirect is fine, but I don't think
358:
Oh, great. I love people who are careful about choosing their words.
545:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113:
109:
105:
177:
500:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
191:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
559:). No further edits should be made to this page.
263:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
422:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
476:but a full merge is not really appropriate. ~
442:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
440:Note: This debate has been included in the
420:Note: This debate has been included in the
261:Note: This debate has been included in the
225:Note: This debate has been included in the
520:. I don't see much of value to merge into
439:
419:
260:
227:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
224:
528:is a particularly likely search term. --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
359:
468:appears adequate and in line with
24:
360:
526:List of .NET Framework versions
80:List of .NET Framework versions
72:List of .NET Framework versions
538:18:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
522:.NET Framework version history
518:.NET Framework version history
505:12:36, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
481:23:17, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
66:15:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
1:
454:00:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
434:00:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
407:07:49, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
377:05:46, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
350:02:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
331:01:25, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
308:17:56, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
291:14:09, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
255:14:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
219:13:52, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
576:
548:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
385:Software Wiki is not a
474:.NET_Framework#History
466:.NET_Framework#History
48:The result was
507:
456:
436:
391:revision deletion
293:
257:
201:Article violates
567:
550:
499:
495:
365:
364:
363:
289:
272:
253:
236:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
575:
574:
570:
569:
568:
566:
565:
564:
563:
557:deletion review
546:
488:
470:WP:NOTCHANGELOG
361:
319:WP:NOTCHANGELOG
268:
266:
232:
230:
203:WP:NOTCHANGELOG
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
573:
571:
562:
561:
541:
540:
510:
509:
508:
497:
496:
485:
484:
483:
458:
457:
437:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
380:
379:
353:
352:
334:
333:
311:
310:
295:
294:
258:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
572:
560:
558:
554:
549:
543:
542:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
512:
511:
506:
503:
498:
494:
492:
487:
486:
482:
479:
475:
471:
467:
464:- Summary in
463:
460:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
438:
435:
431:
427:
423:
418:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
383:
382:
381:
378:
374:
370:
369:Codename Lisa
357:
356:
355:
354:
351:
347:
343:
338:
337:
336:
335:
332:
328:
324:
323:Codename Lisa
320:
315:
314:
313:
312:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
292:
288:
287:
283:
282:
278:
277:
273:
271:
264:
259:
256:
252:
251:
247:
246:
242:
241:
237:
235:
228:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
211:Codename Lisa
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
62:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
547:
544:
525:
513:
502:NorthAmerica
489:
461:
394:
285:
280:
275:
269:
249:
244:
239:
233:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
59:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
530:Mark viking
387:WMF project
165:free images
207:due weight
553:talk page
446:• Gene93k
426:• Gene93k
286:GuestBook
250:GuestBook
37:talk page
555:or in a
491:Relisted
399:James500
342:James500
300:James500
281:Contribs
270:Ascii002
245:Contribs
234:Ascii002
124:View log
39:or in a
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
55:postdlf
514:Delete
462:Delete
143:Google
101:delete
50:delete
395:force
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
534:talk
478:KvnG
450:talk
430:talk
403:talk
373:talk
346:talk
327:talk
304:talk
276:Talk
240:Talk
215:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
61:talk
193:TWL
122:– (
536:)
452:)
444:.
432:)
424:.
405:)
375:)
348:)
329:)
306:)
265:.
229:.
217:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
52:.
532:(
448:(
428:(
401:(
371:(
344:(
325:(
302:(
213:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.