378:- I can actually explain that: I wanted to try something different, given that one of the editors in the WP:VG told me not to link old magazines a long time ago. I can try to provide links at least to the magazines that covered the games here. BTW, Dream Focus; Yes, Net Yaroze did get coverage in Japanese magazines, some even hosting events and awards for Yaroze titles such as Dengeki PlayStation and Hyper PlayStation Re-mix but since most of the issues remain unavailable to read online and finding Japanese info about the Yaroze is even harder than finding western magazines that did covered it, I preferred not bothering with it except the few that I did unearthed.
313:- The thing is, some of these games were released on PlayStation Underground, Official UK PlayStation Magazine and Hyper PlayStation Re-mix demo discs to name a few so in a way, they were technically released. Some of the netyaroze-europe.com urls are from the old severs Sony used to host, since Net Yaroze users could host their own sites via their serves and even share their games on forums. Even if it gets deleted, at least it was fun to make this list, as many people had their video game careers kickstarted by the Yaroze. If anybody really feels enticed to rework the Net Yaroze page, i left a plethora of sources to expand that article...
422:
have 24C Resource (database site), Nick F's Yaroze
Homepage! (fansite), Yaroze Scene (another fansite), Net Yaroze (γγγγγγγ) (primary source?), and PSXDEV Network (fansite). Most of the reliable sources used are just talking about the console itself and not the individual games, and the Giant Bomb source is unreliable because it comes from their database (which is user-generated) and not articles from staff. When most of the sources are unreliable or don't offer any coverage on this topic, then why even have a list like this at all?
239:. None of the games produced for this system were ever commercially released, they were distributed for free via the internet or promotional CDs included in gaming magazines. No Net Yaroze games are notable on their own outside those that are simply ports of pre-existing games. It's simply useless for readers that are interested in navigating through pages, because there ARE no pages.
402:
sources that the community considers reliable (e.g., PlayStation
Official Magazine β UK, Edge, Giant Bomb). It's a list article so each source stands for the proposition that the item is appropriate for inclusion in the list, and its unsurprising that they, by themselves, don't have significant coverage regarding each game. Furthermore, as
477:
Perhaps I'm not understanding, but for many (perhaps even most?) of the entries in the list, there is a citation to "Official UK PlayStation
Magazine" or a similar reliable source. I wasn't referring to the ones cited in the introductory paragraphs. I don't agree with your assertion that "Most of
421:
I don't understand your second point in particular: "Each of the list entries here has a source, the vast majority of which appear to be from sources that the community considers reliable (e.g., PlayStation
Official Magazine β UK, Edge, Giant Bomb)." Ignoring the sources that clutter the lead, you
242:
The sources are abysmal. Most of them come off as ref stuffing and feel like duplicates of each other. The sourcing used in the actual list does not discuss Net Yaroze games as a group, and range from random website catalogs to fansites we would never consider reliable. A list with 80 sources and
401:
doesn't really seem applicable to me. This isn't an indiscriminate grouping of random things (e.g., "List of objects that are yellow") or any of the other types of information that NOTCATALOG seems to bar. Each of the list entries here has a source, the vast majority of which appear to be from
406:
states "The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been." I don't think there's a debate that Net Yaroze (which includes the games themselves) meets GNG. So, in short, (1) I don't understand the application of
478:
the reliable sources used are just talking about the console itself and not the individual games." I checked several and they each referenced individual games. So I still don't see the case for deletion here and I think we'd be better served by continuing to improve the article, per
231:
There are a mountain of problems that riddle this list. To help fill in those unfamiliar with this hardware, the Net Yaroze was a limited circulation model of the PlayStation designed specifically for creating homebrew software, specifically video games.
534:
Maybe the best organised list article I've seen in all my years on wikipedia. Several of the sources cover these games as a group, making it a valid topic. They tend to be a little weak but you don't need top tier RS for this sort of topic.
441:- The links i've placed on some of the sources now do discuss most of the games and demos themselves. 24C, Nick F's and Net Yaroze (γγγγγγγ) use the netyaroze-europe.com url from the old severs Sony used to host the Net Yaroze forums with.
200:
407:
NOTCATALOG here, (2) I disagree with the comments about the sources (or at least the lion's share), and (3) I feel like this AFD is contrary to some of what is stated in LISTN. But, that's just my two cents.
194:
161:
249:
states that sources for lists must be "discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources." None of the sources here have that, and as such, it should be deleted.
268:
290:
134:
129:
138:
108:
93:
503:
Looking through the references that are valid, these sorts of games do get coverage. Those that don't should still be on the list to make it complete.
