511:(but one source can't by itself support an article), not brief discussions of the concept of keywords, or lists or just the evergreen ones. Consider this: all of the sources provided (that include a list at all) include it in the context of a broader article on the rules. That seems to imply that Knowledge (XXG) should do the same, and not have a separate article on the subject.
555:
issue, but it's not. It lists rules (most of which have independent, reliable sources). Many of this keywords themselves meet the GNG. Yes, it feels somehow less important, than say our numerous articles on chess. But it meets our guidelines and is frankly a reasonable breakout article. It
384:
instead of using section markup. I think merging this into the main MTG article would result in a size problem and just eventually another split-out. But, prefer merge over deletion. I haven't pored over the previous discussions in detail yet, and am not sure yet how to evaluate the claim that
96:
91:
86:
233:
525:
Hmm, keep or merge then. It's a question of size in the end. If someone prefers to merge it into the rules article in a reasonable way, considering the possibility to split it out again if it becomes too large, I am not opposed to that.
477:
471:
429:
to MTG rules page, and rewrite as a glossary/defn list. MTG is large enough that its keyword list should be included, but without anything but primary sources, no more than one or two sentences on each keyword are needed.
81:
408:
227:
163:
158:
167:
150:
190:
340:
336:
52:. A consensus to delete is not going to emerge here. A discussion on whether to merge or not can continue on the article's talkpage and does not require a relist
565:
535:
520:
498:
442:
420:
401:
366:
323:
309:
281:
65:
122:
137:
154:
272:. I am aware of the three previous AfDs, but I believe Knowledge (XXG)'s standards have tightened in the last 11 years and it is time to re-evaluate.
248:
332:
215:
146:
71:
209:
507:(and, now that I think about it, oddly aren't). The sort of source that could convince me this list deserves to exist is something like
117:
110:
17:
396:
361:
205:
255:
131:
127:
508:
582:
482:
40:
194:
221:
504:
291:
59:
265:
547:
sources meet the GNG. Yes, there is a potential merge target, but to merge even a fraction of this would be a
552:
578:
393:
356:
54:
36:
416:
241:
548:
531:
494:
460:
385:"Knowledge (XXG)'s standards have tightened in the last 11 years and it is time to re-evaluate"
269:
268:, Keywords from unrelated sets are not generally discussed as a group by sources as required by
381:
106:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
577:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
515:
466:
388:
345:
304:
276:
561:
438:
412:
319:
314:
Do you feel that having a 175 entry table would be an improvement to that merge target?
377:
380:
as any (albeit on a not very serious topic), though it could be reformatted using the
556:
could use a bit more context/framing for certain, but that's not a reason to delete.
527:
503:
All those sources establish, IMO, is that the evergreen keywords should be listed at
490:
486:
456:
184:
512:
295:
273:
557:
431:
315:
294:. We don't need 175 individual subsections, each on a word as used in a game.
469:, and there is at least a limited amount of treatment in secondary sources:
97:
Articles for deletion/List of Magic: The
Gathering keywords (4th nomination)
92:
Articles for deletion/List of Magic: The
Gathering keywords (3rd nomination)
87:
Articles for deletion/List of Magic: The
Gathering keywords (2nd nomination)
409:
list of
Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions
573:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
82:
Articles for deletion/List of Magic: The
Gathering keywords
551:
issue. Yes, it's geeky. Yes, it thinks about being a
180:
176:
172:
240:
483:
How to play Magic: the
Gathering – A beginner’s guide
485:. And more on individual keywords, as indicated by
254:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
585:). No further edits should be made to this page.
331:Note: This discussion has been included in the
407:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
138:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
406:
330:
478:Building Blocks of Tabletop Game Design
79:
147:List of Magic: The Gathering keywords
72:List of Magic: The Gathering keywords
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
266:Knowledge (XXG) is not a game guide
24:
489:in the last deletion discussion.
