430:, and as such does not provide proof of notability to cities/towns per se. Even where cities are discussed in the LA Times article, it describes volcanoes as potentially threatening the entire state (e.g., by impacting power and water supplies). There are no list inclusion criteria in the LA Times article. The book reference discusses a number of cities threatened by volcanoes but, as far as can be seen from the chapter headings the cities listed include Mexico City, Auckland, and Manila - it is hard to find any list inclusion criteria in this if it includes cities dozens of miles from any volcano, and anyway a single reference is not enough to show notability.
265:
where the suggestion was made to repurpose it into a list of settlements threatened by volcanoes. I don't think this would work a) this list is unsourced and much of the content wouldn't apply to a "cities threatened by volcanoes" list (and a lot of content that belongs in such a list is not here)
249:
as I've never seen any source that classifies cities by "This category does not include settlements merely threatened by volcanic activity but which are located at a distance away, and not located on the volcanic structure itself", although sources that discuss settlements threatened by volcanoes
425:
it's important that they discuss the cities/towns as a list, and provide list inclusion criteria (there needs to be a proper definition of what should be listed, since theoretically every city in the world can be threatened in some way by a volcano).
203:
448:
it's important that they discuss the cities/towns as a list". To be precise, that's not what LISTN says; it says sources should discuss "the grouping or set in general", not as a list.
197:
291:
235:
308:
129:
124:
502:
perhaps but it's absurd to assume that means this list should be kept. He did none of the actual comparison of the contents that FOARP did. This does not pass LISTN.
156:
133:
116:
476:
103:
163:
88:
498:
A book discussing something related to the topic does not make this specific list notable. Andrew D's links definitely would support expansion of
262:
218:
185:
402:
279:
83:
76:
17:
527:
506:
487:
461:
439:
406:
379:
345:
317:
300:
283:
179:
58:
175:
120:
361:
97:
93:
225:
112:
64:
544:
375:
40:
523:
255:
398:
275:
191:
540:
36:
371:
519:
356:
211:
394:
271:
480:
456:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
539:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
499:
333:
515:
445:
435:
422:
341:
329:
312:
295:
267:
246:
427:
359:
but, to support this, there seem to be enough sources which discuss such places, e.g.
503:
450:
367:
242:
150:
236:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 May 3#Category:Volcanic settlements
270:
as it would be quite long unless we picked quite arbitrary inclusion criteria.
234:
Old, orphaned article from 2013 without a single source. Apparently created in
431:
337:
54:
428:
The LA Times
Article is based on a USGS paper listing volcanoes, not cities
258:), too, and some of the things mentioned are volcanoes not settlements.
251:
266:
and b) a list of cities threatened by volcanoes would probably violate
263:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject
Volcanoes#List of volcanic settlements
535:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
393:
cities, except in the context of the former criterium.
146:
142:
138:
210:
332:. No evidence of notability for this subject in my
250:certainly exist. Some noteworthy omissions such as
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
547:). No further edits should be made to this page.
475:Note: This discussion has been included in the
307:Note: This discussion has been included in the
292:list of Environment-related deletion discussions
290:Note: This discussion has been included in the
355:The exact scope of the list may need work per
309:list of Geography-related deletion discussions
224:
8:
104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
477:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
474:
306:
289:
336:, let alone for this subject as a list.
241:To me the article sounds like a lot of
7:
385:Er, these sources discuss volcanoes
24:
261:This was discussed (briefly) on
89:Introduction to deletion process
238:, hence the lack of a source.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
514:The source is poor and fails
113:List of volcanic settlements
65:List of volcanic settlements
79:(AfD)? Read these primers!
564:
389:by cities, not volcanoes
537:Please do not modify it.
528:20:44, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
507:18:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
488:10:57, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
462:13:38, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
440:10:39, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
407:10:35, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
380:10:24, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
346:09:15, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
318:08:49, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
301:08:49, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
284:08:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
256:Honolulu Volcanic Series
59:14:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
77:Articles for deletion
368:Dangerous Neighbours
245:and a violation of
490:
320:
303:
94:Guide to deletion
84:How to contribute
555:
500:Volcanic hazards
485:
229:
228:
214:
166:
154:
136:
74:
34:
563:
562:
558:
557:
556:
554:
553:
552:
551:
545:deletion review
481:
171:
162:
127:
111:
108:
71:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
561:
559:
550:
549:
531:
530:
509:
492:
491:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
412:
411:
410:
409:
349:
348:
328:Does not pass
322:
321:
304:
232:
231:
168:
107:
106:
101:
91:
86:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
560:
548:
546:
542:
538:
533:
532:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
510:
508:
505:
501:
497:
494:
493:
489:
486:
484:
478:
473:
463:
459:
458:
453:
452:
447:
443:
442:
441:
437:
433:
429:
424:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
408:
404:
403:contributions
400:
396:
395:Jo-Jo Eumerus
392:
388:
384:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
369:
364:
363:
358:
354:
351:
350:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
323:
319:
316:
315:
310:
305:
302:
299:
298:
293:
288:
287:
286:
285:
281:
280:contributions
277:
273:
272:Jo-Jo Eumerus
269:
264:
259:
257:
253:
248:
244:
239:
237:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
165:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
78:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
536:
534:
511:
495:
483:CAPTAIN RAJU
482:
455:
449:
390:
386:
366:
360:
357:WP:IMPERFECT
352:
325:
313:
296:
260:
240:
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
159:
70:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
198:free images
520:Syndicater
387:threatened
314:CASSIOPEIA
297:CASSIOPEIA
541:talk page
444:"To pass
372:Andrew D.
334:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
543:or in a
516:WP:LISTN
504:Reywas92
446:WP:LISTN
423:WP:LISTN
421:To pass
362:LA Times
330:WP:LISTN
268:WP:SALAT
252:Honolulu
247:WP:LISTN
157:View log
98:glossary
39:or in a
451:postdlf
204:WP refs
192:scholar
130:protect
125:history
75:New to
512:Delete
496:Delete
326:Delete
176:Google
134:delete
50:delete
432:FOARP
338:FOARP
243:WP:OR
219:JSTOR
180:books
164:Stats
151:views
143:watch
139:links
16:<
524:talk
457:talk
436:talk
399:talk
376:talk
365:and
353:Keep
342:talk
276:talk
212:FENS
186:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
55:Tone
226:TWL
155:– (
526:)
518:.
479:.
460:)
438:)
405:)
401:,
391:on
378:)
370:.
344:)
311:.
294:.
282:)
278:,
206:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
52:.
522:(
454:(
434:(
397:(
374:(
340:(
274:(
254:(
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
160:·
153:)
115:(
100:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.