121:
347:
Only four have links to articles. Some of these games only seemed to have been released in Japan. Did they get coverage in any
Japanese media?
215:
182:
88:
81:
17:
176:
125:
544:
526:
491:
470:
450:
433:
416:
387:
370:
338:
322:
304:
282:
260:
63:
102:
98:
172:
243:
none of them actually provide any significant/in-depth/independent commentary on any of these is a serious problem.
561:
40:
222:
117:
69:
540:
487:
412:
557:
36:
188:
465:
428:
398:
333:
299:
277:
255:
236:
208:
455:
That does not make them any more reliable. Actually that would just make them primary sources,
536:
483:
408:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
556:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
504:
446:
383:
348:
318:
460:
423:
403:
328:
294:
272:
250:
246:
456:
54:
479:
397:
I'm having a bit of a hard time understanding the rationale(s) for deletion here.
155:
442:
379:
314:
59:
327:
None of this actually explains why you want the list to be kept.
552:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
151:
147:
143:
207:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
564:). No further edits should be made to this page.
289:Note: This discussion has been included in the
269:list of Video games-related deletion discussions
267:Note: This discussion has been included in the
221:
8:
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
291:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
288:
266:
7:
24:
457:which do not establish notability
235:The list is a big fat serving of
94:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
545:21:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
527:17:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
492:06:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
471:17:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
451:17:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
434:17:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
417:02:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
388:03:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
371:00:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
339:20:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
323:20:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
305:19:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
283:19:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
261:19:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
64:19:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
581:
554:Please do not modify it.
118:List of Net Yaroze games
70:List of Net Yaroze games
32:Please do not modify it.
82:Articles for deletion
55:(non-admin closure)
307:
285:
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
57:
572:
523:
520:
517:
514:
511:
508:
468:
463:
443:Roberth Martinez
431:
426:
380:Roberth Martinez
367:
364:
361:
358:
355:
352:
336:
331:
315:Roberth Martinez
302:
297:
280:
275:
258:
253:
226:
225:
211:
159:
141:
79:
53:
34:
580:
579:
575:
574:
573:
571:
570:
569:
568:
562:deletion review
521:
518:
515:
512:
509:
506:
466:
461:
429:
424:
365:
362:
359:
356:
353:
350:
334:
329:
300:
295:
278:
273:
256:
251:
168:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
578:
576:
567:
566:
548:
547:
529:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
475:
474:
473:
392:
391:
390:
344:
343:
342:
341:
308:
286:
229:
228:
165:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
577:
565:
563:
559:
555:
550:
549:
546:
542:
538:
533:
530:
528:
525:
524:
502:
499:
493:
489:
485:
481:
476:
472:
469:
464:
458:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
440:
437:
436:
435:
432:
427:
420:
419:
418:
414:
410:
405:
400:
399:WP:NOTCATALOG
396:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
373:
372:
369:
368:
346:
345:
340:
337:
332:
326:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
309:
306:
303:
298:
292:
287:
284:
281:
276:
270:
265:
264:
263:
262:
259:
254:
248:
244:
240:
238:
237:WP:NOTCATALOG
233:
224:
220:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
174:
171:
170:Find sources:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
61:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
553:
551:
537:FeydHuxtable
531:
505:
500:
484:DocFreeman24
438:
409:DocFreeman24
394:
375:
349:
310:
245:
241:
234:
230:
218:
212:
204:
197:
191:
185:
179:
169:
75:
58:
49:
47:
31:
28:
195:free images
558:talk page
37:talk page
560:or in a
462:Namcokid
425:Namcokid
404:WP:LISTN
330:Namcokid
296:Namcokid
274:Namcokid
252:Namcokid
247:WP:LISTN
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
439:Comment
376:Comment
201:WPΒ refs
189:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
480:WP:ATD
173:Google
139:delete
60:Bungle
522:Focus
366:Focus
216:JSTOR
177:books
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
541:talk
532:Keep
501:Keep
488:talk
447:talk
413:talk
395:Keep
384:talk
319:talk
311:Keep
209:FENS
183:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
50:keep
223:TWL
160:β (
543:)
490:)
482:.
467:47
459:.
449:)
430:47
415:)
386:)
335:47
321:)
301:47
293:.
279:47
271:.
257:47
203:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
52:.
539:(
519:m
516:a
513:e
510:r
507:D
486:(
445:(
411:(
382:(
363:m
360:a
357:e
354:r
351:D
317:(
227:)
219:Β·
213:Β·
205:Β·
198:Β·
192:Β·
186:Β·
180:Β·
175:(
167:(
164:)
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.