264:Almost entirely primary sourced,
335:lists for the following topics:
123:Introduction to deletion process
463:) 09:59, 11 October 2023 (UTC))
1:
386:
566:23:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
536:09:59, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
521:22:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
499:15:13, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
443:14:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
421:12:11, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
402:04:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
367:03:02, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
324:23:19, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
66:11:53, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
310:22:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
282:22:42, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
113:(AfD)? Read these primers!
602:
505:Magic: The Gathering rules
292:Magic: The Gathering rules
575:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:AfDs for this article:
195:edits since nomination
509:this from Dicebreaker
472:Game Design Deep Dive
111:Articles for deletion
465:I am agreeing with
382:glossary templates
376:as just as good a
464:
423:
369:
128:Guide to deletion
118:How to contribute
593:
454:
435:
400:
378:glossary article
372:Inclined toward
364:
359:
352:
348:
333:deletion sorting
302:
290:as a table into
259:
258:
244:
188:
170:
108:
64:
62:
57:
34:
601:
600:
596:
595:
594:
592:
591:
590:
589:
583:deletion review
518:
517:it has begun...
433:
362:
357:
350:
346:
296:
279:
278:it has begun...
201:
161:
145:
142:
105:
102:
101:
75:
60:
55:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
599:
597:
588:
587:
569:
568:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
516:
445:
424:
404:
370:
328:
327:
326:
277:
262:
261:
198:
141:
140:
135:
125:
120:
103:
100:
99:
94:
89:
84:
78:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
598:
586:
584:
580:
576:
571:
570:
567:
563:
559:
554:
550:
546:
543:
537:
533:
529:
524:
523:
522:
519:
514:
510:
506:
502:
501:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
479:
474:
473:
468:
462:
458:
453:
449:
446:
444:
440:
436:
428:
425:
422:
418:
414:
410:
405:
403:
398:
395:
392:
391:
383:
379:
375:
371:
368:
365:
360:
355:
354:
353:
342:
338:
334:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
308:
307:
303:
301:
300:
293:
289:
286:
285:
284:
283:
280:
275:
271:
267:
257:
253:
250:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
214:
211:
207:
204:
203:Find sources:
199:
196:
192:
186:
182:
178:
174:
169:
165:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
143:
139:
136:
133:
129:
126:
124:
121:
119:
116:
115:
114:
112:
107:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
574:
572:
553:WP:GAMEGUIDE
544:
476:
470:
451:
447:
426:
389:
373:
349:
344:
305:
298:
297:
287:
263:
251:
245:
237:
230:
224:
218:
212:
202:
104:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
467:SMcCandlish
390:SMcCandlish
228:free images
61:Mississippi
513:* Pppery *
455:(Amended.
413:Necrothesp
274:* Pppery *
579:talk page
549:WP:WEIGHT
351:Quidditch
37:talk page
581:or in a
528:Daranios
491:Daranios
487:Jclemens
457:Daranios
270:WP:LISTN
191:View log
132:glossary
39:or in a
234:WP refs
222:scholar
164:protect
159:history
109:New to
299:BD2412
206:Google
168:delete
558:Hobit
452:Merge
427:Merge
341:Lists
337:Games
316:Hobit
288:Merge
249:JSTOR
210:books
185:views
177:watch
173:links
16:<
562:talk
545:keep
532:talk
495:talk
461:talk
448:Keep
434:asem
417:talk
374:keep
339:and
320:talk
242:FENS
216:news
181:logs
155:talk
151:edit
56:Star
450:or
399:😼
256:TWL
189:– (
564:)
534:)
497:)
481:,
475:,
441:)
430:--
419:)
411:.
387:—
347:WC
343:.
322:)
236:)
193:|
183:|
179:|
175:|
171:|
166:|
162:|
157:|
153:|
560:(
530:(
493:(
459:(
439:t
437:(
432:M
415:(
397:¢
394:☏
363:✎
358:☎
318:(
306:T
260:)
252:·
246:·
238:·
231:·
225:·
219:·
213:·
208:(
200:(
197:)
187:)
149:(
134:)
130:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.